>It's a dark age because the counterfeit "christian" catholic cult was persecuting Christian saints.
And the light age was when pagans were persecuting all of you
An episode from these years (1432-34) is also recounted by Vasari: "And being in the Marca d'Ancona, one day sailing with some of his friends in a boat at sea, they were captured all together by the galleys of the 'Moors', that sailed through those places, and led to the Barbary coast (North Africa), each of them being led to the chain in servitude and held slave, where he remained with much discomfort for eighteenth months. He (Filippo Lippi) took a charcoal extinguished from the fire, with it all in one piece and with it he portrayed his new master wearing his clothes in the Moorish style, in a white wall. this was told by the other slaves to the master, because it seemed to everyone a miracle(!), neither drawing or painting were used in those parts, and this was the reason for giving him a reward and freeing him from the chain where he had been kept for so long. "..
An episode from these years (1432-34) is also recounted by Vasari: "And being in the Marca d'Ancona, one day sailing with some of his friends in a boat at sea, they were captured all together by the galleys of the 'Moors', that sailed through those places, and led to the Barbary coast (North Africa), each of them being led to the chain in servitude and held slave, where he remained with much discomfort for eighteenth months. He (Filippo Lippi) took a charcoal extinguished from the fire, with it all in one piece and with it he portrayed his new master wearing his clothes in the Moorish style, in a white wall. this was told by the other slaves to the master, because it seemed to everyone a miracle(!), neither drawing or painting were used in those parts, and this was the reason for giving him a reward and freeing him from the chain where he had been kept for so long. "..
>dude the late medieval period had nice houses for an imaginary friend that took decades to build (Some of which aren't completed to this day lmao) so the mud huts outside it weren't full of illiterate peasants
moronic thread with a moronic OP and a moronic argument
>Romans turn cities of brick into marble within a lifetime >le based dark ages cannot even make a BUILDING of marble within several generations
wew lad
>Paving with marble >Some of the most sophisticated architecture to date with marble
I can't tell which one is supposed to take more time, literally which one is it?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>paving an entire city and coating the buildings with marble and tearing down old buildings to remake them in glorious white marble while continuing to operate at near full capacity
vs >one decently sized building
Probably the city. It took less time, though, because the Romans had an actual society that produced a surplus instead of glorified substinence farming tribes.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You made a great case for being faster than one building. A long cry from being able to diss any generation of medieval Europe, but you'll get there.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Losers trying to be smug is always the strangest thing to me
2 years ago
Anonymous
You got called out by multiple people on both your claims and on meeting the goalposts. As I said, you'll get there, but... until then!
>Romans turn cities of brick into marble within a lifetime
No they don't. They built some important buildings with marble just like the Medieval Europeans did.
>They lived in apartment complexes and had standardized schooling, anon
They also had apartments and schools in medieval cities moron. The thing is 90% of the ancient Roman and medieval population lived in rural villages. It was only until the Industrial Revolution that the majority of people could live in cities.
Really makes you think - is every single item in history reducible to "people in control seeking power" or do people only get away with this lazy analysis in topics that are difficult to navigate?
>>Is every single item in history reducible to this >No
Name one and I'll show you that it is. That's why "bruh it's just a tool of control" is a useless insight. >It was literally "pretty colors" to impress peasants
Among a hundred other things, sure, it was visually appealing. Visual art is usually aiming to be that way in my understanding.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>ignoring the motivations behind it so he can comment on how art is appealing like it's impressive to note how water is wet like he's the first one to have this thought
Christianity literally, and I do mean literally, seeks to control every aspect of your life, down to the eternity you spend afterwards. To say "this was meant to control people" is not hyperbole when you discuss religious art
I can slob the knob of the church and talk about how its meant to represent Gods grace or whatever the frick but that was only emphasized so the Church would continue to exercise power over the masses by appealing to very base instincts humans have.
2 years ago
Anonymous
No we just like beauty you obsessed homosexual. Do you have the same deranged hatred for all other art in history? Or is it only the Middle Ages you hold some vendetta against?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Excuses corrupt people who want to literally control your life and soul because they hired some douche to made some stained glass one time >calls others beauty obsessed
Nice projection and emotionality there pal.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Name a single period of history where art isn’t something that is an evil conspiracy by the wealthy.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>wealthy
Dangerously close to communism there anon
I would call them the elite
Most art, including folk art, music, and what you might call local culture, isn't made by the elite or for the elite, but rather out of self expression by poors and middle classes.
Churches are literally indoctrination centers for Pope Inc. and Christoid LLC. They finance every bit of it and control every aspect of its creation with the tithes they recieve from flocks of sheeple for the right to be read a book in a language you don't understand.
Grow the frick up.
2 years ago
Anonymous
the motivations behind it
I'm not. I'm just not cherry-picking them either. >A piece of art being outstanding is like water being wet
Stopped reading there, go cope somewhere else.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>being honest and not sentimental is cherry-picking >literally cries cope
Pathetic argumentation and pathetic ideology.
you are free to think otherwise, i'm pretty sure that all the Popes selling indulgences and using their influence to get political power really cared about the souls of the plebs
Sorry bro but the 'indulgences' becoming history trivia was just a way for secularists to discredit the previous regime, they have full control over you, it seems.
Vgh what subhumans lived during the 12th century. Wish those boy rapists were still around...
2 years ago
Anonymous
christ, what an improvement as soon as the renaissance started compared to this provincial crap
2 years ago
Anonymous
This is infinitely more interesting than the same bland classical art. They were never able to put 2d figures on windows or create anything nearly as beautiful.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>inb4 le point of perspective
Roman 'art' sucks. The only good thing they ever did was portraits and statues which later people did way better and people only praise ancient 'art'
out of false sense of what could've been rather what was and is.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Wow look how realistic Roman 2d art is...
2 years ago
Anonymous
I can't believe medieval people forgot how to draw 2d people while the Romans drew realistic 2d people, just like the people from the Renaissance...
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Roman
where was this found? that style looks familiar...
2 years ago
Anonymous
My mind is blown, a threesome, how profound, truly better than anything to be found in le dark ages, kek.
2 years ago
Anonymous
this was essentially the brothel's wallpaper.
2 years ago
Anonymous
The thing is these homosexuals don't actually look at the classical period for what it was, nor do they want to. They depict some mythological, nonexistent picture of antiquity and impose that on their understanding of everything that came after it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Want stained glass roughly 200 years earlier? Right fricking here, fool.
There's a lot more dynamism to be found in the stained windows of Chartres.
I love how the only thing medievalists can throw around is a fricking window in a chapel or two within cities of fricking WOOD while Romans were making aqueducts, canals, stone metropolises, shipyards, and multi-layered city walls, you know, shit that actually DOES things beyond solidifying the authority of pedophiles in dresses
2 years ago
Anonymous
Fool, the French alone established impressive and unique cathedrals all throughout what we see as modern France in a shorter period of time than that boring Ionic and Doric temple shit Romans built the world all over in a thousand years.
2 years ago
Anonymous
If you knew anything about the classical era you would know that the Romans used wood constantly. And shockingly, medieval cities had all of those.
>pedophiles in dresses
Whatever you think about the RCC, pedophilia happened on an infinitely smaller scale than it did in pagan Rome and unlike pagan Rome, it is explicitly condemned in the Catholic Church. But I am sure the boy-raping Romans are looking favorably upon you.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>They used the most commonly available building material as well as-
Oh shit you really got me there
They also used concrete and brick and stone and MARBLE to build CITIES
>woah dude boy fricking just vanished after the RCC came into being
Literally worthless
2 years ago
Anonymous
They're coming from the fall of the supposedly 'great' Roman empire, funny how an empire so great succumbed to barbarians and internal fatalism or whatever they with dealt within their own borders, and I find it also funny how since the medieval times onwards, civilization has not collapsed in spite of plagues, catastrophic wars, and genocide's, and yet this 'great' Roman Empire can't deal with some barbarians at the least.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>civilization has not collapsed in spite of plagues
the black plague shattered the Catholic stranglehold on thought and moral authority. Their retreat was the death of Old Europe in the Enlightenment >catastrophic wars
Napoleon and the Revolutionary Wars, followed by the World Wars. Shit bait. >Genocides
Christoids already took care of that during the Reformations
Shit bait from a shitmuncher
2 years ago
Anonymous
>the black plague shattered the Catholic stranglehold on thought and moral authority. Their retreat was the death of Old Europe in the Enlightenment >equating the Catholic Church with the rest of Europe
Civilization went on, fool. People praise the treaty of Westphalia all the time and how by the end of the 30 Years War, Europe went on to form more or less nationalism, something the Romans could never do.
>Napoleon and the Revolutionary Wars, followed by the World Wars. Shit bait.
Did these countries all the sudden collapsed, forget writing, forget how to build a fricking road for one? No, but the Romans did.
>Christoids already took care of that during the Reformations
Again, civilization carried on, in spite of millions of people dying; could the Romans boast that?
Me thinks you don't know shit.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>SPQR isn't nationalism in its nascent form >implying the Roman identity wasn't nationalist in everything but name >implying the peoples who got sucked into the Roman Republic and later Empire didn't identify as Romans first
moron alert
>Dude people just forgot how to write and build roads
moron alert
>Millions die and civilization changes forever after and Christians remain increasingly irrelevant short of stopping scientific advancement whenever they get the chance after the 1400s
oh frick it's a case of terminal moronation. Sorry ma'am, we need to put him down before he hurts someone.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>moron, moron, moron
Only actual moron I can see is (you). Don't bother @ing me. Typical 4chin, idiot, belonging to the nearest gas chamber.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>no stop calling me moronic for being a moron
If your civilization cannot raise a professional army of a million men, it's not a fricking civilization, it's a tribe.
If it cannot build metropolises at a whim, it's not a civilization, it's a tribe.
If your civilization's only export is the rulings of an increasingly corrupt class of pedophiles in dresses asking you to PAY to get into heaven and killing anyone who disagrees with the notion that the Vatican should run EVERYTHING, it's not a civilization. It's a fricking tribe.
Tribes survive catastrophes because they're small and support jack shit, and while most will simply melt away, a few will remain. Civilizations collapse because civilization is a complex structure that needs to be checked and maintained regularly. They bring light and prosperity and wealth and complexity.
Medieval societies don't do that. They produce blithering fools like (You) and substinence farmers who get massacred by the tribe beyond the next hill.
Want stained glass roughly 200 years earlier? Right fricking here, fool.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Pretty colors, but otherwise garbage.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You are genuinely mentally ill
2 years ago
Anonymous
You're the one who is mentally ill if you think this crap can somehow compete with even the art in OP's pic
2 years ago
Anonymous
There's a lot more dynamism to be found in the stained windows of Chartres.
2 years ago
Anonymous
2 years ago
Anonymous
2 years ago
Anonymous
This is what passed for a masterpiece in those days. "Our Lady of the Beautiful Window", pilgrims would flock from all over Europe to gawk at it. Truly the fricking Dark Ages.
2 years ago
Anonymous
But what about the 100000000th row of Doric columns with boring rectangular architecture and a triangular roof? People not regurgitating the same art style indefinitely truly is a sign of ignorance.
2 years ago
Anonymous
It's a great start. Better any Roman shit, pray do tell, any Roman temple that historians cite as some pilgrimage site and peasants would risk life and limb just to witness with their eyes? They were probably too busy living some frick all life under the Roman boot.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Seethes
The Temple of Mars or Uranus
Many also flocked to the Temple of Jupiter in Rome
Shame the Christcucks destroyed what they could or built their pedo playgrounds on top of the ruins of what was once a grand empire
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Shame the Christcucks destroyed what they could or built their pedo playgrounds on top of the ruins of what was once a grand empire >implying the ancient romans weren't degenerates who constantly raped little boys and required a Semitic faith to tell them that's wrong
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Catholics know its wrong and still form clubs to rape boys and silence their critics and protect their fellow pedophiles for centuries
LMAO
Nice self-own, moron
2 years ago
Anonymous
Talks about pedos, these supposedly great ancients had zero qualms with fricking young boys; of course you'd ignore that.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm calling BS on that, the temples were prime estate that the rich and connected enjoyed and peasants from Spain, Gaul, Asia Minor, the Balkans, did not flocked there en masse unless you can provide a source.
Here you go.
I already said that Romans did good portraits and statues, that's indisputable, however the people that came afterward did far better because the Roman Empire was stagnant and placid and no amount of given time would've changed that.
2 years ago
Anonymous
What about this breathtaking, innovative, and stunning 2000000000th rendition of a style that has existed for several centuries straight? Truly better than any of that Gothic architecture the Dark Age savages created.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Here you go.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I think the art in OP's picture is better, your point? Are you going to tell me how that art in OP's picture is actually an attempt of ancient Roman revivalism?
Medieval people invented glasses, no where else on Earth in any time previous, managed to make the blind see for the first time. Not even China, with it's le impressive feats, ever managed to do that.
Referring to the medieval period as the “dark ages” is an early modern idea and is also completely stupid.
It's a dark age because the counterfeit "christian" catholic cult was persecuting Christian saints.
It's "dark" because we have fewer written sources. Christian establishment persecuting Christian saints wasn't anything new or special.
