The final boss of political philosophy. HHH is the endgame
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
The final boss of political philosophy. HHH is the endgame
The final boss of political philosophy. HHH is the endgame
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Yes, very nice but imagine we had an quadruple H philosopher! We would undoubtably live in an utopia!
>Yes, very nice
I thought OP was Huey Lewis and you were making an American Psycho joke for a sec.
End game to political philosophy is John Locke
T. statists
>Disregard empirical evidence because it can be manipulated, only consider a priori logical axioms
>Cites a frickton of empirical evidence when it favors anarcho-capitalism
Pick a lane dude.
t. libertarian (admittedly not ancap though)
I am unaware of any instances where Hoppe dismisses empirical evidence outright (as a concept) based upon the fact that it can be manipulated. It was my understanding that he simply acknowledges that empirical evidence is limited in ways a priori reasoning is not, and that-- indeed-- empiricism itself *relies* upon a priori reason, not the other way around.
Pursuant to this view, empirical evidence may be employed to enrich our understanding of our induced axioms. However empirical evidence which contradicts our axioms must necessarily be faulty (by way of manipulated figures, failure to control variables, etc.), because their conclusions offend rational, formal, logic. To disprove the axiom, you would have to show the logical fault in the reasoning, which is not necessarily accomplished by pointing to a premise and declaring it false based upon an empirical study (which seems to be the mainstream empiricist view).
>another moronic lolbert
Yawn.
This. I really really wish OP posted a based chad tradlarper instead. But they didn't, so I downvoted this thread.
Yes.
While his takes are very interesting it's pretty easy to find weaknesses in his arguments. A final boss should probably be a little more challanging in this regard.
He's a king.
https://www.hanshoppe.com/2024/01/an-open-letter-to-walter-e-block/
Political ideology is for superficial babies, anyways. If you tell yourself you need to live in a box, you deserve the boxes you get.
without boxes to put things in, you end up getting a whole mess all over the floor
Hmmm, listen to this: https://youtu.be/INC3ST0rreY?si=xdHPEeILTlWUP4WD
I'm only a fan of early RHCP
yeah anything after BSSM is trash
Hedonistic gay
NTA but I have the right to party
That's John Frusciante, not RHCP
That's great not my bag
Okay, dick. I was asking you earnestly to listen to the song because it had to do with the conversation. Evidently all you care about is your fricking self-image and pre-conceived ideals, so I'm done here.
that's not the point, there's a spammer on IQfy just like you
no there isn't because I'm that fricking guy and i made that thread almost a week ago
And tell me what you think of it, too. It applies and I'm curious to your thoughts.
Libertarianism seems a bit like a diametral mirror image of marxism. Instead of extreme collectivism you have extreme individualism. It's arguments have a similar flair of optimistic utopianism and, like in Marx, the analysis of the problem (democracy) is more convincing than the proposed solution.
>political philosophy
>shoot aliens with shotguns, punch black people repeatedly
you posted the wrong image op this is HHH not whoever that is
His work is filled with fallacies and some of the most absurd statements (he claims for example that taxation is more unjust than slavery in the South). Still he worth reading as an eccentric curiosity and a refreshing alternative to pedestrian liberalism.
>His work is filled with fallacies
Got an example?
>he claims for example that taxation is more unjust than slavery in the South
trvthnvke