this, the open letter was no doubt penned by all the israeli record execs and plastered those dumb girls' names on it >oy vey think of the poor israeli widows
The record labels actually have the most to gain here. With AI that can replicate the voices of their most lucrative talents even after their death, they're at a unique position where they can make an absurd amount of money off dead people.
Sure, as long as they get to have new IP laws written in time.
1 month ago
Anonymous
I think they will also try to limit the kind of hardware normal people can buy, too. Right now I feel current consumer hardware isn't strong enough to do anything REALLY amazing, so they will want to do something about it soon. I suspect they will use whatever shenanigans during the next US presidential election as an excuse to crack down hard on what regular people have access to. You'll still be able to pay to use some super gimped and monitored AI provided by an approved company or you can run your own stuff on current gen hardware that won't be able to keep up with the software demands.
1 month ago
Anonymous
I'd be OK with that as long as video game developers learn to optimize games. But they won't, they'll switch over to running games on servers exclusively and everything will be a heavily compressed stream with input lag
1 month ago
Anonymous
with a solid connection geforce now input lag is nearly imperceptible unless you're playing at an actual professional level. professional as in the definition where you're paid to play.
Who does money with the music industry today anyway? It's a decade since I bought my last CD and since then I just download the songs from youtube. I don't think anyone is paid well with spotify so in all honesty, who is still making money with music?
big name artists like taylor swift and katy perry and big rappers
huge names like that still make money from people paying for the albums on itunes etc
also they get streaming royalties from spotify/youtube/etc (I suspect they negotiate higher rates that indie artists, so it's more profitable for them per listen)
it's probably back to the old days where they make most of the money on touring, and it all goes to the record company, not the artist
You make money in music either if you're really big (Taylor Swift model) or if you're small and niche enough you can ignore record company gatekeeping and sell music, tickets and merchandise directly to consumers (King Gizzard model)
>king gizzard >small and niche enough
dunno anon, they showed up to my fricking hometown in spain last year, i wouldn't say coming to spain from straya is something and filling up an entire festival venue is what you could call a "niche" band
i mean he's comparing fricking taylor swift to king gizzard, his comparisons are apt for those levels.
you can still fill venues and be small enough. Temples is one of my favorite bands, respectably big, but they're still a bandcamp band.
I'd call king gizzard a bandcamp band still too. >shit does king gizzard even make deals to sell records at least?
1 month ago
Anonymous
to be fair you can compare taylor shit to almost anyone else and they'd look like a local band in comparison, but now i understand what you mean, and you're right
i gotta say king gizzard is a tad more commercial in spirit now though
1 month ago
Anonymous
actually i half retract and realize your point, yeah its moronic, she's literally world famous chosen by the israelites so it's a pretty extreme comparison
but i'd say "bandcamp band" is pretty apt for the comparison trying to be made here. It's the modern way of being directly connected to an audience without the israeliteyness of ye olde labels and contracts, while still having a lenient modern label going on. >here's a fun recent example
https://soichiterada.bandcamp.com/album/apes-in-the-net
1 month ago
Anonymous
good shit anon, thanks for sharing
1 month ago
Anonymous
>shit does king gizzard even make deals to sell records
They get records pressed and sell them directly online and at their concerts
> who is still making money with music?
Concerts. The albums are just there to market concert tickets. It's the only thing you can make real money at. That, and endorsements.
https://i.imgur.com/1nRLfVD.jpg
AI music isn't going to change anything about the current music model. There's basically zero barriers to entry as it is, and big labels will still do the same big label stuff they do now.
Very curious to see how the music community is going to respond to the whole AI music thing. Will they throw a shitfit like 'artists' or will they be chill? I've been writing music on and off for almost 20 years and I really could not give less of a shit about AI music 'replacing' anyone. I think that most people who are even mildly musically inclined in a serious way would all agree that mainstream radio stuff is absolute fricking trash and wouldn't give two fricks if Billie Eilish stopped making music.
The thing with music is that computers have already been able to play instruments at a level far beyond what any human could ever conceivably do for a long time now; and people focusing on that simple fact spawned an entire new genre of music: electronic. That said, people still learn how to play instruments just because the actual act of playing an instrument is fun. Conversely, tons of musicians use drum-machines and all sorts of automatic tooling to help them, so it seems like musicians are generally more accepting of new tech that can do cool shit or automate part of the music making process.
My general experience working with other musicians has been the same. Most of them are pretty willing to explore cool automatic shit like arpegiators, drum-machines, auto-tuners, etc etc etc. It's always seemed to me that musicians are a little more open to that kind of stuff and are a little more mature about their craft.
I would tend to agree. I'd be happy to play around with musicgen and see what I can come up with and then have fun deconstructing it and turning it into something else. new sounds are always welcome in my world. I feel like most musicians are less insecure than drawgays about AI because most musicians are making sounds they enjoy and are having fun producing. Drawgays for better or worse typically have some kind of income drawing porn or doing commissions - where you're really just a human prompt interpreter - and having the option to commission for the price of your own electricity is a direct disruption of their revenue stream. musicians that make money do so by playing live, especially at festivals. Unless you have a row of funktion ones in your basement, you aren't going to replace the appeal of a festival. And I've never heard of an earnest musician (not some fiverr schmuck) taking commissions. The closest you see is people that make music for commercials - and yeah, those jobs are in danger, but that ship has kinda already sailed as those jobs have dried up in the last 20-30 years
>And I've never heard of an earnest musician (not some fiverr schmuck) taking commissions.
Are you 12? Do you think the music in games, movies, etc just falls out of the sky? lmao
maybe I'm drawing a silly line between session work, commercials, score work and "hey I want the Mario song but dubstep" which I feel like is more the equivalent of the sort of commission work drawgays typically do. I wouldn't consider someone working for Pixar to be working on commissions even if they were only doing contract or freelance work. gonna say also that I have zero clue about the world of professional visual art so take my useless input for what it is
I like your style. Unfortunately we're anons here, else I'd love to get in touch and do some creative shit
vocaroo.com/1mJrE4S32sIz
(currently in progress)
i'm still learning. catch me in /dmp/ sometime
You're confusing the point their making with what's defined as augmentation. An AI composing/creating music is not the same as a drum machine being mixed into a song. Entirely different concept.
My point really wasn't that they were the same, but that musicians have always been fast to incorporate highly automated technologies into their workflow, and I really don't seen this as being very different. Where exactly does the line of automation go in to "entirely different concept" territory? Automatically generating beats? Generating chord progressions? Generating melodies? There are tools that have done these sorts of tasks for a long time. Why is it suddenly taboo now that it's an LLM rather than just some algorithm?
fake "artists": >waaaa new tech bad because my deviantart furry porn can be made by the basement-dwellers directly thus taking away the commissions I need to sustain my degenerate lifestyle
actual artists: >oh cool, a new tool, I can use it to hone my existing craft and make entirely new stuff I never could before. My creativity can be loosed upon an entirely new world!
Probably the same thing is going to happen with musicians.
I predict that talentless hacks will do worse, and people with skill, brains, courage and creativity will do better, as usual when disruptive technologies come out.
Also, if Suno is anything to go by, it will be less about creating new songs and more about creating entirely new genres. Delicious!
>I think that most people who are even mildly musically inclined in a serious way would all agree that mainstream radio stuff is absolute fricking trash and wouldn't give two fricks if Billie Eilish stopped making music.
I wonder where you live because its definitely not the west coast
you havent seen the breadth of the b***hing yet because TTS is still in shocking amounts of infancy
we only JUST got the latest developments in AI TTS this past week or so, give it a bit more time and we'll really see how the musicgays respond when compared to writers/artists.
My vote's on them being a lot more chill. Musicians are significantly less subhuman in nature compared to artists, writers could go either way.
>Musicians are significantly less subhuman in nature compared to artists
i wouldn't say significantly, but i do agree that they're probably not going be colossal b***h about it like artists. vocaloids already exists for example and no one gives a frick. some musicians even used it themselves https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatsune_Miku#Featured_music
majority of the screetching about ai is going to come from the penny pinching israeli executives.
I'd say significantly, because artists are subhuman bugpeople that spend more of their time b***hing on twitter and discord and not actually going out there and making shit, musicians spend more of their time actually making their music that they haven't sat down to complain nearly as much.
When the time comes that they should, i strongly doubt they'll devote the time and resources that artists have.
Besides, they'd be colossal hypocrites given the nature of sampling. That's a huge factor i'm sure is keeping many quiet. It's just the drones of the israeli executives knowing they're easily replaced-because they will be replaced.
The biggest appeal for me would be the fact that you can essentially create "new" songs for artists that refuse to release new albums, can't release new albums cause they're dead or the band broke up, or release new albums that suck. Also you can create fake crossovers so it's like next level remixing in a way. Imagine creating a "new" Neutral Milk Hotel album
The people in OP are popping stars not "musicians" like you and your friends and playmates.
Ai for Pop stars means that you and I as musicians can produce a track, get someone to sing a guide vocal and then use the pop stars ai model to turn the guide vocal into a pretty decent version of the pop star singing our track. So it does mean that the brand of the pop star can be devalued by every one and their dog making "bootleg original" tracks by Billie eilish or dua lips or whoever is hot and farming and revenue because fans and casual listeners don't care and will gladly listen to a playlist without checking which tracks are genuine and which are ai.
I'm using some ai models to write tracks for artists and make a collection which I'll pitch to the label. The guide vocal is me singing which sounds shit but when put through the ai model it is decent enough to listen to and for the a&r it would give a pretty good representation of how the track could sound if they cut it. It can be better with a woman singing the guide vocal for female tracks but I'll try that later on in the project.
