if you're changing the distance then whats the fricking point in getting a different size
"im going to get a bigger size and push it farther away"
congrats you spent money accomplishing nothing
Your brain knows how big something is. A larger screen further away is more impressive and immersive than a smaller closer one, even if they're the same angular size on your retina.
You are right of course, but it is so rare. I had been eyeing the Huawei Mateview, but it is too expensive for what it is and probably not even on the market anymore.
All the information is right in front of your eyes, and you still manage to come up to a moronic conclusion.
It's actually fascinating how stupid the average human is
These are autistic and nonsensical. if 24" was perfect for 1080p then 48" should be perfect for 4K. You should just buy the monitor size you want then pick the resolution that has the best pros/cons for your intended use.
I bought a faulty (but low-hour) one from some dude for 250€.
Then I bought a broken 500MS/s (250-300MHz DSO) oscilloscope for 150€, except it wasn't broken so I got an incredible deal there.
Then I reverse-engineered the F520's design fault with the oscilloscope, and fixed it.
So in my case, I needed money, luck and some EE knowledge to get this monitor (into perfect condition).
But this was 2-3 years ago. It's going to be even more difficult now.
2 months ago
Anonymous
What was the issue on yours?
2 months ago
Anonymous
Ghosting and overshoot. Very common issue on F520's.
You'd assume it's a cable issue but it's actually a video amplifier power filtering problem, a design fault from Sony in fact. Messing with/adding a capacitor to the 12 volt rail of the video board fixes the issue.
Another temporary fix is to reduce contact resistances of the video board power connectors using stuff like Deoxit Gold. Some units might just need a reseating. Mine would always revert to the ghosting state so improving power filtering was the final solution.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Frick I don't think I'd be able to mess with the board. I'd be too afraid of the tube exploding in my face.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Well, if you want to get into CRTs these days, get ready to get comfortable disassembling these shits. All the 4 CRTs I currently have, I had to repair or otherwise solder shit on. They either had an issue, randomly developed one in my use, or I broke them by not being careful to write serial connectors correctly 😀
2 months ago
Anonymous
I've read posts that you should depressurize/release the gas before performing a fix, which makes sense to me. I don't know how you would pressurize it again afterwards though.
2 months ago
Anonymous
They're vacuum tubes, there's no pressure. And once the vacuum is lost, they're dead for good.
You might be misremembering discharging the CRT's anode.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Yeah probably. I'm from the era but never bothered to learn anything about them. Thanks for the info.
I think there's only one high hz option depending on which region you're in. KOORUI GP01 is 24" 1440 165hz and has good reviews. Amazon says it's 17% off currently but it's always been ~$214 when I've checked.
I got one on black friday, never had a modern +60Hz monitor (or even 1080p) before but I really like it. As you said it's been sold around $200 ever since it released last august, only back then they claimed it was $400 and 50% off kek.
I'm happy with my 28" 4K. I set games to full HD though, you see very little difference when things are in motion - but 4K is great for still images and text.
I wonder if I'll ever learn what the idea is with "native media" being encoded to a specific resolution
like imagine if displays could fit an image thats larger or smaller to the screens dimensions anyways
I can understand why some productivity and business laptops have gone back to 16:10 ratios, but why are gaming laptops back to 16:10? 16:10 is just objectively worse for literally all video games (except maybe RTS games which is a dead genre at this point). It actually boggles my mind, 16:9 is just plain superior for gaming. 16:10 factually puts you at a disadvantage.
Are gaming laptop manufacturers moronic or something.
I gave my dad my old PC since I built a new one, but he needed a monitor so I just bought him some 27" 1080p monitor on sale for $90
I'm gonna be honest at the distance I view from regularly that 1080p monitor vs my own 1440p monitor didn't feel that jarring at all in drop of quality, I think it's a bit over exaggerated of it being mandatory
It's noticeable at first but I didn't notice after a couple minutes. If I had known beforehand I probably would have just not cared as much and saved some money
the ppi for these arent even remotely similar
if you'd use all at the same distance maybe. I'd place a 24 closer than a 27.
if you're changing the distance then whats the fricking point in getting a different size
"im going to get a bigger size and push it farther away"
congrats you spent money accomplishing nothing
cost, room setup, purpose (watching movies vs high fps games).
Your brain knows how big something is. A larger screen further away is more impressive and immersive than a smaller closer one, even if they're the same angular size on your retina.
>if you're changing the distance then whats the fricking point in getting a different size
I can sit further away and frick up my eyes less
>32 inches
That’s a TV
People use 32" in DAWs.
