>thinks watching Rachel Maddow and Real Time with Bill Maher makes him informed
1 month ago
Anonymous
those are some of the dumbest people around, and the implication that they're people capable of honestly and rationally discussing a topic with actual informed perspective is an insult. No, it's casting shade on the concept of expert panel discussion that got me doubting you.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>casting shade on the concept of expert panel discussion
The vast VAST majority of such is "experts" appearing to speak in 30 second soundbites before plugging a book of soundbites they stretched out to 250 pages that won't be relevant within 3 months. It's reality tv with political opinions instead of white trash fat kids doing beauty pageants.
Thomas Carlyle. Written almost two hundred years ago. >My friend, brag not yet of our American cousins! Their quantity of cotton, dollars, industry and resources, I believe to be almost unspeakable; but I can by no means worship the like of these. What great human soul, what great thought, what great noble thing that one could worship, or loyally admire, has yet been produced there? None: the American cousins have yet done none of these things.
>America too will have to strain its energies, in quite other fashion than this; to crack its sinews, and all but break its heart, as the rest of us have had to do, in thousand-fold wrestle with the Pythons and mud-demons, before it can become a habitation for the gods. America's battle is yet to fight; and we, sorrowful though nothing doubting, will wish her strength for it. New Spiritual Pythons, plenty of them; enormous Megatherions, as ugly as were ever born of mud, loom huge and hideous out of the twilight Future on America; and she will have her own agony, and her own victory, but on other terms than she is yet quite aware of.
Anything associated with American Politics or the American style of Politics is utterly poison. It has become the cancer in the West despite all the hope and toil that went in to her earliest days.
It was at this moment he knew he was wrong. There is no doubt he realized the mistake and that Blood and Soil are important to any future discussion. You can see it in his face.
I mean, how about, the Beatles? Or the Jimi Hendrix experience? Or any popular band in the 1960s?
1 month ago
Anonymous
That is fine but those artists arent the pinnacle of art, that is why I felt the need to include rage against the machine in that category, less known, but people should be aware that when they say that they are talking about popular marvel tier slop
1 month ago
Anonymous
You are aware that most underground artists are leftists too, right? Also, Hendrix is marvel tier? Oh man, I don't even know how to reply to that.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Dumb fricks idea of high art, so I would put him in the middle brow category, marvel is just slop
1 month ago
Anonymous
>You are aware that most underground artists are leftists too, right
1 month ago
Anonymous
I’m an underground musician and think getting rid of the aristocracy was a bad idea
1 month ago
Anonymous
I mean sure, there are fringe cases like you but I'm sure you'd agree that music overall is left leaning. That's all I'm saying.
1 month ago
Anonymous
It wasn’t always that way. Look at Wagner or like the ten thousand martial industrial or power electronics artists out there. I mean I’m one of the, but still.
1 month ago
Anonymous
If they actually did that and started naming artists like rage against the machine or something they would open themselves up to criticism
all are shit. I only listen to video game/anime OSTs
1 month ago
Anonymous
You're even more worthless than anyone in this thread, congrats!
1 month ago
Anonymous
>leftist art funded by the CIA
1 month ago
Anonymous
Do people actually buy the idea 60s art was a deep state plot and this stuff never would’ve emerged on its own? Or is it just a meme?
1 month ago
Anonymous
Do people really buy the idea that the culture of the 60s was organic in any way?
kek
1 month ago
Anonymous
>do people really believe the most inane bullshit
anon you're on post-2016 IQfy, you're posting with people who bet thousands of dollars on trump after he already lost
1 month ago
Anonymous
The odds he was given by bookies was biased due to derangement which is an exploitable opportunity. Then they flipped so I could bet against him and win either way. The derangement cost the bookies money.
1 month ago
Anonymous
I was talking about people actually unironically betting on Trump after he was already announced the loser.
But the odds for him were already very inflated, a very rare case of "too much stupid money" that nowadays doesn't really happen even when England plays football which used to be the stupid money special.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Do people really buy the idea that the culture of the 60s was organic in any way?
kek
I mean, how about, the Beatles? Or the Jimi Hendrix experience? Or any popular band in the 1960s?
All chud nazis by standards of today. Rage against the experts and the science(tm) with Jimi "grab her by the pussy" Hendrix.
Michael Jackson was a bigger "nazi" than Kanye.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Meds
1 month ago
Anonymous
I didn't change. I liked rage and still like rage. You braindead homosexuals started calling me a nazi for actually valuing free flow of information and dialogue.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Wasn’t referring to what you believed just how you worded it
1 month ago
Anonymous
I have a dream, that lies about police brutality statistics be spread in the name of equity propaganda which leads to nation wide riots about a non-existent trend.
I guess they might list rappers who are members of reactionary cults. It is funny that as much as leftists today brag about their artistic output, it really hasn't been that great. The left achieved total control of the arts after WWII, and in this period we have seen the greatest decline in the quality of the arts since the fall of the Roman Empire. This isn't a coincidence.
You are not able to understand, produce or recognize art. You are barely human.
I mean, how about, the Beatles? Or the Jimi Hendrix experience? Or any popular band in the 1960s?
If they actually did that and started naming artists like rage against the machine or something they would open themselves up to criticism
You are aware that most underground artists are leftists too, right? Also, Hendrix is marvel tier? Oh man, I don't even know how to reply to that.
None of these produce Art or beauty.
America is an inherently anti-traditional country.
Nothing that is pro-America can be 'right-wing' in any true sense of the word.
Never forget that the US' strategy to 'win' the cold war was to out-libshit and out-"progress" the USSR.
>President Truman is near the end of his term in office, and Great Britain has a new queen. It is 1952, the Cold War is heating up, and vital military secrets are falling into Soviet hands. The CIA faces a delicate dilemma for the source of the leaks has been traced directly to the Queen s chambers. The situation must be resolved but without damaging the young Queen s self-confidence and public credibility. >Young Blackford Oakes, the handsome, debonaire, and audacious Yale graduate and ex-fighter pilot, is selected to penetrate the royal circle, win the Queen s confidence, and plug the leak. The action leads to an explosive showdown in the skies over London, one that could determine the future of the West. >Buckley presents a thrilling spy novel as he introduces Blackforf Oakes for the first time in "Saving the Queen.""
The absolute state of Conservative "literature".
America is an inherently anti-traditional country.
Nothing that is pro-America can be 'right-wing' in any true sense of the word.
Never forget that the US' strategy to 'win' the cold war was to out-libshit and out-"progress" the USSR.
The biggest problem with that is people don’t realize that chasing tradition at all costs is just as bad as chasing progress at all costs. There is a “mean” that should be desirable to most intelligent people but I’d wager that most of the right chases the specter of Plato instead of Aristotle.
Which brings me to another point, if the middle classes are considered to originate with middle age merchants, is that why both the right and left rail against them with only certain thinkers like Samuel Francis lending them ideological support or it really just based on a combination of envy and disgust depending what side you’re on?
Basically this, there is the reason the most 'traditionalist' American voices tend to be outsider Catholics/Orthodox who are on the fringe of society. If you are too much of a Native American, and are not from certain places in the South, your mind literally does not work in any traditional way.
And the South had the most potential for a stabilized 'traditional' but American culture, but was crushed under the hordes of German '48ers, Northern Baptists, and conscripted Irishmen
I dunno I grew up on a farm and was raised Lutheran and basically have views on women and religion that would make the founders blush. That being said chasing tradition at all costs is just as bad as chasing progress at all costs.
Buckley wrote that the purpose of his National Review magazine was to "stands athwart history, yelling Stop." --- Suicide would appear to be the preferred condition of Conservatism.
What’s this bizarre phenomenon where someone who lived in the past is judged by the standards of today? It makes no sense. One should be judged when they lived and often it isn’t so simple as Team A or Team B
Shapiro is a neocon hack but at least he has genuine beliefs. Destiny became an Israel shill to spite Breadtube and Hasan (who was a Destiny protege iirc and managed to be better at grifting than him). And also because his Onlyfans prostitute wife ran off with a half-Arab.
https://i.imgur.com/kELbeDk.jpg
>The Right's best ''''intellectual''''
Buckley wrote that the purpose of his National Review magazine was to "stands athwart history, yelling Stop." --- Suicide would appear to be the preferred condition of Conservatism.
Carl Schmitt and Alain de Benoist are more interesting. Burkean conservatism and Western fusionist conservatism are contradictions as they endorse the forces that rip apart tradition.
There is a lot of power in giving good and bad reviews, you usually just attract middle brow fart sniffers who want to feel some pseudo superiority to others, but that is pretty much the average art lover, I like art myself and it is definitely a temptation
How is Buckley right wing? He's a liberal through and through...which of course is why he was allowed on the air to begin with.
I swear these communist homosexuals are such bald-faced liars but more than anyone they deceive themselves, conjuring up these strawmen to soothe themselves in imagined victory.
>>The Right's best ''''intellectual''''
lol no. Buckley was an amusing writer with an entertaining prose style, not unlike Scruton. But that picture of Scruton amid niglets says it all, and in the end Buckley sold out the paleo Right and the counter-Semites so as to dine with the elite. The Right's best and only intellectual is De Maistre. The rest are but anal lubricant.
>criticize the political right >don't criticize the political left for undermining individual freedom while engaging in bootlicking of corporations that are engaged in gay ops to convince them that they aren't just trying to make money, but really care about muh 'social justice'.
>OP's best ""post""
If you take political talking heads who appear on tv seriously you're moronic regardless of whichever side you project yourself to be on.
This. Obsessing over current politics is the lowest IQ interest imaginable.
Proof: /misc/
I'll warrant you're holders of a very novel and against the grain point of view, you're not like those other opinion holders!
>thinks watching Rachel Maddow and Real Time with Bill Maher makes him informed
those are some of the dumbest people around, and the implication that they're people capable of honestly and rationally discussing a topic with actual informed perspective is an insult. No, it's casting shade on the concept of expert panel discussion that got me doubting you.
>casting shade on the concept of expert panel discussion
The vast VAST majority of such is "experts" appearing to speak in 30 second soundbites before plugging a book of soundbites they stretched out to 250 pages that won't be relevant within 3 months. It's reality tv with political opinions instead of white trash fat kids doing beauty pageants.
Sure, but analyzing it from a historical and anthropological perspective is high IQ
Ah, yes, Chomsky and Zizek, the kind of “people” that think vaccine refusers should be put in camps. So progressive!
Listen you queer. I’ll sock you in the face and you’ll stay plastered
Buckley, Kirk, Scruton, Burke, Strauss, Schmitt, Evola, Pound, Eliot, Newman, Chesterton...
>being "right wing" is when you oppose liberal cultural policies of 10 years ago but agree with them about economics
KWAB
Correct take
Thomas Carlyle. Written almost two hundred years ago.
>My friend, brag not yet of our American cousins! Their quantity of cotton, dollars, industry and resources, I believe to be almost unspeakable; but I can by no means worship the like of these. What great human soul, what great thought, what great noble thing that one could worship, or loyally admire, has yet been produced there? None: the American cousins have yet done none of these things.
>America too will have to strain its energies, in quite other fashion than this; to crack its sinews, and all but break its heart, as the rest of us have had to do, in thousand-fold wrestle with the Pythons and mud-demons, before it can become a habitation for the gods. America's battle is yet to fight; and we, sorrowful though nothing doubting, will wish her strength for it. New Spiritual Pythons, plenty of them; enormous Megatherions, as ugly as were ever born of mud, loom huge and hideous out of the twilight Future on America; and she will have her own agony, and her own victory, but on other terms than she is yet quite aware of.
Anything associated with American Politics or the American style of Politics is utterly poison. It has become the cancer in the West despite all the hope and toil that went in to her earliest days.
This is literally just Victorian cope and seething.
agreed
It was at this moment he knew he was wrong. There is no doubt he realized the mistake and that Blood and Soil are important to any future discussion. You can see it in his face.
No, everything is getting better!
if only you knew how bad things really are
Get rid of the gay sex, equality, ethnic minorities and law enforcement and its paradise.
That's not Enoch Powell
Philosophers that are explicitly right wing or left wing will always be for fart sniffing pseuds
OP wants to stay plastered
Don't call him a crypto nazi again, worst mistake of my life
The right wing produces inferior intellectuals and inferior artists. It has always been this way.
>inferior artists
>most inferior politically minded artist in history was a militant socialist
Would the left be inclined to share some of their actually good thought or art with us one day?
If they actually did that and started naming artists like rage against the machine or something they would open themselves up to criticism
I mean, how about, the Beatles? Or the Jimi Hendrix experience? Or any popular band in the 1960s?
That is fine but those artists arent the pinnacle of art, that is why I felt the need to include rage against the machine in that category, less known, but people should be aware that when they say that they are talking about popular marvel tier slop
You are aware that most underground artists are leftists too, right? Also, Hendrix is marvel tier? Oh man, I don't even know how to reply to that.
Dumb fricks idea of high art, so I would put him in the middle brow category, marvel is just slop
>You are aware that most underground artists are leftists too, right
I’m an underground musician and think getting rid of the aristocracy was a bad idea
I mean sure, there are fringe cases like you but I'm sure you'd agree that music overall is left leaning. That's all I'm saying.
It wasn’t always that way. Look at Wagner or like the ten thousand martial industrial or power electronics artists out there. I mean I’m one of the, but still.
all are shit. I only listen to video game/anime OSTs
You're even more worthless than anyone in this thread, congrats!
>leftist art funded by the CIA
Do people actually buy the idea 60s art was a deep state plot and this stuff never would’ve emerged on its own? Or is it just a meme?
Do people really buy the idea that the culture of the 60s was organic in any way?
kek
>do people really believe the most inane bullshit
anon you're on post-2016 IQfy, you're posting with people who bet thousands of dollars on trump after he already lost
The odds he was given by bookies was biased due to derangement which is an exploitable opportunity. Then they flipped so I could bet against him and win either way. The derangement cost the bookies money.
I was talking about people actually unironically betting on Trump after he was already announced the loser.
But the odds for him were already very inflated, a very rare case of "too much stupid money" that nowadays doesn't really happen even when England plays football which used to be the stupid money special.
I’d say it’s a combination of both
All chud nazis by standards of today. Rage against the experts and the science(tm) with Jimi "grab her by the pussy" Hendrix.
Michael Jackson was a bigger "nazi" than Kanye.
Meds
I didn't change. I liked rage and still like rage. You braindead homosexuals started calling me a nazi for actually valuing free flow of information and dialogue.
Wasn’t referring to what you believed just how you worded it
I have a dream, that lies about police brutality statistics be spread in the name of equity propaganda which leads to nation wide riots about a non-existent trend.
I guess they might list rappers who are members of reactionary cults. It is funny that as much as leftists today brag about their artistic output, it really hasn't been that great. The left achieved total control of the arts after WWII, and in this period we have seen the greatest decline in the quality of the arts since the fall of the Roman Empire. This isn't a coincidence.
nope
rightoids support socialism as long as it enforces social conservatism
Who are these homos and why are they dressed like that?
It’s punk rock but I figured you’re way to square to get it.
Leftists simply got by on nepotism. It’s really that simple. Nothing related to superior versus inferior.
>It’s punk rock
gaygiest looking 'punks' of all time
You couldn’t possibly understand
You are not able to understand, produce or recognize art. You are barely human.
None of these produce Art or beauty.
Most accurate take in the thread.
the only Buckley I listen to is Tim
>President Truman is near the end of his term in office, and Great Britain has a new queen. It is 1952, the Cold War is heating up, and vital military secrets are falling into Soviet hands. The CIA faces a delicate dilemma for the source of the leaks has been traced directly to the Queen s chambers. The situation must be resolved but without damaging the young Queen s self-confidence and public credibility.
>Young Blackford Oakes, the handsome, debonaire, and audacious Yale graduate and ex-fighter pilot, is selected to penetrate the royal circle, win the Queen s confidence, and plug the leak. The action leads to an explosive showdown in the skies over London, one that could determine the future of the West.
>Buckley presents a thrilling spy novel as he introduces Blackforf Oakes for the first time in "Saving the Queen.""
The absolute state of Conservative "literature".
>Blackford Oakes
kek wtf was Buckley on? thats the most ridiculous name i've ever heard
pls don't make fun of his si
without inferior rightoid intellectuals there could be no superior leftist intellectuals
it's a noble moronation
fr fr
look at this nazi shit
god's duh cuz and she's a black wumen
The most successful right wing artists in America don't call themselves right wing, also they quietly move to Japan and bail on the US if possible.
For example, Toby Fox keeps his politics quiet while he revived interest in Richard Wagner and Musical theory when he made the Undertale OST
toby fox is a israelite
>toby gays
>right iwng
In what way Genderfluid Tale, right wing?
Good choice for ones that make bank like him. Bad news for ones like me that don’t. Travel is a luxury for me.
The right's most recent intellectual
America is an inherently anti-traditional country.
Nothing that is pro-America can be 'right-wing' in any true sense of the word.
Never forget that the US' strategy to 'win' the cold war was to out-libshit and out-"progress" the USSR.
>America is an inherently anti-traditional country
Robert Dabney... how are you still alive?
The biggest problem with that is people don’t realize that chasing tradition at all costs is just as bad as chasing progress at all costs. There is a “mean” that should be desirable to most intelligent people but I’d wager that most of the right chases the specter of Plato instead of Aristotle.
Which brings me to another point, if the middle classes are considered to originate with middle age merchants, is that why both the right and left rail against them with only certain thinkers like Samuel Francis lending them ideological support or it really just based on a combination of envy and disgust depending what side you’re on?
Basically this, there is the reason the most 'traditionalist' American voices tend to be outsider Catholics/Orthodox who are on the fringe of society. If you are too much of a Native American, and are not from certain places in the South, your mind literally does not work in any traditional way.
And the South had the most potential for a stabilized 'traditional' but American culture, but was crushed under the hordes of German '48ers, Northern Baptists, and conscripted Irishmen
I dunno I grew up on a farm and was raised Lutheran and basically have views on women and religion that would make the founders blush. That being said chasing tradition at all costs is just as bad as chasing progress at all costs.
Buckley wrote that the purpose of his National Review magazine was to "stands athwart history, yelling Stop." --- Suicide would appear to be the preferred condition of Conservatism.
What’s this bizarre phenomenon where someone who lived in the past is judged by the standards of today? It makes no sense. One should be judged when they lived and often it isn’t so simple as Team A or Team B
It makes me sad that Destiny and Ben Shapiro are the most respected and influential political minds in the US.
Shapiro is a neocon hack but at least he has genuine beliefs. Destiny became an Israel shill to spite Breadtube and Hasan (who was a Destiny protege iirc and managed to be better at grifting than him). And also because his Onlyfans prostitute wife ran off with a half-Arab.
Carl Schmitt and Alain de Benoist are more interesting. Burkean conservatism and Western fusionist conservatism are contradictions as they endorse the forces that rip apart tradition.
That’s great but that shit don’t work here. De Benoist is sort of a third worldist moron, I used to like him but no longer do.
So much of IQfy is dedicated to the chud and troon culture war and internet battlegrounds.
There is a lot of power in giving good and bad reviews, you usually just attract middle brow fart sniffers who want to feel some pseudo superiority to others, but that is pretty much the average art lover, I like art myself and it is definitely a temptation
FTFY
Was he right when he went after George Wallace?
How is Buckley right wing? He's a liberal through and through...which of course is why he was allowed on the air to begin with.
I swear these communist homosexuals are such bald-faced liars but more than anyone they deceive themselves, conjuring up these strawmen to soothe themselves in imagined victory.
who is the Buckley of today? Tim Pool?
>>The Right's best ''''intellectual''''
lol no. Buckley was an amusing writer with an entertaining prose style, not unlike Scruton. But that picture of Scruton amid niglets says it all, and in the end Buckley sold out the paleo Right and the counter-Semites so as to dine with the elite. The Right's best and only intellectual is De Maistre. The rest are but anal lubricant.
>criticize the political right
>don't criticize the political left for undermining individual freedom while engaging in bootlicking of corporations that are engaged in gay ops to convince them that they aren't just trying to make money, but really care about muh 'social justice'.