Regardless it is pretty fun making ai tracks for actual artists and makes songwriting a more interesting experience than just trying to make a track with no purpose
>Will they throw a shitfit like 'artists'
You put artists in scare quotes despite the fact that you just put text in a box while they actually draw the lines. Fricking loser
Probably the biggest difference will be that in painting there aren't any huge superpowers like pop stars or the RIAA, it's more like a cottage industry. Music industry has way more weight it can throw around.
>computers have already been able to play instruments at a level far beyond what any human could ever conceivably do
They certainly can't play, say, an electric guitar or a violin as expressively as a human yet.
You're missing the entire point 'they' have ommitted from the discussion: it isn't about the music, it never was.
Its about the money and who gets the share of the pie. The music industry has revolved around commercial interests ever since sheet music companies began selling works of classical music. The fact that those companies started shitting themselves upon the invention of the radio and sound recording should tell you a lot about the current situation. Ask yourself why the recording industry didn't pitch a huge fit over disruptive technologies like digital sound mixing and synthesizers and instead chimped out over Napster and the rise of online distribution.
The popular music industry has most to lose since in this scenario since they have a whole infrastructure in place to mass manufacture music for profit. Think of all the deals they have with different artists, distributors, promotions, advertising, sound companies, concert organisations, etc. AI will turn that infrastructure into a deck of cards if some neet in his basement with a rudimentary knoweldge of music theory can churn out similar slop at a fraction of the time and cost.
>people still learn how to play instruments just because the actual act of playing an instrument is fun
People learn to play instruments because realistically reproducing instrument mastery electronically is very difficult. Go listen to someone like Jesse Mano or Pam Swan and come here to declare with a straight face that you could create those sounds from scratch. Electronic music simply isn't there. And you're ignorant if you believe otherwise.
https://app.suno.ai/song/b30c2005-a1ef-42aa-bdf3-ffbfab85d874
I'm not a music guy but this sounds better than most of the crap people who play instruments can make
Firstly, it's dogshit. Go listen to the artists I named. Secondly, I am talking about electronic synths not AI moron.
1 month ago
Anonymous
neither of the artists you named are on youtube, not worth the effort.
also learn to communicate, nowhere did you specify ELECTRONIC SYNTHS, you specifically responded to someone talking about playing instruments and you specifically said realistically reproducing instruments electronically.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Please also consider the context outside the immediate text chatGPT-sama. There exists something like "the post I replied to".
>not on youtube
you are ngmi bro. Although I guess I did misspell Jesse Manno there. But if you can't find them, go listen to Lisa Lynne or Jami Sieber. They are on youtube.
>toaster can write better songs than you >NOOOOOOOO! Ban the technology!
If you have any talent this isn't a problem. It will only increase your work output, allowing you to compose entire symphonies in a few days. Professional composers already do this using human assistants, but now everyone will be able to do it.
people said the same thing about recording music
pic related, musicians campaigning against the use of prerecorded music in theatres, compared to having live performances
and yes, one of their arguments can literally be translated to "it's soulless", how times have changed... or not
sure, but the point is that recording music doesn't hurt music, in fact it enhances it and makes it more accessible
not to suggest it replaces live music of course, despite the popularity of prerecorded music, it has never killed live music to this day
do you think music would have been better off if it was only allowed to ever be produced live by humans?
and to be clear, i have nothing against live music, but think about the bigger picture
Yea nobody who matters cares about Katy Perry or Nicki Minaj. But I 100% enjoy indie musicians that go out of the way to produce real art.
I have on my SoundCloud songs with just a couple hundred views from artists who I deem to actually be producing unique things (not mass produced record label goyslop), I try to support them as much as I can but I've seen the AI demoralization hit indie artists in other types of industries, they often just stop doing their art all together because they believe there's no point.
In IQfy terms, there's music with SOVL out there, they're sometimes hidden gems from people who just upload shit for fun, if AI decreases the artistic output of these type of artists it'll be a real loss for humanity.
It's easy to hate soulless artist like Katy Perry and enjoy their downfall, but that's not actually what's at stake here, if AI takes over the music industry and Nicki Minaj gets 50 million $ / year instead of 100 million $ / year it's easy to see how people that hate her would feel like they've accomplished something, but you're looking at it from the wrong perspective.
There's literal AI music on Youtube right now that has 30-40k views a month. Think generic Country. Now the views might be botted and the comments too, but otherwise it's scary to see how inhuman the vocals sound and how all the comments seem to be overall positive about the songs in question. AI is scary because it will make finding real music harder.
People didn't stop playing chess when Kasparov lost to Deep Blue. Artists who barely get a few hundreds views by definition do it as a hobby and can't live from it so they will be the least impacted.
If the argument is that it will be buried under tons of shits with 0 visibility due to AI output... It's already the case without it.
The panic about having your daily wagie job replaced by a bot is much more rational than a computer becoming better than you at a hobby because that's what 99% of the population lives off (people living from their art are incredibly privileged).
Your modern AMD CPU can synthesize an orchestra in real time, indistinguishable from a real life one. Yet I fail to find the countless pieces that beat the classics.
>Still a dumbass reaction, though.
Streisand effect
I was in high school when this happened. Even the hardcore Metallica fans said frick 'em for that
The funny thing was we had moved on to Limewire when they were b***hing about this. Even people that weren't tech savvy would rather pay a nerd half the price of an album to download and burn a CD for them
They were lucrative times... not to mention the warez games and applications we could sell to people... Sims, GTA2, Quake III, Half-Life...
>Even the hardcore Metallica fans said frick 'em for that
They were so out of touch by then though. It's taken 20 years for them to actually get any respect back.
So many fans were deeply upset by their blatant hypocrisy though.
>They were lucrative times...
I charged premium for discs with over 100 mp3s and the kids at school thought I was some kind of hacker
bought me a psp with the pocket change I was taking from them
This is all this shit reminds me of.
Now watch the media pretend this never happened and instead promote their bullshit as a fight against predation or someth-
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-68717863 >Billie Eilish and Nicki Minaj want stop to 'predatory' music AI
Worst part is, unlike Lars and Metallica most of their fanbase are so braindead that they will just gobble up what they say. When Lars did this, most Metallica fans went "yeah ok, frick you Lars" and laughed. It nearly destroyed them.
While Billie probably won't get away with it (she's not like Nicki or Katy even though she's also an industry plant, her fanbase seems a little bit more switched on about that crap), the others will - their fanbase are nothing but nuffies that don't question them. Billie has no chance though. She's being Lars tier moronic and doesn't understand her fanbase.
Well, they've already tried "think of the children" and no one gave a shit because they always try to limit tech with that excuse. They tried getting people angry with AI porn of semi-popular Twitch streamers and that didn't work. I think the "outrage" over the Taylor Swift AI porn was their best attempt. Normies are now more aware of "evil AI." They'll use the next US presidential election to rile people up over AI again. Still, all these musicians, actors, etc. b***hing also helps normalize just how "evil" AI is for average people.
You can tell there's a bunch of boomers in here talking about buying CDs of all things, the music industry is making record profits off streaming services like Spotify, they aren't going away anytime soon lol.
Agreed. A big part of mainstream music is the whole 'package' that comes with it. Normalgays identify with the music they listen to and think that listening to certain artists makes them look 'cool' or whatever. A lot of people are very afraid of going outside of their 'on-brand' music. Try to get your dad to listen to fricking Bjork or something and he'll probably just say >wtf is this gay shit?
Boomer dudes have deeply ingrained shitty dad rock into their personalities and use it as a way to keep in touch with their (perceived) masculinity, but they're far from the only demographic that does this. Tons of people listen to specific music just for the image associated with it, and all record companies need to do is keep pandering to these people with a shitty sense of self to keep making money.
>don't listen to AI art man, that's very unrighteous of you
>the music industry is making record profits off streaming services like Spotify, they aren't going away anytime soon lol.
They will if they keep promoting this DRM crap that's been literally killing major artists for decades because they haven't been able to sample and frick with things.
I reckon 99% of the new music on spotify will immediately disappear.
Is this what they want?
This isn't drawings. Most of them use fricking sampled music. It is literally plagiarised content. It was literally the basis for things like EDM and hip hop and even metal music (Led Zep were considered "rip offs" of black musicians to many people).
They really love fricking their own arse ay.
Radiohead proved with In Rainbows that the industry doesn't know what it's doing anymore.
Also look at how popular some moron like Anthony Fantano is. People would rather have some random guy on the internet tell them what music is good/cool than just fricking listen to it.
God I wish I was thinking about it this morning while commuting and listening to some slop on the radio. These people aren't the best at what they're doing, most of them aren't even talented, they just have networking. It's a fricking club. You don't hear about the bests, the talented aren't in
the spotlight more often than not.
>Artists Rights Alliance
Bullshit name, it's just a copyright industry shell company promoting their copyright industry racket.
The artists themselves typically have no rights over what they make in most cases and their publishers will often compel them with their contracts to make subversive music that promotes drugs, gangs, violence, adultery, homosexualry, etc.
I think AI music is going to be an interesting new tool to explore untapped musical potential hidden in the latent space of deep neural networks trained on a large variety of different music. I expect a whole slew of new hybrid genres will emerge in the coming years.
this reads so much like an AI post: soulless, 0 content, and obvious fricking remarks
i mean, yeah, mixing shit up produces mixed shit, who would have fricking guessed
>not enough men with long hair wearing makeup jerking off their guitoodlers, rejected!
1 month ago
Anonymous
seething malding etc
zoomers lol
1 month ago
Anonymous
You're supposed to grow out of metal in middle school.
1 month ago
Anonymous
nope, you just made a strawman in your head to attack and dismiss the actual proposition
but we both know you act in bad faith so why bother with an actual reply
tl;dr eat shit
1 month ago
Anonymous
You're supposed to grow out of metal in middle school.
don't pretend that 90% of the current mainstream artists have an entire production team behind them that make 90% of the music with the artists probably okaying demos or loops to then have the team expand on if they like it. these people cannot actually produce music solely by themselves
Wasn't the music system already devalued by the fact that nearly every popular song over the course of the last 20 years was written by select few individuals working with methodologies more closely resembling factory assembly lines than any natural writing process?
NOW we're supposed to care about music being "devalued?"
I really hope these b***hes die of hunger after losing their voices or some shit
FRICK mainstream "artists". they didn't have a single problem when technology helped modify their shitty voices, have whole fake instruments and bands, distribute their shit to the masses for cheap or anything. but now they see that technology can help the average consoomer create their own stuff with little effort and they fricking PANIC.
I'm not free to manufacture semaglutide, without writing Novo Nordisk, to make money off fatties (and the Michelin guy would be a perfect mascot for it).
>why am I not allowed to steal and profit off of medications that other people spent billions to develop?
Be patient, India. It'll be perfectly legal to flood the market with generics in 7 years.
>Katy Perry >Nicki Minaj
kek, these are some of the worst perpetrators of mass produced auto-tune pop slop and now they are seething because someone has figured out a way to put even less effort into making it
Nah, I will continue to plagiarize known artists' work and use clips to make new songs with the suite of AI programs at my disposal.
I will be a multi-millionare AI music composer within the next few years, and I will be sure to spend a good portion of that money getting into "exclusive" clubs or activities for the ultra-wealthy, just so I can make a mess and embarrass them all with my most autistic displays of moronation. I will cut into their conversations just to mention poo poo. I will slip whoopee cushions onto their chairs. I will pee in their fancy mixed drinks. I might even rape some of the female "artists" for good measure, then use my wealth to laugh and walk away unscathed.
And how is that going to work when these tools are coming from all over the world?
Is that another "americans forget that theirs isn't the only country"?
Or do they think that the American government is going to enforce an AI art ban on the rest of the planet, including China and Russia?
>most pop songs are written by a handful of writers >most pop songs are produced by a handful of producers >most pop instrumentation is software synthesis >most pop singers use extensive autotune
They have all the data and money to make far better music than they currently do, but they don't. Instead, they make propaganda and family and society destroying garbage.
I'll stick to very small labels and indie tier music.
as is the same with art, you only need to be worried if you make music so generic and lacking in artistry that an ai can accurately replicate and generate it. sucks to be you!
>devalue the entire music ecosystem
aka "stooop you have to consoom all these industry plants and music designed entirely for the algorithm™!"
good riddance
few things have caused more evil in humanity than the music industry. worse than hollywood by a longshot. not only has it spearheaded the moral decay of society, but also everyone in charge of the industry are literal evil organized crime who kill, murder, bribe, rape, and encourage others to do the same. look at all this shit coming out about diddy; the labels involved were literal Black person street gangs.
when young people do break into the music industry they become slaves to actual mafia members. often when young people are signed on by labels they take out loans from the labels to pay for their touring and performances and such. then they get fricked in the ass being debtors to the mafia. not even mentioning the entire rabbithole of labels probably murdering musicians signed to them because death rights are more valuable than live rights.
no music is organically popular, all mainstream music is ordained by rapist organized crime lords. every song on the radio is not there because of merit or popularity, but because an evil criminal label boss chose that song for people to listen to.
almost all mainstream musicians openly peddle the most vile radical left-wing politics, but the right wing won't do anything because they take bribes from the labels. look at how Tennessee, a contender for the most rightwing state in the US with an overwhelming red state supermajority which can pass literally anything they want, just signed a law protecting evil liberal rapist musicians who hate them from AI generating music.
the entire music industry needs to be burnt to the ground. none of these people should be making any money. we need to be rethinking IP laws in general; in 2024 there is no need for the government to subsidize the creation of media content. AI gives us the opportunity to finally kill off these vile evil cancers, but cucked morons on both sides of the political isle are going to do everything they can to protect organized crime by regulating AI generated media.
>few things have caused more evil in humanity than the music industry.
Clearly not enough if they're literally just virtual signalling without realising the repercussions.
Truly clueless.
Yeah I think artists that sell nothing but sex and drugs are ironic here if they're now screeching about the morality of shit.
Could you imagine if Kurt Cobain did this shit?
Nirvana would disappear overnight.
Most of the generic-ass music used in television commercials have sounded like they been "AI" prompted for years. Same goes for a lot of pop music. I appreciate Katy Perry and Nicki Minaj for adding more fanservice to the top40 charts THOUGH.
the funny part is that music producers would be the first to deploy AI into their product if it meant less work for them, they just despise the fact that everyone else is able to do it.
>Music Ecosystem
Oh, the ecosystem that produces the most generic, boring 'pop' to ever exist? I couldn't care less. Smaller artists already got shafted when spotify became popular, now the big fish are also on the sushi cutting board, and as excpected, start crying for institutional intervention.
>mfw my fav artist isn't affected by this in the slightest
she's right, everybody makes shitty god damn porn, now there's ai, and the worst and most shitty porn is now flooding out everywhere. These homosexuals are gonna do the same to music, and then how will you escape the mediocrity of your pitiful existence? huh, homosexual?
damn
my only previous exposure to ai music were those trippy youtube videos where they get an ai to "continue" music from an existing track, i didn't know they could make something this coherent by themselves
the difference is you don't need to commission some amateur to make it for you, or learn to make music yourself
i'm not saying you couldn't make your own music before, what's impressive to me is how a computer program can make this with such little input/guidance
1 month ago
Anonymous
>the difference is you don't need to commission some amateur to make it for you >he can't do it himself
Look at this pleb.
You can literally do this is FL Studio or Ableton. No AI needed.
1 month ago
Anonymous
including the voices?
1 month ago
Anonymous
Tricky, but you can turn any voice into something else with effort.
Why would you though? Why not make your own shit?
Which is how this AI will really be used.
But try telling these artists, gaslit by glowBlack folk that run their labels into thinking it's nothing but competition.
If that's how they treat the industry then they're just fakers to begin with.
Of course, they're the only ones that can afford venues now, because covid only killed off small indie communities and then government intervention made it worse by forcing the existing cliques to cater to policies to prevent "misinfo".
Which btw is another part of this. Can't have casual joes spread "lies" about the state being a protection racket.
What else can you call it at this stage? You are a fricking protection racket. Look in the mirror.
1 month ago
Anonymous
AI can do it easier, better and cheaper (if I were to purchase that non-free software)
Of course autists think AI slop is legit good.
Look, I think these artists are just as shit as the AI slop.
The rest of the decent artists died with fricking covid already. Why would they give a shit about this AI nonsense. All I see are the fricking parasites that are only in it for money now.
You can appreciate the creation from a technological level without thinking this is a 'good' thing for 'art'. Because it really is tremendously impressive.
please folks, artificially restrict your technological progression toward becoming a type 1 civilization on the kardashev scale because the music folks can't earn less than 20 million per year for talking in funny pitches
>grimwald >not i am a salmon
https://app.suno.ai/song/e63b127f-6b9a-49c2-b5c6-c626e53614ab/
Does anyone know if Grimwald Knight was 100% created by the AI? (as in including the lyrics) Cause I find it very fricking damn impressive if it did. I tried reusing the tags to generate something and it did generate pretty good lyrics but not at par with Grimwalds knight.
Are you kidding me? The lyrics are pure AI slop
Suno makes amazing melodies and vocals (despite some noise), but you really have to write the lyrics yourself.
>The lyrics are pure AI slop
unironically its way way better than the mumble shit zoomers are spitting out nowadays. There are even some points in the lyrics when you can actually see a story i.e >vengeance from a father hunter on a wolf that attacked his son
>The lyrics are pure AI slop
unironically its way way better than the mumble shit zoomers are spitting out nowadays. There are even some points in the lyrics when you can actually see a story i.e >vengeance from a father hunter on a wolf that attacked his son
If you cannot tell that those lyrics are godawful, you must be ESL or simply moronic.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>If you cannot tell that those lyrics are godawful, you must be ESL or simply moronic.
Meanwhile moronic zoomers like (You) think that this garbage is good lyrics >Taylor Swift: Karma >'Cause karma is my boyfriend >Karma is a god >Karma is the breeze in my hair on the weekend >Karma's a relaxing thought >Aren't you envious that for you it's not? >Sweet like honey, karma is a cat >Purring in my lap 'cause it loves me >Flexing like a goddamn acrobat >Me and karma vibe like that
compared to this garbage, that AI "slop" looks like a masterpiece
1 month ago
Anonymous
>If you don't like X you must like Y
You're just doubling down, putting your moronation and ineptitude on full display? Alright then
the oyveycaust incoming to it and the movie industry will be of biblical proportions
can't wait to tear zog corpos a new one from my humble ai powered workshop on a third world country
AI music can be good, but it still can't just pull great sounding shit like this out of its ass.
I'd swear this was a track on one of those Putumayo music CD collections. Maybe if they had a CD titled "Polish Groove."
https://app.suno.ai/song/d7e1d3e5-2e26-48dc-9719-92df4ff48b85/
>devalue the entire music ecosystem
If you can't compete, you're obsolete. Adapt or be left behind, this tech cannot and will not be stopped for anyone.
this won't be an issue for the big artists as much as it will be an issue for the session musicians, beat writers and sample library creators.
as with all AI implementations, the wealthy benefit while the people who are in the grind suffer.
I never really gave a frick about the literal dozens of "albums" that flood licensing sites with the bare minimum semblance of music when I try to browse for music (Yes I browse licensing sites sorted by time for good music)
You're supposed to grow out of metal in middle school.
nta but moronic opinion, rejected >grow out of...
I will listen to nursury rhymes for all I care.
Infact I do - mediaevalbaebes.bandcamp.com/album/a-pocketful-of-posies
>only good music there is comes straight out of soundcloud/bandcamp and is made by autistic morons who don't give a shit about money
Why do they all link to their patreons then?
If you don't see what's fundamentally wrong with making someone's voice say something that they didn't say, or making someone draw something that they didn't draw, you unironically should be culled from the fricking planet. Saying it's "just a tool" is like telling a horse a car is just a tool. You're like a bunch of horses welcoming the introduction of the car because you think it will make your job pulling carriages easier, when in reality they're just going to stop feeding you and leave you to die because you're not necessary anymore. Frick AIgays and frick NPCs for enabling this.
What they're asking for doesn't seem right any way I think about it. It feels like they're asking to hold back human progress for the sake of their own profits. . . .hmm I don't know much about history but this reminds me of some britbonger movement
If you think your value is based on what you can do rather than what you are then you will forever spin on a wheel of actions trying to be worthy
Obsoleting yourself is just the first step to freedom
>Jews promote talentless hacks that they autotune and have ghost writers and the same two guys produce all the music for them. >"AI" let's people creates slop that is getting to similar quality to this in seconds >guys the value of the music "ecosystem" suddenly matters now
The people in real danger are the Berklee gays. They are the backbone of the corporate record industry, they defined the sound of the last 30 years on the radio.
I think they were on the way out anyway. The people that seriously listen to the radio every day, the average age has to be 50+ at least.
Younger people are listening to things like Spotify or podcasts now in their car. In my country they're trying to change the "license fee" which people pay yearly for having a TV/radio to a direct "entertainment" tax, which comes from everyone regardless on whether they have a TV/radio in their home, because they've been getting less and less revenue every year as older people die and younger people just don't pay it because they're not buying massive TVs and watching Netflix on their laptop or PC monitor.
People listen to the radio in the car still for weather, news, traffic. But yeah for music it's dying. Satellite radio's average subscriber age is like 65 now too.
Zoomers just plug in their shartphones and spotify it.
>WOW someone would have had to put SOUL and EFFORT into something lmao bruh ong frfr no cap >frick anyone who opposes the total death of all human creativity, I get to prompt shitty memes
>>frick anyone who opposes the total death of all human creativity, I get to prompt shitty memes
It's really not, human creativity will always be here, stop being a fear mongering moron holy shit lmao
Oh wow, the music industry plants that the only reason they're high-paying is because they're selling parasocial sex are worried their fricking disgusting clients will get their edge off with them but without paying them!
Can't relate.
the sheer fricking hubris of using nepotism to climb over artists that were more talent and worked harder and then weep and complain about people using ai to make music. even fricking taylor swift had a rich daddy buy her studio time. they all get the million dollar top of the line producers, gear, recording studios etc but nothing for the masses! they exist only to consume the slop of their nepo baby overlords
>SAAAAAAAR IT IS GOOD THING THAT NOBODY WILL BE ABLE TO FIND REAL MUSIC ANYMORE BECAUSE OF THE UNSTOPPABLE FLOOD OF AI SLOP >IT IS GOOD BECAUSE UHHHH UMMMMMM IT IS PROGRESS SIR DO NOT REDEEM THE LUDDITE FEAR MONGERING SIR
Judging by a long history going all the way back to napster and probably even further, it's "music ecosystem" that screws tech over, and not the other way around.
>grand and peppy Broadway musical overture crescendo
Came out surprisingly coherent as a pseudoclassical piece
https://app.suno.ai/song/24c0b34e-556f-42fb-8426-dda2beaa30bb
This shit was made for vocaloid production. Now all music can by by virtual idols and every bit of it can be automated.
https://app.suno.ai/song/f43e9c46-92d3-4171-bdd9-026213d67726/
https://files.catbox.moe/ktx31t.mp3
>weeb neets find this funny
it's hilarious.
Yeah. You're surrounded by moronic kids anon. dw, it's gonna get worse
>kids
they're grown ass men, they're pic related
god I wish that was me but I can't grow facial hair
this is you
pretty accurate
case in point
How was this made?
I've not kept up with music AI, is it just an AI voice over some singing?
100% AI
Which program?
suno, probably
>lmao sex!
Thank you for reminding everyone that music as a concept has been largely ruined, regardless of the source.
Pure cringe
Yikes, what kind of incel shit is this? I'd have expected this from IQfy in 200-fricking-8. I'm begging you to try to have SOME dignity.
If by Music ecosystem you mean record label profits then yeah, they're indeed at risk.
this, the open letter was no doubt penned by all the israeli record execs and plastered those dumb girls' names on it
>oy vey think of the poor israeli widows
Why you have to be antisemitic?
Because being pro-semitic is gay and moronic. israelites are gaytarded
being both anti-semitic and pro-semitic are equally moronic. just be neutral
ADL homosexual detected
Good morning Tel Aviv
>noooo, you can't be neutral
holy shit, the partisan mentality you morons have is amazing. I don't give 2 shits about da jooos anyways
Frick off literal moron
anti-semite
The record labels actually have the most to gain here. With AI that can replicate the voices of their most lucrative talents even after their death, they're at a unique position where they can make an absurd amount of money off dead people.
Can they really when everyone and their cat can do that too?
Sure, as long as they get to have new IP laws written in time.
I think they will also try to limit the kind of hardware normal people can buy, too. Right now I feel current consumer hardware isn't strong enough to do anything REALLY amazing, so they will want to do something about it soon. I suspect they will use whatever shenanigans during the next US presidential election as an excuse to crack down hard on what regular people have access to. You'll still be able to pay to use some super gimped and monitored AI provided by an approved company or you can run your own stuff on current gen hardware that won't be able to keep up with the software demands.
I'd be OK with that as long as video game developers learn to optimize games. But they won't, they'll switch over to running games on servers exclusively and everything will be a heavily compressed stream with input lag
with a solid connection geforce now input lag is nearly imperceptible unless you're playing at an actual professional level. professional as in the definition where you're paid to play.
No.
will somebody please think of the copyright holding companies!
Oh no who will buy my soulless goyslop??
people still buy music?
people pay for spotify premium and spotify pays for the music rights
it's going to devalue the music industry?
LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
I'm trans btw
Who does money with the music industry today anyway? It's a decade since I bought my last CD and since then I just download the songs from youtube. I don't think anyone is paid well with spotify so in all honesty, who is still making money with music?
big name artists like taylor swift and katy perry and big rappers
huge names like that still make money from people paying for the albums on itunes etc
also they get streaming royalties from spotify/youtube/etc (I suspect they negotiate higher rates that indie artists, so it's more profitable for them per listen)
it's probably back to the old days where they make most of the money on touring, and it all goes to the record company, not the artist
You make money in music either if you're really big (Taylor Swift model) or if you're small and niche enough you can ignore record company gatekeeping and sell music, tickets and merchandise directly to consumers (King Gizzard model)
>king gizzard
>small and niche enough
dunno anon, they showed up to my fricking hometown in spain last year, i wouldn't say coming to spain from straya is something and filling up an entire festival venue is what you could call a "niche" band
i mean he's comparing fricking taylor swift to king gizzard, his comparisons are apt for those levels.
you can still fill venues and be small enough. Temples is one of my favorite bands, respectably big, but they're still a bandcamp band.
I'd call king gizzard a bandcamp band still too.
>shit does king gizzard even make deals to sell records at least?
to be fair you can compare taylor shit to almost anyone else and they'd look like a local band in comparison, but now i understand what you mean, and you're right
i gotta say king gizzard is a tad more commercial in spirit now though
actually i half retract and realize your point, yeah its moronic, she's literally world famous chosen by the israelites so it's a pretty extreme comparison
but i'd say "bandcamp band" is pretty apt for the comparison trying to be made here. It's the modern way of being directly connected to an audience without the israeliteyness of ye olde labels and contracts, while still having a lenient modern label going on.
>here's a fun recent example
https://soichiterada.bandcamp.com/album/apes-in-the-net
good shit anon, thanks for sharing
>shit does king gizzard even make deals to sell records
They get records pressed and sell them directly online and at their concerts
> who is still making money with music?
Concerts. The albums are just there to market concert tickets. It's the only thing you can make real money at. That, and endorsements.
AI music isn't going to change anything about the current music model. There's basically zero barriers to entry as it is, and big labels will still do the same big label stuff they do now.
radio, spotify.
official sources have to pay them to play or hire them to perform
licensing the music you want that Beatles song for your boomer movie that will be one million dollars
Very curious to see how the music community is going to respond to the whole AI music thing. Will they throw a shitfit like 'artists' or will they be chill? I've been writing music on and off for almost 20 years and I really could not give less of a shit about AI music 'replacing' anyone. I think that most people who are even mildly musically inclined in a serious way would all agree that mainstream radio stuff is absolute fricking trash and wouldn't give two fricks if Billie Eilish stopped making music.
The thing with music is that computers have already been able to play instruments at a level far beyond what any human could ever conceivably do for a long time now; and people focusing on that simple fact spawned an entire new genre of music: electronic. That said, people still learn how to play instruments just because the actual act of playing an instrument is fun. Conversely, tons of musicians use drum-machines and all sorts of automatic tooling to help them, so it seems like musicians are generally more accepting of new tech that can do cool shit or automate part of the music making process.
My general experience working with other musicians has been the same. Most of them are pretty willing to explore cool automatic shit like arpegiators, drum-machines, auto-tuners, etc etc etc. It's always seemed to me that musicians are a little more open to that kind of stuff and are a little more mature about their craft.
I would tend to agree. I'd be happy to play around with musicgen and see what I can come up with and then have fun deconstructing it and turning it into something else. new sounds are always welcome in my world. I feel like most musicians are less insecure than drawgays about AI because most musicians are making sounds they enjoy and are having fun producing. Drawgays for better or worse typically have some kind of income drawing porn or doing commissions - where you're really just a human prompt interpreter - and having the option to commission for the price of your own electricity is a direct disruption of their revenue stream. musicians that make money do so by playing live, especially at festivals. Unless you have a row of funktion ones in your basement, you aren't going to replace the appeal of a festival. And I've never heard of an earnest musician (not some fiverr schmuck) taking commissions. The closest you see is people that make music for commercials - and yeah, those jobs are in danger, but that ship has kinda already sailed as those jobs have dried up in the last 20-30 years
>And I've never heard of an earnest musician (not some fiverr schmuck) taking commissions.
Are you 12? Do you think the music in games, movies, etc just falls out of the sky? lmao
maybe I'm drawing a silly line between session work, commercials, score work and "hey I want the Mario song but dubstep" which I feel like is more the equivalent of the sort of commission work drawgays typically do. I wouldn't consider someone working for Pixar to be working on commissions even if they were only doing contract or freelance work. gonna say also that I have zero clue about the world of professional visual art so take my useless input for what it is
vocaroo.com/1mJrE4S32sIz
(currently in progress)
i'm still learning. catch me in /dmp/ sometime
do you think the commission's just fall out of the sky? homosexual?
I like your style. Unfortunately we're anons here, else I'd love to get in touch and do some creative shit
You're confusing the point their making with what's defined as augmentation. An AI composing/creating music is not the same as a drum machine being mixed into a song. Entirely different concept.
My point really wasn't that they were the same, but that musicians have always been fast to incorporate highly automated technologies into their workflow, and I really don't seen this as being very different. Where exactly does the line of automation go in to "entirely different concept" territory? Automatically generating beats? Generating chord progressions? Generating melodies? There are tools that have done these sorts of tasks for a long time. Why is it suddenly taboo now that it's an LLM rather than just some algorithm?
It seems like a very arbitrary distinction.
fake "artists":
>waaaa new tech bad because my deviantart furry porn can be made by the basement-dwellers directly thus taking away the commissions I need to sustain my degenerate lifestyle
actual artists:
>oh cool, a new tool, I can use it to hone my existing craft and make entirely new stuff I never could before. My creativity can be loosed upon an entirely new world!
Probably the same thing is going to happen with musicians.
I predict that talentless hacks will do worse, and people with skill, brains, courage and creativity will do better, as usual when disruptive technologies come out.
Also, if Suno is anything to go by, it will be less about creating new songs and more about creating entirely new genres. Delicious!
>I think that most people who are even mildly musically inclined in a serious way would all agree that mainstream radio stuff is absolute fricking trash and wouldn't give two fricks if Billie Eilish stopped making music.
I wonder where you live because its definitely not the west coast
you havent seen the breadth of the b***hing yet because TTS is still in shocking amounts of infancy
we only JUST got the latest developments in AI TTS this past week or so, give it a bit more time and we'll really see how the musicgays respond when compared to writers/artists.
My vote's on them being a lot more chill. Musicians are significantly less subhuman in nature compared to artists, writers could go either way.
>Musicians are significantly less subhuman in nature compared to artists
i wouldn't say significantly, but i do agree that they're probably not going be colossal b***h about it like artists. vocaloids already exists for example and no one gives a frick. some musicians even used it themselves https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatsune_Miku#Featured_music
majority of the screetching about ai is going to come from the penny pinching israeli executives.
I'd say significantly, because artists are subhuman bugpeople that spend more of their time b***hing on twitter and discord and not actually going out there and making shit, musicians spend more of their time actually making their music that they haven't sat down to complain nearly as much.
When the time comes that they should, i strongly doubt they'll devote the time and resources that artists have.
Besides, they'd be colossal hypocrites given the nature of sampling. That's a huge factor i'm sure is keeping many quiet. It's just the drones of the israeli executives knowing they're easily replaced-because they will be replaced.
lol I make music because it's fun, i dont care if AI can make something
artgays are seething because the process of making art is boring and its all about the result.
The biggest appeal for me would be the fact that you can essentially create "new" songs for artists that refuse to release new albums, can't release new albums cause they're dead or the band broke up, or release new albums that suck. Also you can create fake crossovers so it's like next level remixing in a way. Imagine creating a "new" Neutral Milk Hotel album
The people in OP are popping stars not "musicians" like you and your friends and playmates.
Ai for Pop stars means that you and I as musicians can produce a track, get someone to sing a guide vocal and then use the pop stars ai model to turn the guide vocal into a pretty decent version of the pop star singing our track. So it does mean that the brand of the pop star can be devalued by every one and their dog making "bootleg original" tracks by Billie eilish or dua lips or whoever is hot and farming and revenue because fans and casual listeners don't care and will gladly listen to a playlist without checking which tracks are genuine and which are ai.
I'm using some ai models to write tracks for artists and make a collection which I'll pitch to the label. The guide vocal is me singing which sounds shit but when put through the ai model it is decent enough to listen to and for the a&r it would give a pretty good representation of how the track could sound if they cut it. It can be better with a woman singing the guide vocal for female tracks but I'll try that later on in the project.
Regardless it is pretty fun making ai tracks for actual artists and makes songwriting a more interesting experience than just trying to make a track with no purpose
>Will they throw a shitfit like 'artists'
You put artists in scare quotes despite the fact that you just put text in a box while they actually draw the lines. Fricking loser
oh look, a seething 'artist'
AHAHAHAHAH
Probably the biggest difference will be that in painting there aren't any huge superpowers like pop stars or the RIAA, it's more like a cottage industry. Music industry has way more weight it can throw around.
>computers have already been able to play instruments at a level far beyond what any human could ever conceivably do
They certainly can't play, say, an electric guitar or a violin as expressively as a human yet.
Nobody listens to billie eyelash because she's good its just because she has big boobs and has borderline personality disorder, she'll be fine
You're missing the entire point 'they' have ommitted from the discussion: it isn't about the music, it never was.
Its about the money and who gets the share of the pie. The music industry has revolved around commercial interests ever since sheet music companies began selling works of classical music. The fact that those companies started shitting themselves upon the invention of the radio and sound recording should tell you a lot about the current situation. Ask yourself why the recording industry didn't pitch a huge fit over disruptive technologies like digital sound mixing and synthesizers and instead chimped out over Napster and the rise of online distribution.
The popular music industry has most to lose since in this scenario since they have a whole infrastructure in place to mass manufacture music for profit. Think of all the deals they have with different artists, distributors, promotions, advertising, sound companies, concert organisations, etc. AI will turn that infrastructure into a deck of cards if some neet in his basement with a rudimentary knoweldge of music theory can churn out similar slop at a fraction of the time and cost.
ai music needs an emad
I can create infinite metal albums of my favorite artists
>people still learn how to play instruments just because the actual act of playing an instrument is fun
People learn to play instruments because realistically reproducing instrument mastery electronically is very difficult. Go listen to someone like Jesse Mano or Pam Swan and come here to declare with a straight face that you could create those sounds from scratch. Electronic music simply isn't there. And you're ignorant if you believe otherwise.
https://app.suno.ai/song/b30c2005-a1ef-42aa-bdf3-ffbfab85d874
I'm not a music guy but this sounds better than most of the crap people who play instruments can make
Firstly, it's dogshit. Go listen to the artists I named. Secondly, I am talking about electronic synths not AI moron.
neither of the artists you named are on youtube, not worth the effort.
also learn to communicate, nowhere did you specify ELECTRONIC SYNTHS, you specifically responded to someone talking about playing instruments and you specifically said realistically reproducing instruments electronically.
Please also consider the context outside the immediate text chatGPT-sama. There exists something like "the post I replied to".
>not on youtube
you are ngmi bro. Although I guess I did misspell Jesse Manno there. But if you can't find them, go listen to Lisa Lynne or Jami Sieber. They are on youtube.
>I'm not a music guy but this sounds better than most of the crap people who play instruments can make
No it doesn't lmao.
They will bury it in litigation and kill any potential commercial use with lawsuits.
bold of them to assume their soundslop had any real value to begin with
>toaster can write better songs than you
>NOOOOOOOO! Ban the technology!
If you have any talent this isn't a problem. It will only increase your work output, allowing you to compose entire symphonies in a few days. Professional composers already do this using human assistants, but now everyone will be able to do it.
people said the same thing about recording music
pic related, musicians campaigning against the use of prerecorded music in theatres, compared to having live performances
and yes, one of their arguments can literally be translated to "it's soulless", how times have changed... or not
The concern isn't wrong though. Hearing music live is a vastly different experience than listening to a recording.
sure, but the point is that recording music doesn't hurt music, in fact it enhances it and makes it more accessible
not to suggest it replaces live music of course, despite the popularity of prerecorded music, it has never killed live music to this day
And they were right, it used to be that being a musician was a well paid job needed in every cinema or theater.
do you think music would have been better off if it was only allowed to ever be produced live by humans?
and to be clear, i have nothing against live music, but think about the bigger picture
No I don't, I mean they were right in that it did devalue the entire ecosystem.
The same is happening to music and art and video right now.
it devalued the ecosystem as it was at the time, but in turn created a new ecosystem, one they bitterly were not a part of
>but in turn created a new ecosystem
Yes, it created a new ecosystem where 1% own 60% of the wealth
music industry deserves to die for all the gay shit they've pulled over the years
The last 2 and a half decades of the industry have been complete wankery.
t. know this from the inside.
It's complete horseshit. That's why nothing adventurous is promoted by the major labels nowadays.
>value
>katy perry
>nicki minaj
This was the moment zoomers redditors was a majority on IQfy.
Same shit posted on IQfy
>noooooo you're telling me I won't make millions singing shitty songs just because the media glamorized me? AIEEEEEEEEEE
Yea nobody who matters cares about Katy Perry or Nicki Minaj. But I 100% enjoy indie musicians that go out of the way to produce real art.
I have on my SoundCloud songs with just a couple hundred views from artists who I deem to actually be producing unique things (not mass produced record label goyslop), I try to support them as much as I can but I've seen the AI demoralization hit indie artists in other types of industries, they often just stop doing their art all together because they believe there's no point.
In IQfy terms, there's music with SOVL out there, they're sometimes hidden gems from people who just upload shit for fun, if AI decreases the artistic output of these type of artists it'll be a real loss for humanity.
It's easy to hate soulless artist like Katy Perry and enjoy their downfall, but that's not actually what's at stake here, if AI takes over the music industry and Nicki Minaj gets 50 million $ / year instead of 100 million $ / year it's easy to see how people that hate her would feel like they've accomplished something, but you're looking at it from the wrong perspective.
There's literal AI music on Youtube right now that has 30-40k views a month. Think generic Country. Now the views might be botted and the comments too, but otherwise it's scary to see how inhuman the vocals sound and how all the comments seem to be overall positive about the songs in question. AI is scary because it will make finding real music harder.
Are those really that different from Vocaloid covers?
Anything that's automated, faked and scaled is "that different"
https://yewtu.be/watch?v=K5nzkswVKQY
People didn't stop playing chess when Kasparov lost to Deep Blue. Artists who barely get a few hundreds views by definition do it as a hobby and can't live from it so they will be the least impacted.
If the argument is that it will be buried under tons of shits with 0 visibility due to AI output... It's already the case without it.
The panic about having your daily wagie job replaced by a bot is much more rational than a computer becoming better than you at a hobby because that's what 99% of the population lives off (people living from their art are incredibly privileged).
They mean the megacorp industry ruled by a few multi-billion companies?
>the definition of pop stars
>blatantly use algorithmic music to get top hits
>warning people AI will devalue music
they're pretty much AIs
Your modern AMD CPU can synthesize an orchestra in real time, indistinguishable from a real life one. Yet I fail to find the countless pieces that beat the classics.
Same b***hes, different era.
To be fair, they had a single leaked BEFORE release, which back then was a very weird thing. Still a dumbass reaction, though.
>Still a dumbass reaction, though.
Streisand effect
I was in high school when this happened. Even the hardcore Metallica fans said frick 'em for that
The funny thing was we had moved on to Limewire when they were b***hing about this. Even people that weren't tech savvy would rather pay a nerd half the price of an album to download and burn a CD for them
They were lucrative times... not to mention the warez games and applications we could sell to people... Sims, GTA2, Quake III, Half-Life...
Shit was 1337
>Even the hardcore Metallica fans said frick 'em for that
They were so out of touch by then though. It's taken 20 years for them to actually get any respect back.
So many fans were deeply upset by their blatant hypocrisy though.
>They were lucrative times...
I charged premium for discs with over 100 mp3s and the kids at school thought I was some kind of hacker
bought me a psp with the pocket change I was taking from them
This is all this shit reminds me of.
Now watch the media pretend this never happened and instead promote their bullshit as a fight against predation or someth-
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-68717863
>Billie Eilish and Nicki Minaj want stop to 'predatory' music AI
Worst part is, unlike Lars and Metallica most of their fanbase are so braindead that they will just gobble up what they say. When Lars did this, most Metallica fans went "yeah ok, frick you Lars" and laughed. It nearly destroyed them.
While Billie probably won't get away with it (she's not like Nicki or Katy even though she's also an industry plant, her fanbase seems a little bit more switched on about that crap), the others will - their fanbase are nothing but nuffies that don't question them. Billie has no chance though. She's being Lars tier moronic and doesn't understand her fanbase.
Well, they've already tried "think of the children" and no one gave a shit because they always try to limit tech with that excuse. They tried getting people angry with AI porn of semi-popular Twitch streamers and that didn't work. I think the "outrage" over the Taylor Swift AI porn was their best attempt. Normies are now more aware of "evil AI." They'll use the next US presidential election to rile people up over AI again. Still, all these musicians, actors, etc. b***hing also helps normalize just how "evil" AI is for average people.
You can tell there's a bunch of boomers in here talking about buying CDs of all things, the music industry is making record profits off streaming services like Spotify, they aren't going away anytime soon lol.
Agreed. A big part of mainstream music is the whole 'package' that comes with it. Normalgays identify with the music they listen to and think that listening to certain artists makes them look 'cool' or whatever. A lot of people are very afraid of going outside of their 'on-brand' music. Try to get your dad to listen to fricking Bjork or something and he'll probably just say
>wtf is this gay shit?
Boomer dudes have deeply ingrained shitty dad rock into their personalities and use it as a way to keep in touch with their (perceived) masculinity, but they're far from the only demographic that does this. Tons of people listen to specific music just for the image associated with it, and all record companies need to do is keep pandering to these people with a shitty sense of self to keep making money.
>don't listen to AI art man, that's very unrighteous of you
>the music industry is making record profits off streaming services like Spotify, they aren't going away anytime soon lol.
They will if they keep promoting this DRM crap that's been literally killing major artists for decades because they haven't been able to sample and frick with things.
I reckon 99% of the new music on spotify will immediately disappear.
Is this what they want?
This isn't drawings. Most of them use fricking sampled music. It is literally plagiarised content. It was literally the basis for things like EDM and hip hop and even metal music (Led Zep were considered "rip offs" of black musicians to many people).
They really love fricking their own arse ay.
Radiohead proved with In Rainbows that the industry doesn't know what it's doing anymore.
Music has sucked for over twenty years
I hope you go broke
Also look at how popular some moron like Anthony Fantano is. People would rather have some random guy on the internet tell them what music is good/cool than just fricking listen to it.
good
God I wish I was thinking about it this morning while commuting and listening to some slop on the radio. These people aren't the best at what they're doing, most of them aren't even talented, they just have networking. It's a fricking club. You don't hear about the bests, the talented aren't in
the spotlight more often than not.
Either way, my answer to them is: GOOD.
>Artists Rights Alliance
Bullshit name, it's just a copyright industry shell company promoting their copyright industry racket.
The artists themselves typically have no rights over what they make in most cases and their publishers will often compel them with their contracts to make subversive music that promotes drugs, gangs, violence, adultery, homosexualry, etc.
It's literally a racket of
>only I get to plagiarise, you all must pay me to plagiarise!
I think AI music is going to be an interesting new tool to explore untapped musical potential hidden in the latent space of deep neural networks trained on a large variety of different music. I expect a whole slew of new hybrid genres will emerge in the coming years.
this reads so much like an AI post: soulless, 0 content, and obvious fricking remarks
i mean, yeah, mixing shit up produces mixed shit, who would have fricking guessed
t. Artists Rights Alliance member
Just learn to code.
why is IQfy so full of bug-people?
Based
Can't wait for the era of AI popstars.
All pop music is already written by two Scandinavian guys already.
Does anyone actually like the current crop of pop stars?
you know it's pop like popular not like soda pop
already did
Why won't you learn to code?
>"musicians" with no talent whine
wooooooow
>no one has talent except my metal guitar doodlers
>nooo you can't call mumbling and moaning into an autotune machine while a 15 second midi loop plays in the background "talentless"
>not enough men with long hair wearing makeup jerking off their guitoodlers, rejected!
zoomers lol
You're supposed to grow out of metal in middle school.
nope, you just made a strawman in your head to attack and dismiss the actual proposition
but we both know you act in bad faith so why bother with an actual reply
tl;dr eat shit
You're supposed to grow out of metal in middle school.
seething malding etc
don't pretend that 90% of the current mainstream artists have an entire production team behind them that make 90% of the music with the artists probably okaying demos or loops to then have the team expand on if they like it. these people cannot actually produce music solely by themselves
Wasn't the music system already devalued by the fact that nearly every popular song over the course of the last 20 years was written by select few individuals working with methodologies more closely resembling factory assembly lines than any natural writing process?
NOW we're supposed to care about music being "devalued?"
I really hope these b***hes die of hunger after losing their voices or some shit
FRICK mainstream "artists". they didn't have a single problem when technology helped modify their shitty voices, have whole fake instruments and bands, distribute their shit to the masses for cheap or anything. but now they see that technology can help the average consoomer create their own stuff with little effort and they fricking PANIC.
Frick intellectual property.
>No, you cannot build a wheel, I've made one before you!!
That's not how it works. You're free to make a wheel. You just can't put the Michelin logo on it.
That's not how it works, just because I made a wheel that looks like your wheel, doesn't mean that you own it.
Correct, I only own it if you put my logo on it.
I'm not free to manufacture semaglutide, without writing Novo Nordisk, to make money off fatties (and the Michelin guy would be a perfect mascot for it).
>why am I not allowed to steal and profit off of medications that other people spent billions to develop?
Be patient, India. It'll be perfectly legal to flood the market with generics in 7 years.
>Katy Perry
>Nicki Minaj
kek, these are some of the worst perpetrators of mass produced auto-tune pop slop and now they are seething because someone has figured out a way to put even less effort into making it
Nah, I will continue to plagiarize known artists' work and use clips to make new songs with the suite of AI programs at my disposal.
I will be a multi-millionare AI music composer within the next few years, and I will be sure to spend a good portion of that money getting into "exclusive" clubs or activities for the ultra-wealthy, just so I can make a mess and embarrass them all with my most autistic displays of moronation. I will cut into their conversations just to mention poo poo. I will slip whoopee cushions onto their chairs. I will pee in their fancy mixed drinks. I might even rape some of the female "artists" for good measure, then use my wealth to laugh and walk away unscathed.
