Typically conservatives don't consider that they could suffer from a mental illness, so they tend to not seek out mental health evaluations, and subsequently have lower rates of diagnoses.
does that imply then that if musk has 170mil followers only 0.003% pays for the platform use
He has "at least" 5000 payed followers, not exactly 5000.
But I'd imagine its <0.5%
It should be noted that the main point of subscription is to access subscription locked content
Little reason to subscribe unless a user's has subscription content exclusively on X
to "Oliver Alexander" and every other imbecile that needs to explained the most basic marketing in life - Elon is trying to incentivize people using twitter subscription model to post their premium content, as opposed to funneling their followers to other "premium content" sites.
So of course there's not many people that fit the criteria - if there were, there wouldnt be any need to introduce the incentive. That's the whole point of every incentive ever.
I don't even like Musk but there is a contingent of people that will be mad about anything he says or does. These people spend all of their time on Xitter or an alternative talking about how much they don't like him. It's fricking weird.
It's the woke NPC's following orders from woke outlets
Musk made electric cars etc - he is a hero
Musk buys Twitter and allow both sides of the political isle equal rights to speak - he is a villain
Rinse and repeat
2 months ago
Anonymous
>woke NPC's >woke outlets >everything i don't like is woke
2 months ago
Anonymous
>and allow both sides of the political isle equal rights to speak
why do stupid people keep parroting this when it's obviously not the case?
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Indian government
how is this relevant to us politics?
2 months ago
Anonymous
Elon Musk owns X and claims to be using it to be using it to allow both sides of the political aisle a platform for free speech. Elon Musk cultists also claim this. Not sure why you brought up US politics.
2 months ago
Anonymous
"both sides of the political aisle" is literally a US politics term. there is no aisle in india, there are castes. elon is indeed letting both sides of the aisle speak, although 90% of the left side were bots. so theyre kinda quiet these days.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>"both sides of the political aisle" is literally a US politics term.
No it isn't. Moreover, Elon Musk isn't American, and Twitter/X operates globally. Happy to clear that up for you.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Elon Musk isn't American
patently false. he holds full american citizenship. learn what you're talking about before you start looking stupider.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>patently false. he holds full american citizenship
As an immigrant, yes. But let's not forget that immigration is woke.
2 months ago
Anonymous
the desperation of this redditard who comes here to cry about musk every day. just go back.
2 months ago
Anonymous
he is equivalent in citizenship to any other US citizen. selective immigration of the best and brightest of others is based as frick. general limitless immigration of anyone who wants to come try and grift the richest country in the world is what you're thinking of.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>he is equivalent in citizenship to any other US citizen
No, that isn't correct. For example, he isn't able to run for president.
lol. x is an american company. elon musk bought it for american political reasons. this is objective fact. nobody cares about the third worlders dangling on to an american app focused on american topics. you're just not that important.
>elon musk bought it for american political reasons.
So he lied about being a freedom of speech absolutist? I mean, we knew that already, but I'm not sure that you did.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>So he lied about being a freedom of speech absolutist? I mean, we knew that already, but I'm not sure that you did.
your brain is broken or something dude. something is really wrong with your mind.
the american political reasons he bought it for is that he opened it for discourse for both sides of the american political spectrum. explain how that is anti-free speech?
also regarding that pic, everyone who hates musk loves trotting it out, but people were literally using that info to attack his kids. the dude who blasts elon musk's children's location to gun-toting nutjobs needs to be jailed, not just banned from twitter. he's lucky elon doesn't have a hit put out on him after that shit, i might not have that restraint if someone was trying to kill my kids, and i know nobody would really bat an eye. >For example, he isn't able to run for president.
wow, such certainty. fact is, you won't know until he tries. he has the resources to fight that clearly unconstitutional restriction and i think he'd win.
2 months ago
Anonymous
I'm not sure you understand the etymology of the words "absolutist" and "absolutism". Can you do some research on that and get back to me? I'll keep an eye on this thread.
2 months ago
Anonymous
i think you just irrationally hate him because your other woke friends programmed you to seethe when you see him. you're starting from there and picking apart word definitions to try and paint him as a hypocrite when he's done nothing that any one of us wouldn't do.
i'm a 2a supporter but i would take a gun from someone threatening to shoot my child. if you say you'd do otherwise, then you deserve to have your kids taken from you.
also, moron, 'etymology' does not mean 'definition'.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Twitter has fully complied with 808 demands from Oct. 27, 2022 through April 26 of this year, bringing Twitter's rate of censorship compliance from about 50% in the pre-Musk era to around 80% now.
2 months ago
Anonymous
again, completely unrelated to allowing free speech on american political matters, which is what his claim was specifically. nobody gives a shit about turkey wanting to ban terrorists sharing plans to frick them up.
here's a chart from the same article you pulled that one from. please point out where the united states is on this chart.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>nobody gives a shit about turkey wanting to ban terrorists sharing plans to frick them up.
Dorsey's twitter did, which is why they regularly fought such requests in Turkey's courts. It's unfortunate that Elon Musk has no genuine principles and caved instantaneously like a coward.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>caved instantaneously like a coward
lol. more like clicked accept on their requests and moved on with his day doing real work because nobody gives a shit about turkey.
your types told people experiencing political censorship in the usa to 'make their own twitter' if they don't like being banned and censored. well, musk bought it and turned it into the right place for americans. maybe people in turkey should make their own twitter instead if they're so assblasted by foreign companies not giving a shit about their political intricacies.
2 months ago
Anonymous
No, he caved instantaneously like a coward. Because he is a coward.
2 months ago
Anonymous
lol, another classic anti-musk gem. >people pretending to be someone in order to defraud other people is heckin legal and based!!
>still too stupid to figure out what "absolutist means"
Ahahahahaha.
concession accepted. you have no real argument left so you just cry about definitions you yourself misunderstand.
2 months ago
Anonymous
pretending to be someone in order to defraud other people is heckin legal and based!!
So you agree that freedom of speech isn't actually possible in a civilized society. Glad we could reach that consensus, and I hope Elon Musk will stop telling lies about it.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Twitter has fully complied with 808 demands from Oct. 27, 2022 through April 26 of this year, bringing Twitter's rate of censorship compliance from about 50% in the pre-Musk era to around 80% now.
Can't wait to see the data for between October 7th, 2023 and today
2 months ago
Anonymous
again, completely unrelated to allowing free speech on american political matters, which is what his claim was specifically. nobody gives a shit about turkey wanting to ban terrorists sharing plans to frick them up.
here's a chart from the same article you pulled that one from. please point out where the united states is on this chart.
oh wow look at that, here's the source data for your "proof" chart, too: https://github.com/row-engineering/everything/blob/main/2023/twitter-lumen/lumen-rest-of-world-project-data.csv
go ahead and search for 'USA' or 'US' or 'United States'. i'll wait while you try to grapple with the fact that 0 results are returned.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Still waiting for you to learn what the word "absolutist" means. Were you too stupid to google it or something?
2 months ago
Anonymous
back to nitpicking verbiage i see. i guess you missed my reply to that one wherein i reminded you that 'etymology' is not synonymous with 'definition' and using that word instead doesn't make you sound smart, it makes you look like an idiot because you used it wrong.
you're saying if you believed all violence was bad and someone was about to kill your kid or worse in front of you, you'd just let it happen and shrug? because if you say that, you're either a liar or need to have your kids taken away from you. and if you're judging musk for taking action against people threatening to kill his kids, you're most likely a massive hypocrite.
only a genuine moron would assume that someone claiming to be an absolutist means that they would be so in the face of the death or torture of their loved ones. maybe you don't have any of those so you don't get it.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>still too stupid to figure out what "absolutist means"
Ahahahahaha.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>drowning in so much musk cum that he can't figure out why freedom of speech doesn't mean anything if it can be taken away from you at any time and rationalized by the whims of someone who imagined that his kids were in danger.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>imagined that his kids were in danger
someone climbed onto the hood of his toddler's car after the elon jet guy sent out the details of his kids clearly intended to incite attack
you're just grabbing at anything because you're so mad at him for no good reason. it's pretty sad. typical you'd bring up drinking cum out of nowhere too.
>you're saying if you believed all violence was bad
Why would I believe something that fricking stupid, btw?
>muh free speech absolutism >unless you post publicly available data about stonetoss
lol the arguments are getting progressively weaker and more emotional. did you miss the 'if' in there? you obviously intentionally ignored it to make yourself feel better.
and yes, you don't have the right to say what you want if what you want to say is "here is the location of a child i want you to kill for political reasons"
2 months ago
Anonymous
>someone climbed onto the hood of his toddler's car >Source: Elon said it
2 months ago
Anonymous
oh shit, someone climbed on the hood of his car (according to him)? sounds like a pretty good argument for cancelling freedom of speech.
>dude it's totally ok to send out constant coordinates of people's kids to deranged domestic terrorists in the hopes they'll take them out
lmao. anyone who seriously holds this position is not human. i pray you never have kids and that they're taken from you if you do somehow manage to find someone to frick.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Ah, I see where the confusion is. You're too stupid to understand the difference between thinking something is ok to do, and acknowledging that something constitutes free speech.
Here's a lesson for anyone as stupid as this guy: speech can sometimes include things that you don't like, or even things that put you in danger. For example, public anti-antisemitism stochastically results in more hate crimes against israeli citizens.
We've generally decided as a society that the the rewards for enabling free speech are preferable to the dangers imposed by free speech.
Elon Musk decided the opposite, while still publicly claiming to be a free speech absolutism. That's how we know he's not an honest person, and that we should probably acknowledge that.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>reddit spacing
What an embarrassing way to lose an argument. Even if you were 100% right the way you typed it out is just gonna make lurkers (like me) think you're a fricking homosexual. (you are)
2 months ago
Anonymous
>reddit spacing
Anon, those are paragraphs.
2 months ago
Anonymous
oh shit, someone climbed on the hood of his car (according to him)? sounds like a pretty good argument for cancelling freedom of speech.
>I am a free speech absolutist! >if you ignore these thousands of exceptions
the absolute state
lmao holy shit i can hear the smoke shooting out of your ears. one simply doesn't get this angry about something unless you're insanely defensive. try to form an actual opinion about something instead of just clinging on to what your liberal media rags are telling you and your friends, and you might have some kind of critical thoughts to fall back on instead of just rage.
alright, i'll leave you be, it's clear by your tantrum i've won but you're incapable of letting go on your own.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Ok, but can you post the source that someone climbed on the hood of his toddler's car? Is there any evidence this even happened? Not that it would change anything, if it did.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>makes a fool of himself >runs away like a homosexual
kek
2 months ago
Anonymous
oh shit, someone climbed on the hood of his car (according to him)? sounds like a pretty good argument for cancelling freedom of speech.
2 months ago
Anonymous
You are too stupid to be real. Honestly 8/10 bait, great stuff.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>you're saying if you believed all violence was bad
Why would I believe something that fricking stupid, btw?
2 months ago
Anonymous
>he has the resources to fight that clearly unconstitutional restriction
LMAO
2 months ago
Anonymous
he's done more for the american public in an afternoon than you'll do in your entire life. i think it makes it pretty clear that it's completely unfair that you could run for prez but he couldn't.
that was only added there because they were afraid of a british monarch moving to the US for a few years to try and seize the country back. that's not really a concern anymore with the internet and shit because everyone would see it happening and stop it. it's a deprecated rule just like the one that supposedly keeps presidents from running for election again if they've angered enough opposition people into stacking local courts to make fake judgements of "treason"
2 months ago
Anonymous
You're fricking stupid if you think the restriction should be lifted. You will end up with a foreign intelligence asset in office immediately.
2 months ago
Anonymous
lol as though a random american couldn't just be paid to do that role instead right now. i bet you'd take a couple million bucks to do it. or they could just threaten to kill your family if you don't. the same systems that would prevent those scenarios that are already possible now would prevent what you say.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Nobody with dual citizenship should be allowed to hold office, period. If someone wants to come here then they should have to give up being a citizen anywhere else to be eligible for office.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>muh free speech absolutism >unless you post publicly available data about stonetoss
2 months ago
Anonymous
you posted a picture of an article about some shit nobody cares about happening in india in refutation to a claim that elon musk is allowing both sides to talk. that's both sides of american politics, obviously, not random indian bullshit. nobody on x gives a shit about india and it's not relevant to the discussion at all
2 months ago
Anonymous
>about some shit nobody cares about
Did you miss the OP or something? Are you confused about what the topic of the thread is?
2 months ago
Anonymous
i think you might be moronic.
someone was talking about american politics in the context of x, which is the topic of this thread.
you brought up indian whatever the frick that has no relevance to anything, probably because you live in a village in india and figure everyone must be in the know on the weird local political bullshit that is irrelevant to anyone else.
you were the one clearly off topic.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>someone was talking about american politics in the context of x
X operates globally, anon. What do American politics have to do with anything?
2 months ago
Anonymous
lol. x is an american company. elon musk bought it for american political reasons. this is objective fact. nobody cares about the third worlders dangling on to an american app focused on american topics. you're just not that important.
2 months ago
Anonymous
2 months ago
Anonymous
Seems to be that way. They're brainwashed by the commie propaganda media
2 months ago
Anonymous
>brainwashed by the commie propaganda media
2 months ago
Anonymous
>I am a free speech absolutist! >if you ignore these thousands of exceptions
the absolute state
Samegay troon with MDS. It's amazing how you've been making these threads everyday since he took over your Twitter safe space.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>elon musk blatantly doesn't care about free speech >but i can say Black person unimpeded now so everything is fine
Lmao
Elon is based, and you are a fricking pedo troon who hate the greatest inventor in human history. I guess you're also one of those troons who are seething now because their posts are No longer promoted on X because of pronouns in your bio, which lower your popularity thanks to the new algorithm.
Gotta be honest, I'm the first to suck Elons wiener at every opportunity, but this change does nothing for the normal guy lurking around. I don't even feel like getting on my knees senpai
still not making an account elon
heh
>e-celeb thread where e-celebs "gift" one each other
...
Is this what mental illness looks like?
Typically conservatives don't consider that they could suffer from a mental illness, so they tend to not seek out mental health evaluations, and subsequently have lower rates of diagnoses.
>millenial comedy
Good goy
>Only 8 accounts with over 2500 followers
That sounds like bullshit.
according to wikipedia theres 50 people with 40mil+ subs
subs are different than followers, moron.
4 accounts with 5000 people who pay for twitter following them.
an additional 4 accounts with 2500 people who pay for twitter following them.
does that imply then that if musk has 170mil followers only 0.003% pays for the platform use
He has "at least" 5000 payed followers, not exactly 5000.
But I'd imagine its <0.5%
It should be noted that the main point of subscription is to access subscription locked content
Little reason to subscribe unless a user's has subscription content exclusively on X
Let me explain what it means to you in more simple terms.
You know "subscribers" on YouTube? It's not the same. You're thinking of "followers" on Xitter.
P USS YI NBIO
>another troon seething about musk thread
Such a generous man. He really is the Jesus Christ of our time.
to "Oliver Alexander" and every other imbecile that needs to explained the most basic marketing in life - Elon is trying to incentivize people using twitter subscription model to post their premium content, as opposed to funneling their followers to other "premium content" sites.
So of course there's not many people that fit the criteria - if there were, there wouldnt be any need to introduce the incentive. That's the whole point of every incentive ever.
I don't even like Musk but there is a contingent of people that will be mad about anything he says or does. These people spend all of their time on Xitter or an alternative talking about how much they don't like him. It's fricking weird.
There's a cottage industry created around being anti-Musk, its absolutely cult like in how they view the world
It's the woke NPC's following orders from woke outlets
Musk made electric cars etc - he is a hero
Musk buys Twitter and allow both sides of the political isle equal rights to speak - he is a villain
Rinse and repeat
>woke NPC's
>woke outlets
>everything i don't like is woke
>and allow both sides of the political isle equal rights to speak
why do stupid people keep parroting this when it's obviously not the case?
>Indian government
how is this relevant to us politics?
Elon Musk owns X and claims to be using it to be using it to allow both sides of the political aisle a platform for free speech. Elon Musk cultists also claim this. Not sure why you brought up US politics.
"both sides of the political aisle" is literally a US politics term. there is no aisle in india, there are castes. elon is indeed letting both sides of the aisle speak, although 90% of the left side were bots. so theyre kinda quiet these days.
>"both sides of the political aisle" is literally a US politics term.
No it isn't. Moreover, Elon Musk isn't American, and Twitter/X operates globally. Happy to clear that up for you.
>Elon Musk isn't American
patently false. he holds full american citizenship. learn what you're talking about before you start looking stupider.
>patently false. he holds full american citizenship
As an immigrant, yes. But let's not forget that immigration is woke.
the desperation of this redditard who comes here to cry about musk every day. just go back.
he is equivalent in citizenship to any other US citizen. selective immigration of the best and brightest of others is based as frick. general limitless immigration of anyone who wants to come try and grift the richest country in the world is what you're thinking of.
>he is equivalent in citizenship to any other US citizen
No, that isn't correct. For example, he isn't able to run for president.
>elon musk bought it for american political reasons.
So he lied about being a freedom of speech absolutist? I mean, we knew that already, but I'm not sure that you did.
>So he lied about being a freedom of speech absolutist? I mean, we knew that already, but I'm not sure that you did.
your brain is broken or something dude. something is really wrong with your mind.
the american political reasons he bought it for is that he opened it for discourse for both sides of the american political spectrum. explain how that is anti-free speech?
also regarding that pic, everyone who hates musk loves trotting it out, but people were literally using that info to attack his kids. the dude who blasts elon musk's children's location to gun-toting nutjobs needs to be jailed, not just banned from twitter. he's lucky elon doesn't have a hit put out on him after that shit, i might not have that restraint if someone was trying to kill my kids, and i know nobody would really bat an eye.
>For example, he isn't able to run for president.
wow, such certainty. fact is, you won't know until he tries. he has the resources to fight that clearly unconstitutional restriction and i think he'd win.
I'm not sure you understand the etymology of the words "absolutist" and "absolutism". Can you do some research on that and get back to me? I'll keep an eye on this thread.
i think you just irrationally hate him because your other woke friends programmed you to seethe when you see him. you're starting from there and picking apart word definitions to try and paint him as a hypocrite when he's done nothing that any one of us wouldn't do.
i'm a 2a supporter but i would take a gun from someone threatening to shoot my child. if you say you'd do otherwise, then you deserve to have your kids taken from you.
also, moron, 'etymology' does not mean 'definition'.
>Twitter has fully complied with 808 demands from Oct. 27, 2022 through April 26 of this year, bringing Twitter's rate of censorship compliance from about 50% in the pre-Musk era to around 80% now.
again, completely unrelated to allowing free speech on american political matters, which is what his claim was specifically. nobody gives a shit about turkey wanting to ban terrorists sharing plans to frick them up.
here's a chart from the same article you pulled that one from. please point out where the united states is on this chart.
>nobody gives a shit about turkey wanting to ban terrorists sharing plans to frick them up.
Dorsey's twitter did, which is why they regularly fought such requests in Turkey's courts. It's unfortunate that Elon Musk has no genuine principles and caved instantaneously like a coward.
>caved instantaneously like a coward
lol. more like clicked accept on their requests and moved on with his day doing real work because nobody gives a shit about turkey.
your types told people experiencing political censorship in the usa to 'make their own twitter' if they don't like being banned and censored. well, musk bought it and turned it into the right place for americans. maybe people in turkey should make their own twitter instead if they're so assblasted by foreign companies not giving a shit about their political intricacies.
No, he caved instantaneously like a coward. Because he is a coward.
lol, another classic anti-musk gem.
>people pretending to be someone in order to defraud other people is heckin legal and based!!
concession accepted. you have no real argument left so you just cry about definitions you yourself misunderstand.
pretending to be someone in order to defraud other people is heckin legal and based!!
So you agree that freedom of speech isn't actually possible in a civilized society. Glad we could reach that consensus, and I hope Elon Musk will stop telling lies about it.
Can't wait to see the data for between October 7th, 2023 and today
oh wow look at that, here's the source data for your "proof" chart, too: https://github.com/row-engineering/everything/blob/main/2023/twitter-lumen/lumen-rest-of-world-project-data.csv
go ahead and search for 'USA' or 'US' or 'United States'. i'll wait while you try to grapple with the fact that 0 results are returned.
Still waiting for you to learn what the word "absolutist" means. Were you too stupid to google it or something?
back to nitpicking verbiage i see. i guess you missed my reply to that one wherein i reminded you that 'etymology' is not synonymous with 'definition' and using that word instead doesn't make you sound smart, it makes you look like an idiot because you used it wrong.
you're saying if you believed all violence was bad and someone was about to kill your kid or worse in front of you, you'd just let it happen and shrug? because if you say that, you're either a liar or need to have your kids taken away from you. and if you're judging musk for taking action against people threatening to kill his kids, you're most likely a massive hypocrite.
only a genuine moron would assume that someone claiming to be an absolutist means that they would be so in the face of the death or torture of their loved ones. maybe you don't have any of those so you don't get it.
>still too stupid to figure out what "absolutist means"
Ahahahahaha.
>drowning in so much musk cum that he can't figure out why freedom of speech doesn't mean anything if it can be taken away from you at any time and rationalized by the whims of someone who imagined that his kids were in danger.
>imagined that his kids were in danger
someone climbed onto the hood of his toddler's car after the elon jet guy sent out the details of his kids clearly intended to incite attack
you're just grabbing at anything because you're so mad at him for no good reason. it's pretty sad. typical you'd bring up drinking cum out of nowhere too.
lol the arguments are getting progressively weaker and more emotional. did you miss the 'if' in there? you obviously intentionally ignored it to make yourself feel better.
and yes, you don't have the right to say what you want if what you want to say is "here is the location of a child i want you to kill for political reasons"
>someone climbed onto the hood of his toddler's car
>Source: Elon said it
>dude it's totally ok to send out constant coordinates of people's kids to deranged domestic terrorists in the hopes they'll take them out
lmao. anyone who seriously holds this position is not human. i pray you never have kids and that they're taken from you if you do somehow manage to find someone to frick.
Ah, I see where the confusion is. You're too stupid to understand the difference between thinking something is ok to do, and acknowledging that something constitutes free speech.
Here's a lesson for anyone as stupid as this guy: speech can sometimes include things that you don't like, or even things that put you in danger. For example, public anti-antisemitism stochastically results in more hate crimes against israeli citizens.
We've generally decided as a society that the the rewards for enabling free speech are preferable to the dangers imposed by free speech.
Elon Musk decided the opposite, while still publicly claiming to be a free speech absolutism. That's how we know he's not an honest person, and that we should probably acknowledge that.
>reddit spacing
What an embarrassing way to lose an argument. Even if you were 100% right the way you typed it out is just gonna make lurkers (like me) think you're a fricking homosexual. (you are)
>reddit spacing
Anon, those are paragraphs.
lmao holy shit i can hear the smoke shooting out of your ears. one simply doesn't get this angry about something unless you're insanely defensive. try to form an actual opinion about something instead of just clinging on to what your liberal media rags are telling you and your friends, and you might have some kind of critical thoughts to fall back on instead of just rage.
alright, i'll leave you be, it's clear by your tantrum i've won but you're incapable of letting go on your own.
Ok, but can you post the source that someone climbed on the hood of his toddler's car? Is there any evidence this even happened? Not that it would change anything, if it did.
>makes a fool of himself
>runs away like a homosexual
kek
oh shit, someone climbed on the hood of his car (according to him)? sounds like a pretty good argument for cancelling freedom of speech.
You are too stupid to be real. Honestly 8/10 bait, great stuff.
>you're saying if you believed all violence was bad
Why would I believe something that fricking stupid, btw?
>he has the resources to fight that clearly unconstitutional restriction
LMAO
he's done more for the american public in an afternoon than you'll do in your entire life. i think it makes it pretty clear that it's completely unfair that you could run for prez but he couldn't.
that was only added there because they were afraid of a british monarch moving to the US for a few years to try and seize the country back. that's not really a concern anymore with the internet and shit because everyone would see it happening and stop it. it's a deprecated rule just like the one that supposedly keeps presidents from running for election again if they've angered enough opposition people into stacking local courts to make fake judgements of "treason"
You're fricking stupid if you think the restriction should be lifted. You will end up with a foreign intelligence asset in office immediately.
lol as though a random american couldn't just be paid to do that role instead right now. i bet you'd take a couple million bucks to do it. or they could just threaten to kill your family if you don't. the same systems that would prevent those scenarios that are already possible now would prevent what you say.
Nobody with dual citizenship should be allowed to hold office, period. If someone wants to come here then they should have to give up being a citizen anywhere else to be eligible for office.
>muh free speech absolutism
>unless you post publicly available data about stonetoss
you posted a picture of an article about some shit nobody cares about happening in india in refutation to a claim that elon musk is allowing both sides to talk. that's both sides of american politics, obviously, not random indian bullshit. nobody on x gives a shit about india and it's not relevant to the discussion at all
>about some shit nobody cares about
Did you miss the OP or something? Are you confused about what the topic of the thread is?
i think you might be moronic.
someone was talking about american politics in the context of x, which is the topic of this thread.
you brought up indian whatever the frick that has no relevance to anything, probably because you live in a village in india and figure everyone must be in the know on the weird local political bullshit that is irrelevant to anyone else.
you were the one clearly off topic.
>someone was talking about american politics in the context of x
X operates globally, anon. What do American politics have to do with anything?
lol. x is an american company. elon musk bought it for american political reasons. this is objective fact. nobody cares about the third worlders dangling on to an american app focused on american topics. you're just not that important.
Seems to be that way. They're brainwashed by the commie propaganda media
>brainwashed by the commie propaganda media
Samegay troon with MDS. It's amazing how you've been making these threads everyday since he took over your Twitter safe space.
>elon musk blatantly doesn't care about free speech
>but i can say Black person unimpeded now so everything is fine
Lmao
He's going to incentivize rich grifters with... 20 bucks? Are you daft or something?
nta but this is just a first test of an idea he had. the amount of subscribes needed will keep dropping.
bot thread.
buy an ad, shill.
Elon is based, and you are a fricking pedo troon who hate the greatest inventor in human history. I guess you're also one of those troons who are seething now because their posts are No longer promoted on X because of pronouns in your bio, which lower your popularity thanks to the new algorithm.
i think olivers data is wrong
>twitter drama
frick off
go back where you came from
we don't care about twatter
Gotta be honest, I'm the first to suck Elons wiener at every opportunity, but this change does nothing for the normal guy lurking around. I don't even feel like getting on my knees senpai
>I am a free speech absolutist!
>if you ignore these thousands of exceptions
the absolute state