Under a syncretic philosophy of both Guenon and Baudrillard, would something like our Internet be correctly classified as a hyperreal copy of the metaphysically real Astral Plane?
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Under a syncretic philosophy of both Guenon and Baudrillard, would something like our Internet be correctly classified as a hyperreal copy of the meta...
Stop being a schizo, jesus christ.
i'm a schizo, this guy is just a larper
Where's the lie though?
In the OP
the only syncretic philosophy of everything is Monism, when you realize that dualism is false and that Jungian opposing binaries are really just regurgitations of the "natural order" i.e. the master-slave morality in everything. So monism must be right because dualism must be wrong and there can only be either monism or dualism, not a mixture of the two, because that's also basically monism: unity.
The philosophical tool, useful for study, is psychoanalysis and CT (Critical Theory)
Applying psychoanalysis and CT to the Internet, you see that the Internet is just a platform for the creation of para-social relationships to replace real-life relationships with people, as these para social online relations are easier as you are ridden of your physical body on the internet
>Monism
Too reductionist. Literally. Like where the possibility of knowledge becomes impossible, so you can't even know what you know to know. You know?
>Like where the possibility of knowledge becomes impossible
its no more and no less impossible than other systems
There isn't One. And there isn't Many either. Stay in that other shit thread, no need for two
>your brain on Deleuze
read Klagis, you abomination of mediocrity
Dualism is not false because the universe works in opposing forces, hylic
>the universe works in opposing forces
unscientific, pseudoscience in the Popperian sense, i.e., dogmatic/religious drivel, has no meaning for Praxis, useless
>if something requires me to use logic rather than my senses it's wrong
also neoplatonism and in general Platonism is monistic, you fool. both assume there is one objective Truth, which is the existence of the world of Ideas, i.e. basically pure "truth." it's a good start but really platonism is infantile as a philosophy, and that makes sense, Plato hadn't heard of Marx Nietzsche and Freud and doesn't really have a cogent definition of Dasein
>the universe works in opposing forces
reddit moment
>not a mixture of the two, because that's also basically monism: unity.
that's my main grip with "non-dualism" it's just a bizarre form of crypto monism
>the universe has to obey my understanding of quantity
the hyperreal isn't a copy of the real. it's as if—and surely I am mistaken—you didn't even read. imagine that, people not reading but posting their opinion anyway on IQfy - Slower Moving /misc/ Threads, and trying to pass themselves off as authorities. No, no one would do THAT since this is the "intellectual" board
The real is that which can be copied scanned or Xeroxed.
Which is more/less real?
The abstract metaphysical #4 or a xeroxed physical #4?
>would something like our Internet be correctly classified as a hyperreal copy of the metaphysically real Astral Plane?
What does the Astral Plane you are talking mean? These late-20-century theories about the Internet being the double or copy of "anything" ontologically "relevant" are not sustainable for contemporary standards. (It never were outside cyberpunk weeaboos).
the internet is not real.
metaphysics are not real.
you are a homosexual.
and you made these people up, frick you
what is the real reason for your obsession with guenon. of all motherfrickers out there. what's your angle, your end game? is it politically motivated?