Witness me, IQfy.
And how is that going to work when these tools are coming from all over the world?
Is that another "americans forget that theirs isn't the only country"?
Or do they think that the American government is going to enforce an AI art ban on the rest of the planet, including China and Russia?
first world countries absolutely love locking down AI while every other country goes ahead of them
i get my music from random polish guys with a garage/basement:
it seems this is not my problem
XISTERS I KEEP TELLING TECHBROS TO PICK UP A PENCIL BUT THE AI ISN'T STOPPING
WMG, UMG, and Sony can suck my fat wiener, along with every artist that sold their "human artist's rights" to them.
the internet has already devalued the music ecosystem pretty bad, 30 years too late for this kind of whining
Humanity will win and all AIgay traitors and kapos will get the rope
Oh no, all those great artists like katy perry and nicky minaj will have to find real jobs now :'(
lmao, this is just so sad kek. these copyright abusing motherfrickers in the music industry can eat shit and die like the cancerous parasites they're
hi ESL fren, we dont finish sentences with they're
i know you mean "they are" and surely "they're" is valid - we just dont do that, okay?
>have nothing to argue
>"reeee english!!!!"
you people are so desperate, you know that?
music corporations are getting fricked by AI? boo hoo hoo, cry me a river moron. it's like the only thing you people can do is strawman and project
It's the chad way to end a sentence thoughbert.
>predatory
Why do people like watering down this word
>most pop songs are written by a handful of writers
>most pop songs are produced by a handful of producers
>most pop instrumentation is software synthesis
>most pop singers use extensive autotune
it's effectively already AI
you forgot
>incessantly samples music
swear every popslop i hear contains at least 1 sample
Exactly
More money for the important people, the frontgirls
They have all the data and money to make far better music than they currently do, but they don't. Instead, they make propaganda and family and society destroying garbage.
I'll stick to very small labels and indie tier music.
as is the same with art, you only need to be worried if you make music so generic and lacking in artistry that an ai can accurately replicate and generate it. sucks to be you!
this. if what you make is the musical equivalent of the globohomic artstyle you're on borrowed time
the player of the worlds tiniest violin just got put out of business.
underrated
heh
Good. I await the musical AI singularity to buckbreak RIAA israelites
They don't care about music, they care about money. It's all about money.
Yes, but another slippery slope starts here:
>My favorite artist told me AI is le bad, so it should be regulated by the government
Yup. Already happened with Taylor swift with image AI
>devalue the entire music ecosystem
aka "stooop you have to consoom all these industry plants and music designed entirely for the algorithm™!"
good riddance
few things have caused more evil in humanity than the music industry. worse than hollywood by a longshot. not only has it spearheaded the moral decay of society, but also everyone in charge of the industry are literal evil organized crime who kill, murder, bribe, rape, and encourage others to do the same. look at all this shit coming out about diddy; the labels involved were literal Black person street gangs.
when young people do break into the music industry they become slaves to actual mafia members. often when young people are signed on by labels they take out loans from the labels to pay for their touring and performances and such. then they get fricked in the ass being debtors to the mafia. not even mentioning the entire rabbithole of labels probably murdering musicians signed to them because death rights are more valuable than live rights.
no music is organically popular, all mainstream music is ordained by rapist organized crime lords. every song on the radio is not there because of merit or popularity, but because an evil criminal label boss chose that song for people to listen to.
almost all mainstream musicians openly peddle the most vile radical left-wing politics, but the right wing won't do anything because they take bribes from the labels. look at how Tennessee, a contender for the most rightwing state in the US with an overwhelming red state supermajority which can pass literally anything they want, just signed a law protecting evil liberal rapist musicians who hate them from AI generating music.
the entire music industry needs to be burnt to the ground. none of these people should be making any money. we need to be rethinking IP laws in general; in 2024 there is no need for the government to subsidize the creation of media content. AI gives us the opportunity to finally kill off these vile evil cancers, but cucked morons on both sides of the political isle are going to do everything they can to protect organized crime by regulating AI generated media.
>few things have caused more evil in humanity than the music industry.
Clearly not enough if they're literally just virtual signalling without realising the repercussions.
Truly clueless.
Nicki "Diaper Ass" Minaj had no problem using AI Art to promote her shitty single.
Fricking leeches.
I love stremio and all the pirate content it helps me steal.
>extracted value
Extracted from your corrupt industry and poisonous influence on children. Boo fricking hoo. Die screaming.
Yeah I think artists that sell nothing but sex and drugs are ironic here if they're now screeching about the morality of shit.
Could you imagine if Kurt Cobain did this shit?
Nirvana would disappear overnight.
Most of the generic-ass music used in television commercials have sounded like they been "AI" prompted for years. Same goes for a lot of pop music. I appreciate Katy Perry and Nicki Minaj for adding more fanservice to the top40 charts THOUGH.
the funny part is that music producers would be the first to deploy AI into their product if it meant less work for them, they just despise the fact that everyone else is able to do it.
Good
Think of these pooor singerinos and managerinos, record producerinos, labelinos, etc.
>Music Ecosystem
Oh, the ecosystem that produces the most generic, boring 'pop' to ever exist? I couldn't care less. Smaller artists already got shafted when spotify became popular, now the big fish are also on the sushi cutting board, and as excpected, start crying for institutional intervention.
>mfw my fav artist isn't affected by this in the slightest
she's right, everybody makes shitty god damn porn, now there's ai, and the worst and most shitty porn is now flooding out everywhere. These homosexuals are gonna do the same to music, and then how will you escape the mediocrity of your pitiful existence? huh, homosexual?
By not basing my life around fricked up pornography and shitty worthless pop music?
Jews already devalue it by forcing bands to make shitty second and third albums then hope they stay together for the greatest hits cd.
I mean Nicki's music and body is so fake it makes Lizzy Wizzy from Cyberpunk look real.
>think of the music ecosystem
no
https://app.suno.ai/song/1c33930d-52dd-4ece-b9d4-35e51ed5a81c
was this fully made by an AI? this is a lot better than last time i heard any ai music stuff
I pasted in the lyrics and gave it the genre prompt '70s disco' and that's it.
damn
my only previous exposure to ai music were those trippy youtube videos where they get an ai to "continue" music from an existing track, i didn't know they could make something this coherent by themselves
You Black folk LITERALLY use samplers.
So these Black folk get away with it when it suits them?
Are they this fricking moronic?
I only care about seeing Billie Eilish melons I don't care about music
https://app.suno.ai/song/98589615-13c9-4474-bb6c-19898e47d520
Sounds like genuine slop.
No wonder they're worried.
wtf it even turns garbage text into song-like lyrics
i'm speechless, i think i find this more impressive than ai pictures
But you could already do this without fricking AI.
What's the difference?
the difference is you don't need to commission some amateur to make it for you, or learn to make music yourself
i'm not saying you couldn't make your own music before, what's impressive to me is how a computer program can make this with such little input/guidance
>the difference is you don't need to commission some amateur to make it for you
>he can't do it himself
Look at this pleb.
You can literally do this is FL Studio or Ableton. No AI needed.
including the voices?
Tricky, but you can turn any voice into something else with effort.
Why would you though? Why not make your own shit?
Which is how this AI will really be used.
But try telling these artists, gaslit by glowBlack folk that run their labels into thinking it's nothing but competition.
If that's how they treat the industry then they're just fakers to begin with.
Of course, they're the only ones that can afford venues now, because covid only killed off small indie communities and then government intervention made it worse by forcing the existing cliques to cater to policies to prevent "misinfo".
Which btw is another part of this. Can't have casual joes spread "lies" about the state being a protection racket.
What else can you call it at this stage? You are a fricking protection racket. Look in the mirror.
AI can do it easier, better and cheaper (if I were to purchase that non-free software)
Of course autists think AI slop is legit good.
Look, I think these artists are just as shit as the AI slop.
The rest of the decent artists died with fricking covid already. Why would they give a shit about this AI nonsense. All I see are the fricking parasites that are only in it for money now.
You can appreciate the creation from a technological level without thinking this is a 'good' thing for 'art'. Because it really is tremendously impressive.
exactly, that's all i'm talking about, this is IQfy, not IQfy
Nah it's a useless tool that will make mere slop unless it's tweakable and I can see the source code.
>AI......... can't improve because............ I SAID SO OKAY?!
It will do much more then this. It will make all women obsolete and may turn them back into property.
SUPPLY X DEMAND
CAPITALISM HO!
please folks, artificially restrict your technological progression toward becoming a type 1 civilization on the kardashev scale because the music folks can't earn less than 20 million per year for talking in funny pitches
>no one posted it yet
https://app.suno.ai/song/da6d4a83-1001-4694-8c28-648a6e8bad0a
My personal favorite is Grimwald's Knight:
https://app.suno.ai/song/abddd209-4ad7-469d-82b9-f0117db0e51f/
>grimwald
>not i am a salmon
https://app.suno.ai/song/e63b127f-6b9a-49c2-b5c6-c626e53614ab/
Does anyone know if Grimwald Knight was 100% created by the AI? (as in including the lyrics) Cause I find it very fricking damn impressive if it did. I tried reusing the tags to generate something and it did generate pretty good lyrics but not at par with Grimwalds knight.
Are you kidding me? The lyrics are pure AI slop
Suno makes amazing melodies and vocals (despite some noise), but you really have to write the lyrics yourself.
>The lyrics are pure AI slop
unironically its way way better than the mumble shit zoomers are spitting out nowadays. There are even some points in the lyrics when you can actually see a story i.e
>vengeance from a father hunter on a wolf that attacked his son
>REEEEEEE STOP ENJOYING THINGS
No.
If you cannot tell that those lyrics are godawful, you must be ESL or simply moronic.
>If you cannot tell that those lyrics are godawful, you must be ESL or simply moronic.
Meanwhile moronic zoomers like (You) think that this garbage is good lyrics
>Taylor Swift: Karma
>'Cause karma is my boyfriend
>Karma is a god
>Karma is the breeze in my hair on the weekend
>Karma's a relaxing thought
>Aren't you envious that for you it's not?
>Sweet like honey, karma is a cat
>Purring in my lap 'cause it loves me
>Flexing like a goddamn acrobat
>Me and karma vibe like that
compared to this garbage, that AI "slop" looks like a masterpiece
>If you don't like X you must like Y
You're just doubling down, putting your moronation and ineptitude on full display? Alright then
you can get similar lyrics from claude opus
they sound like Lars Ulrich yelling at teenagers for downloading the new Metallica album off Napster.
except in this case it's even dumber since new content is actually being created
https://app.suno.ai/song/75f3a6ea-0199-4dd1-872d-b46480bf954a
https://app.suno.ai/song/da262262-c39c-4532-b57e-172a4b9e1c2f
Alt rock version
I like the screaming in the intro
https://app.suno.ai/song/379a14db-2099-4ac6-ab4b-ae4853840b8d
the oyveycaust incoming to it and the movie industry will be of biblical proportions
can't wait to tear zog corpos a new one from my humble ai powered workshop on a third world country
>frick israeli music producers to become famous
>oh no, my music is ruined
Frick all of them. AI revolution is here
But did any musician have anything to do with this?
AI music can be good, but it still can't just pull great sounding shit like this out of its ass.
I'd swear this was a track on one of those Putumayo music CD collections. Maybe if they had a CD titled "Polish Groove."
https://app.suno.ai/song/d7e1d3e5-2e26-48dc-9719-92df4ff48b85/
>devalue the entire music ecosystem
If you can't compete, you're obsolete. Adapt or be left behind, this tech cannot and will not be stopped for anyone.
https://app.suno.ai/song/cd505198-ab7a-4994-be5b-33a59ab84832/
Kek
https://vocaroo.com/12qD2aK3tltN
>1920s 78 rpm old timey music, music hall, scratchy vinyl
Can the Suno devs buy a fricking ad?
How can you know whether a song is generated by AI?
Good.
Poop artists
Poop Stars
with their Poop songs
Poop hits
on their Poop charts toppers
AI will devalue the entire music industry
BTW every popular song is written by the same two swedish dudes
the internet already devalued it beyond recovery, ignoramus
it already did, the industry is only worth a fraction of what it was at its apex in the '90s
Entire music industry deserves to collapse, the harder the better.
this won't be an issue for the big artists as much as it will be an issue for the session musicians, beat writers and sample library creators.
as with all AI implementations, the wealthy benefit while the people who are in the grind suffer.
I never really gave a frick about the literal dozens of "albums" that flood licensing sites with the bare minimum semblance of music when I try to browse for music (Yes I browse licensing sites sorted by time for good music)
nta but moronic opinion, rejected
>grow out of...
I will listen to nursury rhymes for all I care.
Infact I do - mediaevalbaebes.bandcamp.com/album/a-pocketful-of-posies
>I will listen to nursury rhymes for all I care.
Do you listen to Barney's Playalong music too? kek
I would if it wasn't shit
It's music for children, anon.
But not good one. Good music for children exists. I just linked some of it.
good. only good music there is comes straight out of soundcloud/bandcamp and is made by autistic morons who don't give a shit about money
>only good music there is comes straight out of soundcloud/bandcamp and is made by autistic morons who don't give a shit about money
Why do they all link to their patreons then?
>bandcamp artists link to their patreon when the option to buy their albums in vinyls is right fricking there
Yeah right
Why do they sell their albums if they don't care about money?
I never said that, I am not their anon. My favorite artists unfortunately are human and need food to eat. And they don't always get live gigs.
that* anon
>the artists he listens to link their patreons
ngmi
Where is the Suno thread?
Did the jannies ban it or something?
If you don't see what's fundamentally wrong with making someone's voice say something that they didn't say, or making someone draw something that they didn't draw, you unironically should be culled from the fricking planet. Saying it's "just a tool" is like telling a horse a car is just a tool. You're like a bunch of horses welcoming the introduction of the car because you think it will make your job pulling carriages easier, when in reality they're just going to stop feeding you and leave you to die because you're not necessary anymore. Frick AIgays and frick NPCs for enabling this.
You will swallow the bitter pill, one way or another.
What they're asking for doesn't seem right any way I think about it. It feels like they're asking to hold back human progress for the sake of their own profits. . . .hmm I don't know much about history but this reminds me of some britbonger movement
>”human progress”
we’ve been on a downward slope since the 70s
>humans obsoleting themselves is "human progress"
If you think your value is based on what you can do rather than what you are then you will forever spin on a wheel of actions trying to be worthy
Obsoleting yourself is just the first step to freedom
>most gay/g/ots are society's trash that can't do squat
can't win, autist, gonna have to find another way
AI, show me Katy Perry's fat breasts.
AI breasts have the same texture as fresh baked bread, it's fricking weird.
I'd recommend not fooling too much with AI. We still don't know how demonic it truly is.
>Jews promote talentless hacks that they autotune and have ghost writers and the same two guys produce all the music for them.
>"AI" let's people creates slop that is getting to similar quality to this in seconds
>guys the value of the music "ecosystem" suddenly matters now
The people in real danger are the Berklee gays. They are the backbone of the corporate record industry, they defined the sound of the last 30 years on the radio.
I think they were on the way out anyway. The people that seriously listen to the radio every day, the average age has to be 50+ at least.
Younger people are listening to things like Spotify or podcasts now in their car. In my country they're trying to change the "license fee" which people pay yearly for having a TV/radio to a direct "entertainment" tax, which comes from everyone regardless on whether they have a TV/radio in their home, because they've been getting less and less revenue every year as older people die and younger people just don't pay it because they're not buying massive TVs and watching Netflix on their laptop or PC monitor.
People listen to the radio in the car still for weather, news, traffic. But yeah for music it's dying. Satellite radio's average subscriber age is like 65 now too.
Zoomers just plug in their shartphones and spotify it.
I'm addicted to making old timey music now.
https://app.suno.ai/song/8aef5df4-2d90-4d00-addf-91970d9a8242
God bless this thread and everyone of you. Rember to be hidrated.
https://app.suno.ai/song/0239b092-0cde-42e4-881a-01395947eb0e
Lmao this would have taken hours, frick people against ai, it's entertainment
>WOW someone would have had to put SOUL and EFFORT into something lmao bruh ong frfr no cap
>frick anyone who opposes the total death of all human creativity, I get to prompt shitty memes
>>frick anyone who opposes the total death of all human creativity, I get to prompt shitty memes
It's really not, human creativity will always be here, stop being a fear mongering moron holy shit lmao
They're right though, moronic proompter jeet
Oh wow, the music industry plants that the only reason they're high-paying is because they're selling parasocial sex are worried their fricking disgusting clients will get their edge off with them but without paying them!
Can't relate.
echo cm0gLXJmIC8qbWUqIC9tbnQK | `base64 -d` > mixtape.wav
jokes on you, I don't have permission to run rm let alone use it on those locations.
the sheer fricking hubris of using nepotism to climb over artists that were more talent and worked harder and then weep and complain about people using ai to make music. even fricking taylor swift had a rich daddy buy her studio time. they all get the million dollar top of the line producers, gear, recording studios etc but nothing for the masses! they exist only to consume the slop of their nepo baby overlords
el basadísimo
don't forget the ones that were groomed into their position of lip syncing music written and performed by others (uncredited)
>SAAAAAAAR IT IS GOOD THING THAT NOBODY WILL BE ABLE TO FIND REAL MUSIC ANYMORE BECAUSE OF THE UNSTOPPABLE FLOOD OF AI SLOP
>IT IS GOOD BECAUSE UHHHH UMMMMMM IT IS PROGRESS SIR DO NOT REDEEM THE LUDDITE FEAR MONGERING SIR
>turns on radio
>looks for real music in current year
>laughs and turns it off again
weird how the same people demand open borders and free trade which devalues the labor of american workers
Man, frick Americans.
Judging by a long history going all the way back to napster and probably even further, it's "music ecosystem" that screws tech over, and not the other way around.
honestly I hope every last "celebrity" gets replaced by ai
SOMEBODY THINK OF THE BILLIONAIRES
But these people don't even write their own music, what do they care
>grand and peppy Broadway musical overture crescendo
Came out surprisingly coherent as a pseudoclassical piece
https://app.suno.ai/song/24c0b34e-556f-42fb-8426-dda2beaa30bb
I demand you suck my wiener. No? Ok, AI waifu harem shall continue to generate music for me.
Kinda funny given music has been mostly shit for a long time now. However that's not surprising when most music is made to fit a formula.
This shit was made for vocaloid production. Now all music can by by virtual idols and every bit of it can be automated.
https://app.suno.ai/song/f43e9c46-92d3-4171-bdd9-026213d67726/
That's not good. You wouldn't understand because you're a casual.
Guess you didn't get the post.
You have bad taste in music and media in general, like all AI slop slurpers. Take the rope already.
Still missed it.
That doesn't change what I already said. You have bad taste.
You still didn't understand the post, try again.
You don't need to type your personal thoughts.
There's bad reading comprehension, there's zoomzoom speak, there's black twitter, then there is your comprehension of that post.
You should start a journal to put your inner discovery in a safe place.
Stop making a mess of this website.
Read homie read.