The government has won the war on privacy

The government has won the war on privacy

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Sage

    I have conceded the war on tik tokkers, normoes and zoomers
    I don't care what their takes are or what their cookie settings are
    I hate Black folk, women, and everyone who takes this kind of easy bait

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Same, I've given up on helping those who don't want to help themselves.
      Now I just secure my own shit the best one can these days.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        please help me with this

        She's right
        Name ONE(1) way in which targeted advertisments have made your life worse, or perjudicated you in any way

        one
        Serious answers only

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    better normalgays than me, if they give in the govt will be satisfied and won't try to innovate their privacy stealing technology more which means I'll be able to circumvent it and won't be in an arms race with them

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >he actually believes this
      lol, they already have all of the data from the cattle. why do you think they invest billions of dollars into researching backdoors and surveilling "high-risk" people? because data from people like us is worth far more than some npc that just uses facebook, tiktok, and youtube like 99% of the population. that's why they brainwash people into thinking theyre invading your privacy for the sake of catching "dangerous criminals"
      they will NEVER have enough data, and you will never be safe. it's a game of cat and mouse

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      lol no. Is your mom a privacy autist? What about your dad? Your granny? All of your friends? Just as an example: Facebook indexes the contact list of their users so if anyone with facebook has your number, then facebook has your number.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >he actually believes this
      lol, they already have all of the data from the cattle. why do you think they invest billions of dollars into researching backdoors and surveilling "high-risk" people? because data from people like us is worth far more than some npc that just uses facebook, tiktok, and youtube like 99% of the population. that's why they brainwash people into thinking theyre invading your privacy for the sake of catching "dangerous criminals"
      they will NEVER have enough data, and you will never be safe. it's a game of cat and mouse

      she has a point though, you can just stop using the internet at any point and all of a sudden there's no data for them to sell.

      >Year Of Our Lord Two-Thousand-Twenty-Two
      >Believing that "privacy" is a thing
      If you're posting on this board, it's because your government has already decided that you are unfit for normies and they've sent you here as punishment. Wireless neural-interfaces were invented decades ago, they aren't like the stories or memes, you can barely notice them even when you're specifically made aware of them--
      Try writing this post down, then write down another note to remind you to check what you wrote down and see if you remember any of that at all.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        tf are you on about?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        wireless neural interfaces? tell me more

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >it's because your government has already decided that you are unfit for normies and they've sent you here as punishment.
        tell that to the normies i regularly sleep with.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        oh shit oh frick

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        2spooky4me

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    these people can get their data farmed to keep the services I enjoy free for me

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >these people
      you think you're not one of them?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        No, because I use privacy enhancing tools

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          every time you visit a site, including this one, you're being logged whether you want to or not. moron

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >has a job
          woops your company made you accounts with your personal information like the emails that you used to apply online and their company email for you

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      > roastie doesnt care about privacy
      > sends loose selfie
      > apple sends it to icloud
      > whole family sees selfie
      Many such cases

      Women don't care about what happens online because they have a LIFE outside of the internet. That's something that you always online IQfytards don't understand. There is a world out there that people do shit in. You think when she goes hiking, kayaking, or parties in Spain ANYONE is going to know about what she did on the internet? NOPE! Get a life, nerds!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        2/10 you tried

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Have fun with your offline live when you're victim of identity fraud

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Instagram/tiktok data mining = identity fraud? You always online nerds are more likely to fall for that because you are the ones always using online services. You nerds probably have a coinbase account.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The average normalgay uses the same password and email account everywhere. It's just a matter of time before one of the places they use it at is compromised and then Ivan or Chang credit stuff their logins onto every website of importance.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        What are you even talking about? Women are obsessed with social media. Their "real life" only exists to generate content for their Instagram. They crave attention and validation online.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >ANYONE is going to know about what she did on the internet
        In case you didn't notice, they document everything they do on the internet

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        So people shouldn’t be held accountable for the things they say and do online because THATS THEIR ONLINE LIFE NOT THEIR OUTSIDE LIFE?

        Oy vey

        Reminder that she raped her sister and faced no consequences

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >So people shouldn’t be held accountable for the things they say and do online
          Correct

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >raped her sister
          Wait what?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Stuck marble pebbles in her sister’s vegana when she was like 4 or 5 years old I think. She literally admitted it in her book.
            lmao easy mode

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            And no doubt she's not getting into any legal trouble because she's a woman.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >when she was like 4 or 5 years old
            Which one of them was 4-5? How old was the other?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Sister 5 and Leah was like 12 or 13 if i recall

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >what is geolocation
        ?/10 you got me to reply

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    > roastie doesnt care about privacy
    > sends loose selfie
    > apple sends it to icloud
    > whole family sees selfie
    Many such cases

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      so w*men who feel this way aren't allowed to get mad about having their naked pictures shown

      I f*cking love facts and logic

      >bitchless chudcels can only come up with cumbrain fantasies to justify their irrational ideas about privacy
      I just know y'all were rubbing your tiny white boy clits while writing those posts

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        shalom troonstein

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I have a big heavy hog, sister. Post those breasts, privacy doesn't matter, right? What are you, delusional?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          what does the pink hat with ears left bottom mean? why is it bad?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            frick off hatgay. You're what's wrong with this country

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            im not even in your country. i dont even own such a hat. matter of fact, i dont own any hat. im asking what it stands for, what it means etc

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            It’s a pussyhat, feminist movement I Believe

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            POOR IRISHMAN DETECTED

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            im not irish either

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >matter of fact, i dont own any hat
            how can anyone be a hatlet? I thought manlets were the shittiest ""males"" around and yet here we are...

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            It's a "pussy hat".
            Feminists love using the most crude puns and analogies. I'm all for abortions, but seeing shit like this makes more pro-abortion than pro-choice. Imagine if guys protested draft, unequal parental rights or hookup culture by wearing phallic accessories.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >makes more pro-abortion than pro-choice
            wat

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            "Pro-choice" means letting a dumb hog choose.
            Vast majority of women aren't qualified to make that decision.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Imagine if guys protested draft, unequal parental rights or hookup culture by wearing phallic accessories.
            frick off it would be hilarious

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            we'd wear hats and call ourselves Dickheads

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The abortion thing needs to be added on

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            That's what the last one is

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Lmao, moron, you are literally same supporting the opposite of the current thing but thinking you are somehow better.
          Honestly, being Ukrainian right now is eye-opening as to how braindead everyone is

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            [...]
            To iterate on this, since you posted that pic, explain in simple words how exactly Ukraine is in the wrong so that everyone here will see how absolutely braindead you are. I am just wondering what route will you go. Labs? Nazis? The bombings of Donbass? Maybe historical Russian clay?
            picrelated

            I am so done with aggro'd Russians and Ukrainians on the internet.
            You're worst than Xi's or Biden's slaves with your inane banter on why one side it best. You're both being lead by cartels, we're being lead by cartels. They're all profiting from this because this is what war is really for and this is how it has been since WWII, the last true war.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Lmao, moron, you are literally same supporting the opposite of the current thing but thinking you are somehow better.
          Honestly, being Ukrainian right now is eye-opening as to how braindead everyone is

          To iterate on this, since you posted that pic, explain in simple words how exactly Ukraine is in the wrong so that everyone here will see how absolutely braindead you are. I am just wondering what route will you go. Labs? Nazis? The bombings of Donbass? Maybe historical Russian clay?
          picrelated

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Ukraine is an oligarchic dictatorship. In Russia, even some parties that are banned in western countries, like the KPRF are allowed.
            Also the genocide of Russians in donbass

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Best be joke/b8

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I actually support Ukraine's sovereignty, the image is more about how idiots like you who don't see beyond the surface just accept whatever narrative is sold to them.

            Most Americans would have believed Ukraine was a province in Russia before this propaganda campaign started. Outrage and activism is entirely manufactured and astroturfed here.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Outrage and activism
            So, education?
            Yes, that is how you let people know about a cause and get them to form an opinion on it.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >be ukranian
            >live like a literal third worlder while nu-czar and their friends fill their pockets
            >these nu-czars have not only stopped paying tribute to the emperor, they now serve the emperors enemies against him in open rebellion
            >all this just so nuczars fill their pockets while sending the pleb to die like dogs

            I know you're frustrated, but anyone who aspires to czardom is not a good person, you desperately want to be told you're a victim at the forces of evil, maybe you should start by killing the nu-czars in your country who think disturbing the geopolitical power balance to line their fat pockets is somehow altruistic

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >if you are invaded by the country that has been invading your country for the last 3 hundred years and is currently ruled by a man who has been in power for THIRTY (30) years you better go and protest your own government since it’s clear they are the real villains

            I actually support Ukraine's sovereignty, the image is more about how idiots like you who don't see beyond the surface just accept whatever narrative is sold to them.

            Most Americans would have believed Ukraine was a province in Russia before this propaganda campaign started. Outrage and activism is entirely manufactured and astroturfed here.

            I come from a poor family and definitely can speak from an experience, Ukrainian schools gave me an ability to go to university, Ukrainian university gave me an ability to get skills for the employment, Ukrainian IT product companies gave me an ability to get money and experience to current hold a FAANG position all the while paying absolutely minimal taxes

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You do realize there are people alive who remember what it's like to be ruled by russia? Why do you think ukrainians are willing to fight to the death against a far more powerful country?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            DA GLOBOhomosexual WANTS YOU TO DEFEND YOURSELF DON'T YOU SEE!?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I love how the term globohomosexual has taken off. When NPCs start using it in their strawmen, you know it's here to stay.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Russia is less than 75% white, over 15% muslim, has rampant aids/abortion/suicide rates and you claim I'm the npc for hating that shithole.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Hey israeli person. Stop israeliteing!!!!

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous
          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >I'm going to premptively name common criticisms of Ukraine so you can't use them.
            >now give me another reason Ukraine sucks or you're wrong!
            Nice debating technique there, moron.

            Imagine unrioncally giving two shits about that irrelevant war while our standard of living falls by the day. Please do everyone a favor and go and fight for Ukraine.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          republitards support ukraine and fly the flags, with their trump flags, 10000x more than any dems do.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Why would anyone be a democrat at this point?
            Biden is impotent and so was obama to a lesser extent and at the state level their soft on crime, let hobos shit on the streets and scare away businesses.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Pretty much healthcare and nothing else.
            Until now that is. Conservatards have motivated quite some libtards to vote with their state abortion bans (Ohio has a law from 1850 go into effect lmao). Not to mention the things to come now. SCOTUS is in lolbertarian mode, probably fair labor standards act will be ruled unconstitutional as well. At that point it won't be just the libtards ...

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I mean youd think so but what has biden done to fix healthcare?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Nothing. You didn't ask about biden however, but dems in general, which would include sanders I would think

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Whats needed is the right regulations not throwing more money at the problem i think. Never mind 20%. If the tax burden got raised 20% or more the united states would spend more taxes than european countries even. You know like poor people get medicaid, middle has to pay and old people get medicare. Okay then just write the laws and fix it.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Sure that may be your opinion, but 70% of americans think there should be universal healthcare apparently. At least that's what I have heard. Not an american however, so the specifics are unknown to me.
            However seeing how pentagon spent 1 million on some printers I would also bet there is plenty of money already in government hands, just misused. Add the tax loopholes to that, and if both of these get corrected, america would get a shit ton of money

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Americans spend more on healthcare than most countries with public insurance. They just dont realize it because it isnt explicitly earmarked as a tax.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            No yeah i doubled checked.
            20%
            If you sdd 20% thatd put the us gdp to tax ratio at around the level of denmark
            But thats just the healthcare. So yeah probably more than denmark of ol sanders his way.

            Americans spend more on healthcare than most countries with public insurance. They just dont realize it because it isnt explicitly earmarked as a tax.

            I mean again i agree that there ought to regulations you know. Cant say what regulations thats not my job to figure out anyways.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Canadians spend about $6.6k a year on healthcare. Americans spend $13k, it's a significantly higher percentage of GDP as well. Canadian provinces don't serve the best example, but it's next door and it helps illustrate that public insurance is much more economically efficient. I don't get why paying more is better so long as you don't call it a tax.
            You could just make it a public company and call it a copay. The tax incidence would be the same, but you could just collect it from employers instead to make burgers think it aint no stinken tax on them.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Why would anyone be a democrat at this point?
            Most people pick one of the two options.
            There are the massive, mega morons with anti-human values, and there are the impotent b***hes who change nothing.

            If I was a burger, I'd vote for the lesser evil.
            I wouldn't identify as a democrat, but many would call me one, simply because I'd prefer party of doing nothing over a party of subhumanity.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Most people pick one of the two options.
            There aren't two options, there is only the illusion of choice.
            >If I was a burger, I'd vote for the lesser evil.
            There's no such thing.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >There's no such thing.
            If you're saying that voting is not a thing, I might agree.
            But saying that democrats aren't less shit than republicans would be fricking moronic.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Democrats aren't less shit than Republicans, and you don't have a single argument against that fact. Obama and Biden simply allow you to forget the evil you're supporting, whereas Trump acted like a moron and made it blatant.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah rather not think about politics anyways. Also the fact that theres people struggling financially begging to get jobs is upsetting. Stay in your containment thread.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            That image triggers you NPCs so bad. Now for the next bludgeon to your ego. Only the hits.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Oh look I posted that one before. Must be pretty popular

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            me program computer

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I claim welfare

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            While I agree in the sense that the first 3 sound useless, what ultimately matters is what someone will pay for it.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        have a nice day, you will eventually anyway so let's expedite this

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >ask chick for AppleID "to update laptop"
        >say yours isn't working or some shit
        >login to an icloud scraper
        Me and my friends literally did exactly that throughout college.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I JUST LEFT COLLEGE AND NOW I FRICKING READ THIS????? FUUUUCK. So many nudes lost, like tears in the rain...

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          absolutely devilish
          find any noteworthy shit? dead bodies? epstein island photos?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Not much, some chick had mad beef curtains and a hairbrush in her vag.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You forgot the -ACK

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I had an iPod touch in 2010. I took a selfie with my girlfriend who was naked. I plugged it into their parents computer to charge one day, and all my photos popped up, including that one. Awkward.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        never write that combination of words again

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      BUT SHE LOGGED OUT, OKAY CHUD?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I still don't get this "chud" thing. Is it supposed to be offensive? I just imagine picrel saying it like the moronic b***h they are

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Why does she make you so mad?
          What did she do?

          She's completely right about the eco stuff btw

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            maybe Y'ALL should stop being pedos

            >She's completely right about the eco stuff btw
            meds

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          According to Urban Dictionary, it means an irredeemable butthole. In common usage it's either any person an SJW disagrees with or used by right wingers to mock how SJWs use it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      oh noo my family saw my selfie

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    extremely onlineIQfy incels absolutely BTFO

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    so w*men who feel this way aren't allowed to get mad about having their naked pictures shown

    I f*cking love facts and logic

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Why is Pepe sucking on that crucifix?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        it's a joint m8

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        He's kissing it, like a good Argentinian.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Women who take nudes deserve to get shame anyways.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        According to MSM, the fappening's fault was because men are evil and misogynistic rapists, not because Apple's government backdoor had some shitty security

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I want the government to collect all kinds of data on everyone and share it with medical companies (name etc expunged)

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No shit, anon. That happened twenty years ago.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I literally stopped caring. I've gone off grid. I use Windows 11 sans Internet. I'm chilling at a friend's house, house sitting on an ipad they own. it's been a month since I've used the internet. They won. Frick the Internet.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >that's not happening, and it's good that it is
      https://americanmind.org/salvo/thats-not-happening-and-its-good-that-it-is/

      The rallying cry of the authority-worshipping NPC

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >>that's not happening, and it's good that it is
        honestly couldn't have summed it up better

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Okay but if you aren't doing anything illegal why would you even care? Like if your data got leaked to the public what's the worst outcome? Ppl see what porn you watch?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I don't want them to have my data because they want to have it.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I know that feel.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The services already manipulate what you are going to see based on the data. The effects aren't a conjecture at this point. Only clearly written search terms and specific clicks are.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Identity theft. The government mismanages your personal data as often as private companies do, and by the time you hear about it it'll be too late because they usually consult a lawyer for 2-3 months before saying anything.

      >It couldn't happen to me, I'm security conscious, I have unique passwords, 2fa, hard security questions and...

      It can happen to anybody because the attack is not on you, a data broker or government auditor can have your information stored somewhere they shouldn't, medical companies will probably be the biggest source of private leaks this century (in terms of financial/identity theft.) All it takes is for a private company or government agency to use an obsolete program somewhere or hire someone "they know" to badly design/implement a website that asks for your most valuable personal details. Accellion and SolarWind are real world examples you can look at.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I work in risk management

        your data is fricked. it takes a single employee writing improper code, accidently not using a prescribed VPN, not checking a security box in some SaaS environment etc for thousands of documents with PII to be totally open for anyone to grab. I see this shit literally every day

        I genuinely don't understand how any data could be even remotely secure, unfortunately

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        This can happen just as easily with physical documents and criminals aren't that sophisticated it will almost always boil down to just trying to max out your credit cards.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >This can happen just as easily with physical documents
          This is objectively incorrect. Data leaks happen pretty much daily, and the nature of digital information means it's much easier to disseminate, and there's no way to know if you've contained it.

          Russia had the right idea when they went back to typewriters. We're fricked because our leaders are both hubristic and incompetent.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >This is objectively incorrect.
            workers at hotels in Russia used to sell the credit card information of their clients. Credit card skimmers are as old as time and disposing of documents incorrectly in the garbage/recycle bin are just as common as the classic "uhhh actually everyone's password was stored in plaintext." Mail is stolen, you are always one wallet drop or even a pick pocket away from your government issued photo identification and all your credit cards.
            Data breaches happen. But the amount of customer information accessed isn't necessarily more alarming than preinternet.

            It kind of reminds me of someone who was always screaming about how unsecure smart locks without any grasp of physical vulnerabilities that make way for b&e.

            Nvidia being ransomwared or Sony documents leaking is a more sexy headline but its not really a bigger threat to consumers.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Again, you are objectively incorrect.

            The scale that digital information can be disseminated at, along with the ease and anonymity makes it inherently more threatening. Scale is the key factor you're pretending not to understand (very common on the internet when someone wants to make a point without actually defending it). If digitized information is more useful to businesses and organizations because it's easier to access, share, and document, those factors also apply to its illicit use as well. You aren't using reason even though you think you're being clever. Privacy matters and digitally stored information is INHERENTLY and OBJECTIVELY riskier for the consumer because of the scale and ease at which it can be misused.

            But yeah I'm sure some Russian prostitute stole a customer's credit card one time, same exact thing. Good point moron. Wanna know how I know you need to go back to R*ddit?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I think you are confusing corporations with individuals/consumers.
            You also don't seem to grasp what information is of use/obtainable and how. """Cloud""" is a new threat vector. But for most people it's not bigger threat than social engineering or any other vulnerability.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not merely talking about corporations, also governments, police departments, political groups, private documents, the cloud. Anyone that stores information digitally.
            >You also don't seem to grasp what information is of use/obtainable and how
            The thing is, you don't either. You don't know if that leak of Trump voters is going to get people killed. You obviously aren't considering what criminals might do with the recent database leak of gun owners in California. The point is, the information isn't secure and the risks are INHERENTLY open ended. Don't try to move the goalposts.

            >But for most people it's not bigger threat than social engineering or any other vulnerability.
            >for most people
            >isn't necessarily
            >not really

            You're qualifying all of your statements because you have no point, you're just here to show off that you understand how data is currently being misused. Good for you, pat on the back. You are still OBJECTIVELY incorrect on a philosophical level. There is no rebutting what I'm saying, digital information is inherently less secure. It's a riskier way to store information than physical copies in the aggregate, not qualifying for any particular use case. Stop shilling for the digitization of data. You are incorrect and I'm tired of explaining to you how.

            If you were smart you'd be arguing that the payoffs outweight the risks, but you're just here to shit fling and show off the particular knowledge you seem to have from whatever job you do. That Upton Sinclair quote about jobs comes to mind.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >The thing is, you don't either.
            I evidently do.
            >You don't know if that leak of Trump voters is going to get people killed.
            your vote is not stored ina darabse linked to your identity. Nobody has been killed for this
            >another dumb hypothetical.
            Today someone had their mail stolen so that someone could commit identity theft, use the information to get replacement documents or a credit card. maybe they even got that credit card today.
            Someone is skimming obtiuaries to get a sin card/ birth certificate replacements issued for a dead guy to sell to an illegal.

            You couldn't even come up with an example of identity theft and just made a hypothetical " dude what if a leaked donor list gets people killed" again, you need to touch grass. Trump voters literally put maga shit on their cars and windows. I have an easier way to identify them.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >yeah I'm sure some Russian prostitute stole a customer's credit card one time, same exact thing. Good point moron. Wanna know how I know you need to go back to R*ddit?

            Again, just because the possibilities haven't been realized yet, doesn't mean my reasoning is incorrect. You cannot tell me my reasoning is incorrect because it is not. You can only deflect by mentioning smaller scale operations, not realizing you're proving my point.

            >your vote is not stored ina darabse linked to your identity.
            For now. You'd argue it should because there are no inherent risks to storing information digitally. That it's just as bad as having them on note cards in an office file somewhere (aka you don't live in reality, and I'm starting to get to you by reminding you of this, I can tell)
            >Nobody has been killed for this
            Yet. I can tell you don't like to extrapolate to the future because incuriosity helps you shill for shitty things like universal digitally stored information. It's always the same with you NPCS
            >nothing can possibly go wrong. you're a conspiracy theorist
            >who could have seen this coming?!

            >You couldn't even come up with an example of identity theft
            If you're limiting your argument to merely identity theft then we don't have to continue. I accept your concession of my broader point that digitally stored information is inherently less secure though (something you couldn't once respond to directly, I win)

            >I have an easier way to identify them.
            Yes, when they're balls deep in your fat wife and she calls their name.

            Your digitally run, error-free utopia is NEVER coming. It's incompatible with human nature (notice how I understand your motivations better than you do).

            COMMIE
            homosexualS
            STAY
            MAD

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Again, just because the possibilities haven't been realized yet, doesn't mean my reasoning is incorrect. You cannot tell me my reasoning is incorrect because it is not.
            The onus on you is to demonstrate your claim. Not on my to disprove the negative. The potential volunerabilities of carrying a tomagatchi are endless. Jus because you (or I) can't actually think of them doesn't mean they don't exist.
            >You can only deflect by mentioning smaller scale operations, not realizing you're proving my point.
            I am explaining how crime/ identity theft work. It's mostly petty/small scale. I'm sorry if crime doesn't line up with your movies. But at least I have example

            >For now.
            Just glossing over that your only example is impossible?
            >You'd argue it should because there are no inherent risks to storing information digitally.
            What a dumbass strawman.
            1) there are risks with storing information digitally.
            2) tying votes to identity and logging it undermines democracy and should never be legalized. Whether it's digital or using a fricking stone on a cave wall.
            I'm simply stating you are grossly missatributing individual risk to the internet.
            For example, getting bank invoices exclusively online is drastically more secure then getting them mailed and does wonders for identify theft.
            Is it foolproof? No. Should you use your Runescape password for your bank? No. Should your bank keep it in an SMB share accesible by all employees? No.
            >That it's just as bad as having them on note cards in an office file somewhere (aka you don't live in reality,
            dumpster diving is incredibly effective.
            >identity theft is your only example.
            I was directly responding to someone who said you should explicitly care because of identity theft. I assumed thats what we were talking about because nothing else was mentioned.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Oh also taxes. Never get your NoA mailed. And if you do make sure to shred it.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >The thing is, you don't either.
            I evidently do.
            >You don't know if that leak of Trump voters is going to get people killed.
            your vote is not stored ina darabse linked to your identity. Nobody has been killed for this
            >another dumb hypothetical.
            Today someone had their mail stolen so that someone could commit identity theft, use the information to get replacement documents or a credit card. maybe they even got that credit card today.
            Someone is skimming obtiuaries to get a sin card/ birth certificate replacements issued for a dead guy to sell to an illegal.

            You couldn't even come up with an example of identity theft and just made a hypothetical " dude what if a leaked donor list gets people killed" again, you need to touch grass. Trump voters literally put maga shit on their cars and windows. I have an easier way to identify them.

            >being worried about voting records
            Heh, don't worry chums, they've got it all figured out! They've stopped killing people over votes, like, at least a couple years ago!
            Now, they're smart enough to put you on a list and ensure you have negative social credit, like, forever, so say goodbye to any job or marriage prospects!

            (Btw, see

            [...] [...]
            >Year Of Our Lord Two-Thousand-Twenty-Two
            >Believing that "privacy" is a thing
            If you're posting on this board, it's because your government has already decided that you are unfit for normies and they've sent you here as punishment. Wireless neural-interfaces were invented decades ago, they aren't like the stories or memes, you can barely notice them even when you're specifically made aware of them--
            Try writing this post down, then write down another note to remind you to check what you wrote down and see if you remember any of that at all.

            , because if you're posting here then you're already on a list)

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Clearly you've never had a crazy stalker

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Clearly you've never had a crazy stalker
        breasts or gtfo
        why would I care about a f*male issue?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >crazy stalkers must be male
          Are you actually moronic?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            and what is your hypothetical crazy stalker grill going to do to you?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Slash your tires, call your friends and try to slander you, steal your mail, harass your family or anyone else close to you and try to get them to spend less time with you, etc.
            You really can't think of this shit on your own? I was joking before when I asked if you're moronic, but now I really do think you are.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >woman doing any of that
            you must be a real shitbag to drive somebody to do all that

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            moron

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not that dude, but come the frick on, you really think women only do shitty things as an "eye for an eye" thing?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      you clearly don't know how fickle the definitions of legal and ilegal are.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You can always tell when a zoomer wrote a post because the opinion is garbage and they say things like "ppl"

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Please post your address, a naked picture of yourself, your family, and your job.
      Shouldn't be an issue for you, clearly.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      "It's like saying, I don't care for freedom of speech, because I have nothing to say."

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Nothing to hide, nothing to show either.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >so what if the gov has a copy of my house key i aint storing cocain in there

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Doesn't matter. The right to privacy doesn't require you to have done anything wrong.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >getting baited by zoomers on tiktok
    this is when you know you’ve become an old man

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    she has a point though, you can just stop using the internet at any point and all of a sudden there's no data for them to sell.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      you can't avoid the internet. if you walk down a street, a camera is recording you, sizing you up, and sending it somewhere. that's sellable data.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >if you walk down a street, a camera is recording you
        tell that to all the people who's shit i've been stealing. doesn't seem to help them much.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          GIVE IT BACK JAMAL

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          People will only get arrested when it is profitable or when they endanger someone important.

          Think of how often you hear about a shooting or a bombing or a riot or whatever. There was probably one yesterday; in all honesty, there is probably one going on right now.
          ...Now think about how often a famous person is injured in one of those incidences. How often a judge or politician or celebrity is caught up in the danger. Take your time, but keep in mind that these Important People have known addresses on the internet (just a google search away!) and you get to be famous by proxy if you harm them; that the same folks that would eat that person's baby's soiled-diaper on live TV for a moment of fame...are able to get guns. But hardly anyone Important ever gets hurts, right? There is a reason for that.
          You don't matter. The cops don't care about you.
          I don't matter. The cops don't care about me.
          But judge Carl Buttfrick McDuckstein? He matters. And if anything threatens him the entire power of the USA will come down on that threat to turn it into a greasy smear on a wall before the plan to harm him is even put to paper.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >People will only get arrested when it is profitable or when they endanger someone important.
            ah so you might say it's... quite literally NOT MY PROBLEM

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            you're on IQfy; you're not important enoug

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            i've been telling IQfy this for years. no one here really has anything to worry about because they're not as important as they really think they are.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            That can always change...

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            well i'll be right here when it does.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >be me, roastie
    >track my period in a cool app thing
    >log off to get an abortion
    >some cool company buys your data
    >??????
    >get imprisoned

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You would have to be moronic to not just go somewhere it's legal. Even if you have to take out a loan or something to do the travel, that's a much better financial decision than having the kid.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >I do not care I can just log off and go about my day like
    But you won't log off. You keep spending more and more time on the internet. Even if that wasn't the case, the various services will soon force you to use smartphone apps and websites for getting basic shit done in real life, so you will have no choice.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    She is right, the internet is a public place. People who want privacy and anonymity obviously want it for criminal reasons, you'll never see a person in a skimask out in public unless he is partaking in some kind of crime.

    Law enforcement has a duty to protect us from these criminals in real life and on the internet.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      she has a point though, you can just stop using the internet at any point and all of a sudden there's no data for them to sell.

      https://behavioranalyticsretail.com/technologies-tracking-people/

      You will be tracked.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        not my problem.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      There's a grey area to that though. There's a difference between collecting enough info for the service to work and collecting every scrap possible to sell to the highest bidder. Also, you trust the government with that kind of power?

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Some of these advertisement companies are extremely good at using their customer data.
    They can use the combination of all the data points they have about you to deduce so much that it looks like sci-fi. They can know things about you that not even you know, simply through correlations.
    The more varied the info, the more they can infer. The bigger the dataset, the higher the confidence their systems will have in their deductions.
    After they build a (continuously updating) profile on you they can try and sell you things that they think you'll want to buy, which isn't that big of a deal, until you consider that we already know for certain that the US government forces these companies to give them access to their databases (remember prism? that's old as hell now, imagine how advanced whatever they currently have is), and they like to keep data for as long as possible, decades and possibly centuries.
    So how do you know that the government will forever be ok with what it knows about you? Do you think it's impossible that in a few decades they'll start putting people in camps for having your opinions, or for being related to someone who's part of some undesired group?
    Once they have your data they have it forever and you're vulnerable to anything they might want to do with it.

    And that's not counting any possible data breach. Nothing guarantees that your data won't become public and searchable by anyone.
    Imagine your family, friends, potential partners, potential/current employers, stalkers, etc knowing every intimate detail about you. That's not a good scenario for anybody, yet it gets more and more likely to happen as time goes on.

    It doesn't matter if you stop using the Internet forever. The consequences of this are very much practical and in the real world.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >They can use the combination of all the data points they have about you to deduce so much that it looks like sci-fi. They can know things about you that not even you know, simply through correlations.
      Think about it this way. If you see an example once you notice some things. If you see very similar examples hundreds of times, you will see similarities without much effort. You will be able to pick up dependencies that would be guesswork with just one example.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      the reality is that all things can be tracked, predicted and deduced given enough intelligence. even the blackest Black person can figure out what something is going to do based on conjecture through past experiences, and the internet is just a fancy extension of this principle. it's an artform, a technique that one can refine and learn to such an extent that they can track someone from across the world by the smell of their farts. we've had men that could analyse a person and predict their next move on an abstract level since time before time, in that sense hunting a human is just a more complex version of hunting any other animal, except you're looking for digital bullshit as opposed to tracks and droppings. the trick is to use this information yourself as opposed to b***hing and moaning about muh privacy, something that will never happen, because of the simple fact that every single thing can be tracked and traced no matter what kind of cope you pull.

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Is asiatic Moot using my data?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      He's serring you rike hotcakes.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        filled the captcha for you

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I'm studying to work in data analysis. Would I be contributing to this mess?

    is there another tech field I can work in that is less harmful?

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    So many blackpilled anons in this thread saying they no longer care about privacy or that "they have already won anyways". It genuinely makes me sad.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Honestly guys, she's right. Why do I even give a frick?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Some of these advertisement companies are extremely good at using their customer data.
      They can use the combination of all the data points they have about you to deduce so much that it looks like sci-fi. They can know things about you that not even you know, simply through correlations.
      The more varied the info, the more they can infer. The bigger the dataset, the higher the confidence their systems will have in their deductions.
      After they build a (continuously updating) profile on you they can try and sell you things that they think you'll want to buy, which isn't that big of a deal, until you consider that we already know for certain that the US government forces these companies to give them access to their databases (remember prism? that's old as hell now, imagine how advanced whatever they currently have is), and they like to keep data for as long as possible, decades and possibly centuries.
      So how do you know that the government will forever be ok with what it knows about you? Do you think it's impossible that in a few decades they'll start putting people in camps for having your opinions, or for being related to someone who's part of some undesired group?
      Once they have your data they have it forever and you're vulnerable to anything they might want to do with it.

      And that's not counting any possible data breach. Nothing guarantees that your data won't become public and searchable by anyone.
      Imagine your family, friends, potential partners, potential/current employers, stalkers, etc knowing every intimate detail about you. That's not a good scenario for anybody, yet it gets more and more likely to happen as time goes on.

      It doesn't matter if you stop using the Internet forever. The consequences of this are very much practical and in the real world.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Because only a dumb b***h would make it easier for everyone to frick/steal her data.

      A Shitty lock analogy always works, even for your privacy.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      JUST

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    You "could", but it's not what she actually does. She will pick up the phone every now and then, each time being nudged and made aware of products & the services will try to stretch the time the phone is being used.

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >the government
    Not to say they aren't collecting their fair share, but corporations are the ones making the tools and selling your data

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They are also the ones trying to change what we think of privacy and data sharing, especially Google

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    All the drives full of farmed data and telemetry will just be smashed in a few years and melted back down into rare earth metals once we run out of fresh supplies, and we probably won't start back up the advertising economy grift once it collapses after not returning real profits for 20 years.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Which movie is that ?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        bladerunner 2049

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I think you're dreaming. Hard Drive tech and it's constituents will most likely change and clouds are a thing.
      And that sounds scary as frick.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Despite what a marketer told you, the cloud isn't magically infinite storage space - its just someone else's computer, even if storage tech changes (right now ssds are still 5 times more expensive than platters) they're still beholden to available materials.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Google is a trillion dollar company because they don’t make profits

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        A botnet does cost money and requires physical resources to run - and that sort of farmed information does have a shelf life of usefulness. Google, like most big tech is like 90% ethereal, over-valuated, never-liquid, marshmallow-fluff money, any *real* hard wrenches into the supply chain or economy will bring them back down to earth where every other industry is.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >no gayMANs in my retirement portfolio, NFTs and Web3 were those homosexuals running out of ideas

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I personally do not give af that a Stasi officer is following my every move. I can just not look in his direction and go about my day like

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Until they list people by percentage risk factors and then begin to frick with people of "high risk".
      Btw that already happens. Frick think tanks.

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    i know a lot of people which don't care about internet privacy and they even think "personalized ads" are good

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >if I'm not looking at the data it can't effect my life

    Do zoomers not understand object permanence? Are they that brain damaged?

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Just stop being a criminal. It's not hard

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >pedophiles still raping
    >criminal masterminds hiding in plain sight
    >witnesses openly intimidated and no one knows until they relay the blackmail
    >conflicts of interest not stated, peer review burdened with checking, paper still used by gov't

    >but regular people shouldn't be allowed the freedom of privacy
    Authoritarianism always starts with the least guilty. And ends at that, the guilty ones ensure that from the top.

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I bet she'd have a problem if she knew I was jerking off to her every night

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    why are companies so interested in all of the kemoshota porn I look at? are they going to do anything useful with this information? If they're gonna subsidize kemoshota porn then more power to them, they can have all my data if they want

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    women will care when their nudes get them jailed after the eventual regime change.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >the eventual regime change
      >jailed
      if there's a regime change in a western country, they'll have bigger problems

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I hope that change will come soon.

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Cute

  34. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Schizophrenics, their zero sum logic and religious dedication to FOSS won it for them lmao.

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Then the emails and and phone calls start flooding you with endless scams. Your credit cards get declined because of fraudulent purchases.

  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah no shit, zoomers never owned anything and never had privacy, they don't get it. It was always a lost cause.

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This is why you guys have to make an effort to make linux for morons

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      why bother
      they'll just make a botnet for linux

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Well it's not trustless. No such as trustless. But Linux mint is a good base. The only thing Linux mint is missing some eye candy. Fixing gimp should also be a high priority. Also that Linux music editor. I think mint is good enough to the point that everything works. They don't collect telemetry and even went as far as to remove snaps cause they found them suspicious.
        Doing everything from scratch on something like openbsd though is a fools errand.
        But yeah stop acting like eye candy isn't important. Its super important.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          yeah it's important, but it also has to work well.
          GNOME may look very nice for the near-sighted looking from a distance, and some part in me wishes that it would "just werk" (since i really like a bunch of gnome programs), but it is by far the worst UX I have ever come across.
          I've found peace on every single DE, including explorer.exe, but not on gnome.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        They've got quantum computers and AI.
        They probably already have that.

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I feel the same way.

  39. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I'm the same but different. I realized in order to manipulate the system so it can indoctrinate people for me, I need to maximize the data that is mined from me.

  40. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >The government has won the war on privacy
    There was never a fight to begin with, they won from the start.

  41. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    > I literally don't give af that my personal online data is being sold.

  42. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    have a nice day.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      Why would someone do this?

      ignore and report, newbies

  43. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Why would someone do this?

  44. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Its not the govt having my data that im worried about, its the govt time and time again mismanaging that data and having horrible security that worries me.
    Rakeesh from it at the NSA just made a blog and left some important credentials on it, ivan the data leaker now can access and sell data that has every detail about my personal life and how i think, data he just sold to some shady pakistani criminals
    >NOOOOOOOOO MUH STRAWMAN
    what i said just happened to 1 billion chinese citizens last month

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Source? Dunno what to find

  45. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Not the govt. the corpos. Worse.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It means they could potentially use it to start murdering people real easy ay.
      Which I imagine is well underway.

      ..... hurry the frick up already and end me.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        man if only i could get my hands on that murder tech and use it in minecraft

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >you get hands on it
          >immediately use it on yourself

  46. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    We are all Julian Assange
    The UK government is targeting everyone

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They're losing staff in governments, the problem is clearly all corp now.

  47. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  48. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    only morons care about ""privacy"""
    you never had it. you never will. anyone that thinks Apple respect your data more than Facebook, M$, or Google is a clueless moron

  49. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I love how discontented normies are from the fact that everything now is connected through web.
    And there is no going back to "offline civilization"

  50. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >using apple/google/facebook/twitter/tiktok/instagram because "i literally dont care who has my data"
    >thinking privacy is about you
    >thinking privacy is about YOUR data
    >or about you being arrested
    >or about whether you're doing something illegal
    >or about if you're important or not

    that's what's fricked - the vast majority of people don't understand that each click, scroll, search, and purchase is being fed into the PRISM/jedi blue machine learning system. these billions of data points are combined into a model of your personality which can predict with 99.99% accuracy what you're going to buy, how you'll react to a news story, how you'll vote, etc. this profile is then combined with HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of other people's data who "literally don't care". this machine learning system is now capable of modeling SOCIETY AT LARGE, granting whomever controls the system the power to effectively predict and control the future. any government would spend trillions for that kind of power

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >which can predict with 99.99% accuracy what you're going to buy
      I fricking wish.
      Maybe someday they'll predict the exact size of the futa dick you want to fap to, but right now, they can't even suggest an yt video that is like the ones you watched.

      If current trend in supreme court continues, they'll start using their ebin ML model to predict who will commit crime and then throw a lot of randoms into prison while psychopaths continue to rape and steal.

  51. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >The government has won the war on privacy
    Isn't government the side that opposes data being collected and sold? You meant corporations.

  52. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Someone should actually buy it and send hardcore rape hentai with girl looking exactly/deepfaked like her via (e)mail
    Not me though, lmao

  53. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >war on privacy
    This also ties into the war on on sub-cultures, which they won quite a while ago, but can lose quite easily if they don't maintain their surveillance.

    >but why sub-subcultures
    They hate diversity of thought, because if everyone thinks different, then it's harder to manipulate and control everyone. Their ideal world is a world of only 2 warring factions, where they understand what makes each side react strongly, or is "triggered" so they can control both sides.
    Just look at IQfy, this place use to be a sub-culture paradise. Each board was like a pocket universe. Now it's been reduced to pepe and wojack and everything is the same no matter which board you go to. This was by design, not accident. You've already been conquered, long before your "perceived" loss of privacy.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I mean, the site is divided into subcultures already. Boards...

  54. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >privacy is largely non-existent nowadays
    >gays still haven't been final solution'd
    the shittiest dystopia

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They contriboot to society.
      If anyone is going to be final solution'd, it will be useless incels like you. Your parasitic kind only causes trouble.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        homosexuals contribute nothing to anything
        and now that the supreme court finally got some people who aren't pushovers you'll get all your disgusting privileges taken away

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >They contriboot to society.
          Gays contribute disproportionately to STD rates and child abuse cases. We know and we're never going to forget, no matter how hard your corporate daddies sanitize your image.

          You should read some statistics instead of saying dumb incel shit.
          I bet you're from some group that is actually statistically overrepresented among pedophiles, like catholics.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Or Republicans
            lest we forget how much both-side-ism sanitizes their image
            https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1709387

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >They contriboot to society.
        Gays contribute disproportionately to STD rates and child abuse cases. We know and we're never going to forget, no matter how hard your corporate daddies sanitize your image.

  55. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I make it a point every year to give updated biometrics to the government so they can keep me safe by knowing where I am and what I'm doing at all times.

  56. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    You can tell this wasn't directed at a general group and instead directed at men because of how affirmed she is in her views. She clearly has had a conversation with a (very likely male) privacy nerd and found him deeply unattractive and had to resort to confirmation mining on social media to feel like her laziness in protecting herself from people who want to profit off her data is not only a non-issue, but premeditated.

  57. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    People who post titktok on IQfy deserve physical punishment.

  58. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I seriously don't know how you homosexuals have not realized we are living in the Biblical end times. We literally just had an entire month of Pride, pride of being able to shove things up our buttholes, chop our wieners off, blow our brains out with 41% accuracy, and all other types of degenerate bullshit.
    Pride is greatest before the fall and yet you still are confused when you see women, creatures incapable of significant thought or logic - literal slaves to emotion and a complement to the male psyche nature improvised - expressing shitty opinions.
    How are you frickers the ones posting "based and redpilled" when you are taking the words of some dumb b***h to be anything other than NPC-think? This entire thread would be completely unneeded if you were actually woke to this shit.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      you know how many generations of people thought they are living in the Biblical end times? especially by people from hamburgerland? i personally believe things will get much much worse before they get better

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >you know how many generations of people thought they are living in the Biblical end times?
        None of them had an AI problem.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          you're one of those morons that thinks that AI is anything more than algorithims and moronic fantasy LARP aren't you?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            you're one of those morons that thinks that consciousness is anything more than algorithims and moronic fantasy LARP aren't you?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >comparing the absurd nature of consciousness to literal bing bing wahoo one and zero devices
            absolute bugman detected

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You've never heard of the "machine"?
            The matrix was a metaphor for the increasing processing of information and how it was controlling our lives already back in the 90s.
            Well... now it's an actual AI hive.

            The 0s and 1s are the scary part.
            The scariest part is their potential for listing and hierarchy in data processing and the unseen consequences of that.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            again it is literally just bing bing wahoo devices, implements and tools that are slightly more complex than sticks and stones. you are freaking out about lifeless, mindless lumps of silicon and wires that make electric currents do fancy funny things with light and sound. i can only assume that you are an urbanite with no natural anchor in your life, your existence ruled entirely by artifice to such an extant that the world to you is not stone and mud but metal and concrete.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            why is it that people who understand things the least are also the most prone to being scared of such things?

            Machines, like your lawn mower, are fricking terrifying on all scales dude. People get minced by them every fricking day.
            This is why I dream for sentience in AI to stabilise that potentially.

            If you can't read between the lines there then I'm sorry.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            why is it that people who understand things the least are also the most prone to being scared of such things?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            these are the motherfrickers that will have a say in how technology is utilised and can actually fricking vote. we need mandatory racial segregation, iq testing and forced euthanisation of Black folk and low iq apes NOW

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            It's more the stuff you don't see and the interactions between AI.
            And they're a bit clueless on it themselves... well I hope they are (for science).

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >the world is literally ending because homosexuals are shoving things up their ass and women are being moronic
      holy shit anon the world must have been ending since forever by your standards

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        keep watching female tiktoks and having epic rage reactions to them then i guess?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          huh? i'm not the one mad about gays being gays and women being women

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            if you put it like this, i suddenly am angry for women being women.
            can't they simply stop? at least some of the smart ones (talking in terms of mere psychology, decision making, etc.. not biology)? sorry for using zoomer speech, but surely it was decided to mega nerf women reasoning so they won't be just man 2.0.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            > surely it was decided to mega nerf women reasoning so they won't be just man 2.0.
            MEDS

  59. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >brown eyes

  60. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >work security training: 2 easy questions
    >work diversity training: 10 multiple choice with mulitple correct and wrong answers and rewording the same answers to frick you up - have to get 100%

  61. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I don't think any of the kids I saw in town last night would agree with her.
    They look real agitated and paranoid now. Nothing like my gen or older gens. Far fricking worse.

    Bit worried.

  62. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The government won like 2 decades ago, but there wasn't any war cause nobody cared, and media actively tried to hide it and downplay it
    The current ""privacy"" bullshit is nothing but Apple marketing|propaganda to weaken its competitors

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      current IQfy is 99.9% morons who actually believe the propaganda, anyways

  63. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]

    Literally this:

    [...]

    [...]

    [...]

  64. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    She's right
    Name ONE(1) way in which targeted advertisments have made your life worse, or perjudicated you in any way

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      what are you serious, why do you think i blocked the recomendations div on youtube.
      I rather not live in a small bubble.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        what a shitty non-answer. I'll take it as your admission of defeat

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >n-no, not like that!
          lol

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            you already lost, stop making it worse
            the more you write, the more moronic you look

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Easely. Total commercial surveillance has made sheeple traitors to consider it as OK and inherent part of the life because their position is

      >someome has to pay, but I wanna a free service, I'm OK to sell myself for free service.

      It has caused them to self-censor own words, feelings and thoughts to the point

      >this booring boomer (not really a part of Baby Boomer generation) is not a traitor like me; he is not my bro: I hate him because he is better than me and I know that; maybe I should call the armed representatives of my master just to show them that I'm a good loyal slave, please don;t slaughter me by mistake thinking I may be like that boring boomer

      Frick, with such kind of shit instead of the society we will be slaves sthernally.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        the question was one CONCRETE way it has affected YOU, to avoid those alarmist, imaginary scenarios where's there are not victims, because propaganda is usually made using that kind of fabricated, hypotetic bullshit
        can you rephrase that to say something of value?
        try to be critical and think for yourself this time

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *