It's pretty funny how OP was clearly making a joke based on ANCIENT behavior that doesn't exist in ANY modern file manager, proprietary or otherwise, and hasn't for several decades. But then Loonixcels instantly went on the defensive for some reason (
but this makes sense
>he thinks the file manager should implement some Black personlicious pattern finding algorithm that tokenizes the filename and attempts to find common places with numbers in all filenames
I'm sorry, but sorting by character code is just a simpler and better solution.
>This is how it's supposed to sort.
Says who?
my uncle works at nintendo and he told me this is how it's supposed to work.
) and tried to claim this inane sorting method ackshually makes sense, despite their OS of choice not using it either.
IQfy will defend anything just to be contrarian.
On the other hand, it also nice symbolizes how YOTLD will never happen. >freetards fix thing >winjeets cry about it anyway until the end of time
2 years ago
Anonymous
>our os is just so leet and epic and better than your winblows or igayos >we put basic features into our hobby os DECADES after windows or macos
Pick one.
2 years ago
Anonymous
linux has had multiple workstations for 20 years, wasn't added to windows until recently
2 years ago
Anonymous
>shitty esl bot gives shitty esl bot replies
If you mean multiple desktops, Windows 3.1 had one in its Resource Kit in 1992 (called TopDesk). Windows NT had foundation support for multiple desktops since its release in 1993.
You see, multiple desktops are a poorgay thing, for losers like you who can't afford multiple monitors. People with jobs, lives, etc. have never needed them. Hell, on 90%+ of Windows 10 installs, the multiple desktop feature is one of the first things that are turned off.
TL;DR: freetards BTFO again for the thousandth time this microsecond.
2 years ago
Anonymous
In my experience, it was more because Linux had such shitty multi-monitor support. It's only in the last few years that it's gotten usable. It's why it birthed such horrors as x2x to work around it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Uh-oh. Freesisters better report this thread, and hope the jannies clean it up before they embarass themselves any further.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>You see, multiple desktops are a poorgay thing,
Sour grapes.
Microsoft actually had plans to add true virtual desktops to Windows (and not just that awful toy you could download from MSDN) ages ago. They left it out because the average Windows user is so fricking dumb that it confused the QA testers.
Not even Macgays are this dumb.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>sour grapes >when it's been part of not just the window manager >but right down to the session manager >for 30 fricking years >and nobody cared to write the 10 loc to implement it, not even ms
The copium overdose required to achieve this take.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>not even ms
Not like anyone else could have implemented it.
Only in a freetard's mind. This is how it's supposed to sort.
[...]
Too hard for the unemployed "programmers" working on open-source software?
look like a joke to you? Everyone knows windows explorer has filename sorting that somewhat implements this.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I, the second person you quoted, am not OP, lmao. Just realized freetards were actually willing to defend shitty, user-unfriendly sorting, and took that opportunity to have fun at your expense.
As someone pointed out, this is exactly why year of the Linux desktop will never happen. Linux fixes thing, Winjeets complain about it years after they're fixed, and freetards claim it's a feature instead of simply telling them - perhaps not even realizing - it's already been fixed.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>instead of simply telling them - perhaps not even realizing - it's already been fixed.
That is not what I meant. If someone is actually using Linux and genuinely complaining about it, they won't even notice, and if they're arguing in bad faith they'll just respond to this with accusations of lying.
Only in a freetard's mind. This is how it's supposed to sort.
>he thinks the file manager should implement some Black personlicious pattern finding algorithm that tokenizes the filename and attempts to find common places with numbers in all filenames
I'm sorry, but sorting by character code is just a simpler and better solution.
Too hard for the unemployed "programmers" working on open-source software?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Too hard for the unemployed "programmers" working on open-source software?
Probably not worth the effort and likely doesn't scale too well with large directories. I couldn't tell you as I don't develop a file manager.
2 years ago
Anonymous
bizarre chimpout
2 years ago
Anonymous
Why were you trying to defend sorting by character code then?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>there's only one person on IQfy
You need to go back to plebbit homosexual
2 years ago
Anonymous
Correct, all of IQfy is a single autist with multiple VPNs replying to himself. I should know; I am that autist.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Akshually, we had a thread the other day on this topic, and we figured out there's nearly five of us.
Now, whether it's actual people or just personalities, that we never answered.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>tfw I made that thread
2 years ago
Anonymous
Well yeah - four (nearly five) of us - and I didn't do it - so there was a one-in-three chance it was you.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>This is how it's supposed to sort.
Says who?
2 years ago
Anonymous
my uncle works at nintendo and he told me this is how it's supposed to work.
>2 doesn't come before 10
Freetard logic, everyone.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>doesnt name files 01, 02, 10
project manager logic, everyone
2 years ago
Anonymous
>get to file 100 >have to insert an extra 0 for every preceding file to keep up naming schema
awful convention
2 years ago
Anonymous
Its like one line with perl rename
2 years ago
Anonymous
my uncle works at nintendo and he told me this is how it's supposed to work.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>That's how it supposed to sort
Yeah, if the numbers were written in word form and not numerically as shown in your pic
2 years ago
Anonymous
Just having thumbnails at all is the biggest flex from this post.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Linux has no problem with thumbnails in the file manager. It's the filepicker dialog that doesn't have them.
Only in a freetard's mind. This is how it's supposed to sort.
[...]
Too hard for the unemployed "programmers" working on open-source software?
This is more natural way for humans.
Computers look at characters and sort that way. Humans look at numbers as one blob. Leading zeros remove the ambigiuity but you never know how much you need.
I prefer the blob method but strictly speaking it is not the "correct" way and reqires more complexity.
If you want to be more user friendly the default should be the blob in my opinion.
That's pretty moronic, can't file managers do A-Z sorting that also does numerical sorting? That just looks like alphabetical sorting is being applied to the numbers as well, it's just literally saying that the word "One" comes before "Ten" despite there no letters being there.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yes, they can and do nowadays.
See
Only in a freetard's mind. This is how it's supposed to sort.
[...]
Too hard for the unemployed "programmers" working on open-source software?
>he thinks the file manager should implement some Black personlicious pattern finding algorithm that tokenizes the filename and attempts to find common places with numbers in all filenames
I'm sorry, but sorting by character code is just a simpler and better solution.
Files by Google cant sort my hentai doujins correctly (10 before 2), it's a major pain in the ass. Yesterday I blew my load early because of this sorting problem, thanks google.
>doesn't know how sorting by filename works
Sounds like a freetard problem. Windows hasn't done this for at least 20 years.
Works for me on GNU/Linux but I recall it not working when I used Windows 7
It's pretty funny how OP was clearly making a joke based on ANCIENT behavior that doesn't exist in ANY modern file manager, proprietary or otherwise, and hasn't for several decades. But then Loonixcels instantly went on the defensive for some reason (
) and tried to claim this inane sorting method ackshually makes sense, despite their OS of choice not using it either.
IQfy will defend anything just to be contrarian.
As we'd speaking only about computers. There are other devices that handle files and most of them won't do it properly.
On the other hand, it also nice symbolizes how YOTLD will never happen.
>freetards fix thing
>winjeets cry about it anyway until the end of time
>our os is just so leet and epic and better than your winblows or igayos
>we put basic features into our hobby os DECADES after windows or macos
Pick one.
linux has had multiple workstations for 20 years, wasn't added to windows until recently
>shitty esl bot gives shitty esl bot replies
If you mean multiple desktops, Windows 3.1 had one in its Resource Kit in 1992 (called TopDesk). Windows NT had foundation support for multiple desktops since its release in 1993.
You see, multiple desktops are a poorgay thing, for losers like you who can't afford multiple monitors. People with jobs, lives, etc. have never needed them. Hell, on 90%+ of Windows 10 installs, the multiple desktop feature is one of the first things that are turned off.
TL;DR: freetards BTFO again for the thousandth time this microsecond.
In my experience, it was more because Linux had such shitty multi-monitor support. It's only in the last few years that it's gotten usable. It's why it birthed such horrors as x2x to work around it.
Uh-oh. Freesisters better report this thread, and hope the jannies clean it up before they embarass themselves any further.
