>Sumatra is Hindu
>Singapore is Buddhist
So why exactly can’t the rest of Indonesia and Malaysia be Hindu/Buddhist again?
>Sumatra is Hindu. >Singapore is Buddhist
>Sumatra is Hindu
>Singapore is Buddhist
So why exactly can’t the rest of Indonesia and Malaysia be Hindu/Buddhist again?
isn't singapore like >80% chang?
Sumatra has the most pious Muslims in Indonesia no? Bali is Hindu
Why this obsession with turning the Muslim SEA Hindu or Buddhist? You already have Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar for that
probably streetshitters seething
96% rural bathrooms now
Cope harder
Islam is a bad fit for SEA.
Indonesia is the most populous Muslim c**t on earth thoughever.
Indonesia has more christians than buddhists.
What the frick does that have to do with
it's a perfect fit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amok_syndrome
What the frick is that? The wikipedia doesn't give any reasons why it happened.
It's Malay culture and closely tied to honor(maruah), when a man in wronged he "runs amok" and goes on a killing spree. One of the ministers of Sultan Mahmud II, the mad King of Johor, had his wife killed for eating the royal fruit while she was pregnant, in response the minister killed the Sultan and caused the downfall of Johor.
"mengamuk" isn't allowed in Sharia law.
the view that "mengamuk" is a "psychological disorder" is out of touch with actual Malay custom. Let me illustrate this, the Javanese who created the keris place their keris at their backs, but the Malays put them in front, in clear view of people
>Thailand
Muslim insurgents in south
>Myanmar
Muslim insurgents from west
And in Myanmar's case they will probably have those insurgents expelled because they are considered "Bengalis" and not Myanmar citizens. (They seem to have been citizens at one point, as they held office and ran in elections, but were de-listed in 1982)
The Bengals were never citizens. They are workers in the British empire that came to work in Burma and helped the British rule over the land. When the Burmese independence movements were happening, the Bengals worked with the British to suppress the Burmese. When the Burma won independence, the Bengals demanded a piece of Burma for their own self-rule. They begged Pakistan to invade Burma to help them take over the land. Pakistan refused. When that didn't work, they wanted citizenship and declared jihad against Burma. That was in the early 50s, right after WW2. The government suppressed that jihad movement. Years and decades rolled by, animosity/violence/distrust/etc built up with no meaningful change. Then Burma coup happened and the military Junta had taken over the country. The 1982 law was created to create a proper citizenship census metric. It only asked the people living there to verify that they've been here in the country for 100 years. Thats not much for actual Burmese people, but for the Bengals and others, thats a tall order. Ofcourse, there's path to citizenship through registration as an immigrant as well, many were legally registered as immigrants as a result. The Bengals didnt because they wanted a country for themselves and see their right as citizen as default. This led to further terrorist attacks and military suppressions throughout the years.
pajeets make the worst threads
leaving islam is a crime there, so you must engage in perpetual larping and arab worship.
Sumatra has the most fanatically Muslim part of Indonesia with the longest historical association with the Middle East. Bali is the only majority Hindu part of the country
they like using toilets so doubt hinduism will get popular again
Hindus will remain isolated in India, and with their declining birth rate compared to their 300 million Muslim population, they are next up
timor and new guinea should've gotten their whole islands, brunei borders are also gore