>>32 inches
that's your mom's dildo size
I'm blind anon
WXGA (1360 x 768) 21.5": 64 PPI
Full HD (1920 x 1080) 24": 92 PPI
WQHD (2560 x 1440) 27": 109 PPI
UHD (3840 x 2160) 32": 138 PPI
The calculation for PPI involves dividing the horizontal resolution by the screen size in inches and then taking the square root of the result.
I feel like 27" 4k is what I want, bigger is uncomfortable for gaming but 1440p is a meme resolution that doesn't scale 1080p perfectly
>doesn't scale 1080p perfectly
What do you mean by that?
convert a 4x2 image to 6x3
To be "perfect" these would have to be 3/2 instead of awful 16/9.
An aristocrat among plebs.
5:4 the best aspect
You are right of course, but it is so rare. I had been eyeing the Huawei Mateview, but it is too expensive for what it is and probably not even on the market anymore.
>21.5"
>1360x768
It looks terrible on 14", how can it be "perfect" on 21.5? Stop smoking crack.
You're right. This one is not accurate. The rest is right tho.
1080p at 24" is not correct you fricking moron
>16:9
>perfect
gamer manchildren have ruined monitors
The only game I play is chess, son.
27" 1440p is peak resolution.
Nothing else is needed.
>16:9
weird history
seems so arbitrary and dumb
i thought they gave it more thought than
>overlap some shit
>come up with a bullshit number
All the information is right in front of your eyes, and you still manage to come up to a moronic conclusion.
It's actually fascinating how stupid the average human is
>It's actually fascinating how stupid the average human is
I know, right? People like you exist. Read the quoted paragraph.
16:9 is funny because it's 4^2:3^2
If you're happy with anything less than 200 ppi you have severe genetic defects.
post fps for 8k gaming
poorgay resolutions
moron resolution
>not 7680 x 2160
Widelet
based
>jpg
moron
I'm never using a monitor below 4k. I don't care what the size is. It's 2024 and unlike you, I don't live in crippling poverty
30" 2560x1600
>2560x1600
fingerprintable as frick
Stop maximizing your browser window
more vertical res allows you to not maximize windows, why are you such a fricking moron
You don't cry about aspect ratios at the movie theater because the screen is bigger than the average apartment.
Really makes you think.
No one cries about the aspect ratio at the movie because no one uses the theater as their personal TV/monitor.
Aspect ratio doesn't actually matter very much, screen size does. You're just too much of a third worlder to get this basic fact.
These are autistic and nonsensical. if 24" was perfect for 1080p then 48" should be perfect for 4K. You should just buy the monitor size you want then pick the resolution that has the best pros/cons for your intended use.
All those three- and four-digit numbers are half of what they should be
t. Retina-quality monitor enjoyer
22'' 1080p 75Hz is the Aryan man's choice.
>21.5"
>768p
time to get better glasses, grandpa
wrong. pic related.
someone needs to do this but for Nvidia GPUs:
2016: 1070, 8GB, 256-bit bus, $379
2023: 4060ti, 8GB, 128-bit bus, $399
2030: 7060, 8GB, 64-bit bus, $419
2037: 10050ti, 8GB, 32-bit bus, $439
>32"
>1440p
I used 4k displays before and honestly don't see the dofference
moronic gayshit
spoken like a true IQfyner
fify
now lets see 1600x1200 which i had in the year 2000 and has more vertical pixels than 1080p trash
OP is not a homosexual.
>fixed resolutions
What is this backwards technology? I can view anything from 480p to 2160p.
me 2. so wut?
Why discuss resolutions at all? Just run the monitor at the optimal PPI for the usecase.
>2005
Anon living the past, as usual.
I want this fricking thing so bad
I own one :3
How do I get one
I bought a faulty (but low-hour) one from some dude for 250€.
Then I bought a broken 500MS/s (250-300MHz DSO) oscilloscope for 150€, except it wasn't broken so I got an incredible deal there.
Then I reverse-engineered the F520's design fault with the oscilloscope, and fixed it.
So in my case, I needed money, luck and some EE knowledge to get this monitor (into perfect condition).
But this was 2-3 years ago. It's going to be even more difficult now.
What was the issue on yours?
Ghosting and overshoot. Very common issue on F520's.
You'd assume it's a cable issue but it's actually a video amplifier power filtering problem, a design fault from Sony in fact. Messing with/adding a capacitor to the 12 volt rail of the video board fixes the issue.
Another temporary fix is to reduce contact resistances of the video board power connectors using stuff like Deoxit Gold. Some units might just need a reseating. Mine would always revert to the ghosting state so improving power filtering was the final solution.
Frick I don't think I'd be able to mess with the board. I'd be too afraid of the tube exploding in my face.
Well, if you want to get into CRTs these days, get ready to get comfortable disassembling these shits. All the 4 CRTs I currently have, I had to repair or otherwise solder shit on. They either had an issue, randomly developed one in my use, or I broke them by not being careful to write serial connectors correctly 😀
I've read posts that you should depressurize/release the gas before performing a fix, which makes sense to me. I don't know how you would pressurize it again afterwards though.
They're vacuum tubes, there's no pressure. And once the vacuum is lost, they're dead for good.
You might be misremembering discharging the CRT's anode.
Yeah probably. I'm from the era but never bothered to learn anything about them. Thanks for the info.
I want 1440p on 24"
I think there's only one high hz option depending on which region you're in. KOORUI GP01 is 24" 1440 165hz and has good reviews. Amazon says it's 17% off currently but it's always been ~$214 when I've checked.
I got one on black friday, never had a modern +60Hz monitor (or even 1080p) before but I really like it. As you said it's been sold around $200 ever since it released last august, only back then they claimed it was $400 and 50% off kek.
3200x1800 is my favorite resolution now.
That's moronic, no media is natively produced and you will always experience up/downscaling
1440p is just 360p added ontop of 1080p
1800p is just 360p added ontop of 1440p
2160p is just 360p added ontop of 1800p
What moronic gibberish are you babbling about?
it all just works. 1800p is better than 1440p.
Still moronic resolution with no native media encoded for it. Your post make no sense whatsoever, you didn't forget to take your meds today, right?
theres no native media encoded to 1440p by your logic either but its just +360p from 1080p like 1800p is +360p and 2160p is +360p.
3072x1728 and 3200x1800 are very common dldsr and fsr resolutions
>AI Upscaling
>Still babbling moronic cope math
I'm happy with my 28" 4K. I set games to full HD though, you see very little difference when things are in motion - but 4K is great for still images and text.
all of these are shit, 200ppi monitors when
5:4lets are such unique snowflakes
these days it just means if you want to play video games you get 1440p 27"
and if you want to do something else you buy 32" 4k
I wonder if I'll ever learn what the idea is with "native media" being encoded to a specific resolution
like imagine if displays could fit an image thats larger or smaller to the screens dimensions anyways
C:>ppi 1920 1080 27
The Pixels Per Inch (PPI) value is: 81.59 PPI
Noice!
package main
import (
"fmt"
"math"
"os"
"strconv"
)
func calculatePPI(horizontalRes, verticalRes int, screenSize float64) float64 {
return math.Sqrt(math.Pow(float64(horizontalRes), 2) + math.Pow(float64(verticalRes), 2)) / screenSize
}
func main() {
if len(os.Args) != 4 {
fmt.Println("Usage: go run ppi_calculator.go <horizontal_resolution> <vertical_resolution> <screen_size>")
return
}
horizontalRes, err := strconv.Atoi(os.Args[1])
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Error parsing horizontal resolution:", err)
return
}
verticalRes, err := strconv.Atoi(os.Args[2])
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Error parsing vertical resolution:", err)
return
}
screenSize, err := strconv.ParseFloat(os.Args[3], 64)
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Error parsing screen size:", err)
return
}
ppiValue := calculatePPI(horizontalRes, verticalRes, screenSize)
fmt.Printf("The Pixels Per Inch (PPI) value is: %.2f PPIn", ppiValue)
}
You suck, OP.
I can understand why some productivity and business laptops have gone back to 16:10 ratios, but why are gaming laptops back to 16:10? 16:10 is just objectively worse for literally all video games (except maybe RTS games which is a dead genre at this point). It actually boggles my mind, 16:9 is just plain superior for gaming. 16:10 factually puts you at a disadvantage.
Are gaming laptop manufacturers moronic or something.
I play my games on a 4:3 CRT, and I WILL destroy you.
>plays game on no colors no nice format 20kg shit
Better colors than on your gaming monitor
>CRT not even showing anything because it broke down a decade ago
How fitting
moronic take
I hecking love 4:3!
>uses the word take
>calls others moronic
I gave my dad my old PC since I built a new one, but he needed a monitor so I just bought him some 27" 1080p monitor on sale for $90
I'm gonna be honest at the distance I view from regularly that 1080p monitor vs my own 1440p monitor didn't feel that jarring at all in drop of quality, I think it's a bit over exaggerated of it being mandatory
It's noticeable at first but I didn't notice after a couple minutes. If I had known beforehand I probably would have just not cared as much and saved some money
First worlders can't CRT.
https://lista.mercadolivre.com.br/monitor-crt#D[A:monitor%20crt]