Well worth the $10B investment no doubt

Well worth the $10B investment no doubt

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    yeah

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Do you spergs think the image on the right is the entire output of the webb telescope? I thought it was pretty obvious this was just a demonstration.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ahaha yeah because the JWST was developed over the course of 30 years for the sole purpose of taking a single picture and nothing else for the next 15 years, of course, very original observation. There should be a mandatory IQ test for posting on IQfy.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      it wasn't, everyone realizes that, yet none of you morons realize how much could've happened had that money been invested in a huge particle collider.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >"just one more order of magnitude guys, 100TeV is all we need to unlock the secrets of the universe!"
        >30 years later
        >"just one more order of magnitude guys, 1PeV is all we need to unlock the secrets of the universe!"
        >repeat ad nauseam

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I agree but there simply isn't any alternative.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          So you're saying every discovery we've made via telescope has been pointless? And do you think that we already know everything we can learn via telescope?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Nowhere did I say anything even remotely close to that.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Nobody is claiming that. String theorists say that it would take a particle accelerator 10.000 light years long to test their theories. So they are not asking for any money because it would be pointless.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I agree, the captchas on IQfy should look like pic

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        *uses wolfram*
        heh, nothing personnel kid

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      it will be swiss cheese in 1 year from micrometeorites

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    soul
    soulless

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Shut the frick up

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >muh there's no point in resolution
    >muh nihilism
    Get fricked peabrain.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I can see more things on the right side, seems like a good investment, 10 billion dollars are a rounding error compared to the world economy of 100 trillion dollars. Also you are an obese Black

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      God Jackie was so lame.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    You do understand that 10 billion is literally pennies for a country like the US? The US spends more than that on food stamps for minorities or foreign aid to Israel.

    I'd rather get better space pictures than feed Shaniqua's 10th kid

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I'd rather not do either

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >i'd rather not invest in space

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >grandiose generosity with other people's money
      where'd you get the sense that you're entitled to spend other people's money?

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What did you expect, moron? A little green man looking directly into the camera?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yes.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      maybe

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    10 billion
    300 million people
    20 years

    oh no, every American had to pay $1.70 per year
    the horror, the horror

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    You paid 1,7$ on that telescope.
    Shut the frick wagecuck.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >thinking we sent a telescope a million miles into space so you could get higher res desktop backgrounds

    consider suicide.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      What did we do it for?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Data.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Data for pretty pictures?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            No.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            What's that data for? Also that's a poorly fit model. I think a recursive smoothing would probably be better. It looks like they're just doing a nearest neighbors with weights, but I think that removes most of intrinsic oscillations (i.e. too smooth)

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            they can detect habitable planets with it.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            some gas giant's atmosphere's water content

            because finding one of the most common molecules in the universe is super exciting

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Me when I buy a new $5000 telescope to look at a slightly larger version of Jupiter. Totally worth it.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It should have been invested in not finding dark matter.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Hexagonal lines obscure a bigger area of the image than Hubble.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No, but then again, what in the government is worth the investment? Better put, what isn't a bloated to frick project? You give any of them enough money and they'll meet your requirements with lowest bidder contractor who somehow manages to bloat the budget.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Schizo-tier theory here
    The JWST is really a covert program to provide navigation maps and forward intelligence on potentially habitable planets for the US DoD's secret space program. There are persistent rumors on ATS that not only do we have spacecraft actively "sailing the metric sea" in nearby solar systems, but has an active off-world base affectionately named "Planet Dirt" that fits a description of a fairly recently discovered planet near Proxima Centauri

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    would have rather that money went to something useful like alternate energy tbh

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >amerifats paid $10B+ tip for this while their infrastructure and society in general degenerates around them

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >starving brown man thinks $10B is a lot of money
      kek

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        brown man
        interesting to see you join me in mocking ameriturds

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Poverty society.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            My currency is worth more than yours, mutt. And public spending goes toward useful things, not the equivalent of shiny new keys to jingle in front of your face while you oooh and ahhh.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Post citizenship or shut the frick up.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            If you're European, you paid for the JWST also lmao. Thanks for chipping in and getting zero credit.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            My currency is worth more than yours, mutt. And public spending goes toward useful things, not the equivalent of shiny new keys to jingle in front of your face while you oooh and ahhh.

            assuming he's a eurogay whos gunna tell him the USD and EURO just matched in parity.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            what do you mean?

