Was he the best of the "Four Horsemen"?
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Was he the best of the "Four Horsemen"?
Was he the best of the "Four Horsemen"?
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Yes. God had to take out his biggest threat first.
I'm pretty sure it was the self-inflicted cancer
it's funny how when I was a teenager I thought he must be scoring so many points against idiot Christians and was surely making them turn away from their religion in droves, but now as a Catholic man the idea of someone arguing me out of my faith is comical. indeed, someone who would devote so much time to this task even earns my pity.
Your God gives cancer to children and asks its followers to stone gay people, while allowimg your church to rape kids.
thank you for your profound insights young man.
>asks its followers to stone gay people
Nothing wrong with that. Reddit tier arguments.
So, go on and stone homosexuals as your God commands you. Let's see how much you how long you last before the police arrests you.
I don't care about homosexuals like you. I'm just saying there's nothing wrong if someone gets rid of that filth.
christlike love in action
The aim was never to actually convince people to give up their religion, the aim was to make money by arguing endlessly about points that will never be resolved through logical arguments. People like Hitchens discovered a way to profit off cyclical, irresolvable debates. All that mattered was that they did it in an entertaining way, feeding the media's desire for conflict and controversy. If religion ceased to exist, Hitchens would have lost his source of income.
I made this thread as a shitpost, but I think you just convinced me that he was actually the best of the four. The other guys seem too earnest to be in it only for the money.
Yeah, Hitchens had the best style and sense of humor and didn't take it too seriously. He was the most entertaining, and since entertainment was the ultimately goal, he was the best.
True, it's a business model that has thrived and evolved into the libtard vs megachud debates that dominate today, for example do rightwing e-celebs actually believe trannies will stop being trannies if they whine about them enough?
Because, of course, there's no money in being a preacher and begging for donations for "the ministry". Nothing cynical on that side of the ledger!
Word on the streets say that he had a side-hustle as a town preacher in the British country. He kept the surname, but went for the name "Peter" or something. People suspected, but most of them couldn't believe Chris would make something like that!
high iq take
Except any time an audience was polled before and after his events there was a significant shift away from belief in God and the church.
>U.S.
That ain't Hitchens, that's just the BBC propaganda working on the American's minds. The only way to push a WASP away from religion is black wieners, not some fat Britbong complaining about the church.
Mutt's law
Definitely. The phenomenon seen in America you just pointed out is an instance of the Mutt's law on full effect.
sampling bias. anyways, hitchens was smited by lennox.
He looks like a gay.
All the horsemen do as well
Most people look like gays. I think that's just how humans are meant to look.
Lennox is a total idiot. It's genuinely painful listening to him try to complete a syllogism.
Ain't the whole point of faith to just believe something, regardless of what the evidence actually shows? You're right there's no point arguing against it, since it simply rejects logic outright.
You gotta admit that the mythology is rather out there.
>"Oh, silly Christians and their... horses, sheeps, lions and zebras." How do they even come up with these things?
If the holy book isn't what you have faith in, then what is?
My dick.
>which ones are considered his best?
The Bible.
dishonesty: the post
>reddit: the reply
takes one to know one
uh, no it doesn't?
it does tho
source?
no u
Best in terms of what? He wasn't a scientist nor a philosopher, just a pop commentator.
Best in making Christians seethe.
Dawkins was more controversial.
Yeah, but Dawkins wad raped as a kid, which subtracts him some points. If I were a Christian, I couldn't really seethe at a man who was raped---I'd rather feel pity and a bit of disgust for him.
Hitchens was a israelite who died bald while his wife was cheating on him with a hack journalist. I wouldn't really count him as based or best anything. He's even more pitiable.
Getting cucked isn't as bad as getting raped. This isn't even up to debate. If you think otherwise, you deserve to get raped.
He was raped a child, meaning he had no control over it. Meanwhile Hitchens was cucked as an adult and while he was dying of cancer. Far more humiliating and pitiable.
>e had no control over it.
Can we finally stop with this bullshit? A kid can perfectly defend himself from an adult: through biting his dick, kicking him in the balls, screaming really loud, etc.
Let me tell you something: those kids who've been "raped" actually liked it; they're just a bunch of fairies---that's it. Why do you think many of them keep going back to their "abuser"? Don't be so guillable.
Dawkins is a closeted homosexual who discovered he liked dick when he got it as a kid. That's the whole reason why he has a beef with Christianity.
Frogposter detected
Gee, how'd you figure that out?
He was the best speaker. Like the rest he didn't have actual arguments, but he argued against christcucks and small town preacher christcucks at that so they didn't have arguments either.
Christians literally don't have an argument beyond "Its just faith bro". On any factual matter, religion is superfluous at best.
Yeah, also the only funny one
Dan Dennett is better.
This moron's entire life was an appeal to emotion against God.
He took the phrase "if God real, why bad thing happen?" and turned it into millions of buckaroonies. His fans proved how stupid they were when they didn't drop him after he stated the Iraq invasion was a good thing.
>be a catholic priest
>see a cute, unsupervised british shota
>his face looks soft and femenine
>his little ass looks cute and firm
>horny.exe
>tell him to come with you to a discreet area of the church
>big_nut.exe
>feels good man
>20 years later
>yfw he becomes a biologist
>yfw he's a hardcore atheist
>yfw he gives lectures attacking religion
>yfw millions leave the church because of what you did
>didn’t believe in metaphysics
>’youre god is ebil!!1!’
I wonder what a belief system completely shorn of Christian presuppositions would look like. In all honesty he was very charismatic and a pretty sharp dude. I just got a big book of his essays/articles, which ones are considered his best?
He was a israelite who pushed for the Iraq War and waterboarding (until he got waterboarded himself). Cancer thankfully took care of him.