"starting whit the greeks" is a psyop

I've read atleast 30 different works of philosophy from hegel nietzsche marx foscault you name it and i understood what all of them are trying to say. Am reading Plato right now and while I am enjoying the book you really dont need to "start with the greeks" to understand modern or postmodern philosophy/

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >foucault
    YWNBAW

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >you only have to read things you agree with
      I've read Evola as well homosexual. I want to see what ideas people hold. Let me guess you havent opened a page of Foscault but you dismiss him because muh postmodernism bad, Actual anti intellectual scum.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I read Foucault in college and that's where I formed my opinion. Hadn't encountered him before then -- but I guess maybe if I was just some typical IQfy homosexual your shit comeback would've worked.
        >disagrees with Evola
        how is your sophomore year of college going, leftard homosexual?

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Your understanding of Western Philosophy is incomplete because you didn't start with the Greeks. The worst part is that you don't even know that it's incomplete

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      greeks aren’t western

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You of course don't actually need to read all of the Greeks but you still need to understand what they were talking about.
        Jumping into western philosophy around the 20th century without being knowledgeable about what preceded it is the equivalent of entering a conversation halfway, only having had the speakers' points telephoned to you by your friend. you'll have a rough grasp of what the conversation might be about, sure, but you'll still be missing out on the depth of the convo.
        there's your "muh normal fricking response"

        ? actual moron bait

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Just read Chinese philosophy. Once you can reliably feel and manipulate your chi you just ignore western ideas

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Starting with the Greeks is not about philosophy, it's about literature
    If someone wanted to express the idea of 'starting with the Greeks' but wanted to restrict themselves to philosophy, they'd say something like 'all of philosophy is just a footnote to Plato'
    I don't know where people got this bizarre idea from

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      thanks for a normal fricking response

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        holy shit i can smell the estrogen from here, this is the gayest post on the board right now. stop seething and people might take you a little more seriously

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >I don't know where people got this bizarre idea from
      Alfred North Whitehead
      Also, he was generally correct in this assessment. This is why some 'philosophers' like Nietzsche and Derrida aren't necessarily philosophers in the most literal sense of the term.
      And also why OP is a moron. But we are all moronic as beginners. One day he will realise it, unless he becomes so arrogant that he ends up being generic leftist, which is perhaps more likely.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    SWtG

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Neetzsche actually studied the Greeks and he was a scholar though

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      i know but he references them in his books

      I read Foucault in college and that's where I formed my opinion. Hadn't encountered him before then -- but I guess maybe if I was just some typical IQfy homosexual your shit comeback would've worked.
      >disagrees with Evola
      how is your sophomore year of college going, leftard homosexual?

      >he unironically fell for evola
      yeah no pussy i suppose?

      You of course don't actually need to read all of the Greeks but you still need to understand what they were talking about.
      Jumping into western philosophy around the 20th century without being knowledgeable about what preceded it is the equivalent of entering a conversation halfway, only having had the speakers' points telephoned to you by your friend. you'll have a rough grasp of what the conversation might be about, sure, but you'll still be missing out on the depth of the convo.
      there's your "muh normal fricking response"

      ? actual moron bait

      i already understood the basics of ancient greek philosophy before i started getting into the 18th century.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You need to reach a point where you stop reading philosophy, and actually put what you learned into practice. Just being able to understand the texts means nothing if you're still so mentally unrefined that you get perturbed by the basic responses ITT.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >i know but he references them in his books
        He got a lot of shit wrong. Take him at face value and you’ll pick up his errors without realizing it. For instance the Apollo-Dionysus dichotomy didn’t actually exist - Nietzsche’s Apollo is virtually nothing like the mystical Apollo that the Greeks worshipped

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >no pussy
        i've been in a relationship with the love of my life for nearly 6 years now. plan on marrying her. hope you find love one day, anon.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Is she fat?

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    NGMI !!!

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You don't start with the Greeks to better understand modern/postmodern.
    You start with the Greeks because they are better than the modern/postmodern

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    run of the mill dumbass leftist

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *