Things that instantly filter below 120IQ

Don't want your job outsourced to India? Just add meta.

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Things that instantly filter below 120IQ
    Straight, pure and unadulterated C.
    >C++
    lol
    lmao

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      he's right cus C is for 130+

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        and golang is for 140+

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Straight, pure and unadulterated C.
      You need an IQ below 50 to use C.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >t. filtered

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No, that's only partially true.
        The infamous case you are referring to was a C programmer who had an apparent IQ of 49, but was actually a genius with an IQ of 305, since at the time of measurement only 8 bits were sat aside to store the IQ.
        The man was adamant about keeping his privacy, which is why we never knew who it exactly was, only that he was a C programmer who claimed that defaulting to signed integers as the default was the biggest mistake to have crept into C.
        He never mentioned anything about null-terminated strings, though.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          my sides

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      he's right cus C is for 130+

      and golang is for 140+

      c comes in stages, lads

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Modern C++ is much, much harder to write properly than C.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Artificially making it harder and then circlejerking yourself to it doesn't actually count, Seppletard.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The funniest part is that this isn't even correct advice. It's actually much simpler.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >cute trap
          c++ bros, we can't stop winning

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Look at me mom! I'm doing the compiler's job for it! I'm such a good C programmer:-)

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            By this logic, you should just use Python.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Python doesn't provide zero-cost abstractions over C.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            ASM to C
            >less code to write, okay
            C to C++
            >more code to write, no thanks

            C sits at the golden ratio. Coincidentally, I, a C-programmer, have written an algorithm in Bohemia Interactive's SQF scirpting language that just happened to be centered around the golden ratio, because I am that awesome.

            I know it's hard for you to fathom, but the truth of the matter is that over here in "C," we don't really give a shit what we use, and C's used just because it works. Don't touch a running system.
            Rustgays, on the other hand, are not just touching the running system, they want to rebuild the entire thing in a new language as well.
            These are the worst type of mindsets you can have as an engineer, and they don't even realize it.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >an algorithm in Bohemia Interactive's SQF scirpting language that just happened to be centered around the golden ratio
            I had a formula that "activated" (i.e. spawned enemies and objects) a location when your player character is XYZ distance away from center, and I wanted to create a hysteresis for this activation when you leave, and the formula I created for that, when refactored and reduced to polynomials, had the constant (1 + 5^(1/2)) / 2, i.e. the golden ratio, in it.

            Basically, I accidentally "discovered" the golden ratio while writing some shitty code for some shitty milsim.

            Suck my dick.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Trust me, this 20000 line C project has no memory bugs since it passed all the unit tests!

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You don't use unit tests to assert memory completeness, and I'm not sure if you knew that or not when you were posting that reply.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Sorry, I don't believe that you've ever written a mathemathical proof or touched Coq. No, it's not the thing you suck daily.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >No, it's not the thing you suck daily.
            fricking kek.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You're too dumb to even discern between someone discovering something and someone (mathematically) proving something, anything I explain to you to make you believe would be a waste of my time.
            Nay, you are my counterpart as we vie for the favor of the public, my moronic little friend.

            Apart from that, you know I saw that coming, baby!

            ASM to C
            >less code to write, okay
            C to C++
            >more code to write, no thanks

            C sits at the golden ratio. Coincidentally, I, a C-programmer, have written an algorithm in Bohemia Interactive's SQF scirpting language that just happened to be centered around the golden ratio, because I am that awesome.

            I know it's hard for you to fathom, but the truth of the matter is that over here in "C," we don't really give a shit what we use, and C's used just because it works. Don't touch a running system.
            Rustgays, on the other hand, are not just touching the running system, they want to rebuild the entire thing in a new language as well.
            These are the worst type of mindsets you can have as an engineer, and they don't even realize it.

            >I know it's hard for you to fathom

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Then you just showed us you don't even bother wrapping your asan/valgrind checks into proper unit tests. Hell, most Cniles don't even bother with using asan/valgrind. And then they cry about how nobody takes them seriously.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't think you even bothered to look up what SQF is...

            Anyhoo, you can't even follow a casual conversation that borders on technical stuff, I wouldn't want to go bare metal with you, fren 🙂

            Best of luck to you and your endeavours, I think you might need it ;D

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'm talking about C, not your shitty proprietary DSL

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why would I need mathematical proof for C?
            Logical is enough.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            (I'm ignoring you shifing the goal posts again, because otherwise this conversation wouldn't even get off the ground. The things I do...)

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Yes, I asserted my program's correctness. What? No, I did not do any tests... no, there were no proofs either... and I didn't use asan while debugging because that's bloat...
            >Just trust me it's correct, mkay?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes. My code works. There were hiccups, sure. But my code has been keeping machines safe, that have the potential to blow up buildings, for five years straight, 24/7.
            It's a watchdog unit, it checks that a control PC for a machine changes a digital output every 1000ms (because if it doesn't, it means the PC has frozen).
            The code overflows after 65535 milliseconds and has a finite set of states it can assume in accordance to that.
            I *could* run whatever official test you want me to, but I know I didn't frick up.

            Maybe you just don't know this code completeness feeling that you need these whatever tests. I have enough shit to do, my shit works with machines worth and earning millions, but none of them need certification like in the aerospace industry.
            There's really nothing more I can add to that.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >and none of them need certification
            Case closed.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            LabVIEW, Siemens S7, all their underlying code, it's all C.
            Not Rust.
            They control nuclear power plants.
            And I said I *could* certify it and it would pass with flying colors.
            I just can't be bothered if I don't need to, doesn't mean I didn't write the code to be as perfect as possible so as to only have to do it once and never touch it again.
            What have you done?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            yeah thankfully after shit like Therac-25 engineers learned that cniles are mentally ill like (You) and thankfully all safety is in hardware so no matter how shit your code is, it won't matter.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >all safety is in hardware so no matter how shit your code is, it won't matter
            Who do you think programs this hardware, JFC, lol, this is getting more and more ridiculous.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You don't know neither Verilog nor VHDL

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Are all just formalizations of what you should be doing intuitively.

            total moronic monkeys like you, that's why all safety is in the unprogrammable part of hardware

            You know, I could just flip this around and say, well then, why even use Rust if safety doesn't matter?

            C programmers thinking they are engineers is the funniest shit ever

            Thanks, I'm flattered.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >You know, I could just flip this around and say, well then, why even use Rust if safety doesn't matter?
            because I'm talking about this thing called embedded programming which is trivial compared to real programming, like writing real useful programs that are so complicated and need so many things in them and safety built in that people choose to write them in... C++ because C is for midwits who write most boring code that could be provided by the guys who created the hardware.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >are so complicated and need so many things in them...
            skill issue

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            yeah just like in this example https://lwn.net/Articles/542457/ where C programmers admitted that they're incapable of maintaining their own compiler in their toy language inadequate for writing compilers in

            Yeah, well, embedded is the only safety critical thing that matters, everything else is peanuts.
            Everywhere else doesn't risk limbs being chopped off, bombs detonating too soon or too late, heart-pacing machines beating too fast or too slow, kidney filtering bypass machines operating reliably, etc., etc.

            All your other "safety" critical bullshit are memes compared to life and death.

            So, sincerely, shut the frick up.

            everything you mentioned has built-in hardware safety that is impossible to override in software because engineers know that (You) are mentally ill and out to kill people

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >engineers know that (You) are mentally ill and out to kill people
            What the frick, man.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's like he *hates* me more than I am ...annoyed by him.
            Idk, it's the bed you made.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >others suck therefore you do
            frick you too, crab

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, well, embedded is the only safety critical thing that matters, everything else is peanuts.
            Everywhere else doesn't risk limbs being chopped off, bombs detonating too soon or too late, heart-pacing machines beating too fast or too slow, kidney filtering bypass machines operating reliably, etc., etc.

            All your other "safety" critical bullshit are memes compared to life and death.

            So, sincerely, shut the frick up.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Everywhere else doesn't risk limbs being chopped off, bombs detonating too soon or too late, heart-pacing machines beating too fast or too slow, kidney filtering bypass machines operating reliably, etc., etc.
            *Correction, it does, when's being operated from a higher-level language/interface.
            So the chain does extend upward.
            I hope the Rust developer knows what he's doing when he interfaces wif my low-lewwel icky-fippy litty-bitty embeeddid C-progwammed EM-CEE-UwU *twerKs*

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Yeah, well, embedded is the only safety critical thing that matters, everything else is peanuts.
            Most embedded software is not safety critical. It's toy software where nobody cares if it crashes.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Are all just formalizations of what you should be doing intuitively
            Hardware design and its logic doesn't come out of thin air Black person. It's not written in C.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >It's not written in C.
            So it doesn't matter then.
            It's not written in Rust either.
            Ad absurdum.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            C does not provide safety in modern low-level hardware designs. It also doesn't provide safety in complex programs. So why do you delusional Black folk keep lying that it's safe?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            because it provides control
            now go speedrun rust ack% somewhere else

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            C provides so little control you cannot even define a compile time constant in big endian without having to manually swap it when it changes

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >C++ thread
            >Rust Rust Rust Rust troony troony troony
            They truly live in your head rent free. Friendly reminder that most embedded programmers trooned out, including cniles.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            never mentioned troondom even once.
            meds homosexual
            and not of the hrt kind this time

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            C is not a hardware specification language

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            total moronic monkeys like you, that's why all safety is in the unprogrammable part of hardware

            C programmers thinking they are engineers is the funniest shit ever

            >verilog
            >vhdl
            https://github.com/GPUOpen-Drivers/xgl

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            total moronic monkeys like you, that's why all safety is in the unprogrammable part of hardware

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            C programmers thinking they are engineers is the funniest shit ever

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            C programmers are literal accountants of programming industry, they write most boring menial code like drivers and firmware which is just very spoopy words to the uninitiated but it basically boils down to writing basic functions like do_thing that wraps something like 3 bytes being sent to hardware directly which is a coded instruction for doing thing, very deep, requires very high intellect, and indeed, without C it's impossible to do, it's not like there's driver frameworks created in fricking Python because someone thought it would be funny to write drivers in Python because writing drivers is so complex even a Pyjeet can do it.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >t. Therac-25 programmer's nephew

            >The NASA study of the Toyota electronic throttle control firmware found at least 243 violations of these rules.
            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_of_10%3A_Rules_for_Developing_Safety-Critical_Code

            How many drive hours does Toyota have vs. JPL's satellite and spaceship flight hours?
            Certification requirements depends on external factors and should never be taken for absolute.
            Which is something every actual engineer knows.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            every actual engineer learned the hard way that if he won't make it safe, then it won't be safe, the end user is ALWAYS fricking moronic and in this case end user is the C programmer

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >t. Therac-25 programmer's nephew

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Why would I need mathematical proof for C?
            I mean, how do you think glibc fixed condvars in pthreads? someone had to define a working model of C execution and and parallelisms to spot a deadlock. to be fair, sophisticated condvars are fricking nightmare fuel, but anyhow.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >implementation 0 was so shit it needed fixing
            lol, cniles truly are geniuses

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            look at how condvars are implemented. It's not a problem limited to C, honestly. It's just a very tricky problem with how multithreading and how the C++ atomics model works.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            yeah I know some trivial stuff is too hard for cniles who can only think in single thread because that's just how limited their brain is

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            implementing a trivial condvar isn't hard... implementing one that's free of ABA tier bugs trying to avoid spurious wake ups is, however.... what are we arguing about again?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            all condvar implementations have spurious wakeups

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            implementing a trivial condvar isn't hard... implementing one that's free of ABA tier bugs trying to avoid spurious wake ups is, however.... what are we arguing about again?

            *checked what tf is a condvar*
            lmfao
            fricking toddlerlangs

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Ya, it's about avoiding them when possible.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >working model of C execution
            You mean a working model of the machine code created by C.
            This is ridiculous.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Hell, most Cniles don't even bother with using asan/valgrind
            to be fair, using it is nontrivial, especially in some cases where timing dependencies are involved.
            I really just don't understand why people deal with this unknowable unworkable garbage instead of taking the Rust pill, but whatever. miri works well enough in the cases where you can't "know" anyhow.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Modern C++ is much, much harder to write properly than C.
        I can agree with this to some degree. It's generally to the point where It's better to just ignore the standard's garbage and make your own.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Artificially making it harder and then circlejerking yourself to it doesn't actually count, Seppletard.

          I just ignore all the OOP crap and write as pure functional as possible. That solves literally 99% of problems anyone complains about. It's not my fault you all fell for the worst paradigm in history. A whole generation of coders writing spaghetti because university told them to inherent wheel from car and they drank the coolaid.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's more than just the OOJeet. Fundamental shit like co-routines are unusable in C++.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            This is what I mean bro. All my functions are pure, that means all my parallelism just werks. Don't even need to think about it.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yep, late 90s to mid 2000s.
            Then it was about making everything a webapp.
            Now it's about rewriting everything in Rust.

            In all cases, it was always about morons by morons for morons.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah. Clojure saved me from this hell and showed me the light. Coding is fun again in any language. All I need is lambdas and all your classes can go to hell.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >C
      >he doesn't write asm
      >shiggy

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ASM is the cherry on top, fren :^)

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        how is fasm anyhow? It looks pretty macro-y.
        hand writing modern ISA shit looks cancerous though.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you don't use the standard library or templates C++ is pretty much the most astheticc language there is

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Don't want your job outsourced to India?
    >Mehta-programming
    sounds like the opposite would happen

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    do the owners of these companies ever visit these office towers and see that its completely staffed by pajeets not doing anything?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >owners
      who? the shareholders? they can't do shit anyhow as long as the executive team (who will all be pajeet) are making the money roll in and don't say anything that will imply they are undermining the shareholders'.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >fire anon
    >hire 20 Indians on an HB for the same total monthly wage
    >rewrite whole program in Java
    >get government subsidies as a reward for ditching a memory-unsafe language

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >>get government subsidies as a reward for ditching a memory-unsafe language
      the last part is moronic, but the former is actually happening.
      The Indian government is actually subsidizing offshoring tech work to India.
      It's fricking horrifying how bad it's going to get if India keeps it up.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >the last part is moronic
        https://www.whitehouse.gov/oncd/briefing-room/2024/02/26/press-release-technical-report/

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          ok, so you're moronic. stop shitting up this thread.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Don't shoot the messenger! Biden's the one mandating Rust, not me.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Holy shit frick off idiot. I swear to christ bringing back /misc/ (neo /new/) was a fricking mistake. I fricking hate Hiromoot for not genociding it already.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          > make software "safe" from outside attack
          > include CIA backdoor

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *