>in the past 20 years AI has advanced from exclusively playing chess at a mediocre level to almost matching humans in every conceivable metric, from playing games to creating art to problem solving etc etc etc. >it'll never meet or surpass humans though
I know that's intended behavior, but you could also make it not delete itself simply by preventing the target string being contiguous in the code.
It would still fulfill the intended behavior, just not delete itself.
The robots that assemble cars still have human maintainers.
The AI that automates peolpes' jobs will still need human programmers watching over them.
And if they get to the point that is unnecessary, the concept of working will be abolished, so it won't matter anyway.
Problem is that agi (or an ai that can write a better ai than itself) will be created faster than an agi with morals (3 laws). So now we gave 4 realistic threats wiping out humanity within our lifetime > hostile ai > singularity > nuclear war > global warming (100% chance of wiping out humanity this century)
I'd like to see a robit fish cable through an 80 year old office building's drop ceiling and cram a cat7 into an rj45 and terminate it. That's why I abandoned my cushy machine learning job and joined the IBEW
I'm genuinely intrigued how the translation can be made, sure you have a lot of "data" as open source software for deep learning, but how do you know the specifics of each instruction ? it's a whole other level than training an IA from labelled pictures. Impressive.
>deletes itself
Heh.
this
AI will never be even close to being smart as humans
>in the past 20 years AI has advanced from exclusively playing chess at a mediocre level to almost matching humans in every conceivable metric, from playing games to creating art to problem solving etc etc etc.
>it'll never meet or surpass humans though
"This is Emma, spend the coming two weeks training her. She'll be your replacement."
>train it wrong on purpose
>they have to keep you
>We trained him wrong on purpose
>As a joke
Brainlet.
that's intended behaviour if the file is in the current directory
I know that's intended behavior, but you could also make it not delete itself simply by preventing the target string being contiguous in the code.
It would still fulfill the intended behavior, just not delete itself.
Programmers: "We're automating your job, you working class piece of shit. Go frick yourself and learn to program."
Meanwhile:
The robots that assemble cars still have human maintainers.
The AI that automates peolpes' jobs will still need human programmers watching over them.
And if they get to the point that is unnecessary, the concept of working will be abolished, so it won't matter anyway.
Problem is that agi (or an ai that can write a better ai than itself) will be created faster than an agi with morals (3 laws). So now we gave 4 realistic threats wiping out humanity within our lifetime
> hostile ai
> singularity
> nuclear war
> global warming (100% chance of wiping out humanity this century)
Also a reason to have humans in the loop.
>global warming (100% chance of wiping out humanity this century)
Ok bill nye
bill nye the nwo mouthpiece guy.
Aw man I actually forgot that garbage existed up until now. Frick you anon
and she is israeli....IQfy ruined me
I'd like to see a robit fish cable through an 80 year old office building's drop ceiling and cram a cat7 into an rj45 and terminate it. That's why I abandoned my cushy machine learning job and joined the IBEW
I'm genuinely intrigued how the translation can be made, sure you have a lot of "data" as open source software for deep learning, but how do you know the specifics of each instruction ? it's a whole other level than training an IA from labelled pictures. Impressive.
I located the opposite on their website as well: https://beta.openai.com/examples/default-python-to-natural-language
>doesnt close the file
>doesn't know about context managers
looks like the AI is better than you at python sweaty
wtf frick python
>gets outed as a moron
>w-wtf python has a feature I don't understand so python bad right guys??
you can open and close it manually if you want to anon
what exactly is wrong with it?
moron
the with statement does it automatically.
I told it to write a C function that makes an HTTP request and it spit out gibberish. It cannot do anything beyond trivial.
>draw the rest of the fricking owl
Ok now write me a program that generates 4 16 color words from a 32bit packed bitmask.
Omfg this is amazing
Its not perfect kek but pretty damn impressive
Its kind of frustrating how this thing gets you 75% of the way there
wtf does this do?
Just run it here
https://www.onlinegdb.com/online_c_compiler
I can tell you what it doesn't do.
Compile.
An infinite loop, assuming _ and __ were declared beforehand. Otherwise a compile error.