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Worth more than the $60B investment in droning pakistani kids

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Can't wait for the next 20 years of images and data to absolutely blow the frick out of simpletons like OP. It's gonna be a slow burn.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Yes.
    By far a better investment than the trillions going to war, Boomers' pensions, private insurance (a racket scheme) and subsidizing fossil fuels.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      How about using the money for fixing your crumbling infrastructure, or finally implementing a first-world healthcare system long after every other developed nation has already done?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >muh free healthcare

        Reminder that every country with free health has problems finding it and nurses and doctors switch to private hospitals whenever possible because they get paid better and don't have to do 14 hour shifts because public is intentionally understaffed.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          You live in a third-world nation in denial mate

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It's literally the other way around in my country (with free Healthcare)

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You live in a third-world nation in denial mate

        It's literally the other way around in my country (with free Healthcare)

        you have lost the faustian spirit, if we had your way we'd die on this rock

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        NASA's budget is nowhere near enough to do any of that. It's basically within the margin of error and moving a few billion dollars that actually makes a serious difference into the trillions of bloated healthcare spending is going to do absolutely fricking nothing. We spend $4 TRILLION on healthcare, which is 160 times more than NASA's entire budget. The US needs serious healthcare reform but that's not solved by giving up on space exploration to save a few pennies.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >We spend $4 TRILLION on healthcare, which is 160 times more than NASA's entire budget.
          This is extremely funny given the lack of any universal health care system whatsoever.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            literally all for keeping the fricking corn syrup addicted boomers alive.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >muh healthcare

        Frick the sick and elderly, cull the weak

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Fascism is a bad system, anon.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The solution is to open the medical market but the AMA runs a cartel to guarantee permanent doctor scarcity. Allow more medical schools and lower the barriers to enter medical school, let the tests filter bad students and not some quota

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Hubble has SOVL

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Hubble was good enough.

    There is nothing to see here, there is no way those are all real galaxies.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >there is no way those are all real galaxies.
      source?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >asking a schizo to provide his sources

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yes.

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    You can litterally see the jpeg compression as you compressed a 4k image to 1000x1020 you absolute trogladyte.

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why are there so few photos released? Is there a very strict limit to how many they can take and transmit back or something?

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    is the lens flare on webb different because the mirror panels are all hexagonal?

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >my dad works at nasa and he stole an important piece, will never work!
    >too many steps to unfold, will never work!
    >barely better image, lol!

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why can Americans just not refuse to accept that their little toy is already a micrometeorite pelted toy with the surface structure of a pancake?

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    that picture was made in 12 hours, compared to the older one that took like 12 weeks of exposure. imagine what they can do with the webb telescope if they do a long exposure somewhere that the hubble was never able to see anything.

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    mainstream media are constantly showing these picture down our throats, clearly these are fake right

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      > clearly these are fake right
      based on what? your feelings?

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >$10B investment no doubt
    Its not an investment its an expense. Word have meaning

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's worth it if it debunks the lie of Big Cosmology.

    https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >muh 10 bil
    >meanwhile glowies spent 800 billion dollars last year

  34. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    51.
    51 days and still no exomoons

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Amerimutt stfu you paid 1,7$ on that scientific marvel. Your lack of appreciation is irrelevant in any cases and let it rent free in your head. It may keep you busy spamming schizo /misc/oid boards for the next 10 months.

  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >literal weeks of exposure vs quick demo image for the public
    Bruh we're already getting atmospheric spectra of exoplanets
    They can get (maybe already did) spectra of very early stars/galaxies to figure out how early universe evolved
    Deep ir allows to look deep into gas/dust clouds
    And more on the pop-sci side of things advanced alien civilisations (dyson swarms advanced) would output great abundance of ir which Webb is specialized in

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    that's the same picture

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    All these buttmad space homosexuals

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *