>want to all in Google for efficient one-account-does-all
>remember this
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
>want to all in Google for efficient one-account-does-all. >remember this
>want to all in Google for efficient one-account-does-all
>remember this
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
>remember this
No because frick AIO management utils
Ok but what if you didn’t use your account for that?
???
Google is never wrong. It's their official policy.
The appeal button doesn't do anything, just queues up an auto-rejection email.
You *will* get your door kicked in.
They did this to me a couple years ago, but I had already moved all my shit to a better email provider. So I just abandoned gmail and now I only use Google over Tor.
I like Google even more now.
Good. all pedos should be in prison, along with all their data from their google account deleted forever.
Google is beyond moronic and so is mother of our kids. I need to constantly remind her this is not the 1990s and a pajeet from india will check every picture you take. What seems to be harmless like bath time or a picture without a shirt turn out be banworthy inside google megacorp. They need a quota that is demanded by FBI and this is how they get it: by banning families. Reminds me of the guy who send pictures of his son to his family doctor during the covid. Bye bye google account with everything inside it.
this is literal moron version of 1984
Have you tried not sending CP via email?
Have you tried not to be an butthole?
>The man, only identified as Mark by the New York Times, took pictures of his son’s groin to send to a doctor after realizing it was inflamed. The doctor used that image to diagnose Mark’s son and prescribe antibiotics. When the photos were automatically uploaded to the cloud, Google’s system identified them as CSAM. Two days later, Mark’s Gmail and other Google accounts, including Google Fi, which provides his phone service, were disabled over “harmful content” that was “a severe violation of the company’s policies and might be illegal”, the Times reported, citing a message on his phone. He later found out that Google had flagged another video he had on his phone and that the San Francisco police department opened an investigation into him.
>Mark was cleared of any criminal wrongdoing, but Google has said it will stand by its decision.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/aug/22/google-csam-account-blocked
behind every picture there is pain
google is right by definition
he was literally raped
thats the law
>flagged another video he had on his phone
uhm?
the fact that he was cleared of criminal wrongdoing despite investigation suggests that the phone video was of a similar nature and not a depiction of child abuse. google is obviously in the wrong here
how can google flag a video he had saved locally on his phone?
i hope this is just bad wording and he had it uploaded to google's cloud
Morons that forget to disable automatic photo uploads
lmao, there was a comic of the very same issue here
>*disables photo autoupload to google cloud*
Wow it's that simple!
I look like that and do that
>putting all your eggs in the same basket
bad idea
>trusting israelitegle with anything
OOF
I choose AIO over bloat, gay. If my gmail blows up I'll just get a new account at little loss. Most websites only need your phone number anyway.
I've heard that this happens a lot when you use google collaboratory to create AI generated anime/hentai images. Most anime involving little girls is pedophilic in nature and Google automatically picks this up.
>uploading anything suspect to cloud services
>uploading anything suspect to clearnet
People really are stupid as frick huh?
>Google's face when they have to say 'might be illegal'
>don't be a pedo
>no problem
>life's good
Chuds will never feel this.