The perfect resolution for each monitor.

The perfect resolution for each monitor.

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    the ppi for these arent even remotely similar

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      if you'd use all at the same distance maybe. I'd place a 24 closer than a 27.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        if you're changing the distance then whats the fricking point in getting a different size
        "im going to get a bigger size and push it farther away"
        congrats you spent money accomplishing nothing

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          cost, room setup, purpose (watching movies vs high fps games).

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Your brain knows how big something is. A larger screen further away is more impressive and immersive than a smaller closer one, even if they're the same angular size on your retina.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >if you're changing the distance then whats the fricking point in getting a different size
          I can sit further away and frick up my eyes less

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >32 inches
    That’s a TV

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      People use 32" in DAWs.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >>32 inches
      that's your mom's dildo size

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I'm blind anon

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    WXGA (1360 x 768) 21.5": 64 PPI
    Full HD (1920 x 1080) 24": 92 PPI
    WQHD (2560 x 1440) 27": 109 PPI
    UHD (3840 x 2160) 32": 138 PPI

    The calculation for PPI involves dividing the horizontal resolution by the screen size in inches and then taking the square root of the result.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I feel like 27" 4k is what I want, bigger is uncomfortable for gaming but 1440p is a meme resolution that doesn't scale 1080p perfectly

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >doesn't scale 1080p perfectly
        What do you mean by that?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          convert a 4x2 image to 6x3

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    To be "perfect" these would have to be 3/2 instead of awful 16/9.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      An aristocrat among plebs.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      5:4 the best aspect

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You are right of course, but it is so rare. I had been eyeing the Huawei Mateview, but it is too expensive for what it is and probably not even on the market anymore.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >21.5"
    >1360x768
    It looks terrible on 14", how can it be "perfect" on 21.5? Stop smoking crack.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You're right. This one is not accurate. The rest is right tho.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        1080p at 24" is not correct you fricking moron

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >16:9
    >perfect
    gamer manchildren have ruined monitors

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The only game I play is chess, son.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    27" 1440p is peak resolution.
    Nothing else is needed.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >16:9
    weird history
    seems so arbitrary and dumb
    i thought they gave it more thought than
    >overlap some shit
    >come up with a bullshit number

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      All the information is right in front of your eyes, and you still manage to come up to a moronic conclusion.
      It's actually fascinating how stupid the average human is

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >It's actually fascinating how stupid the average human is
        I know, right? People like you exist. Read the quoted paragraph.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      16:9 is funny because it's 4^2:3^2

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If you're happy with anything less than 200 ppi you have severe genetic defects.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      post fps for 8k gaming

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    poorgay resolutions

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      moron resolution

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >not 7680 x 2160
      Widelet

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    based

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >jpg
      moron

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I'm never using a monitor below 4k. I don't care what the size is. It's 2024 and unlike you, I don't live in crippling poverty

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    30" 2560x1600

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >2560x1600
      fingerprintable as frick

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Stop maximizing your browser window

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          more vertical res allows you to not maximize windows, why are you such a fricking moron

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You don't cry about aspect ratios at the movie theater because the screen is bigger than the average apartment.
    Really makes you think.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No one cries about the aspect ratio at the movie because no one uses the theater as their personal TV/monitor.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Aspect ratio doesn't actually matter very much, screen size does. You're just too much of a third worlder to get this basic fact.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    These are autistic and nonsensical. if 24" was perfect for 1080p then 48" should be perfect for 4K. You should just buy the monitor size you want then pick the resolution that has the best pros/cons for your intended use.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    All those three- and four-digit numbers are half of what they should be
    t. Retina-quality monitor enjoyer

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    22'' 1080p 75Hz is the Aryan man's choice.

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >21.5"
    >768p
    time to get better glasses, grandpa

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    wrong. pic related.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      someone needs to do this but for Nvidia GPUs:
      2016: 1070, 8GB, 256-bit bus, $379
      2023: 4060ti, 8GB, 128-bit bus, $399
      2030: 7060, 8GB, 64-bit bus, $419
      2037: 10050ti, 8GB, 32-bit bus, $439

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >32"
    >1440p
    I used 4k displays before and honestly don't see the dofference

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    moronic gayshit

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      spoken like a true IQfyner

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      fify

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      now lets see 1600x1200 which i had in the year 2000 and has more vertical pixels than 1080p trash

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    OP is not a homosexual.

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >fixed resolutions
    What is this backwards technology? I can view anything from 480p to 2160p.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      me 2. so wut?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Why discuss resolutions at all? Just run the monitor at the optimal PPI for the usecase.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >2005
          Anon living the past, as usual.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I want this fricking thing so bad

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I own one :3

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          How do I get one

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I bought a faulty (but low-hour) one from some dude for 250€.
            Then I bought a broken 500MS/s (250-300MHz DSO) oscilloscope for 150€, except it wasn't broken so I got an incredible deal there.
            Then I reverse-engineered the F520's design fault with the oscilloscope, and fixed it.

