iPhone pic has a lot less noise so I'd say the sensor there is better at least for low light settings. The colors are a lot less warm than on the chinkphone but I wouldn't know whether that's more or less accurate.
Who the frick takes pictures of their feet, floor aan a plastic toy car and why would quality matter for this. Take pictures of things you're actually going to photograph if you want to test them against each other.
i guess that's your answer then. although I like the bottom photo more, it's more vibrant and seems more crisp. personally i would go with the bottom photo over the top photo.
apple and samsung are known for their superior
photo quality. but i really like the outcome of the xiaomi phone. i'd call it a draw in this case.
better photos would be appreciated.
hard to tell when the cameras aren’t even set to the same color temperature
Xiaomi cameras have artificial overexposure because for chinks having a whiter skin is a sign of nobelty.
When I took a pic of myself with a frontal camera it blurred the frick out of my face to hide wrinkles. Generally all photos are kind of blurry but you can change sharpness.
Their cameras are only usable in RAW mode and you should use GCam instead of default MIUI crap. Unlike iPhones the software here can affect your quality heavily.
If you can't answer that question, does it really fricking matter?
>Which one is better?
By what metric?
Picture quality ofc
>Picture quality ofc
Entirely subjective. Which technical standards did you wish us to use to compare each image?
They both kind of suck.
Why are you comparing a 5 year old phone to a new one?
Pft, okay some with a brand new iPhone take a picture then
..in English..? Or are you tripping over yourself to recover because you no on has bitten on your basic b***h ebin trole thread?
Oh, you are actually ESL. Kek. No wonder you're talking about 5 year old shitboxes.
I installed Grammarly. It's all I can do regarding that.
You're shilling it wrong.
iPhone pic has a lot less noise so I'd say the sensor there is better at least for low light settings. The colors are a lot less warm than on the chinkphone but I wouldn't know whether that's more or less accurate.
Look slightly than it should be on the iPhone I think
FOOTA
Who the frick takes pictures of their feet, floor aan a plastic toy car and why would quality matter for this. Take pictures of things you're actually going to photograph if you want to test them against each other.
well looking at the colors, which photo matches the color of the floor better?
The iPhone I guess.
i guess that's your answer then. although I like the bottom photo more, it's more vibrant and seems more crisp. personally i would go with the bottom photo over the top photo.
apple and samsung are known for their superior
photo quality. but i really like the outcome of the xiaomi phone. i'd call it a draw in this case.
better photos would be appreciated.
yes that's right.
hard to tell when the cameras aren’t even set to the same color temperature
IPhone, looks more natural
top has more definition, less contrast
bottom has less definition, more contrast
Xiaomi cameras have artificial overexposure because for chinks having a whiter skin is a sign of nobelty.
When I took a pic of myself with a frontal camera it blurred the frick out of my face to hide wrinkles. Generally all photos are kind of blurry but you can change sharpness.
Their cameras are only usable in RAW mode and you should use GCam instead of default MIUI crap. Unlike iPhones the software here can affect your quality heavily.
This one?
You are the most stupidest homosexual in this board right now
The bottom one still has visible noise even when downsampled to that tiny ass ant size, it's complete garbage
Colors you can always fix in post
use stock camera app in both, homosexual.