Like 80% of the book is unironic schizo rambling that treats Henry Lee Lucas as a reliable source though. The MKULTRA stuff is interesting but he falls too easily into the "x is bad because satanists do it" thing and treats every single satanic panic claim as absolute irrefutable fact which is not only silly but easily disprovable when treated as a truism.
100% agree most of the book is straight up schizo rambling but the idea that serial killers are part of larger and hidden criminal networks isn't that far out there. It's also one of the few English sources that goes in depth into the Dutroux affair which is just insane.
Eg. Sandusky and Gacy were evidently both linked to elite institutions, had help from unknown people and probably ran pedo rings but are only really remembered as serial killers and rapists.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I think it just reveals how much damage the CIA did intentionally or incidentally by oozing into every bit of society. Like Ted K targeted academic institutions almost certainly because of how badly the CIA hurt him. CIA fronts funded a disturbingly large amount of anthropology and sociology research for example.
The larger conspiracy seems to be that "they" (the CIA mostly but they're hardly the only ones) are already in every aspect of humanity. It goes back to the old hypnotism research the OSS was doing where you can't really make someone do something they have no capacity for however you can push people to their absolute darkest possible version of themselves. OP's book goes over it too, where it talks about how Manson "somehow" kept getting arrested but released before he ever got fully processed through the system and put in prison and readily supplied with orange sunshine the government brand LSD.
Written by James Earl Ray's defense attorney. Hadn't heard of this book until I discovered it in the library in the basement of the local African-American museum.
I heard on this very website that the CIA killed MLK so that his extramarital affaris and other degenerate shit he was up to wouldn't wind up coming out and undermining the movement.
Seems convoluted. I think the most plausible explanation to me is that he was starting to come out hard against the Vietnam War and therefore he had to go. But it's interesting that King family members believe Ray is innocent, and Ray claimed he was a patsy who got set up (while on the lam at the time after escaping from prison) by a guy named "Raoul" who set him up in the hotel room with the gun and binocs but he said he didn't do it and wasn't in the room at the time King was shot.
>It’s not clear when Coretta Scott King, widow of King, began to believe in Ray’s innocence. But almost immediately after her husband’s assassination, she suspected that the FBI, which had investigated the murder, was involved in it.
>“There is abundant evidence of a major high level conspiracy in the assassination of my husband, Martin Luther King, Jr.,” Coretta King said at a press conference in 1999, according to The King Center. It was a theory she maintained until her death in 2006 that has so far never been proven.
[...]
>Coretta King’s specific belief in Ray’s innocence is a little tougher to explain. The King family started to publicly voice the opinion in 1997. That year, King’s son Dexter Scott King visited Ray in prison to draw attention to the family’s push to appeal his case. Even after Ray died in 1998 from complications caused by hepatitis C, the family continued to assert there was, as Coretta King said in 1999, “overwhelming evidence that identified someone else, not James Earl Ray, as the shooter, and that Mr. Ray was set up to take the blame.”
>The King family’s belief in Ray’s innocence was partly influenced by the strange case of Loyd Jowers, who’d owned the restaurant below Ray’s rented room in Memphis. For the first 25 years after King’s death, Jowers did not claim any involvement in the murder. But after HBO conducted a televised mock trial about the assassination in 1993—in which Ray gave his first public testimony and was found not guilty—Jowers declared that he’d been part of a conspiracy to kill King, and that Ray had been set up to take to fall. The other people involved in this conspiracy, Jowers said, included Memphis police officers, a Mafia member and the infamous Raoul.
Why do morons on this site think CIA and FBI were pro-civil rights when they were literally trying to get King to kill himself, framed Malcolm X's guards so he would get shot, murdered Fred Hampton, and were generally stamping down on the leftist movements both in the US and world.
Why is the right-wing/white racist victim complex so warped.
What the frick do they think COINTELPRO was for, who do you think MK Ultra was made to fight against(Soviets), what do you think they were toppling governments for. Holy shit.
People here have accused Adorno of writing fricking Beatles music of all things, just because he was a israelite who wrote about music and that capitalism bad, no knowing this included him hating Beatles and music of the 60's and thinking capitalism degenerated music.
These people are politically and historically illiterate
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Adorno the anti-degenerate.
I've read it all now.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm not using degenerate in the /misc/ sense. He thought jazz was too capitalism and that protest music was insincere and a bad way to spread messaged, he praised classical music, shit like that.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yes, he comes from that now extinct line of Marxists that indeed loved "the West" and saw Communism as its inevitable culmination of the West, or the process that helped give rise to it.
