>the exception that proves the rule

>the exception that proves the rule

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    example?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      There are none, because that's a stupid concept

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        all primes are odd
        proof: 2 is even

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          More like: anons are virgins. Some anons are married though. Therefore not all anons are virgins or marriage != non-virginity. Still the majority of anons are virgins. Married anons are
          >>the exception that proves the rule.
          Married anons are an invalid counterexample to the claim that anons are virgins.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            All white people are evil and racist.
            > but what about X philantropist
            Exception that proves the rule.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >ALL
            Can you read? moron.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Remove the word all if you dislike it. My point still stands.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Therefore we must agree on a definition of what we're studying and compare observations from different frames of reference.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            All white people are evil and racist.
            > but what about X philantropist
            Exception that proves the rule.

            It's not PROOF though

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      There are none, because that's a stupid concept

      It is applicable to statistical rules (i.e. trends). You would remark a chinese individual having all white hair due to albinism because they statistically are very likely to have black hair. The fact that this would be remarkable is the because it is an exception to the strong statistical trend.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        More like: anons are virgins. Some anons are married though. Therefore not all anons are virgins or marriage != non-virginity. Still the majority of anons are virgins. Married anons are
        >>the exception that proves the rule.
        Married anons are an invalid counterexample to the claim that anons are virgins.

        All white people are evil and racist.
        > but what about X philantropist
        Exception that proves the rule.

        This is not how it works. Here's a real example of an exception proving the rule:
        You're looking for a spot to park your car. You see a sign that says "no parking". Therefore, you can deduce that, in places where there is no sign, parking is allowed. The fact that an explicit exception was made proves the implicit existence of the general rule that it is an exception to.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          What if the sign says "No Killing"
          Dear me, it seems your logic has failed *tips fedora*

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Nothing can be its own opposite which is why the value of nothing, 0, is allowed to be its own opposite number -0=0.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        the opposite of nothing is +-infinity

        • 1 month ago
          Cult of Passion

          >no "complex infinities"
          I wouldnt even know what to do with it.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          No, opposites numbers are defined through the additive inverse 1/-1, 2/-2, etc.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    > you can't prove a negative

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/y1h8lvJ.jpeg

      > all models are wrong, but some are useful

      Both of these are true. Are you moronic?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >the exception that proves the rule
      Valid reasoning by B if A tries to disprove a deduction from a bigger number of observations with a deduction from a smaller number of observations.

      >you can't prove a negative
      Valid reasoning by B if A tries to disprove X by fallaciously claiming a lack of observation of X. After all: there's a chance that X might be observed somewhere sometime in the future so it's a matter of probability rather than absolute presence/absence.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    > all models are wrong, but some are useful

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      models are not complete but are useful, they are less wrong as compared to stupid shit. they don't perfectly represent reality as they are not complete, but partially describing reality works better than having no fricking clue.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >models are not complete but are useful
        What the frick do you mean not complete?
        > they don't perfectly represent reality
        They can perfectly represent the part of reality that you're studying. In what fricking sense is the model wrong?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >What the frick do you mean not complete?
          you brainlet

  4. 1 month ago
    Cult of Passion

    Yes.

    If you had two magnets without markings, you could deduce similar poles via perfect counter-balance, only possible in "Theory".

    >why dont you connect the two
    Not posssible, figure it out.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    > Both of these are true. Are you moronic?

  6. 1 month ago
    Saint. Barkon

    You are stylish.

    • 1 month ago
      Saint. Barkon

      And iconic.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yes.

      If you had two magnets without markings, you could deduce similar poles via perfect counter-balance, only possible in "Theory".

      >why dont you connect the two
      Not posssible, figure it out.

      And iconic.

      Meds, NOW

      • 1 month ago
        Cult of Passion

        On it.

        Thanks, I sometimes forget to take care of myself, I just get so caught up is helping the poor*cough-humble-brag-cough*.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      And iconic.

      https://i.imgur.com/QBKVN1C.jpeg

      On it.

      Thanks, I sometimes forget to take care of myself, I just get so caught up is helping the poor*cough-humble-brag-cough*.

      Why are off-topic spam like this allowed on IQfy? They spam every thread with nonsense day in and day out.

      • 1 month ago
        Saint. Barkon

        gaypot

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >epistemological a priory platonic qualia

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >dualism
    >dichotomy
    >dimorphisn
    >dihydrogenmonoxide
    >opposites
    >inverse

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Future humans will have extreme female biased size dimorphism

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yo I've been looking for you to dump porn for months now, assuming you're the same poster

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You know it senpai. I've been very busy for like a year now and occupying my free time with other things.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >appeal to authority

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >0.9999...=1

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >actually... did you know that [math]0.999ne 1[/math] in the hyperreals?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/VOW1Ryy.jpeg

      >actually... did you know that [math]0.999ne 1[/math] in the hyperreals?

      0.999... is not real in nature so it's completely useless to talk about. Make up whatever "facts" you want about it.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        wym? 1 does exist in nature

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    moron thread

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >only the natural numbers between 1 and 10^80 can be considered since that's what appears in nature

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yes? The rest is fantasy, might as well talk about lord of the rings or your favorite anime or something.
      >It's real if I can imagine it!
      Nope

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The only case I found in which it makes any sense, is that if you ever meet an exception, you may ask him "you're russian and you don't drink? I heard all russians drink booze. Is it true?" and if he tells "yes" then maybe that rule is not that wrong, but his existence alone may indicate that "not exactly"

  14. 1 month ago
    Saint. Barkon

    >The OP that proves OP is a gay i.e. most OPs on sci bar St. Barkon

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *