Was he wrong? They were naïve, they weren't going to turn China into a democracy in a day, it is a giant country with over a billion people, and they can't split it up either without causing chaos.
That's not even what he was referring to you schizo. He just got pissed and went into deranged rant mode because a HK reporter asked him if he "supported" the current HK Chief Executive's reelection (i.e. had rigged the election, which he obviously had).
Sending the tanks into crushing the CIA sponsored color revolution was the right decision he made. If these student disguised psy-op agent didn’t die, millions more would die ensuing the aftermath of the Anglo backed regime change and israelite exploitation.
>Basically the Shanghai Clique was China's last hope for a free society
The problem is the Chinese are far too smart to ever trust what the US refers to as “freedom.” You’ve utterly worn out your goodwill with the developing world. Get over it
2 years ago
Anonymous
Luckily, that is not for me or you to decide. I don't have a crystal ball, but if you made me bet, I think freedom isn't quite as lost of a cause in China as people like to think.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>my specific brand of mutt libertarianism isn't a lost cause ye-ACK!
spare me your drivel, you filthy fricking mutt. nobody believes your kind anymore. nobody.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>israeli star
Not sure what sort of communist is anti-Semitic, but okay
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Not sure what sort of communist is anti-Semitic, but okay
Most communists after 1937.
India split apart massively because they couldn't get their Muslims to believe in democracy. Pakistan and Bangladesh were meant to be part of India as a single unified nation. If democracy had truly succeeded for them India would have 2 billion people
>1.3 billion isn't enough >let's add 400 million more people >even poorer than the average Indian with zero belief in the potential of nation states not founded in Islamic tradition
Lol no. That would be a horrific mistake for Indian democracy's health
King Chinsect before the current one. He was not as confrontational from what I can remember, but then again the geopolitical circumstances were different.
gets worse every day
Explain the Three Represents right now, wtf are they what does it even mean
>he doesn’t know
Was he wrong? They were naïve, they weren't going to turn China into a democracy in a day, it is a giant country with over a billion people, and they can't split it up either without causing chaos.
That's not even what he was referring to you schizo. He just got pissed and went into deranged rant mode because a HK reporter asked him if he "supported" the current HK Chief Executive's reelection (i.e. had rigged the election, which he obviously had).
Sending the tanks into crushing the CIA sponsored color revolution was the right decision he made. If these student disguised psy-op agent didn’t die, millions more would die ensuing the aftermath of the Anglo backed regime change and israelite exploitation.
>Hurr durr Tiananmen Square was CIA backed!1!1!1
Shut up, tankie troony. Ywnbaw
>t. CIA agent
Enough with your unfunny memes.
>he says while going muh CIA
The CIA did at least airlift the protest leaders out of China on helicopters so it isn't too far fetched.
You're a moron, Tiananmen happened under Deng. Jiang actually was about to settle protests in Shanghai peacefully.
Basically the Shanghai Clique was China's last hope for a free society, and now it's over.
>Basically the Shanghai Clique was China's last hope for a free society
The problem is the Chinese are far too smart to ever trust what the US refers to as “freedom.” You’ve utterly worn out your goodwill with the developing world. Get over it
Luckily, that is not for me or you to decide. I don't have a crystal ball, but if you made me bet, I think freedom isn't quite as lost of a cause in China as people like to think.
>my specific brand of mutt libertarianism isn't a lost cause ye-ACK!
spare me your drivel, you filthy fricking mutt. nobody believes your kind anymore. nobody.
>israeli star
Not sure what sort of communist is anti-Semitic, but okay
>Not sure what sort of communist is anti-Semitic, but okay
Most communists after 1937.
India
India split apart massively because they couldn't get their Muslims to believe in democracy. Pakistan and Bangladesh were meant to be part of India as a single unified nation. If democracy had truly succeeded for them India would have 2 billion people
>1.3 billion isn't enough
>let's add 400 million more people
>even poorer than the average Indian with zero belief in the potential of nation states not founded in Islamic tradition
Lol no. That would be a horrific mistake for Indian democracy's health
lol
lmao
Literally who?
King Chinsect before the current one. He was not as confrontational from what I can remember, but then again the geopolitical circumstances were different.
Two before Xi.
To be fair Li Keqiang was basically unknown outside of China and the countries they border
it's called thoughtless shitposting. know this and your time here will be much better.
苟利国家生死以,岂因蛤蟆必趋之