            So in my case, I needed money, luck and some EE knowledge to get this monitor (into perfect condition).
            But this was 2-3 years ago. It's going to be even more difficult now.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            What was the issue on yours?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Ghosting and overshoot. Very common issue on F520's.
            You'd assume it's a cable issue but it's actually a video amplifier power filtering problem, a design fault from Sony in fact. Messing with/adding a capacitor to the 12 volt rail of the video board fixes the issue.
            Another temporary fix is to reduce contact resistances of the video board power connectors using stuff like Deoxit Gold. Some units might just need a reseating. Mine would always revert to the ghosting state so improving power filtering was the final solution.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Frick I don't think I'd be able to mess with the board. I'd be too afraid of the tube exploding in my face.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Well, if you want to get into CRTs these days, get ready to get comfortable disassembling these shits. All the 4 CRTs I currently have, I had to repair or otherwise solder shit on. They either had an issue, randomly developed one in my use, or I broke them by not being careful to write serial connectors correctly 😀

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I've read posts that you should depressurize/release the gas before performing a fix, which makes sense to me. I don't know how you would pressurize it again afterwards though.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            They're vacuum tubes, there's no pressure. And once the vacuum is lost, they're dead for good.
            You might be misremembering discharging the CRT's anode.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah probably. I'm from the era but never bothered to learn anything about them. Thanks for the info.

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I want 1440p on 24"

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I think there's only one high hz option depending on which region you're in. KOORUI GP01 is 24" 1440 165hz and has good reviews. Amazon says it's 17% off currently but it's always been ~$214 when I've checked.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I got one on black friday, never had a modern +60Hz monitor (or even 1080p) before but I really like it. As you said it's been sold around $200 ever since it released last august, only back then they claimed it was $400 and 50% off kek.

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    3200x1800 is my favorite resolution now.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That's moronic, no media is natively produced and you will always experience up/downscaling

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        1440p is just 360p added ontop of 1080p
        1800p is just 360p added ontop of 1440p
        2160p is just 360p added ontop of 1800p

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          What moronic gibberish are you babbling about?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            it all just works. 1800p is better than 1440p.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Still moronic resolution with no native media encoded for it. Your post make no sense whatsoever, you didn't forget to take your meds today, right?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            theres no native media encoded to 1440p by your logic either but its just +360p from 1080p like 1800p is +360p and 2160p is +360p.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            3072x1728 and 3200x1800 are very common dldsr and fsr resolutions

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >AI Upscaling

            theres no native media encoded to 1440p by your logic either but its just +360p from 1080p like 1800p is +360p and 2160p is +360p.

            >Still babbling moronic cope math

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I'm happy with my 28" 4K. I set games to full HD though, you see very little difference when things are in motion - but 4K is great for still images and text.

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    all of these are shit, 200ppi monitors when

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    5:4lets are such unique snowflakes

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    these days it just means if you want to play video games you get 1440p 27"
    and if you want to do something else you buy 32" 4k

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I wonder if I'll ever learn what the idea is with "native media" being encoded to a specific resolution
    like imagine if displays could fit an image thats larger or smaller to the screens dimensions anyways

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    C:>ppi 1920 1080 27
    The Pixels Per Inch (PPI) value is: 81.59 PPI

    Noice!

    package main

    import (
    "fmt"
    "math"
    "os"
    "strconv"
    )

    func calculatePPI(horizontalRes, verticalRes int, screenSize float64) float64 {
    return math.Sqrt(math.Pow(float64(horizontalRes), 2) + math.Pow(float64(verticalRes), 2)) / screenSize
    }

    func main() {
    if len(os.Args) != 4 {
    fmt.Println("Usage: go run ppi_calculator.go <horizontal_resolution> <vertical_resolution> <screen_size>")
    return
    }

    horizontalRes, err := strconv.Atoi(os.Args[1])
    if err != nil {
    fmt.Println("Error parsing horizontal resolution:", err)
    return
    }

    verticalRes, err := strconv.Atoi(os.Args[2])
    if err != nil {
    fmt.Println("Error parsing vertical resolution:", err)
    return
    }

    screenSize, err := strconv.ParseFloat(os.Args[3], 64)
    if err != nil {
    fmt.Println("Error parsing screen size:", err)
    return
    }

    ppiValue := calculatePPI(horizontalRes, verticalRes, screenSize)
    fmt.Printf("The Pixels Per Inch (PPI) value is: %.2f PPIn", ppiValue)
    }

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You suck, OP.

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I can understand why some productivity and business laptops have gone back to 16:10 ratios, but why are gaming laptops back to 16:10? 16:10 is just objectively worse for literally all video games (except maybe RTS games which is a dead genre at this point). It actually boggles my mind, 16:9 is just plain superior for gaming. 16:10 factually puts you at a disadvantage.

    Are gaming laptop manufacturers moronic or something.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I play my games on a 4:3 CRT, and I WILL destroy you.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous
      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >plays game on no colors no nice format 20kg shit

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Better colors than on your gaming monitor

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >CRT not even showing anything because it broke down a decade ago
        How fitting

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        moronic take

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I hecking love 4:3!

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >uses the word take
          >calls others moronic

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I gave my dad my old PC since I built a new one, but he needed a monitor so I just bought him some 27" 1080p monitor on sale for $90
    I'm gonna be honest at the distance I view from regularly that 1080p monitor vs my own 1440p monitor didn't feel that jarring at all in drop of quality, I think it's a bit over exaggerated of it being mandatory
    It's noticeable at first but I didn't notice after a couple minutes. If I had known beforehand I probably would have just not cared as much and saved some money

  36. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    First worlders can't CRT.

    https://lista.mercadolivre.com.br/monitor-crt#D[A:monitor%20crt]

  37. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *