Isn't actually the inverse? It's not "If there is no God, anything is permitted" but rather, "If not everything is permitted (due to the existence of conscience and guilt), there is a God"
I'm only half way through the book though. Still waiting for Alyosha to return to the guy that Dmitri beat up and give him the money from Dmitri's fiance.
>morons still failing to realize that Kant secured secular morals forever and ever and ever and no amount of crying christgayging will change it or convince anyone versed in philosophy that God is needed for morality
Plebs.
lol, pleb. Daily reminder: Kant was fully retroactively refuted by Bakker.
For example, while Quine fatally weakened the synthetic/analytic distinction, it was Bakker who provided the proof that calcified dogma is not observably different from analytic fact using a combination of the philosophy of information and semiotics of abstraction, joining the logical systems of Floridi to the physics of messaging via Landauer's Principal and computational entropy. Incomputability, Krylov Complexity, Yao Entropy, have disasterous consequences for proving analytics that are not tautologies, and nowhere is this more apparent then in the Dunyain-Logos Paradigm, as viewed from the Absolute Judging Eye Vector, Whale Rape Gang Bang Hypothesis laid out in The Great Ordeal. Bakker brings philosophy from Kant to Quine full circle, unsublating both, so both can be resublated as an organic whole into the dynamics of whale-mother-cave-rape-as-logos, which provides proof of the incompleteness of Logos due to the incomputability problem. Turing would have been proud!
Note that Kant is also more seriously retroactively refuted vis-á-vis the transcendental aesthetic via the proof of Meat Fueled Murder Rape Orgy (where the inefficiency of the alien space nuke, and resultant high level of radiation released, reminiscent of primitive, WWII era nuclear weapons, results in the Scalded as a boipussy dynamical system, which, shows that even a simple system represented by a differential equation can, and will necissarily produce chaos if it reaches a phase of three in any cycle.) The result is that the faculties cannot be an anchor of anything, as strong variance driven by "initial" conditions invariably leads to chaos. Bakker symbolizes this using the stochastic forces of nuclear radiation, as from those quantum activity we still see the larger classical objects of emergence in the rape orgy.
This shows the teleology of rape, the Inchori Theory and defeats appeals to classical ethics as such.
Again, even more than retroactive refutation, which others have done, Bakker RETROACTIVELY SUBLATES Kant. Bakker is the Absolute.
There are no Kantians. At the very best there is only some people that teach Kant in college.
Secular morality has no use for Kant.
People don't free themselves from religion to submit to reason, they free themselves from religion to submit for nothing at all and do what is most pleasurable for them in the only chance at life they have before going back to the black void of inexistence.
If you tell a modern secular woman Kant's categorical imperative goes against abortion, she will answer "I won't let that frick my career".
I tried reading this in 8th grade and gave up after 20 pages. I still have yet to find a Russian author I legitimately enjoy. Gogol is good, but that begs the question of whether or not a person living in the borders of modern-day Ukraine in the 1850's would be counted a Ukrainian by modern standards
>traits associated with being a god
>lying, cheating
uhh... Christsisters???
He said A god, not The God. He's thinking of gods like Zeus and Hermes.
but zeus and hermes doesn't real either
What's the difference?
Why can't The God cheat and lie? What are you going to do about it?
>I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things. (Isaiah 45:7, KJV)
Isn't actually the inverse? It's not "If there is no God, anything is permitted" but rather, "If not everything is permitted (due to the existence of conscience and guilt), there is a God"
I'm only half way through the book though. Still waiting for Alyosha to return to the guy that Dmitri beat up and give him the money from Dmitri's fiance.
>If not everything is permitted (due to the existence of conscience and guilt), there is a God
that sounds more like crime and punishment
Can this board stop fricking spoiling it?!?!?!
I'm only on chapter 8 ye c**ts.
The butler did it.
I just bought that book. Jumping on it right after House of Leaves.
>morons still failing to realize that Kant secured secular morals forever and ever and ever and no amount of crying christgayging will change it or convince anyone versed in philosophy that God is needed for morality
Plebs.
lol, pleb. Daily reminder: Kant was fully retroactively refuted by Bakker.
For example, while Quine fatally weakened the synthetic/analytic distinction, it was Bakker who provided the proof that calcified dogma is not observably different from analytic fact using a combination of the philosophy of information and semiotics of abstraction, joining the logical systems of Floridi to the physics of messaging via Landauer's Principal and computational entropy. Incomputability, Krylov Complexity, Yao Entropy, have disasterous consequences for proving analytics that are not tautologies, and nowhere is this more apparent then in the Dunyain-Logos Paradigm, as viewed from the Absolute Judging Eye Vector, Whale Rape Gang Bang Hypothesis laid out in The Great Ordeal. Bakker brings philosophy from Kant to Quine full circle, unsublating both, so both can be resublated as an organic whole into the dynamics of whale-mother-cave-rape-as-logos, which provides proof of the incompleteness of Logos due to the incomputability problem. Turing would have been proud!
Note that Kant is also more seriously retroactively refuted vis-á-vis the transcendental aesthetic via the proof of Meat Fueled Murder Rape Orgy (where the inefficiency of the alien space nuke, and resultant high level of radiation released, reminiscent of primitive, WWII era nuclear weapons, results in the Scalded as a boipussy dynamical system, which, shows that even a simple system represented by a differential equation can, and will necissarily produce chaos if it reaches a phase of three in any cycle.) The result is that the faculties cannot be an anchor of anything, as strong variance driven by "initial" conditions invariably leads to chaos. Bakker symbolizes this using the stochastic forces of nuclear radiation, as from those quantum activity we still see the larger classical objects of emergence in the rape orgy.
This shows the teleology of rape, the Inchori Theory and defeats appeals to classical ethics as such.
Again, even more than retroactive refutation, which others have done, Bakker RETROACTIVELY SUBLATES Kant. Bakker is the Absolute.
There are no Kantians. At the very best there is only some people that teach Kant in college.
Secular morality has no use for Kant.
People don't free themselves from religion to submit to reason, they free themselves from religion to submit for nothing at all and do what is most pleasurable for them in the only chance at life they have before going back to the black void of inexistence.
If you tell a modern secular woman Kant's categorical imperative goes against abortion, she will answer "I won't let that frick my career".
I tried reading this in 8th grade and gave up after 20 pages. I still have yet to find a Russian author I legitimately enjoy. Gogol is good, but that begs the question of whether or not a person living in the borders of modern-day Ukraine in the 1850's would be counted a Ukrainian by modern standards
I want to see what Tyler does
>Accepting evolution naturally leads to becoming a nietzschean nazi
So true
if a small child can become a sociopath the moment they are told no god exists that kid probably was designed/destined to be pain in the ass.