>Speaking to girl
>Says she’s into writing and does freelance work
>Doesn’t know the difference between your/you’re and to/too.
Why are normies like this?
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
>Speaking to girl. >Says shes into writing and does freelance work
>LOOK AT ME I KNOW GRAMMAR
you could of just said your an incel
This! So much this!
OP is just complaining because there mad that a womyn is breaking into the industry and epicly BTFO'ing fallogocentric grammer standards.
OP, your incel stench is unmistakable.
Irregardless of how right you think you are, your obviously just coping beacause you get NO pussy...
>irregardles, your obviously...
Based bait mate.
You’re**
dont try to colonize me
>he be
>I be
>you was
>I were
Just a few examples I can instance off the top of my head that I've heard on the bus or the street regarding black eubonics. It isn't about being racist or not, it's about the English language having a specific and concrete structure that makes it either clear or less clear. It's the same in any language. Teachers are obligated to teach their students the proper way to enunciate and exhibit their thoughts in writings to others, and this is done through the 'art' or structure of grammar.
I agree in principle but in reality there's no set structure that everyone will follow, and there are ongoing violent debates on modern English usage. English has been in flux for over a thousand years. Old English is incomprehensible to Modern English speakers without study, and Old English speakers might have said the same things about Middle/Modern English that you say about ebonics.
>Old English is incomprehensible to Modern English speakers without study
I disagree, I've read Canturbury tales in the old English and journals and essays from the 15th century where they spoke and wrote in Old English and they are fairly intelligible to me, and I am an American who has never studied Old English.
That's because Chaucer isn't old English, dumbfrick
Chaucer is Middle English
I didn't say throw the whole rulebook out. Your comment is nonsense.
Chaucer is Middle English.
ME is very easy to understand for speakers of "Modern" or Present Day English (PDE).
Here is some actual Old English, which I'm sure you'll find incomprehensible:
>Hwæt. We Gardena in geardagum, þeodcyninga, þrym gefrunon, hu ða æþelingas ellen fremedon. Oft Scyld Scefing sceaþena þreatum, monegum mægþum, meodosetla ofteah, egsode eorlas. Syððan ærest wearð feasceaft funden, he þæs frofre gebad, weox under wolcnum, weorðmyndum þah, oðþæt him æghwylc þara ymbsittendra ofer hronrade hyran scolde, gomban gyldan.
That's an entirely different language. It's "English" in name only. Modern english is a blend of that, Latin and Greek, is it not? regardless, my point was grammar structure, action and possession does not change. Old English would still differentiate between "was" and "were". "Was" and "were" are different and denote different idea's and whether anyone likes it or not and we have to accept "they were" is more clear an idea than "they was".
>That's an entirely different language
it is the language from which English is descended, that's why it is classified as such
>Modern english is a blend of that, Latin and Greek, is it not?
No, Present Day English is a blend of Latin, French, and German. You don't know what you're talking about, and I don't mean that to be inflammatory -- just saying you're incorrect.
>my point was
yea i wasn't really concerned with that, just pointing out that you were wrong about the "Old English" thing, that's all.
You may find this image to be helpful, this is basic stuff in any History of English course
"eugh, there are minor disagreements about a few rules, better through the whole rulebook out!"
moron.
(Also technically "I were" is correct, but subjunctive)
Yeah, they can't. Study the various African languages. They're much less complex than English. But It's not so important, as we can understand them.
>moronic northerner doesn't understand Southern dialects
You associate that with blacks because American blacks are a Southern diaspora. They learned how to speak from Southerners and imitating Southerners. They've passed their way of Southern speaking down through the generations. I guarantee if you heard a Southern white man speaking you wouldn't be getting your panties in a wad about the death of the English language. Here's how a Southern white man would say those things
>I been
>He's been
>You was
>I were
As you can tell blacks are like the brits and tend to lop of the last half of the word. So the white Southern "I been" becomes "I be".
Now shut the frick up you homosexual bumlicking northerner cuck.
I dispute the idea that blacks are capable of learning, unless you mean it in the way in which a dog learns
Hardy harr harrr, such wit!! Truly, an emblem of the heights of the human race, you are!!!
Dumb frogposters
Not actually an incel. Maybe a hint of tism though
Knowing grammar is literally the rudiments. It's one thing to make a big issue of a typo, but it's an altogether different matter if the person legitimately does not know the difference between your and you're. That is a mark of a lack of education and refinement.
Consistent grammar and spelling is something that was made up in the last 100 years. Anything from the 19th century and before is filled with inconsistent spellings and they can't spell they're last names to. So I don't think your write, I don't think your aloud to tell people it's wrong to not right like you.
Much of that was the result of regional dialects, not ignorance. You'll find the same thing in many mediterranean cities and villages throughout Greece and Italy, where they have developed their own dialect and way of spelling, but what you will often find is that, grammatically speaking, they are relatively uniform. A Gailic might have spelt 'perverse' as 'pervurse' but if I read both of those I know what word they mean. They did not differ in 'you're' and 'your', in matters of possession and action they were almost always uniform.
Your just ignorant and that doesn't even make no sense. How we're their English grammar lessons in the 15th century Renaissance when English didn't exist then.
>grammatical education only exists in English
Oh, plebs...
You have revealed your ignorance. Thank you.
Grammar was a fundamental part of a liberal education from the Renaissance, pleb. You're grasping at non-existent straws; but, by all means, continue to make yourself look uneducated. It suits you.
He has to be shitposting, I refuse to believe he's being sincere.
>I don't think your aloud...its wrong or right
Then you're not allowed to tell people they have to understand you.
Enjoy being dismissed.
I can't imagine any other professional field where people can simply declare that they don't know anything more recent than the 1800s
"Knowing" grammer is literally fake. Its made up by fallogecentric dead white men just to colonize and enslavigate womyn and other BIPOC minorities and marginalized communities.
Your hiding behind this "grammer" thing but its clear that you are just toeing the line for the establishment, the institutions, the patrarchary, and FAUX news.
your rain of power is over. the world is changing. its 2024 and BIPOC womyn who are black do not have to put up with you're made up standards anymore.
fricking incel's never change.
This is a unlearned take. You are ignorant of history and your lack reason. That you're left with no recourse but to parrot the rhetoric of the politicizers of education is evidence to that fact. I am a half-black man, btw. My stake in the rights of black people is probably far higher than yours.
half-black just means your half WHITE.
And Im not a fricking parrot so stop calling me that you fricking KKKolonizer.
I will not cower against you’re misoginystic display
Yes, I'm half white. I'm also visibly half black. The rights of black people are intrinsically an issue of my life, as they concern my mother and half of my relatives directly, even more directly should I take a black wife.
Yes, you are parroting. You did not originate the concepts of BIPOC or any of the other nonsense you're throwing around. They were created by the politicizers of academia.
You can hurl around buzzwords like misogynistic all you want, but it doesn't change the facts. Grammar has been thought a core part of education—a foundational part of it—since Plato. It has been considered an essential part of a liberal education since the Renaissance. Grammar is nothing less than precision in the organization of language, and as such it is intrinsically tied to philosophy, poetry, and literature. Anyone arguing against it is arguing for stupidity.
wow. incel much?
you of done nothing but repeat your fallogentric argumence. incase its not clear, i dont give a DAMN what academeia thinks, beacuse acadimaeia is full of DEAD. WHITE. MEN.
read that again, you fricking cracker ..
DEAD. WHITE. MEN.
grammer is fake and your obviously and indubitibly an incel freak loser just trying to silence me for being unapologetic with my utter and brutal takedown of 4,000+ years of white supremacy masquerading as """knowledge""".
your not smart, incel.
also, men and white people cannot produce poetry or literature beacuse they have never experienced abjection or marginalization like BIPOC and black people have.
You're bonkers, man. Well, good luck in your crusade against grammar, I guess.
>your bonkers man
i am A BIPOC WOMYN WHO IS BLACK...
INCEL!
>The rights of black people are intrinsically an issue of my life
Black people are equal; their failure is a result of their lower intelligence. This is because there were fewer evolutionary pressures on intelligence in Africa. The rights of black people should not be of great concern at the moment, as they are firmly protected. Institutional racism doesn't exist, it is just academic posturing. Neo-Marxism.
Blah, blah, blah. Pure nonsense. Also, it has nothing to do with anything I've said. You're meant to be arguing with the troony, /misc/cel.
>troony
Wow! Transphobia, nice. You're a child.
No. I'm a sane man. As such, I do not accept that men who LARP as women are sane or should be treated as sane.
They're just gay, well, basically. Transgenderism is just an offshoot of homosexuality. It probably shouldn't be institutionalised to the same degree, I believe. Nor should children be subject to transgender care. Further research is required on that front, for sure.
You're totally right, by the way. Grammar is foundational.
>education and refinement.
not needed to write a good book
Give me one example of a good book produced without it. Show me a good book which has poor grammar. I'll wait.
Incredibly low bar to clear and with the amount of attention it gets there is no reason to not learn.
>could of
it's could have
your could of said that said your could of
1) She's lyinig
2) She only knows those things instinctively, not black-on-white logically. It's real although the case in question is maybe too simple to account for.
>on date with petite bookish qt
>she used "which" to introduce a restrictive clause
>call her a pseud and leave her with bill
>meet a single person
>why is everybody like this?
this thread is either 5 levels deep of shitposting or ESL galore
>I make linguistic 'mistakes' on purpose
>I bend words so they become different
>I like to use barbarisms
>I excessively use loanwords
>my language is the future language
IQfy - Literature
>knows the difference between your/you're and to/too
Why are incels like this?
You 'll complaining like its the mid ages,
I don't care about your stupid rages,
I don't give a damn about grammer,
The way I see it, you are just another scammer,
My language use is so far in the future,
You can only understand it with a quantinum computer
Instead of resisting you should just go with the flow,
But that's the problem; you are so fricking slow,
When I and my homies are done with speech,
I'll hear you again and again screech,
I verbally BTFO'D all of you like its game over,
You are just another incel without a lover
>t. looney troony
I do see a lot of basic grammatical errors in articles these days. It's strange. Colleges have been pumping out students with English degrees, so copywriting jobs must get tons of overqualified applicants. Shouldn't this make standards go up? It seems like news publications are actively hiring the worst applicants.
>be native Spanish speaker
>work at company that does LQA/FQA
>manage to successfully pass both English and Spanish LQA exams
>never get assigned to English LQA projects
>native English speakers who managed to pass the exam on their second third try get assigned to English projects
Frick you angloids.
That’s an editors job