Based
We're in the dark ages now then
>It's a dark age because the counterfeit "christian" catholic cult was persecuting Christian saints.
And the light age was when pagans were persecuting all of you
Before Christians wiped pagans out of Europe?
>NO 3D AAAAAAAAAAHHHH MY EYES ARE FRICKED UP IM GOIN INSANEEEEEEEEEEEEEE ENLIGHTEN MEEEEEEEE AAAAAAAAHHHH
There was a small number of very talented and knowledgeable people, but 99% of Medieval people really were primitive.
Even arabs were more advance. Full shame mode.
For cca 10% of the Medieval period lol and even that just in selected fields.
cope
LOl nope, kang.
An episode from these years (1432-34) is also recounted by Vasari: "And being in the Marca d'Ancona, one day sailing with some of his friends in a boat at sea, they were captured all together by the galleys of the 'Moors', that sailed through those places, and led to the Barbary coast (North Africa), each of them being led to the chain in servitude and held slave, where he remained with much discomfort for eighteenth months. He (Filippo Lippi) took a charcoal extinguished from the fire, with it all in one piece and with it he portrayed his new master wearing his clothes in the Moorish style, in a white wall. this was told by the other slaves to the master, because it seemed to everyone a miracle(!), neither drawing or painting were used in those parts, and this was the reason for giving him a reward and freeing him from the chain where he had been kept for so long. "..
>dude the late medieval period had nice houses for an imaginary friend that took decades to build (Some of which aren't completed to this day lmao) so the mud huts outside it weren't full of illiterate peasants
moronic thread with a moronic OP and a moronic argument
have a nice day
>Decades is to long. Cancel that.
>moronic argument.
>Romans turn cities of brick into marble within a lifetime
>le based dark ages cannot even make a BUILDING of marble within several generations
wew lad
>Paving with marble
>Some of the most sophisticated architecture to date with marble
I can't tell which one is supposed to take more time, literally which one is it?
>paving an entire city and coating the buildings with marble and tearing down old buildings to remake them in glorious white marble while continuing to operate at near full capacity
vs
>one decently sized building
Probably the city. It took less time, though, because the Romans had an actual society that produced a surplus instead of glorified substinence farming tribes.
You made a great case for being faster than one building. A long cry from being able to diss any generation of medieval Europe, but you'll get there.
Losers trying to be smug is always the strangest thing to me
You got called out by multiple people on both your claims and on meeting the goalposts. As I said, you'll get there, but... until then!
>dies of dysentery
>Romans turn cities of brick into marble within a lifetime
No they don't. They built some important buildings with marble just like the Medieval Europeans did.
>Implying Roman peasants weren't illiterate and didn't live in mud huts
They lived in apartment complexes and had standardized schooling, anon
>They lived in apartment complexes and had standardized schooling, anon
They also had apartments and schools in medieval cities moron. The thing is 90% of the ancient Roman and medieval population lived in rural villages. It was only until the Industrial Revolution that the majority of people could live in cities.
All of this to worship the israelite raised by a cuck, pathetic.
In Roslin Chapel the monks figured out how to record music in shapes which thr sounds created
The video shows it best
Another victory for the Scottish race
The Church used stained glass windows to impress poor uneducated people to get them to join their sect
Really makes you think - is every single item in history reducible to "people in control seeking power" or do people only get away with this lazy analysis in topics that are difficult to navigate?
>Is every single item in history reducible to this
No
But he was right. It was literally "pretty colors" to impress peasants
>>Is every single item in history reducible to this
>No
Name one and I'll show you that it is. That's why "bruh it's just a tool of control" is a useless insight.
>It was literally "pretty colors" to impress peasants
Among a hundred other things, sure, it was visually appealing. Visual art is usually aiming to be that way in my understanding.
>ignoring the motivations behind it so he can comment on how art is appealing like it's impressive to note how water is wet like he's the first one to have this thought
Christianity literally, and I do mean literally, seeks to control every aspect of your life, down to the eternity you spend afterwards. To say "this was meant to control people" is not hyperbole when you discuss religious art
I can slob the knob of the church and talk about how its meant to represent Gods grace or whatever the frick but that was only emphasized so the Church would continue to exercise power over the masses by appealing to very base instincts humans have.
No we just like beauty you obsessed homosexual. Do you have the same deranged hatred for all other art in history? Or is it only the Middle Ages you hold some vendetta against?
>Excuses corrupt people who want to literally control your life and soul because they hired some douche to made some stained glass one time
>calls others beauty obsessed
Nice projection and emotionality there pal.
Name a single period of history where art isn’t something that is an evil conspiracy by the wealthy.
>wealthy
Dangerously close to communism there anon
I would call them the elite
Most art, including folk art, music, and what you might call local culture, isn't made by the elite or for the elite, but rather out of self expression by poors and middle classes.
Churches are literally indoctrination centers for Pope Inc. and Christoid LLC. They finance every bit of it and control every aspect of its creation with the tithes they recieve from flocks of sheeple for the right to be read a book in a language you don't understand.
Grow the frick up.
the motivations behind it
I'm not. I'm just not cherry-picking them either.
>A piece of art being outstanding is like water being wet
Stopped reading there, go cope somewhere else.
>being honest and not sentimental is cherry-picking
>literally cries cope
Pathetic argumentation and pathetic ideology.
Damn you've convinced me that beautiful medieval art is bad
Glad to see you admit it, anon. There's hope for you yet.
All art is an evil power grabbing scheme, that's why we only need brutalism and strip malls.
you are free to think otherwise, i'm pretty sure that all the Popes selling indulgences and using their influence to get political power really cared about the souls of the plebs
Sorry bro but the 'indulgences' becoming history trivia was just a way for secularists to discredit the previous regime, they have full control over you, it seems.
apply the same logic to anywhere else in history homosexual
>The Church measurably ruins the lives of the people it allegedly worked for
>FDR gave people wealth and purpose with a New Deal
It's not comparable anon. Sorry to offend your trad sensibilities
>literally business on murdering people
>not primitive
>1405 Florence
that's basically the renaissance, you know
hell, that particularly stained glass work is by Lorenzo Ghiberti
But anon, medieval Europe was le based and the fall of Rome was a total nothingburger
Vgh what subhumans lived during the 12th century. Wish those boy rapists were still around...
christ, what an improvement as soon as the renaissance started compared to this provincial crap
This is infinitely more interesting than the same bland classical art. They were never able to put 2d figures on windows or create anything nearly as beautiful.
>inb4 le point of perspective
Roman 'art' sucks. The only good thing they ever did was portraits and statues which later people did way better and people only praise ancient 'art'
out of false sense of what could've been rather what was and is.
Wow look how realistic Roman 2d art is...
I can't believe medieval people forgot how to draw 2d people while the Romans drew realistic 2d people, just like the people from the Renaissance...
>Roman
where was this found? that style looks familiar...
My mind is blown, a threesome, how profound, truly better than anything to be found in le dark ages, kek.
this was essentially the brothel's wallpaper.
The thing is these homosexuals don't actually look at the classical period for what it was, nor do they want to. They depict some mythological, nonexistent picture of antiquity and impose that on their understanding of everything that came after it.
I love how the only thing medievalists can throw around is a fricking window in a chapel or two within cities of fricking WOOD while Romans were making aqueducts, canals, stone metropolises, shipyards, and multi-layered city walls, you know, shit that actually DOES things beyond solidifying the authority of pedophiles in dresses
Fool, the French alone established impressive and unique cathedrals all throughout what we see as modern France in a shorter period of time than that boring Ionic and Doric temple shit Romans built the world all over in a thousand years.
If you knew anything about the classical era you would know that the Romans used wood constantly. And shockingly, medieval cities had all of those.
>pedophiles in dresses
Whatever you think about the RCC, pedophilia happened on an infinitely smaller scale than it did in pagan Rome and unlike pagan Rome, it is explicitly condemned in the Catholic Church. But I am sure the boy-raping Romans are looking favorably upon you.
>They used the most commonly available building material as well as-
Oh shit you really got me there
They also used concrete and brick and stone and MARBLE to build CITIES
>woah dude boy fricking just vanished after the RCC came into being
Literally worthless
They're coming from the fall of the supposedly 'great' Roman empire, funny how an empire so great succumbed to barbarians and internal fatalism or whatever they with dealt within their own borders, and I find it also funny how since the medieval times onwards, civilization has not collapsed in spite of plagues, catastrophic wars, and genocide's, and yet this 'great' Roman Empire can't deal with some barbarians at the least.
>civilization has not collapsed in spite of plagues
the black plague shattered the Catholic stranglehold on thought and moral authority. Their retreat was the death of Old Europe in the Enlightenment
>catastrophic wars
Napoleon and the Revolutionary Wars, followed by the World Wars. Shit bait.
>Genocides
Christoids already took care of that during the Reformations
Shit bait from a shitmuncher
>the black plague shattered the Catholic stranglehold on thought and moral authority. Their retreat was the death of Old Europe in the Enlightenment
>equating the Catholic Church with the rest of Europe
Civilization went on, fool. People praise the treaty of Westphalia all the time and how by the end of the 30 Years War, Europe went on to form more or less nationalism, something the Romans could never do.
>Napoleon and the Revolutionary Wars, followed by the World Wars. Shit bait.
Did these countries all the sudden collapsed, forget writing, forget how to build a fricking road for one? No, but the Romans did.
>Christoids already took care of that during the Reformations
Again, civilization carried on, in spite of millions of people dying; could the Romans boast that?
Me thinks you don't know shit.
>SPQR isn't nationalism in its nascent form
>implying the Roman identity wasn't nationalist in everything but name
>implying the peoples who got sucked into the Roman Republic and later Empire didn't identify as Romans first
moron alert
>Dude people just forgot how to write and build roads
moron alert
>Millions die and civilization changes forever after and Christians remain increasingly irrelevant short of stopping scientific advancement whenever they get the chance after the 1400s
oh frick it's a case of terminal moronation. Sorry ma'am, we need to put him down before he hurts someone.
>moron, moron, moron
Only actual moron I can see is (you). Don't bother @ing me. Typical 4chin, idiot, belonging to the nearest gas chamber.
>no stop calling me moronic for being a moron
If your civilization cannot raise a professional army of a million men, it's not a fricking civilization, it's a tribe.
If it cannot build metropolises at a whim, it's not a civilization, it's a tribe.
If your civilization's only export is the rulings of an increasingly corrupt class of pedophiles in dresses asking you to PAY to get into heaven and killing anyone who disagrees with the notion that the Vatican should run EVERYTHING, it's not a civilization. It's a fricking tribe.
Tribes survive catastrophes because they're small and support jack shit, and while most will simply melt away, a few will remain. Civilizations collapse because civilization is a complex structure that needs to be checked and maintained regularly. They bring light and prosperity and wealth and complexity.
Medieval societies don't do that. They produce blithering fools like (You) and substinence farmers who get massacred by the tribe beyond the next hill.
L O L
K Y S
Want stained glass roughly 200 years earlier? Right fricking here, fool.
Pretty colors, but otherwise garbage.
You are genuinely mentally ill
You're the one who is mentally ill if you think this crap can somehow compete with even the art in OP's pic
There's a lot more dynamism to be found in the stained windows of Chartres.
This is what passed for a masterpiece in those days. "Our Lady of the Beautiful Window", pilgrims would flock from all over Europe to gawk at it. Truly the fricking Dark Ages.
But what about the 100000000th row of Doric columns with boring rectangular architecture and a triangular roof? People not regurgitating the same art style indefinitely truly is a sign of ignorance.
It's a great start. Better any Roman shit, pray do tell, any Roman temple that historians cite as some pilgrimage site and peasants would risk life and limb just to witness with their eyes? They were probably too busy living some frick all life under the Roman boot.
>Seethes
The Temple of Mars or Uranus
Many also flocked to the Temple of Jupiter in Rome
Shame the Christcucks destroyed what they could or built their pedo playgrounds on top of the ruins of what was once a grand empire
>Shame the Christcucks destroyed what they could or built their pedo playgrounds on top of the ruins of what was once a grand empire
>implying the ancient romans weren't degenerates who constantly raped little boys and required a Semitic faith to tell them that's wrong
>Catholics know its wrong and still form clubs to rape boys and silence their critics and protect their fellow pedophiles for centuries
LMAO
Nice self-own, moron
Talks about pedos, these supposedly great ancients had zero qualms with fricking young boys; of course you'd ignore that.
I'm calling BS on that, the temples were prime estate that the rich and connected enjoyed and peasants from Spain, Gaul, Asia Minor, the Balkans, did not flocked there en masse unless you can provide a source.
I already said that Romans did good portraits and statues, that's indisputable, however the people that came afterward did far better because the Roman Empire was stagnant and placid and no amount of given time would've changed that.
What about this breathtaking, innovative, and stunning 2000000000th rendition of a style that has existed for several centuries straight? Truly better than any of that Gothic architecture the Dark Age savages created.
Here you go.
I think the art in OP's picture is better, your point? Are you going to tell me how that art in OP's picture is actually an attempt of ancient Roman revivalism?
Medieval people invented glasses, no where else on Earth in any time previous, managed to make the blind see for the first time. Not even China, with it's le impressive feats, ever managed to do that.