>You see, multiple desktops are a poorgay thing,
Sour grapes.
Microsoft actually had plans to add true virtual desktops to Windows (and not just that awful toy you could download from MSDN) ages ago. They left it out because the average Windows user is so fricking dumb that it confused the QA testers.
Not even Macgays are this dumb.
>sour grapes
>when it's been part of not just the window manager
>but right down to the session manager
>for 30 fricking years
>and nobody cared to write the 10 loc to implement it, not even ms
The copium overdose required to achieve this take.
>not even ms
Not like anyone else could have implemented it.
>OP was clearly making a joke
look like a joke to you? Everyone knows windows explorer has filename sorting that somewhat implements this.
I, the second person you quoted, am not OP, lmao. Just realized freetards were actually willing to defend shitty, user-unfriendly sorting, and took that opportunity to have fun at your expense.
As someone pointed out, this is exactly why year of the Linux desktop will never happen. Linux fixes thing, Winjeets complain about it years after they're fixed, and freetards claim it's a feature instead of simply telling them - perhaps not even realizing - it's already been fixed.
>instead of simply telling them - perhaps not even realizing - it's already been fixed.
That is not what I meant. If someone is actually using Linux and genuinely complaining about it, they won't even notice, and if they're arguing in bad faith they'll just respond to this with accusations of lying.
What's the issue? 1 comes before 10.
He probably thought
>11
>1
No, I think he means
>1
>10
>2
>3
but this makes sense
Only in a freetard's mind. This is how it's supposed to sort.
Too hard for the unemployed "programmers" working on open-source software?
>Too hard for the unemployed "programmers" working on open-source software?
Probably not worth the effort and likely doesn't scale too well with large directories. I couldn't tell you as I don't develop a file manager.
bizarre chimpout
Why were you trying to defend sorting by character code then?
>there's only one person on IQfy
You need to go back to plebbit homosexual
Correct, all of IQfy is a single autist with multiple VPNs replying to himself. I should know; I am that autist.
Akshually, we had a thread the other day on this topic, and we figured out there's nearly five of us.
Now, whether it's actual people or just personalities, that we never answered.
>tfw I made that thread
Well yeah - four (nearly five) of us - and I didn't do it - so there was a one-in-three chance it was you.
>This is how it's supposed to sort.
Says who?
>2 doesn't come before 10
Freetard logic, everyone.
>doesnt name files 01, 02, 10
project manager logic, everyone
>get to file 100
>have to insert an extra 0 for every preceding file to keep up naming schema
awful convention
Its like one line with perl rename
my uncle works at nintendo and he told me this is how it's supposed to work.
>That's how it supposed to sort
Yeah, if the numbers were written in word form and not numerically as shown in your pic
Just having thumbnails at all is the biggest flex from this post.
Linux has no problem with thumbnails in the file manager. It's the filepicker dialog that doesn't have them.
This is more "correct" way.
This is more natural way for humans.
Computers look at characters and sort that way. Humans look at numbers as one blob. Leading zeros remove the ambigiuity but you never know how much you need.
I prefer the blob method but strictly speaking it is not the "correct" way and reqires more complexity.
If you want to be more user friendly the default should be the blob in my opinion.
That's pretty moronic, can't file managers do A-Z sorting that also does numerical sorting? That just looks like alphabetical sorting is being applied to the numbers as well, it's just literally saying that the word "One" comes before "Ten" despite there no letters being there.
Yes, they can and do nowadays.
See
classic picrel
>he thinks the file manager should implement some Black personlicious pattern finding algorithm that tokenizes the filename and attempts to find common places with numbers in all filenames
I'm sorry, but sorting by character code is just a simpler and better solution.
Dolphin. How does it know?
We just can't stop winning, KDEbros.
ls-sisters...
touch {0..12}testing; echo dictionary; ls | sort -d; echo numeric; ls | sort -n; rm *testing
Files by Google cant sort my hentai doujins correctly (10 before 2), it's a major pain in the ass. Yesterday I blew my load early because of this sorting problem, thanks google.
it's your doujinshi's fault for not making the filenames 001.png