Uyghurs

These people have apparently been around in the same place since the 800s. Why have they had zero impact on history, unlike the other nomadic turkic/mongol tribes? What even are they? Some sort of Tajik-Han hybrid?

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I thought they had some European mix... oops! You can't say European in IQfy, can you? if you do this, you are basically a Nordicist. I'm sorry...
    continuing;
    I thought they had some mixed ancestry from something from western Eurasia, but nah.
    They are basically mutts. they have a lot of bmac.
    they had basically the same historical usefulness as the Bolivians.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >they have a lot of bmac.
      no they don't you dumb moron

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >they have a lot of bmac
      No, you dumbfrick. They don't. And don't have a single clue on how BMAC people even looked like.

      Since you IQfytards discovered the existence of BMAC you have been trying to connect every single non-semite asian people to them, despite BMAC being a tiny, shitty civilization covering an area the size of Switzerland. Stop this nonsense.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >And don't have a single clue on how BMAC people even looked like.
        Actually, I know.
        The BMAC population largely derived from earlier local Copper Age peoples who, in turn, were related to Neolithic farmers of the Iranian plateau (Iran_N) and, to a *lesser* extent, ANF.
        (browns)

        >Since you IQfytards
        Who is "you"?

        >discovered the existence of BMAC you have been trying to connect every single non-Semite Asian people to them, despite BMAC being a tiny, shitty civilization covering an area the size of Switzerland. Stop this nonsense.
        I don't know if I understand your argument?
        In any case, several people in the region have Bmac ancestry, the Persians, several Indo-Iranians and others.
        It's not like it's something insignificant, you know?
        The Andronovo (who were not an organized people) quickly became part of them.
        Successor cultures (yaz) were basically a combination of BMAC and WSH ancestries, and associated with the *early Indo-Iranians*.
        what's your point then?
        Genetic data on Iron Age samples from present-day Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan confirm admixture between local BMAC groups and populations related to Andronovo, at the end of the Oxus Civilization. This Iron Age population of South Central Asia derived about 57% of its ancestry from Western Steppe Shepherds (Andronovo) and c. 43% of the BMAC culture population.
        Wow! 43% dude

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >they have a lot of bmac
          No, you dumbfrick. They don't. And don't have a single clue on how BMAC people even looked like.

          Since you IQfytards discovered the existence of BMAC you have been trying to connect every single non-semite asian people to them, despite BMAC being a tiny, shitty civilization covering an area the size of Switzerland. Stop this nonsense.

          In fact, cutie, some peripheral samples of bmac were already seen among the WSH in line with the southward expansion of the western steppe herders of the Sintashta and Andronovo cultures into southern Central Asia.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          [...]
          In fact, cutie, some peripheral samples of bmac were already seen among the WSH in line with the southward expansion of the western steppe herders of the Sintashta and Andronovo cultures into southern Central Asia.

          >Indo-Iranians and their direct descendants are BMAC
          >That means a random turkic central asian people is also BMAC
          Still couldn't prove your point.

          I know that the Andronovo peoples were intermixed with BMAC. That's my whole point: ever since discovering that genetic relationship, anons on IQfy try to conflate every other asian people to this same fact, despite Andronovo not being a direct ancestor to other central asian culture aside from Iranians.

          >Who is "you"
          (You), in particular.
          Show me actual proofs that Uyghurs have a lot of BMAC or stop larping as an archeogenetics specialist.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not that guy but I don't think that even matters. The pictured people with fair eyes/hair/skin are that way from the remnants of EHG that didn't migrate to Europe. They are basically what Aryans claim to be although Aryans themselves were never of this complexion. These people are probably very aryan/east asian compared to true EHG, with just enough DNA going along in their society to pass on the light complexion. But I must admit, EHG probably had some asiatic features although likely not much as what is pictured here.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Im not sure beyond numbers and geography. I will say though it’s crazy how white some of them look while at the same time most of them just look Asian. I had a coworker in china who was one and she looked completely white. Not even like 10% Asian. Not Swedish white, obviously, but nobody would have questioned her as white in the US. And her personality was not remotely Asian either. Was kind of strange, when I talked to her it wasn’t much different than talking to a European. The only noticeable Muslim thing about her was her food had to be halal.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Larp

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Was she beautiful? What country would you guess she was from if you didn't know?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >they had basically the same historical usefulness as the Bolivians.
      It's spelled Bollywood.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Why have they had zero impact on history
    The Tang empire was their vassal during and after the an lushan rebellion until their khanate was overthrown by the krygz. Their script was used by other steppe people like the mongols

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Tajik
    They are Turkic, not Iranic

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    They were turned submissive and docile due to centuries of taking BHC (Big Han wiener) trampling over their lands to trade with the Europeans and Arabs.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Some sort of Tajik-Han hybrid?
    Some sort of Steppe Han hybrid with a sprinkle of CHG.

    Target: Uyghur
    Distance: 4.9598% / 0.04959812
    46.2 Han_Shandong
    34.8 Russia_MLBA_Sintashta
    19.0 Iran_Wezmeh_N.SG

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >These people have apparently been around in the same place since the 800s

    They haven't. Modern Uyghurs are Karluks who have been brainwashed by the Soviet Union into thinking that they're these guys:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yugurs

    They have nothing to do with the real Uyghurs, who in turn have hardly anything to do with le Tocharians.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine this idiot's level of schizophrenia.
      1. Nobody said about the Uyghurs being the same as before or not.
      2. nobody said anything about Tocharians
      funny; using the argument of "real" and fake Uyghurs is the same as arguing about ancient and real Egyptians LOL.
      and the Tocharianoz weren't even really an organized or large group, they were more like the British in Belize

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >1. Nobody said about the Uyghurs being the same as before or not.
        You're a low IQ vermin that can't read the OP implication of continuity since the 800s, that the modern Uyghurs (pictured in the OP) do not have with the old Uyghurs.
        >2. nobody said anything about Tocharians
        They will eventually, given the cherrypicked bait image of depigmented hapas that is in the OP and in the post below me. morons attribute this to the Tocharians all the time.
        >Funny; using the argument of "real" and fake Uyghurs is the same as arguing about ancient and real Egyptians LOL.
        and the Tocharianoz weren't even really an organized or large group, they were more like the British in Belize
        You are a dishonest low IQ roach. Egyptians, unlike the Uyghurs (an ethnonym that they have adopted in the previous century) have a substantial genetic contribution from the ancient Egyptians. Karluks on the other hand have frick all to do with the Uyghurs.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Now I know why Xi is giving Han men Uyghur mandated wives. These girls will be a plus to Han attractiveness. Soon we will have 50 million blond Chinese.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      where's my Uyghur mandated wife, president Xi PLEASE…

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        This, I'll gladly trade my woman for an Uyghur too

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        why are her legs so long? She is like 80% legs.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >She is like 80% legs.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >buck breaking Muslims and giving their women away as spoils

      WTF I love the CPC now

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Usually dominated women find the ethnicity of the men doing the domination more attractive than their native men, but Han Chinese are such repulsive manlets their government has to force marriages between them lmao. Once again, communism is for the people who cannot compete against the beautiful and strong.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    anon there were so many different groups of steppe people in those parts of the world and they were often quite massive threats to the most advanced civilizations of the day (china) for hundreds if not thousands of years pretty much up from the start of recorded history up until guns made their style of warfare obsolete

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Mongols, Huns, proto-Turks

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Turkic

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >roach detected

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Free east Turkestan

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Guy on the right is Chinese, his family is originally from Xinjiang.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'm more amazed the guy on the left is Italian

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        He's a true Padanian

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is the person on the right a girl or a boy, wtf?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      clearly a girl, short hair doesn't make one a boy

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >unlike the other nomadic turkic/mongol tribes
    Absolute brainlet take. Most of them were unknown and did frick all until Europeans, Persians, Arabs, and Chinese pushed into their lands. Nomadic turkics are similar to Caucasus mountain dwellers in this regard. All of the Central Asia being uplifted by Soviets in the previous century should give you a hint on the cultural development of locals throughout recent history.

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    They are Uzbeks that have nothing to do with the Tocharian peoples or the first Turkic waves of conquerors. They settled this land after genociding the Oirat

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Ozbeks and Tocharians are Turkics

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Actually those "Uyghurs" are actually Karluks from the Kharakhanids and Chagatai. Basically they're closer to Uzbeks than to Qocho Uyghurs who are now Yughurs

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      They are Uzbeks that have nothing to do with the Tocharian peoples or the first Turkic waves of conquerors. They settled this land after genociding the Oirat

      explain to me!
      I didn't understand anything

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        During the Yuan dynasty the Mongol rulled Chinese displaced much of the western Mongol Oirats, this caused them to develop a unique identity outside of east Asia. These Mongols became the Oirat and populated much of the steppe from the Volga to Tocharian basin. As their power diminished the Turks around them began to displace their people and replace them, the Uighurs of today have nothing to do with the old Uighurs that these Mongols displaced and instead are Uzbek colonists, the Oirats and original Uighurs of these areas actually fled deeper into China and western Mongolia and they can still be found in Qinghai and Gansu. That said, both the original Uighurs and the Uzbeks are Turkic peoples just not the same, think about how Russia expelled the Poles from their eastern lands and populated it with Belarussians. They are both Slavic but they are different peoples

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          That sounds like the same kind of bullshit excuse used by Burmese people to justify the genocide of Rohingya people.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            We’re just stating the reality of the Uighurs, in my opinion if your great great grand parents were born in the region, you are now native to it. I dont support the bug men but i wont be delusional and claim that the modern Uighur have anything to do with the people there 400 years ago let alone the people there 2000 years ago

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            “Burmese” Muslims are just foreign invaders from bangledesh

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    why are uyghur women so hot but uyghur men ugly as sin?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      That describes al hapas anon, Asian women are cute especially those with 50% west Eurasian genes like the central asian turks. Asian men just look weak and ugly

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    A blessed race. Their food is the best I've ever had.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *