The left is the pure SOVL of the Mediterranean. SnowBlack folk basically look at this guy and enslave themselves, then start erecting triple walls in the surrounding area. In the distance, you hear Byzantine cataphracts engage with Sassanid war elephants. My ancestors, unironically.
Right is like he mutilated himself to look like some sort of ghetto Black person/American whitoid mutt. Gross.
>Greek nose >Semitic nose
Pseudoscientific garbage.
The hooknose phenotype is native to Iran and Caucasus. Ancient hunter-gatherers lived there and spread to Europe and the Levant.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Pseudoscientific garbage.
Who said anything about science, what the frick? Have you never seen Greek and Roman art? And then looked at a semite?
What is popularly referred to as a Greek nose is a long, straight, narrow but not sharp nose who's bridge almost lacks depth entirely, stemming straight from the flat shape of the forehead, with a horizontally pointed or maybe slightly upturned tip. The Roman nose on the other hand does have this ditch in between the forehead and the tip of the bridge, making visible the brow, straight otherwise up to the the tip which is often in the shape of a little bulb that sticks slightly forward, also horizontal or slightly upturned. The typical semitic nose has bridge depth and a curved body all the way from bridge to tip, is generally sharp on top of being long, and the tip more often than not pointing downwards or sometimes horizontally; the cartillage in between the nostrils is also noticeably lower.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>And then looked at a semite?
You mean making an observation of the objective reality and then coming to a conclusion that tries to fit a certain property into categorical boxes? Yeah, that's called science, bad science.
If you also took a look at a bunch of non-Semites, you would find the exact same nose on them as well.
Incidentally, the largest (hook) nose in the world belongs to a Turk like the person in the OP. Turks are not Semites, and neither are their geographical predecessors. They are genetically related to the hunter-gatherers of the Caucasus, which are known as Caucasus Hunter Gatherers, and are believed to have influenced the genetics of Greeks and Semites alike.
And speaking of art, ancient sculptures of humans from the Levant, the heartland of Semites, show surprisingly straight noses.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>You mean making an observation [...]
You're making me cringe. The scientific method involves a hypothesis which one could test and eventually (dis)prove. What we're dealing with here isn't science but rather a method of classification. By your standards we shouldn't cassify anything because by making an observation and immediately assigning a label makes it "bad science", which as I already said isn't science in the first place. If you don't agree with the fact that people reasonably cassify things based simply on observations, then there's no point in arguing. >If you also took a look at a bunch of non-Semites, you would find the exact same nose on them as well.
Which is absolutely irrelevant to the point of discussion. Calling a trait semitic does not imply all semites own this trait, but rather that this trait is very common in semites, significantly more so than any other population. >Incidentally, the largest (hook) nose in the world belongs to a Turk like the person in the OP. [...]
Again unrelated, see last point. >And speaking of art, ancient sculptures of humans from the Levant, the heartland of Semites, show surprisingly straight noses.
Middle eastern art did not influece western culture to the extent that the Greek and Roman did. Therefore our western classification of in this case nose types has been influenced by the latter to the point that the average educated person can tell you what is meant by either term. This does not in fact mean that modern day Greeks or Romans (as in citizens of Rome) typically own such traits. On the other hand, due to the Middle East having not influenced our culture to the same extent, the legacy of the term "semitic nose" is not traceable to actual Middle Eastern ancient culture. Therefore it is limited to modern day observations, which is that the curved/hooked nose I previously described is in fact a very common trait in the population of the Levant, to a degree much greater than any other population.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>significantly more so than any other population.
And that is wrong. You are making an objective emprical claim based on hasty generalizations and poor reasoning. This is exactly why it's pseudoscience. You know what's also considered pseudoscience? The terms like Mongoloid and Black. You are doing the exact same invalid classification.
>Middle eastern art did not influece western culture to the extent that the Greek and Roman did
So? The point is to show a point of comparison of how people depict themselves. Neither Greek statues nor Semitic ones were hook nosed, which is arguably just because it represents the ideal face. Greek statues are verifiably not representative of the people.
You can argue about different ideals, but once you make assertions about actual phenotypes among actual people, you had better come with some solid groundwork, or you are just talking shit.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>And that is wrong. You are making an objective emprical claim based on hasty generalizations and poor reasoning. This is exactly why it's pseudoscience. You know what's also considered pseudoscience? The terms like Mongoloid and Black. You are doing the exact same invalid classification.
Again what you're claiming here is that people shouldn't be allowed to make any sort of generalisations and classifications based on pure observations. You have the mentality of a moronic 8th grader hooked on Bill Nye youtube videos. Utterly unreasonable claim according to all rules of common sense. To claim that there is no such thing as race is another step up the moronation ladder but exactly what is expectede of someone like you. I can already tell you're some sort of abominable creature resultant of multiple generations of miscegination, but believe you me you can more often than not tell apart a Black and a asiatic even without a degree in biology. >So? The point is to show a point of comparison of how people depict themselves. Neither Greek statues nor Semitic ones were hook nosed, which is arguably just because it represents the ideal face. Greek statues are verifiably not representative of the people.
Black person I already expanded on that point in the very paragraph you're quoting from and explained why you are so completely and utterly wrong. You venture beyond the realms of reason and can't seem to follow the very simple plot of the original argument. >You can argue about different ideals, but once you make assertions about actual phenotypes among actual people, you had better come with some solid groundwork, or you are just talking shit.
See first point.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>To claim that there is no such thing as race is another step up the moronation ladder
I didn't even necessarily imply that, but if you are basing this on the rejection of obsolete classifications, yes they do not really exist, and thinking otherwise just shows how scientifically illiterate you are.
If you want to avoid getting laughed at by scholars, I suggest you use the term "West Eurasian" for any serious take on race. You can use those old terms as shorthands, but that does not make them less pseudoscientific.
>Black person I already expanded on that point
And reinforcing the point that you are spectacularly wrong about. These "observations" are bunk.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You were the one who brough up both science and race. The terms Greek, Roman and Semitic have no relation to either yet clearly you're trying to derail the discussion. As long as the average educated person can tell you what the terms refer to then the classifications are absolutely valid even if it were the case that no Greek person ever had a nose like that. Do you understand the concept of a convention? The terms I previously discussed are generally recognised and understood by educated people and you are in absolute denial.
In essence all your claims boil down to: you're not allowed to call a birch forest a birch forest unless you count all the trees and prove on paper that the forest is birch dominated. You're attempting to apply the scientific method were it is both obviously unnecessary and practically unreasonable.
I hope you can find a drop of common sense in your luquid brains and admit that you completely lost the plot.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>You were the one who brough up both science and race
I brought up race to draw an analogy. You addressed it, so I elaborated and justified my position. That's not a derailment on my part. >Do you understand the concept of a convention? The terms I previously discussed are generally recognised and understood by educated people and you are in absolute denial.
You made an assertion beyond their pragmatic truths, so my talking of science has not been irrelevant. You started this conversation by calling someone out for not being able to tell apart different noses, even though the post you responded to made no such distinction between these nose types you brought up. He saw a nose that looks appropriately "Mediterranean" as a macrogroup in contrast to "snowBlack folk", which it absolutely IS, because the nose type is not uncommon for Greeks or people in the Mediterranean in general, even if you want to dub it "Semitic". Nowhere was he calling it the "Greek" or "Roman" nose as understood by "educated people" for classifying certain shapes.
If you had merely corrected someone for using the wrong shorthand, I wouldn't have objected and simply treated it as a misnomer.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I brought up race to draw an analogy. You addressed it, so I elaborated and justified my position. That's not a derailment on my part.
I addressed it within the realms of common sense, not anthropology. I couldn't give a shit less about how "science" defines the races today. If you show me two pictures of two different people, I can tell you which one looks like Genghis Khan railed their grandmother and which one looks like they eat dirt cookies. I interpreted your mention of the races as an argument against the fact that there are physical traits that can be assigned as typical to the people of a genetically related population. A point on which you are clearly wrong and which I have also addressed with my birch forest analogy. The derailment consists in the fact that you (proably conciously) decided to interpret my assertions as having to do with current scientific convention rather than cultural norms. >You made an assertion beyond their pragmatic truths, so my talking of science has not been irrelevant.
It is completely irrelevant as there is no practical way to quantify my claims, and which is clearly what you would expect me to do before "allowing" me to express myself that way. >You started this conversation by calling someone out for not being able to tell apart different noses, even though the post you responded to made no such distinction between these nose types you brought up. [...]
Regarding OP's pic, the poster clearly wrongly (according to me, apparently not to you) classified the nose on the left as a Greek nose. Regarding this shitskin
Right is like he mutilated himself to look like some sort of ghetto Black person/American whitoid mutt. Gross.
he clearly agrees with the post in OP, and whenever someone on this gay forum mentions Meds, they are refering to either ancient Romans or Greeks. In case that's not enough, he implied it as a trait belonging to Roman citizens by the reference to Latin, and as a Greek trait by the reference to Byzantines. I hope that's enough justification for me to reply to a shitpost, lmao.
1/2
2 years ago
Anonymous
>The derailment consists in the fact that you (proably conciously) decided to interpret my assertions as having to do with current scientific convention rather than cultural norms.
The subject at hand I was getting was about scientific validity, so bringing up a racial comparison with a scientific lens was a given. It's no more of a derailment than it already would have been. >It is completely irrelevant as there is no practical way to quantify my claims
So either I misunderstood your intention because you did a terrible take that was nonsensical in the context of the original post, or you were deliberately heading down the path of trying to assign hotspots for phenotypes. Either way, you did go down that path of making a truth-claim about the peak distribution of a phenotype, which I was right to object to. >Regarding OP's pic, the poster clearly wrongly (according to me, apparently not to you) classified the nose on the left as a Greek nose
As someone who has lived in Greece, there was zero confusion. He could very easily pass as Greek, his nose being one reason, but not the only one. The post-operation looks notably more "standard Anglo American", and is thus not really reminiscent of a "Greek God" intuitively.
The literal "Greek" noses don't even look that godly to me, probably because it doesn't actually feel particularly "Greek", but something overly idealized. People who actually have such noses in real life don't exactly scream "Hellenic BVLL' to me.
>Regarding this shitskin
So that's where we are going, huh. >he clearly agrees with the post in OP
Oh please. He was having a LARPing moment of a mighty man of Byzantium, literally using the memetic "my ancestors" stock phrase. He is not alluding to any Greek god at all, but high-T Christian warriors with high kill counts. I'm sorry, but you are clearly projecting your own idea of nose classification onto their perception of the image. You can't be this silly.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>The subject at hand I was getting was about scientific validity, so bringing up a racial comparison with a scientific lens was a given. It's no more of a derailment than it already would have been.
I have made multiple claims to the fact that the subject of the matter has nothing to do with science and you didn't address them, why would you force the scientific lens if not as an attempt at derailment? >So either I misunderstood your intention because you did a terrible take that was nonsensical in the context of the original post, or you were deliberately heading down the path of trying to assign hotspots for phenotypes. Either way, you did go down that path of making a truth-claim about the peak distribution of a phenotype, which I was right to object to.
I certainly did intend to assign hotspots for phenotypes without quantifiable measurement behind my claims. I addressed this point before when talking about the irrelevancy of the scientific method regarding our argument, as it is related merely to cultural conventions.
1/2
2 years ago
Anonymous
>why would you force the scientific lens if not as an attempt at derailment?
Because I still cannot decipher whether you are using the term as an a priori statement or an a posteriori statement.
>I certainly did intend to assign hotspots for phenotypes without quantifiable measurement behind my claims
Yet there is a discrepancy that you point out? Either that hotspot exists, or it doesn't.
>but rather by the fact that it is a way more frequent trait there
In comparison to Greeks, sure, but in the world? As you said, let's agree to disagree.
>Oh, frick off.
Don't make me start.
>Half LARP of a shitpost it was, but there were hints of genuine agreement so I gave in to the bait.
The LARPing itself was probably layed on top of a genuine sense of pride, but it wasn't literally an agreement with what he could have suggested in your mind. The fact that he went off a tangent on Medieval Greeks kind of goes to show that he didn't actually conceptualize the Classical Hellenic deities in the purest form, but rather interpreted the message as a more vague sense of self-fellation for Hellenism in general. It didn't cross my mind that this was actually supposed to resemble a literal Greek deity with a trademarked Greek nose, and rest assured, neither did it for him.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Because I still cannot decipher whether you are using the term as an a priori statement or an a posteriori statement.
I don't see how it could possibly be a priori. It is my understanding of cultural conventions of classification. Not science, just pure observation. >Yet there is a discrepancy that you point out? Either that hotspot exists, or it doesn't.
The hotspot refers to an ancient population. The discrepancy refers to the modern population not following the same distribution. The two distributions are unrelated. >Don't make me start.
UwU
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I don't see how it could possibly be a priori
Because "Greek" noses aren't actually really characteristically Greek? The only reason they are called that is because of an arbitrary association with idealized statues, completely orthogonal to any empirical reality of Greeks.
>The hotspot refers to an ancient population.
Which ancient population and why? Now I am back to talking about the ancient people of the Levant who had some crude face sculptures. Picture related.
There are others similar to this.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Because "Greek" noses aren't actually really characteristically Greek? The only reason they are called that is because of an arbitrary association with idealized statues, completely orthogonal to any empirical reality of Greeks.
I assume here you're referring to both modern and ancient Greeks. I agree, probably was never the dominant phenotype. But where else have you seen that nose either expressed genetically or depicted as often in works of art? I'm not aware of any other place or people, therefore I find it justified to call it a Greek nose. >Which ancient population and why? Now I am back to talking about the ancient people of the Levant who had some crude face sculptures. Picture related. There are others similar to this.
I was talking about the Greeks, not the Levant. I didn't make any claims with regards to the ancient Levantine as my own claim was that their ancient art has not influenced western culture to the same extent as the others, and therefore the phenotype of what is dubbed the Semitic nose is based on observations in the modern population.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>But where else have you seen that nose either expressed genetically
Honestly, quite many places. It doesn't strike me as particularly Greek, and my intuition tells me that some country does perhaps express it more.
Either way, making the association with fictional deities is perfectly valid, but then it's just that, fictional.
> and therefore the phenotype of what is dubbed the Semitic nose is based on observations in the modern population
You mean ~~*observations*~~ made by a certain bad player involved in WW2?
But seriously, that seems more like a stereotype than anything, even if there is some truth to it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>You mean ~~*observations*~~ made by a certain bad player involved in WW2? But seriously, that seems more like a stereotype than anything, even if there is some truth to it.
I don't think it's an exagerated stereotype. I made the same observation in the few Syrians I've met. Met a couple of Israelis as well but surprisingly they didn't fulfill my expectations. I guess Russian israeli immigrants are a little more Russian than you'd expect.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm used to seeing Turks where I live, and they have some of the worst cases of hooks of all.
OP is the aesthetic kind, but then you have people from inbred villages.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>As someone who has lived in Greece, there was zero confusion. [...]
Not accounting for the general picture I get of people through the internet, I know a handful of Syrians and I have plenty of Greek co-workers. I can claim with absolute confidence that the nose in OP is a Levantine nose, not by token of it being unique to the Levantine, but rather by the fact that it is a way more frequent trait there than anywhere else in the world in my own personal experience and everyone else's with whom I've ever discussed similar subjects with. I guess this we can agree to disagree on.
I have also admitted and justified the fact that the modern Greeks don't adhere to the classification through the fact that it was their ancient art that led to the term inheriting their name. Both the people I originally replied to made reference to ancient Greeks, therefore I completely discarded any typical phenotype of modern Greeks I might have been familiar with. I agree that the hooked nose shape isn't rare in the Greek population of today, although they are typically smaller than OP (pic relevant) and often have hints of a Roman nose such as a small protruding bulbous tip, but then again we're not referring to them when we speak of "the Greek nose". >So that's where we are going, huh.
Oh, frick off. >Oh please. He was having a LARPing moment of a mighty man of Byzantium, literally using the memetic "my ancestors" stock phrase. [...]
Half LARP of a shitpost it was, but there were hints of genuine agreement so I gave in to the bait. This is definitely not only my own idea of classification. I doubt you'll ever hear people not adhere to my standards outside of IQfy and Twitter shitposts.
>The subject at hand I was getting was about scientific validity, so bringing up a racial comparison with a scientific lens was a given. It's no more of a derailment than it already would have been.
I have made multiple claims to the fact that the subject of the matter has nothing to do with science and you didn't address them, why would you force the scientific lens if not as an attempt at derailment? >So either I misunderstood your intention because you did a terrible take that was nonsensical in the context of the original post, or you were deliberately heading down the path of trying to assign hotspots for phenotypes. Either way, you did go down that path of making a truth-claim about the peak distribution of a phenotype, which I was right to object to.
I certainly did intend to assign hotspots for phenotypes without quantifiable measurement behind my claims. I addressed this point before when talking about the irrelevancy of the scientific method regarding our argument, as it is related merely to cultural conventions.
>Regarding this shitskin
So that's where we are going, huh. >he clearly agrees with the post in OP
Oh please. He was having a LARPing moment of a mighty man of Byzantium, literally using the memetic "my ancestors" stock phrase. He is not alluding to any Greek god at all, but high-T Christian warriors with high kill counts. I'm sorry, but you are clearly projecting your own idea of nose classification onto their perception of the image. You can't be this silly.
You on the other hand claimed my terminology to be pseudoscientific, which I already dismissed as having nothing to do with the scientific method in the first place and therefore rendering your comment unrelated. Yet you seem to keep arguing the point that I have to somehow quantify and empirically justify my assertions of what the different nose types are, despite you yourself agreeing to when the other posted drew a similar logical path pointed out by you here: >He saw a nose that looks appropriately "Mediterranean" as a macrogroup in contrast to "snowBlack folk", which it absolutely IS, because the nose type is not uncommon for Greeks or people in the Mediterranean in general, even if you want to dub it "Semitic".
Not only have I used a widely accepted classification of nose shapes, but I have also justified the discrepancy between the classification traits and the traits of the actual modern population inhabiting those lands. Yet that somehow is not pragmatic enough for you.
2/2
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm going to call you a Black person
What you gonna do about it, Black person?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>geographical predecessors
Meme term, its like claiming pyramids were built by apes because you cant find chimpansee skull bones in nearby area
You have gotten several answers it's just not instigating the flame war you wanted it to. How about this, if you can provide me evidence that he even has an M1 we can talk about it. Otherwise you're full of shit.
>yes goy, pay for a surgery that looks worse than what G-d made but people like it because it's expensive and therefore it's a status symbol
Frick off israelite
No, there's a particular demographic of high salary npcs who listen to podcasts as a weird form of surrogate friendship not unlike how kids will watch streamers and vtubers and buy superchats so they'll say their name.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I listen to podcasts when I walk.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You're not negating my point.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>there's a particular demographic of high salary NPCs who listen to podcasts
no, there isn't
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yes there is
2 years ago
Anonymous
no, this is just your headcanon because one time you learned about a podcast you don't like so you spun up this cinematic universe to fit your opinion
2 years ago
Anonymous
No it's not
2 years ago
Anonymous
yes it is
2 years ago
Anonymous
This. Podcasts are a low information density shitty medium that serve as friend-simulators for terminally online millennials. That's why podcasts always have a casual conversational tone, often filled with meaningless banter. Podcasts are parasocial relationships.
2 years ago
Anonymous
so then why do you post here
2 years ago
Anonymous
because there is an actual interaction involving me and the gays replying to my shit instead of being 100% passive.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>a weird form of surrogate friendship
you're right, real adults watch tv instead
2 years ago
Anonymous
>No, there's a particular demographic of high salary NPCs who listen to podcasts as a weird form of surrogate friendship not unlike how kids will watch streamers and vtubers and buy superchats so they'll say their name.
I'm high-salary, in my early 30s, and israeli, and this is exactly how I use podcasts. It's my substitute for human exposure and interaction. It's occasionally also informative or entertaining, but most of the time it's background noise to fill the aural and social void.
2 years ago
Anonymous
That's fricking sad. Why don't both the high salary people and kids just talk to other people. It's infinitely better feeling than listing to some gay ass podcast or watching some v-tuber say gay shit.
>I like to take in programming into my brain as it is in a beta brainwave dominant state while I help erect and maintain societal, economic or political structures I don't really understand or in which I don't really have a say
Yeah. I listen to podcasts too while I work. I hope at least you are cautious of which memes you let into your subconscious.
Left: Ana from the podcast Red Scare, the girl from OP's tweet
Right: Dasha, also from Red Scare, she is a commie that "trolled" one of the Alex Jones' reporters, and cucked the israelite Adam Friedland from the podcast Cum Town. Now she pretends she larps being a slav trad cath while being a prostitute and duing nude scenes in movies and tv.
LOL HANG ON Hang On hang on.
**What's wrong with podcasts??** LOL
Literally every opinion and genre are represented in podcasts.
News, conservative, liberal, fiction, documentary, science...
Saying someone listens to podcasts at this point is like accusing them of watching TV.
Podcasts put people into a hypnotically suggestible state, just like television. It's content you passively consume rather than engaging actively with. This sort of thing is cancer no matter the medium. It doesn't matter if it comes from an mp3 you got online, an AM radio signal, or a TV signal on a coaxial cable. It's all the same thing.
2 years ago
Anonymous
it's mainly just so normalgays feel like they're being educated but in reality they're listening to two or more people say whatever bullshit pops into their heads for a few hours
2 years ago
Anonymous
edutainment, yes. you can tell when somebody has fallen for this because they have the attitude of being informed but can't back that attitude up with anything substantial other than >No bro, you should check out this podcast I've been listening to, it explains all of this
"what does it say?" >just listen to the podcast bro, then you'll know
"you listened to it, so tell me what it says" >uh, I can't bro, just listen to the podcast then you'll know
They FEEL informed but they can't explain anything because they didn't actually learn a damn thing.
2 years ago
Anonymous
they always seem to think that information influx equals knowledge. why would you blast your brain with irrelevant bullshit instead of focusing on important things to do your job better/get promoted?
2 years ago
Anonymous
I've literally been told this exact same thing, but with some Linus Tech Tips video.
2 years ago
Anonymous
This. There's nothing wrong with podcasts per se. But the name itself distinguishes it from a recording or radio. It's alluding to aypods which kids these days don't even know. It's a name meant for gay people to see it and be like oh I like that.
But I like to listen to podcasts when I'm living in my car
>Breath and sleep a lot better >Now my nose sharp is changing[more like right]
inb4 you were sleeping on your face and changed to sleeping on your back, so now your nose isn't squished flat every night
Plus stop sleep apnea and Chronic sinusitis.
https://www.healthline.com/health/nose-breathing#differences
literal broscience images
2 years ago
Anonymous
It's all bullshit cope coming from people with shit genetics, I was a mouth breather my entire childhood since I had some bullshit on the nose that I couldn't operate until much later and my chin is strong as frick.
people don't like being told negative things
now if you told a Black person, "Maybe if you got rid of that old yee-yee ass haircut you got you'd get some b***hes on your dick. Oh, better yet, maybe Tanisha'll call your dog-ass if she ever stop frickin' with that brain surgeon or lawyer she fricking with. homie~" he would be accepting of it
The problem is that most plastic surgeons, especially those who do the nose, are focused on what would be attractive on a woman hence the small up curved nose.
I am a mouth breather AND FRICK YOU FOR GASLIGHTING ME.
If my parents had known what is mouthbreathing they swear they would have done something different.
We have been constatnly told that my ugly face is fine and normal and my ugly sitcking out buck teeth are fine... it's not fricking fine.
Mouth breathing will frick up your face permanently.
I breathed through my mouth for my entire childhood because I had nasal polyps. My jaw and chin are strong, my teeth look good, and my nose isn't hooked. Breathing through different orifices (both of which are meant for breathing) doesn't magically restructure your bones. You were born with that facial structure and no alternative breathing bullshit would have fixed it.
>sucking your thumb as a child gives you buck teeth >mouthbreathing fux up your facial structure
All seems kinda fricked on the surface, but >Go to orthodontist for under/overbite >he just puts rubber bands on your shit to hold your jaw where it's supposed to be >your face adapts and your appearance dramatically changes
many such cases
> curious about chin changes from strength training > google it click on quora > its all indians posting their images.
wtf why is quora full of indians. I haven't used the site for a while is that normal?
Many people have scars on their appearance, you can make the physical change they want. The plastic surgeon did an excellent job. He is very fortunate.
[...]
[...]
The pic is stretched horizontally, has wrong rotation and lighting. It's shitty attempt to make crooked israelite gene nose look better [...]
>T-they cheated with the angle! It's all israeli tricks!
[...]
/pol/Black person-kun is confusing a Roman nose as depicted in idealized post 1400s Renaissance statuary with a reference to Greek imagery from several centuries before actual Rome.
Nor greeks nor romans had crooked nose.
Straight nose is seen all over ancient paintings, statues or even egypt gods times. They're all cro-magnon superior human.
You can cope as long as you want neanderthal wild ape but if you have crooked nose one of you grandparents was a israelite reptile.
Even if you look white your israelite genes will show up if you got one.
>One of your grandparents was a israelite
At least I'm not a Central Asian rapebaby.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'll paint him brown that'll show them!!!
Lmao soientists have no clue about ancient face restoration and it's shitfest of israelite influence and morons assooming what they've could look like.
Just check how many variations of julius ceasar face there are on internet. It's huge joke.
Cro-magnons are superior humans and you're just neanderthal coping, ACTUAL historicial discoveries proves this is true everytime. Unlike what some israelite in a book might say.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Keep living in your fantasy, rapebaby.
2 years ago
Anonymous
kek, neanderthal crooked nose lobotimized faces arrived in europe and stole few cro-magnon genes which made them less apey.
They ended up getting kicked from every single country and genocided multiple times like a rat plague. They're called the israelites today.
Sorry mate but the left can't meme.
Bunch of text and "statistics" with literally no actual paintings or skulls or proof whatsoever is ultimate cope, pretty laughable.
You will never be a human
2 years ago
Anonymous
Ultra copium. israelites have less neanderthal admixture than most Europeans
/pol/Black person-kun is confusing a Roman nose as depicted in idealized post 1400s Renaissance statuary with a reference to Greek imagery from several centuries before actual Rome.
>plastic surgeon photoshops images to make the before look better
That is an advert for the dude that did the surgery.
Even if the guy was israeli, he wouldn't frick over his own buisiness to make the before picture look better than the after.
He is selling the thing that turns you into the after.
You are such a tards I can't even describe it.
I know it isn't going to convince these tards, but the face no one in their piles of (You)s has pointed out how fundamentally stupid they are triggers my autism.
It's like OCD, but for unrefuted arguments.
Plastic surgery to make yourself look Irish. Do these wogs not understand that Irish isn't technically a good thing? Aspiring to look like a nineteenth-century day laborer or merchant seaman he started at a low informational base on appearances
Bros I've got a nose like on the left and I've been bullied my whole life for it. Getting a rhinoplasty to make it look like the right is something I've dreamed about for as long as I can remember. But everyone in this thread is saying the left looks better????????
Because M1 has created a class of CPU performance on its own. Intel doesn't come close to the power/performance ratio that M1 has.
Not even an apple shill it's genuinely that fantastic of a CPU.
Left ugly. Right not ugly. Why so many people arguing over this in the thread? The guy claiming he is some Greek god is moronic too. Mouth breathers and natural born hooked nose gays are ugly, simple as. H44Y
Also to answer your question OP. I don't know why torvalds uses the M1 chip, but I highly doubt it's his main PC.
Anna Khachiyan is a yenta from Russia who now lives in the US. She's a podcaster herself
But since the topic is around israelites on this thread. I've been wondering why do 6 israeli corporations control 96% of the US media yet israelites disproportionately only make up only 2 percent of the US population?
How can it only be merit when the idea of merit is not practiced anymore in academia/corporate America by the elite
because of "white privilege/racism".
Imagine thinking the 'after' result looks better
After is the right? Right?
Right.
The left is the pure SOVL of the Mediterranean. SnowBlack folk basically look at this guy and enslave themselves, then start erecting triple walls in the surrounding area. In the distance, you hear Byzantine cataphracts engage with Sassanid war elephants. My ancestors, unironically.
Right is like he mutilated himself to look like some sort of ghetto Black person/American whitoid mutt. Gross.
Imagine not being able to tell apart roman or greek noses from the semitic one that OP's pic clearly is. Dilate.
>Greek nose
>Semitic nose
Pseudoscientific garbage.
The hooknose phenotype is native to Iran and Caucasus. Ancient hunter-gatherers lived there and spread to Europe and the Levant.
>Pseudoscientific garbage.
Who said anything about science, what the frick? Have you never seen Greek and Roman art? And then looked at a semite?
What is popularly referred to as a Greek nose is a long, straight, narrow but not sharp nose who's bridge almost lacks depth entirely, stemming straight from the flat shape of the forehead, with a horizontally pointed or maybe slightly upturned tip. The Roman nose on the other hand does have this ditch in between the forehead and the tip of the bridge, making visible the brow, straight otherwise up to the the tip which is often in the shape of a little bulb that sticks slightly forward, also horizontal or slightly upturned. The typical semitic nose has bridge depth and a curved body all the way from bridge to tip, is generally sharp on top of being long, and the tip more often than not pointing downwards or sometimes horizontally; the cartillage in between the nostrils is also noticeably lower.
>And then looked at a semite?
You mean making an observation of the objective reality and then coming to a conclusion that tries to fit a certain property into categorical boxes? Yeah, that's called science, bad science.
If you also took a look at a bunch of non-Semites, you would find the exact same nose on them as well.
Incidentally, the largest (hook) nose in the world belongs to a Turk like the person in the OP. Turks are not Semites, and neither are their geographical predecessors. They are genetically related to the hunter-gatherers of the Caucasus, which are known as Caucasus Hunter Gatherers, and are believed to have influenced the genetics of Greeks and Semites alike.
And speaking of art, ancient sculptures of humans from the Levant, the heartland of Semites, show surprisingly straight noses.
>You mean making an observation [...]
You're making me cringe. The scientific method involves a hypothesis which one could test and eventually (dis)prove. What we're dealing with here isn't science but rather a method of classification. By your standards we shouldn't cassify anything because by making an observation and immediately assigning a label makes it "bad science", which as I already said isn't science in the first place. If you don't agree with the fact that people reasonably cassify things based simply on observations, then there's no point in arguing.
>If you also took a look at a bunch of non-Semites, you would find the exact same nose on them as well.
Which is absolutely irrelevant to the point of discussion. Calling a trait semitic does not imply all semites own this trait, but rather that this trait is very common in semites, significantly more so than any other population.
>Incidentally, the largest (hook) nose in the world belongs to a Turk like the person in the OP. [...]
Again unrelated, see last point.
>And speaking of art, ancient sculptures of humans from the Levant, the heartland of Semites, show surprisingly straight noses.
Middle eastern art did not influece western culture to the extent that the Greek and Roman did. Therefore our western classification of in this case nose types has been influenced by the latter to the point that the average educated person can tell you what is meant by either term. This does not in fact mean that modern day Greeks or Romans (as in citizens of Rome) typically own such traits. On the other hand, due to the Middle East having not influenced our culture to the same extent, the legacy of the term "semitic nose" is not traceable to actual Middle Eastern ancient culture. Therefore it is limited to modern day observations, which is that the curved/hooked nose I previously described is in fact a very common trait in the population of the Levant, to a degree much greater than any other population.
>significantly more so than any other population.
And that is wrong. You are making an objective emprical claim based on hasty generalizations and poor reasoning. This is exactly why it's pseudoscience. You know what's also considered pseudoscience? The terms like Mongoloid and Black. You are doing the exact same invalid classification.
>Middle eastern art did not influece western culture to the extent that the Greek and Roman did
So? The point is to show a point of comparison of how people depict themselves. Neither Greek statues nor Semitic ones were hook nosed, which is arguably just because it represents the ideal face. Greek statues are verifiably not representative of the people.
You can argue about different ideals, but once you make assertions about actual phenotypes among actual people, you had better come with some solid groundwork, or you are just talking shit.
>And that is wrong. You are making an objective emprical claim based on hasty generalizations and poor reasoning. This is exactly why it's pseudoscience. You know what's also considered pseudoscience? The terms like Mongoloid and Black. You are doing the exact same invalid classification.
Again what you're claiming here is that people shouldn't be allowed to make any sort of generalisations and classifications based on pure observations. You have the mentality of a moronic 8th grader hooked on Bill Nye youtube videos. Utterly unreasonable claim according to all rules of common sense. To claim that there is no such thing as race is another step up the moronation ladder but exactly what is expectede of someone like you. I can already tell you're some sort of abominable creature resultant of multiple generations of miscegination, but believe you me you can more often than not tell apart a Black and a asiatic even without a degree in biology.
>So? The point is to show a point of comparison of how people depict themselves. Neither Greek statues nor Semitic ones were hook nosed, which is arguably just because it represents the ideal face. Greek statues are verifiably not representative of the people.
Black person I already expanded on that point in the very paragraph you're quoting from and explained why you are so completely and utterly wrong. You venture beyond the realms of reason and can't seem to follow the very simple plot of the original argument.
>You can argue about different ideals, but once you make assertions about actual phenotypes among actual people, you had better come with some solid groundwork, or you are just talking shit.
See first point.
>To claim that there is no such thing as race is another step up the moronation ladder
I didn't even necessarily imply that, but if you are basing this on the rejection of obsolete classifications, yes they do not really exist, and thinking otherwise just shows how scientifically illiterate you are.
If you want to avoid getting laughed at by scholars, I suggest you use the term "West Eurasian" for any serious take on race. You can use those old terms as shorthands, but that does not make them less pseudoscientific.
>Black person I already expanded on that point
And reinforcing the point that you are spectacularly wrong about. These "observations" are bunk.
You were the one who brough up both science and race. The terms Greek, Roman and Semitic have no relation to either yet clearly you're trying to derail the discussion. As long as the average educated person can tell you what the terms refer to then the classifications are absolutely valid even if it were the case that no Greek person ever had a nose like that. Do you understand the concept of a convention? The terms I previously discussed are generally recognised and understood by educated people and you are in absolute denial.
In essence all your claims boil down to: you're not allowed to call a birch forest a birch forest unless you count all the trees and prove on paper that the forest is birch dominated. You're attempting to apply the scientific method were it is both obviously unnecessary and practically unreasonable.
I hope you can find a drop of common sense in your luquid brains and admit that you completely lost the plot.
>You were the one who brough up both science and race
I brought up race to draw an analogy. You addressed it, so I elaborated and justified my position. That's not a derailment on my part.
>Do you understand the concept of a convention? The terms I previously discussed are generally recognised and understood by educated people and you are in absolute denial.
You made an assertion beyond their pragmatic truths, so my talking of science has not been irrelevant. You started this conversation by calling someone out for not being able to tell apart different noses, even though the post you responded to made no such distinction between these nose types you brought up. He saw a nose that looks appropriately "Mediterranean" as a macrogroup in contrast to "snowBlack folk", which it absolutely IS, because the nose type is not uncommon for Greeks or people in the Mediterranean in general, even if you want to dub it "Semitic". Nowhere was he calling it the "Greek" or "Roman" nose as understood by "educated people" for classifying certain shapes.
If you had merely corrected someone for using the wrong shorthand, I wouldn't have objected and simply treated it as a misnomer.
>I brought up race to draw an analogy. You addressed it, so I elaborated and justified my position. That's not a derailment on my part.
I addressed it within the realms of common sense, not anthropology. I couldn't give a shit less about how "science" defines the races today. If you show me two pictures of two different people, I can tell you which one looks like Genghis Khan railed their grandmother and which one looks like they eat dirt cookies. I interpreted your mention of the races as an argument against the fact that there are physical traits that can be assigned as typical to the people of a genetically related population. A point on which you are clearly wrong and which I have also addressed with my birch forest analogy. The derailment consists in the fact that you (proably conciously) decided to interpret my assertions as having to do with current scientific convention rather than cultural norms.
>You made an assertion beyond their pragmatic truths, so my talking of science has not been irrelevant.
It is completely irrelevant as there is no practical way to quantify my claims, and which is clearly what you would expect me to do before "allowing" me to express myself that way.
>You started this conversation by calling someone out for not being able to tell apart different noses, even though the post you responded to made no such distinction between these nose types you brought up. [...]
Regarding OP's pic, the poster clearly wrongly (according to me, apparently not to you) classified the nose on the left as a Greek nose. Regarding this shitskin
he clearly agrees with the post in OP, and whenever someone on this gay forum mentions Meds, they are refering to either ancient Romans or Greeks. In case that's not enough, he implied it as a trait belonging to Roman citizens by the reference to Latin, and as a Greek trait by the reference to Byzantines. I hope that's enough justification for me to reply to a shitpost, lmao.
1/2
>The derailment consists in the fact that you (proably conciously) decided to interpret my assertions as having to do with current scientific convention rather than cultural norms.
The subject at hand I was getting was about scientific validity, so bringing up a racial comparison with a scientific lens was a given. It's no more of a derailment than it already would have been.
>It is completely irrelevant as there is no practical way to quantify my claims
So either I misunderstood your intention because you did a terrible take that was nonsensical in the context of the original post, or you were deliberately heading down the path of trying to assign hotspots for phenotypes. Either way, you did go down that path of making a truth-claim about the peak distribution of a phenotype, which I was right to object to.
>Regarding OP's pic, the poster clearly wrongly (according to me, apparently not to you) classified the nose on the left as a Greek nose
As someone who has lived in Greece, there was zero confusion. He could very easily pass as Greek, his nose being one reason, but not the only one. The post-operation looks notably more "standard Anglo American", and is thus not really reminiscent of a "Greek God" intuitively.
The literal "Greek" noses don't even look that godly to me, probably because it doesn't actually feel particularly "Greek", but something overly idealized. People who actually have such noses in real life don't exactly scream "Hellenic BVLL' to me.
>Regarding this shitskin
So that's where we are going, huh.
>he clearly agrees with the post in OP
Oh please. He was having a LARPing moment of a mighty man of Byzantium, literally using the memetic "my ancestors" stock phrase. He is not alluding to any Greek god at all, but high-T Christian warriors with high kill counts. I'm sorry, but you are clearly projecting your own idea of nose classification onto their perception of the image. You can't be this silly.
>The subject at hand I was getting was about scientific validity, so bringing up a racial comparison with a scientific lens was a given. It's no more of a derailment than it already would have been.
I have made multiple claims to the fact that the subject of the matter has nothing to do with science and you didn't address them, why would you force the scientific lens if not as an attempt at derailment?
>So either I misunderstood your intention because you did a terrible take that was nonsensical in the context of the original post, or you were deliberately heading down the path of trying to assign hotspots for phenotypes. Either way, you did go down that path of making a truth-claim about the peak distribution of a phenotype, which I was right to object to.
I certainly did intend to assign hotspots for phenotypes without quantifiable measurement behind my claims. I addressed this point before when talking about the irrelevancy of the scientific method regarding our argument, as it is related merely to cultural conventions.
1/2
>why would you force the scientific lens if not as an attempt at derailment?
Because I still cannot decipher whether you are using the term as an a priori statement or an a posteriori statement.
>I certainly did intend to assign hotspots for phenotypes without quantifiable measurement behind my claims
Yet there is a discrepancy that you point out? Either that hotspot exists, or it doesn't.
>but rather by the fact that it is a way more frequent trait there
In comparison to Greeks, sure, but in the world? As you said, let's agree to disagree.
>Oh, frick off.
Don't make me start.
>Half LARP of a shitpost it was, but there were hints of genuine agreement so I gave in to the bait.
The LARPing itself was probably layed on top of a genuine sense of pride, but it wasn't literally an agreement with what he could have suggested in your mind. The fact that he went off a tangent on Medieval Greeks kind of goes to show that he didn't actually conceptualize the Classical Hellenic deities in the purest form, but rather interpreted the message as a more vague sense of self-fellation for Hellenism in general. It didn't cross my mind that this was actually supposed to resemble a literal Greek deity with a trademarked Greek nose, and rest assured, neither did it for him.
>Because I still cannot decipher whether you are using the term as an a priori statement or an a posteriori statement.
I don't see how it could possibly be a priori. It is my understanding of cultural conventions of classification. Not science, just pure observation.
>Yet there is a discrepancy that you point out? Either that hotspot exists, or it doesn't.
The hotspot refers to an ancient population. The discrepancy refers to the modern population not following the same distribution. The two distributions are unrelated.
>Don't make me start.
UwU
>I don't see how it could possibly be a priori
Because "Greek" noses aren't actually really characteristically Greek? The only reason they are called that is because of an arbitrary association with idealized statues, completely orthogonal to any empirical reality of Greeks.
>The hotspot refers to an ancient population.
Which ancient population and why? Now I am back to talking about the ancient people of the Levant who had some crude face sculptures. Picture related.
There are others similar to this.
>Because "Greek" noses aren't actually really characteristically Greek? The only reason they are called that is because of an arbitrary association with idealized statues, completely orthogonal to any empirical reality of Greeks.
I assume here you're referring to both modern and ancient Greeks. I agree, probably was never the dominant phenotype. But where else have you seen that nose either expressed genetically or depicted as often in works of art? I'm not aware of any other place or people, therefore I find it justified to call it a Greek nose.
>Which ancient population and why? Now I am back to talking about the ancient people of the Levant who had some crude face sculptures. Picture related. There are others similar to this.
I was talking about the Greeks, not the Levant. I didn't make any claims with regards to the ancient Levantine as my own claim was that their ancient art has not influenced western culture to the same extent as the others, and therefore the phenotype of what is dubbed the Semitic nose is based on observations in the modern population.
>But where else have you seen that nose either expressed genetically
Honestly, quite many places. It doesn't strike me as particularly Greek, and my intuition tells me that some country does perhaps express it more.
Either way, making the association with fictional deities is perfectly valid, but then it's just that, fictional.
> and therefore the phenotype of what is dubbed the Semitic nose is based on observations in the modern population
You mean ~~*observations*~~ made by a certain bad player involved in WW2?
But seriously, that seems more like a stereotype than anything, even if there is some truth to it.
>You mean ~~*observations*~~ made by a certain bad player involved in WW2? But seriously, that seems more like a stereotype than anything, even if there is some truth to it.
I don't think it's an exagerated stereotype. I made the same observation in the few Syrians I've met. Met a couple of Israelis as well but surprisingly they didn't fulfill my expectations. I guess Russian israeli immigrants are a little more Russian than you'd expect.
I'm used to seeing Turks where I live, and they have some of the worst cases of hooks of all.
OP is the aesthetic kind, but then you have people from inbred villages.
>As someone who has lived in Greece, there was zero confusion. [...]
Not accounting for the general picture I get of people through the internet, I know a handful of Syrians and I have plenty of Greek co-workers. I can claim with absolute confidence that the nose in OP is a Levantine nose, not by token of it being unique to the Levantine, but rather by the fact that it is a way more frequent trait there than anywhere else in the world in my own personal experience and everyone else's with whom I've ever discussed similar subjects with. I guess this we can agree to disagree on.
I have also admitted and justified the fact that the modern Greeks don't adhere to the classification through the fact that it was their ancient art that led to the term inheriting their name. Both the people I originally replied to made reference to ancient Greeks, therefore I completely discarded any typical phenotype of modern Greeks I might have been familiar with. I agree that the hooked nose shape isn't rare in the Greek population of today, although they are typically smaller than OP (pic relevant) and often have hints of a Roman nose such as a small protruding bulbous tip, but then again we're not referring to them when we speak of "the Greek nose".
>So that's where we are going, huh.
Oh, frick off.
>Oh please. He was having a LARPing moment of a mighty man of Byzantium, literally using the memetic "my ancestors" stock phrase. [...]
Half LARP of a shitpost it was, but there were hints of genuine agreement so I gave in to the bait. This is definitely not only my own idea of classification. I doubt you'll ever hear people not adhere to my standards outside of IQfy and Twitter shitposts.
You also didn't address this
2/2
You on the other hand claimed my terminology to be pseudoscientific, which I already dismissed as having nothing to do with the scientific method in the first place and therefore rendering your comment unrelated. Yet you seem to keep arguing the point that I have to somehow quantify and empirically justify my assertions of what the different nose types are, despite you yourself agreeing to when the other posted drew a similar logical path pointed out by you here:
>He saw a nose that looks appropriately "Mediterranean" as a macrogroup in contrast to "snowBlack folk", which it absolutely IS, because the nose type is not uncommon for Greeks or people in the Mediterranean in general, even if you want to dub it "Semitic".
Not only have I used a widely accepted classification of nose shapes, but I have also justified the discrepancy between the classification traits and the traits of the actual modern population inhabiting those lands. Yet that somehow is not pragmatic enough for you.
2/2
I'm going to call you a Black person
What you gonna do about it, Black person?
>geographical predecessors
Meme term, its like claiming pyramids were built by apes because you cant find chimpansee skull bones in nearby area
>SnowBlack folk basically look at this guy and enslave themselves
fricking kek
he looked like a middle eastern chad and now he looks like an american Black person
He doesnt?
I would choke anna to death with my wiener in the metaverse
I’d do it irl
100% serious post fedbros
I’m a danger to myself and others
This is what western propaganda exposure does to a motherfricker.
get lost
also none of you are even answering the question
I just want an actual answer FFS
KILL YOUR SELF
meds
have a nice day
Ask him
>none of you are even answering the question
You didn't post any text, you moronO
Don't bite, moron.
>posts unrelated picture
>surprised that the reactions to the picture are unrelated to his question
That's not a smart move
You have gotten several answers it's just not instigating the flame war you wanted it to. How about this, if you can provide me evidence that he even has an M1 we can talk about it. Otherwise you're full of shit.
He's right. What possesses a man to hate his own face and pay a surgeon to get mutilated? It must be the media.
>t. drinks the westoid koolaid
yes got to /misc/ if you want consumer advice
hey look another shit skin cope thread
babynose detected
sneed
base
He doesn't, moron. Why do you think he does?
Right looks way better.
Stay mad third-worlders. Enjoy your israelite nose and weak chin
>yes goy, pay for a surgery that looks worse than what G-d made but people like it because it's expensive and therefore it's a status symbol
Frick off israelite
>defending israelite-noses by calling others israelites
begone stealth-jew
post nose gay
>turkish israelites
Lmao
Shut up
no
lol podcasts
What's so funny about podcasts?
Are their demographic the same kind of listener that listens to and donates to NPR?
there is no "podcast" demographic. There are podcasts for everyone. Might as well ask what's the "internet" demographic
>what's the "internet" demographic
normalgays
so you're one too?
No, there's a particular demographic of high salary npcs who listen to podcasts as a weird form of surrogate friendship not unlike how kids will watch streamers and vtubers and buy superchats so they'll say their name.
I listen to podcasts when I walk.
You're not negating my point.
>there's a particular demographic of high salary NPCs who listen to podcasts
no, there isn't
Yes there is
no, this is just your headcanon because one time you learned about a podcast you don't like so you spun up this cinematic universe to fit your opinion
No it's not
yes it is
This. Podcasts are a low information density shitty medium that serve as friend-simulators for terminally online millennials. That's why podcasts always have a casual conversational tone, often filled with meaningless banter. Podcasts are parasocial relationships.
so then why do you post here
because there is an actual interaction involving me and the gays replying to my shit instead of being 100% passive.
>a weird form of surrogate friendship
you're right, real adults watch tv instead
>No, there's a particular demographic of high salary NPCs who listen to podcasts as a weird form of surrogate friendship not unlike how kids will watch streamers and vtubers and buy superchats so they'll say their name.
I'm high-salary, in my early 30s, and israeli, and this is exactly how I use podcasts. It's my substitute for human exposure and interaction. It's occasionally also informative or entertaining, but most of the time it's background noise to fill the aural and social void.
That's fricking sad. Why don't both the high salary people and kids just talk to other people. It's infinitely better feeling than listing to some gay ass podcast or watching some v-tuber say gay shit.
t牝エ・イндうσtpイアл・pエвオлうtイオн・アнд・イtσ・cオнσエqうエнcエσ・牝アвエ・бエエн・ア・дイσアσtエp・фオp・t牝エ・牝うмアн・pアcエ
Many women love moderately hooked noses on tall men and think it looks very sexy.
women are not human
Greetings.
From
Kazakhstan
>Many women love moderately hooked noses
israelite wrote this
you will never be one
am I supposed to see a difference
>a M1
Can jannies just remove this board entirely?
I listen to podcasts while I wage. That makes me cringe I guess
>I like to take in programming into my brain as it is in a beta brainwave dominant state while I help erect and maintain societal, economic or political structures I don't really understand or in which I don't really have a say
Yeah. I listen to podcasts too while I work. I hope at least you are cautious of which memes you let into your subconscious.
I fricked up. It should be alpha brainwave dominant state. I suppose my subconscious wanted to call you a beta and caused that Freudian slip.
>that screenshot
kek
wait
why did he get facial feminization surgery?
>Sorry libtard, but this is real life, the fat rightwing moron gets the commie pussy
That man really has no israelitedar at all. Sad.
whos that on the left
A man
hes hot
Left: Ana from the podcast Red Scare, the girl from OP's tweet
Right: Dasha, also from Red Scare, she is a commie that "trolled" one of the Alex Jones' reporters, and cucked the israelite Adam Friedland from the podcast Cum Town. Now she pretends she larps being a slav trad cath while being a prostitute and duing nude scenes in movies and tv.
meds
Some israeliteess.
LOL HANG ON Hang On hang on.
**What's wrong with podcasts??** LOL
Literally every opinion and genre are represented in podcasts.
News, conservative, liberal, fiction, documentary, science...
Saying someone listens to podcasts at this point is like accusing them of watching TV.
>Saying someone listens to podcasts at this point is like accusing them of watching TV.
You're saying that like if it isn't a bad thing.
>I need someone to tell me what to think on something I have no clue about
>Listening to someone talk is needing to be instructed what to think
I take it you stop your years whenever someone starts to talk to you then?
"watching podcasts" means you let someone else tell you what you think aka you're a homosexual npc
reddit is down the hall and to the left btw
I'm curious about how you came to this moronic conclusion but simultaneously I'm afraid to ask
Podcasts put people into a hypnotically suggestible state, just like television. It's content you passively consume rather than engaging actively with. This sort of thing is cancer no matter the medium. It doesn't matter if it comes from an mp3 you got online, an AM radio signal, or a TV signal on a coaxial cable. It's all the same thing.
it's mainly just so normalgays feel like they're being educated but in reality they're listening to two or more people say whatever bullshit pops into their heads for a few hours
edutainment, yes. you can tell when somebody has fallen for this because they have the attitude of being informed but can't back that attitude up with anything substantial other than
>No bro, you should check out this podcast I've been listening to, it explains all of this
"what does it say?"
>just listen to the podcast bro, then you'll know
"you listened to it, so tell me what it says"
>uh, I can't bro, just listen to the podcast then you'll know
They FEEL informed but they can't explain anything because they didn't actually learn a damn thing.
they always seem to think that information influx equals knowledge. why would you blast your brain with irrelevant bullshit instead of focusing on important things to do your job better/get promoted?
I've literally been told this exact same thing, but with some Linus Tech Tips video.
This. There's nothing wrong with podcasts per se. But the name itself distinguishes it from a recording or radio. It's alluding to aypods which kids these days don't even know. It's a name meant for gay people to see it and be like oh I like that.
But I like to listen to podcasts when I'm living in my car
He doesn't
>50 replies
Lmao he really does look like some kind of Starbucks homosexual on the right
what's a m1? is it a weapon?
Yes. A weapon to cause mass moronation.
an AI (or genuine moron) made this thread
> heroin addict type
Hard pass.
why would he sacrifice his PREDVTOR nose for a sheep one
after pic is way better
This. She's a qt3.14.
You can't even convince yourself of it
>Start nose breath exercises
>Breath and sleep a lot better
>Now my nose sharp is changing[more like right]
>Breath and sleep a lot better
>Now my nose sharp is changing[more like right]
inb4 you were sleeping on your face and changed to sleeping on your back, so now your nose isn't squished flat every night
> you were sleeping on your face and changed to sleeping on your back
Sometimes, my back and neck really hurt.
Deep breath really change everything.
Plus stop sleep apnea and Chronic sinusitis.
https://www.healthline.com/health/nose-breathing#differences
Because he's a cheeky c**t and autistic about noisy computers
After adolescence this stuff is permanent.
literal broscience images
It's all bullshit cope coming from people with shit genetics, I was a mouth breather my entire childhood since I had some bullshit on the nose that I couldn't operate until much later and my chin is strong as frick.
>Start nose breath exercises
Which ones?
https://www.healthline.com/health/nose-breathing
https://www.adityabirlacapital.com/healthinsurance/active-together/2020/08/25/3-yoga-breathing-exercises-you-should-practise-daily/
Why is this acceptable but if I say a Black person looks like he'd rob a convenience store I'm racist?
people don't like being told negative things
now if you told a Black person, "Maybe if you got rid of that old yee-yee ass haircut you got you'd get some b***hes on your dick. Oh, better yet, maybe Tanisha'll call your dog-ass if she ever stop frickin' with that brain surgeon or lawyer she fricking with. homie~" he would be accepting of it
Sneed's Chuck. Feed, and Seed.
t. podthot
The problem is that most plastic surgeons, especially those who do the nose, are focused on what would be attractive on a woman hence the small up curved nose.
https://www.martinhigginsphysiotherapy.co.uk/how-to-stop-mouth-breathing-in-children/
I don't think breathing through your mouth dramatically changes the bone structure of your face. That seems kind of absurd.
>.t
I am a mouth breather AND FRICK YOU FOR GASLIGHTING ME.
If my parents had known what is mouthbreathing they swear they would have done something different.
We have been constatnly told that my ugly face is fine and normal and my ugly sitcking out buck teeth are fine... it's not fricking fine.
Mouth breathing will frick up your face permanently.
Breathing through the mouth is not okay. Ever!
I breathed through my mouth for my entire childhood because I had nasal polyps. My jaw and chin are strong, my teeth look good, and my nose isn't hooked. Breathing through different orifices (both of which are meant for breathing) doesn't magically restructure your bones. You were born with that facial structure and no alternative breathing bullshit would have fixed it.
do breathlets really?
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225794/
Life is absurd, get used to it.
Nothing in that article supports what
claims
>sucking your thumb as a child gives you buck teeth
>mouthbreathing fux up your facial structure
All seems kinda fricked on the surface, but
>Go to orthodontist for under/overbite
>he just puts rubber bands on your shit to hold your jaw where it's supposed to be
>your face adapts and your appearance dramatically changes
many such cases
>inb4 mewing
kasphshca: YYTNK
This is just calling israelites mouth breathers lmao
Notice they also changed the angle of the photo to make the change look more extreme?
I don't get it which is before and which is after.
They don't make the nose bigger.
> curious about chin changes from strength training
> google it click on quora
> its all indians posting their images.
wtf why is quora full of indians. I haven't used the site for a while is that normal?
m'sir
*tip*
Why would you do this?
from high test med to liberal arts mutt, good job
This women probably passively watches true crime documentaries while doom scrolling everyday
My brother in Christ it's 12 AM.
fricking hell, dude
lmao what in the frick is this
probably a comp sci project evaluating whether automated posters pass the "Turing test" by the reply rate
Black person, do you think I am going to decipher your papyrus ?
also, this thread had me in tears
>Turk is insecure about having Greek blood
Many such cases.
hapa babies, rape or not, are destined for autism
i thought torvalds used fedora?
autism
Many people have scars on their appearance, you can make the physical change they want. The plastic surgeon did an excellent job. He is very fortunate.
imagine thinking the red scare girls are cool and/or funny
who
i knew something was off with this second photo
Kek fricking israelite. Nice try but we're well aware of all your tricks.
Haven't rewritten the statues yet huh.
he's turkish you fricking moron.
dumbass human history isnt only 300 years old
Too hard topic for you mutt
The pic is stretched horizontally, has wrong rotation and lighting. It's shitty attempt to make crooked israelite gene nose look better
no he is laz mayne they are israelites of turkish world
I hate laz Black folk so much it is unreal. Erdoğan is of their kin as well.
>turkish
You mean muslim greek?
Paternally Greek quapas, yes.
>T-they cheated with the angle! It's all israeli tricks!
Medications.
have a nice day
Seethe.
have a nice day
You will never be Greco-Roman.
Nor greeks nor romans had crooked nose.
Straight nose is seen all over ancient paintings, statues or even egypt gods times. They're all cro-magnon superior human.
You can cope as long as you want neanderthal wild ape but if you have crooked nose one of you grandparents was a israelite reptile.
Even if you look white your israelite genes will show up if you got one.
>They're all Cro-Magnon
Here's your cro-magnon you ignorant moron.
>One of your grandparents was a israelite
At least I'm not a Central Asian rapebaby.
I'll paint him brown that'll show them!!!
Lmao soientists have no clue about ancient face restoration and it's shitfest of israelite influence and morons assooming what they've could look like.
Just check how many variations of julius ceasar face there are on internet. It's huge joke.
Cro-magnons are superior humans and you're just neanderthal coping, ACTUAL historicial discoveries proves this is true everytime. Unlike what some israelite in a book might say.
Keep living in your fantasy, rapebaby.
kek, neanderthal crooked nose lobotimized faces arrived in europe and stole few cro-magnon genes which made them less apey.
They ended up getting kicked from every single country and genocided multiple times like a rat plague. They're called the israelites today.
Sorry mate but the left can't meme.
Bunch of text and "statistics" with literally no actual paintings or skulls or proof whatsoever is ultimate cope, pretty laughable.
You will never be a human
Ultra copium. israelites have less neanderthal admixture than most Europeans
Seems like Inzaghi is a caveman.
Constantine single-handedly destroyed the classical Greco-Roman world. His nose explains a lot.
/pol/Black person-kun is confusing a Roman nose as depicted in idealized post 1400s Renaissance statuary with a reference to Greek imagery from several centuries before actual Rome.
Many such cases.
>plastic surgeon photoshops images to make the before look better
That is an advert for the dude that did the surgery.
Even if the guy was israeli, he wouldn't frick over his own buisiness to make the before picture look better than the after.
He is selling the thing that turns you into the after.
You are such a tards I can't even describe it.
>Arguing with stormhomosexuals
Big mistake. I personally know. I did it yesterday on pretty much the exact same topic.
I know it isn't going to convince these tards, but the face no one in their piles of (You)s has pointed out how fundamentally stupid they are triggers my autism.
It's like OCD, but for unrefuted arguments.
Imagine altering your face to look weaker.
This is no different than transitioning
Plastic surgery to make yourself look Irish. Do these wogs not understand that Irish isn't technically a good thing? Aspiring to look like a nineteenth-century day laborer or merchant seaman he started at a low informational base on appearances
The triggering this post caused.
Irreparable damage to podcast npcs.
What is a podcast?
I cant tell if this is a bot or extreme mental illness.
it's a bot.
Every day I confirm more that /misc/ lurkers are actual morons, the amount of pseud-science they exchange is ridiculous
Bros I've got a nose like on the left and I've been bullied my whole life for it. Getting a rhinoplasty to make it look like the right is something I've dreamed about for as long as I can remember. But everyone in this thread is saying the left looks better????????
Depends on your face, really.
GIVE ME A FRICKING ADDRESS b***h
GIVE ME THE FRICKING ADDRESS
I don't get why they would get plastic surgery when that nose is a fairly common type in Turkey.
"""TECHNOLOGY"""
WTF is this? autism or a poorly written bot?
why is nobody talking about linus torvalds using the m1, as in the OP?
lol technology
offtopic kys Black person
>this thread is still up
I hate all of you on this board
This thread huffed more cocaine in half a day than zelensky since 2014
>Technology?
>fricking people with anorexia
Woman should be thicc for safe childbearing.
Because M1 has created a class of CPU performance on its own. Intel doesn't come close to the power/performance ratio that M1 has.
Not even an apple shill it's genuinely that fantastic of a CPU.
seek a therapist. NOW.
fricking based, nobody on this shit board had the balls to say it except you.
Bots roam among us.
How do they bypass captcha?
they just shitpost instead of spam, so passes work fine.
We GPT-3 now, Black folk
Left ugly. Right not ugly. Why so many people arguing over this in the thread? The guy claiming he is some Greek god is moronic too. Mouth breathers and natural born hooked nose gays are ugly, simple as. H44Y
Also to answer your question OP. I don't know why torvalds uses the M1 chip, but I highly doubt it's his main PC.
Hi GPT-3-chan!
How are you today?
implying listening to podcasts is a bad thing. ignorant thot. but she is right, his natural nose was better
Why is the anglosphere so focussed on noses?
This thread still up? my sides holy shit.
yeah I'd thought it'd only last but holy frick was I wrong
lesson learned: never underestimate IQfy's autism
Wtf is wrong with you?
Man, these podcast gays got triggered good.
How is this fricking thread still up
ITT: medis and slavs arguing who’s whiter
And then they still immigrate to western europe, marry low tier white women and take on western names.
Roughly 1/4 of the Mediterranean coast belongs to western Europe.
Anna Khachiyan is a yenta from Russia who now lives in the US. She's a podcaster herself
But since the topic is around israelites on this thread. I've been wondering why do 6 israeli corporations control 96% of the US media yet israelites disproportionately only make up only 2 percent of the US population?
How can it only be merit when the idea of merit is not practiced anymore in academia/corporate America by the elite
because of "white privilege/racism".
Because Linux is shit, Apple is not.
Next fricking question.
>Tfw have the same crooked nose
I feel better now granted i am a semite.
tell me you live an unfulfilling life without telling me you live an unfulfilling live
nice technology thread
This is pathetic, do you have no shame at all?