A position inconceivable to modern day communists and anti-communists alike who both agree that Communism is about rectifying the sins of the white man.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Not to be too annoying but I don't think that any marxist would believe that communism was the "culmination" (nor the inevitable one at that) of the west. A huge aspect of Marxism is an extremely high-scale, sweeping critique of western philosophy, politics, etc. Their position toward "western" thought was a lot more nuanced than the lines trotted out by most of the "communists" you see today—not that I think today's communists are entirely incorrect—but your characterization of Adorno and the current of Western Marxism is a simplification.
2 years ago
Anonymous
The west has been engaged in self-critique since the Greeks, Marxism doing the same doesn't represent any significant break. Regarding Communism being seen as the culmination of the process underlying the west, I vaguely gesture toward Hegel and the State.
>God I hate liberals so fricking much and Malcolm X was right about them.
And I homosexuals who spout
Yes, he comes from that now extinct line of Marxists that indeed loved "the West" and saw Communism as its inevitable culmination of the West, or the process that helped give rise to it.
A position inconceivable to modern day communists and anti-communists alike who both agree that Communism is about rectifying the sins of the white man.
(You)
You are a homosexual, and a liberal. Self-hate is ugly.
What seems to have happened is that civil rights activists were fine provided they kept it to that but people prominent enough or perceived as dangerous enough to connect it to the war -- which is what MLK was doing shortly before he was killed -- got offed. Preferable were Bayard Rustin types who co-organized the March on Washington but then supported the Vietnam War, he just opposed "how it was fought" (a liberal-style procedural critique which doesn't mean anything) and...
>Along with Allard Lowenstein and Norman Thomas, Rustin worked with the CIA-sponsored Committee on Free Elections in the Dominican Republic, which lent international credibility to a 1966 ballot effectively rigged against the socialist former president, Juan Bosch.
Aaaand:
>Rustin maintained his strongly anti-Soviet and anti-communist views later in his life, especially with regard to Africa. Rustin co-wrote with Carl Gershman (a former director of Social Democrats, USA and future Ronald Reagan appointee) an essay entitled "Africa, Soviet Imperialism & the Retreat of American Power", in which he decried Russian and Cuban involvement in the Angolan civil war and defended the military intervention by apartheid South Africa on behalf of the National Liberation Front of Angola (FNLA) and National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA).
Aaaaaaaaaand:
>In 1976, Rustin was a member of the anti-communist Committee on the Present Danger (CPD), founded by politician Paul Nitze. Nitze was a member of Team B, the independent analysts commissioned by George Bush to scrutinize the CIA's assessments of the Soviet nuclear threat. CPD promoted Team B's controversial intelligence claims about Soviet foreign policy, using them as an argument against arms control agreements such as SALT II. This cemented Rustin's leading role in the neoconservative movement.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Wonder if he was friends with any of those John Birch Society guys.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yeah, I didn't even think about the anti-war aspects of the movement too. If I remember correctly, MLK's approval rating went lower than it even was before started criticizing the war? His image has ironically been whitewashed. I can't believe people on this site think the government didn't want people to know he fricked hookers or pointless shit like that. >Rustin worked with the CIA-sponsored Committee on Free Elections in the Dominican Republic, which lent international credibility to a 1966 ballot effectively rigged against the socialist former president, Juan Bosch.
maintained his strongly anti-Soviet and anti-communist views later in his life, especially with regard to Africa. Rustin co-wrote with Carl Gershman (a former director of Social Democrats, USA and future Ronald Reagan appointee) an essay entitled "Africa, Soviet Imperialism & the Retreat of American Power", in which he decried Russian and Cuban involvement in the Angolan Civil War and defended the military intervention by apartheid South Africa on behalf of the National Liberation Front of Angola (FNLA) and National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA).
God I hate liberals so fricking much and Malcolm X was right about them.
And I homosexuals who spout
Yes, he comes from that now extinct line of Marxists that indeed loved "the West" and saw Communism as its inevitable culmination of the West, or the process that helped give rise to it.
A position inconceivable to modern day communists and anti-communists alike who both agree that Communism is about rectifying the sins of the white man.
>A position inconceivable to modern day communists and anti-communists alike who both agree that Communism is about rectifying the sins of the white man.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Malcolm X supported Fidel Castro. MLK was not a communist but months before his death he was saying that anti-communism was irrational at a speech honoring W.E.B. Du Bois who was a communist. Once you start saying stuff like that and opposing the Vietnam War in the late 60s and being that prominent / having a loyal following that would go to war for you and could cause problems, then *you* become a problem.
Rustin being mixed up in "Social Democrats USA" also reminds me Jeane Kirkpatrick who was in Norman Thomas' Socialist Party as a girl and then became a prominent neoconservative figure in the Reagan administration. Not Trotskyists in this case but like... DSA members who like Elizabeth Warren or something like that. Also see Paul Mason in the U.K. for one of these types.
2 years ago
Anonymous
So is this that Thomas Sowell guy I've been hearing about
>Why do morons on this site think CIA and FBI were pro-civil rights
because keeping blacks tethered to government assistance in the name of civil rights gives them an excuse to broaden their influence over everyones lives, and use "helping out da poor blackie" as an excuse.
idk wtf you mean by framed malcolm x's guards, its pretty well documented that the NoI killed him
2 years ago
Anonymous
>because keeping blacks tethered to government assistance in the name of civil rights gives them an excuse to broaden their influence over everyones lives, and use "helping out da poor blackie" as an excuse.
You literally only made yourself sound more moronic and out of your league in the conversation, nothing you said is attached to historical reality that has already been mentioned. They literally killed the people you're talking about. >idk wtf you mean by framed malcolm x's guards, its pretty well documented that the NoI killed him
And you also can't read, it was never said NoI didn't kill him. Framed is not the right word, but the FBI knew NoI were after him and tried to make him as vulnerable as possible
2 years ago
Anonymous
lbj admitted it was the reason he passed welfare policies
stop typing like your panties are in a bunch, anonymity is no excuse to lose your civility
>plagiarized his doctorate dissertation >prostitute monger >beat women >didn't write his speeches >Commie puppet
Lmao@ anyone who looks at MLK as anything but just another nog
Quick reminder that he was assassinated because his israelite handler was tired of covering up the orgies he threw wherever he went. Also Bob Dylan most likely sucked his dick.
>Behold a Pale Horse >Committee of 300 >Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion >The Secret World Government or ''The Hidden Hand'' >Under The Sign of The Scorpion >Ultimate Evil >Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon
"JFK and the Unspeakable" makes the strongest case for "the CIA did it" that I've seen. Also "Disconnecting the Dots" by Kevin Fenton, on how 9/11 was allowed to happen, "Family of Secrets" by Russ Baker about the crimes of the Bush dynasty, and "Israel's Superspy" about the life of Robert Maxwell (Ghislaine's dad, who fell off a boat in mysterious circumstances.)
Finishing this book now called the ‘The perversion of Normality’
It’s the least conspiratorial conspiracy book I’ve read. The dude that wrote it is a doctor. It’s well sourced and basically just walks you through why the world is so hell bent on sexualizing children. The guy doesn’t rage like the dude that wrote Transgender industrial Complex and it’s much easier to follow..it really helped me clean up my perspective about “the israelites”
Oh my God, I never actually read passages from this before. I steered clear because I figured any novel shilled so hard here had to be bad (echoes of Tao Lin), but I wasn't anticipating something that reads like it was written by a fifth grader. Is this one passage out of context or it is all this sub-par?
i didnt like this because it did not propose a theory. if you cannot tie your conspiracy into an actual THEORY, then it's just an assortment of facts which, although interesting, do not make for a very comepelling book
There isn't any because conspiracists are fundamentally childish and or mentally ill. It's pretty safe you'll come across two types: right-wingers who think some obscure Bavarian masons from 200 years ago, or perhaps israelites, are secretly orchestrating everything they don't like today or left-wing boomer libtards who can't accept communists or strung out hippies might do something crazy on their own initiative without being manipulated and or framed.
Whenever I encounter one of these tards in the wild I inform them I exclusively eat GMOs, am fully vaxxed and a subscriber to Foreign Affairs and that immediately scares them off or gets me called a shill or sheep.
He probably did do that shit but there's a kind of left-conspiracism which blames everything on the CIA when there are also various CIA insiders who have blown the whistle on stuff or flat-out gone rogue and defected in some circumstances (like Philip Agee) who seem to depict the organization as basically the mafia for corporate interests, with an added element that they frick-up their operations all the time. "Burn After Reading" is probably the most accurate depiction of who these higher-ups actually are while trying to deal with some clusterfrick disaster partly of their own making since one of their analysts is a maniac.
I got in big trouble last time I tried to post a certain author, so I won't bother. But OP's book is full of shit. >On July 19, 2019, Variety reported that Amazon Studios purchased the film rights to the book. Before CHAOS was published, an adaptation of O'Neill's story was originally in development by Errol Morris in collaboration with Netflix but O'Neill backed out of the project over creative differences.[16]
If your conspiracy theory about Charles Manson was going to get a Netflix series before it was EVEN FRICKING PUBLISHED, you are reading fake propaganda (remember that the CEO of Netflix is a nephew of Edward Bernays and Sigmund Freud?). To top it off, Amazon bought the film rights less than a month after publishing.
The truth of Charles Manson is that the murders were fake, the trial was a Hollywood hoax, the entire "family" (of actors/elite teenagers) was a blackwashing of the hippie movement. It worked, it killed public support for anti-war sentiment a few years longer and hippies became a joke (also thanks to fellow CIA assets pushing copious drug use), because boomers and silent gen and greatest gen TV viewers implicitly trusted everything the TV told them. No brainwashing necessary, just a series of psyops, not unlike the fake mass shootings, fake terrorists, fake protests/riots you see today.
NATO's Secret Armies - Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe - Daniele Ganser
The Phoenix Program: America’s Use of Terror in Vietnam - Douglas Valentine
Programmed To Kill
The CIA As Organized Crime
Secret Societies And Psychological Warfare
>Programmed To Kill
opened this thread to control+f for this book, didn't have to. fpbp
Like 80% of the book is unironic schizo rambling that treats Henry Lee Lucas as a reliable source though. The MKULTRA stuff is interesting but he falls too easily into the "x is bad because satanists do it" thing and treats every single satanic panic claim as absolute irrefutable fact which is not only silly but easily disprovable when treated as a truism.
100% agree most of the book is straight up schizo rambling but the idea that serial killers are part of larger and hidden criminal networks isn't that far out there. It's also one of the few English sources that goes in depth into the Dutroux affair which is just insane.
Eg. Sandusky and Gacy were evidently both linked to elite institutions, had help from unknown people and probably ran pedo rings but are only really remembered as serial killers and rapists.
I think it just reveals how much damage the CIA did intentionally or incidentally by oozing into every bit of society. Like Ted K targeted academic institutions almost certainly because of how badly the CIA hurt him. CIA fronts funded a disturbingly large amount of anthropology and sociology research for example.
The larger conspiracy seems to be that "they" (the CIA mostly but they're hardly the only ones) are already in every aspect of humanity. It goes back to the old hypnotism research the OSS was doing where you can't really make someone do something they have no capacity for however you can push people to their absolute darkest possible version of themselves. OP's book goes over it too, where it talks about how Manson "somehow" kept getting arrested but released before he ever got fully processed through the system and put in prison and readily supplied with orange sunshine the government brand LSD.
Written by James Earl Ray's defense attorney. Hadn't heard of this book until I discovered it in the library in the basement of the local African-American museum.
I heard on this very website that the CIA killed MLK so that his extramarital affaris and other degenerate shit he was up to wouldn't wind up coming out and undermining the movement.
Seems convoluted. I think the most plausible explanation to me is that he was starting to come out hard against the Vietnam War and therefore he had to go. But it's interesting that King family members believe Ray is innocent, and Ray claimed he was a patsy who got set up (while on the lam at the time after escaping from prison) by a guy named "Raoul" who set him up in the hotel room with the gun and binocs but he said he didn't do it and wasn't in the room at the time King was shot.
>It’s not clear when Coretta Scott King, widow of King, began to believe in Ray’s innocence. But almost immediately after her husband’s assassination, she suspected that the FBI, which had investigated the murder, was involved in it.
>“There is abundant evidence of a major high level conspiracy in the assassination of my husband, Martin Luther King, Jr.,” Coretta King said at a press conference in 1999, according to The King Center. It was a theory she maintained until her death in 2006 that has so far never been proven.
[...]
>Coretta King’s specific belief in Ray’s innocence is a little tougher to explain. The King family started to publicly voice the opinion in 1997. That year, King’s son Dexter Scott King visited Ray in prison to draw attention to the family’s push to appeal his case. Even after Ray died in 1998 from complications caused by hepatitis C, the family continued to assert there was, as Coretta King said in 1999, “overwhelming evidence that identified someone else, not James Earl Ray, as the shooter, and that Mr. Ray was set up to take the blame.”
>The King family’s belief in Ray’s innocence was partly influenced by the strange case of Loyd Jowers, who’d owned the restaurant below Ray’s rented room in Memphis. For the first 25 years after King’s death, Jowers did not claim any involvement in the murder. But after HBO conducted a televised mock trial about the assassination in 1993—in which Ray gave his first public testimony and was found not guilty—Jowers declared that he’d been part of a conspiracy to kill King, and that Ray had been set up to take to fall. The other people involved in this conspiracy, Jowers said, included Memphis police officers, a Mafia member and the infamous Raoul.
Why do morons on this site think CIA and FBI were pro-civil rights when they were literally trying to get King to kill himself, framed Malcolm X's guards so he would get shot, murdered Fred Hampton, and were generally stamping down on the leftist movements both in the US and world.
Why is the right-wing/white racist victim complex so warped.
What the frick do they think COINTELPRO was for, who do you think MK Ultra was made to fight against(Soviets), what do you think they were toppling governments for. Holy shit.
People here have accused Adorno of writing fricking Beatles music of all things, just because he was a israelite who wrote about music and that capitalism bad, no knowing this included him hating Beatles and music of the 60's and thinking capitalism degenerated music.
These people are politically and historically illiterate
>Adorno the anti-degenerate.
I've read it all now.
I'm not using degenerate in the /misc/ sense. He thought jazz was too capitalism and that protest music was insincere and a bad way to spread messaged, he praised classical music, shit like that.
Yes, he comes from that now extinct line of Marxists that indeed loved "the West" and saw Communism as its inevitable culmination of the West, or the process that helped give rise to it.
A position inconceivable to modern day communists and anti-communists alike who both agree that Communism is about rectifying the sins of the white man.
Not to be too annoying but I don't think that any marxist would believe that communism was the "culmination" (nor the inevitable one at that) of the west. A huge aspect of Marxism is an extremely high-scale, sweeping critique of western philosophy, politics, etc. Their position toward "western" thought was a lot more nuanced than the lines trotted out by most of the "communists" you see today—not that I think today's communists are entirely incorrect—but your characterization of Adorno and the current of Western Marxism is a simplification.
The west has been engaged in self-critique since the Greeks, Marxism doing the same doesn't represent any significant break. Regarding Communism being seen as the culmination of the process underlying the west, I vaguely gesture toward Hegel and the State.
>God I hate liberals so fricking much and Malcolm X was right about them.
And I homosexuals who spout
(You)
You are a homosexual, and a liberal. Self-hate is ugly.
What seems to have happened is that civil rights activists were fine provided they kept it to that but people prominent enough or perceived as dangerous enough to connect it to the war -- which is what MLK was doing shortly before he was killed -- got offed. Preferable were Bayard Rustin types who co-organized the March on Washington but then supported the Vietnam War, he just opposed "how it was fought" (a liberal-style procedural critique which doesn't mean anything) and...
>Along with Allard Lowenstein and Norman Thomas, Rustin worked with the CIA-sponsored Committee on Free Elections in the Dominican Republic, which lent international credibility to a 1966 ballot effectively rigged against the socialist former president, Juan Bosch.
Aaaand:
>Rustin maintained his strongly anti-Soviet and anti-communist views later in his life, especially with regard to Africa. Rustin co-wrote with Carl Gershman (a former director of Social Democrats, USA and future Ronald Reagan appointee) an essay entitled "Africa, Soviet Imperialism & the Retreat of American Power", in which he decried Russian and Cuban involvement in the Angolan civil war and defended the military intervention by apartheid South Africa on behalf of the National Liberation Front of Angola (FNLA) and National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA).
Aaaaaaaaaand:
>In 1976, Rustin was a member of the anti-communist Committee on the Present Danger (CPD), founded by politician Paul Nitze. Nitze was a member of Team B, the independent analysts commissioned by George Bush to scrutinize the CIA's assessments of the Soviet nuclear threat. CPD promoted Team B's controversial intelligence claims about Soviet foreign policy, using them as an argument against arms control agreements such as SALT II. This cemented Rustin's leading role in the neoconservative movement.
Wonder if he was friends with any of those John Birch Society guys.
Yeah, I didn't even think about the anti-war aspects of the movement too. If I remember correctly, MLK's approval rating went lower than it even was before started criticizing the war? His image has ironically been whitewashed. I can't believe people on this site think the government didn't want people to know he fricked hookers or pointless shit like that.
>Rustin worked with the CIA-sponsored Committee on Free Elections in the Dominican Republic, which lent international credibility to a 1966 ballot effectively rigged against the socialist former president, Juan Bosch.
maintained his strongly anti-Soviet and anti-communist views later in his life, especially with regard to Africa. Rustin co-wrote with Carl Gershman (a former director of Social Democrats, USA and future Ronald Reagan appointee) an essay entitled "Africa, Soviet Imperialism & the Retreat of American Power", in which he decried Russian and Cuban involvement in the Angolan Civil War and defended the military intervention by apartheid South Africa on behalf of the National Liberation Front of Angola (FNLA) and National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA).
God I hate liberals so fricking much and Malcolm X was right about them.
And I homosexuals who spout
>A position inconceivable to modern day communists and anti-communists alike who both agree that Communism is about rectifying the sins of the white man.
Malcolm X supported Fidel Castro. MLK was not a communist but months before his death he was saying that anti-communism was irrational at a speech honoring W.E.B. Du Bois who was a communist. Once you start saying stuff like that and opposing the Vietnam War in the late 60s and being that prominent / having a loyal following that would go to war for you and could cause problems, then *you* become a problem.
Rustin being mixed up in "Social Democrats USA" also reminds me Jeane Kirkpatrick who was in Norman Thomas' Socialist Party as a girl and then became a prominent neoconservative figure in the Reagan administration. Not Trotskyists in this case but like... DSA members who like Elizabeth Warren or something like that. Also see Paul Mason in the U.K. for one of these types.
So is this that Thomas Sowell guy I've been hearing about
lol
>Why do morons on this site think CIA and FBI were pro-civil rights
because keeping blacks tethered to government assistance in the name of civil rights gives them an excuse to broaden their influence over everyones lives, and use "helping out da poor blackie" as an excuse.
idk wtf you mean by framed malcolm x's guards, its pretty well documented that the NoI killed him
>because keeping blacks tethered to government assistance in the name of civil rights gives them an excuse to broaden their influence over everyones lives, and use "helping out da poor blackie" as an excuse.
You literally only made yourself sound more moronic and out of your league in the conversation, nothing you said is attached to historical reality that has already been mentioned. They literally killed the people you're talking about.
>idk wtf you mean by framed malcolm x's guards, its pretty well documented that the NoI killed him
And you also can't read, it was never said NoI didn't kill him. Framed is not the right word, but the FBI knew NoI were after him and tried to make him as vulnerable as possible
lbj admitted it was the reason he passed welfare policies
stop typing like your panties are in a bunch, anonymity is no excuse to lose your civility
>Why do morons on this site think CIA and FBI were pro-civil rights
Well it seems to have benefited them
LMAO
Was MLK an unarmed prophet?
>plagiarized his doctorate dissertation
>prostitute monger
>beat women
>didn't write his speeches
>Commie puppet
Lmao@ anyone who looks at MLK as anything but just another nog
Quick reminder that he was assassinated because his israelite handler was tired of covering up the orgies he threw wherever he went. Also Bob Dylan most likely sucked his dick.
United States of Paranoia by Jesse Walker
Just try to find that list image that goes around. Gatekeeper's Regret, I think it was called.
Hold on I may have it
>Behold a Pale Horse
>Committee of 300
>Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
>The Secret World Government or ''The Hidden Hand''
>Under The Sign of The Scorpion
>Ultimate Evil
>Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon
Good shit
"JFK and the Unspeakable" makes the strongest case for "the CIA did it" that I've seen. Also "Disconnecting the Dots" by Kevin Fenton, on how 9/11 was allowed to happen, "Family of Secrets" by Russ Baker about the crimes of the Bush dynasty, and "Israel's Superspy" about the life of Robert Maxwell (Ghislaine's dad, who fell off a boat in mysterious circumstances.)
All of Debord
Debord is a demiurge-worshipper
Finishing this book now called the ‘The perversion of Normality’
It’s the least conspiratorial conspiracy book I’ve read. The dude that wrote it is a doctor. It’s well sourced and basically just walks you through why the world is so hell bent on sexualizing children. The guy doesn’t rage like the dude that wrote Transgender industrial Complex and it’s much easier to follow..it really helped me clean up my perspective about “the israelites”
Val’s Matrix series
which one of these tomes is the best
They’re very based
Oh my God, I never actually read passages from this before. I steered clear because I figured any novel shilled so hard here had to be bad (echoes of Tao Lin), but I wasn't anticipating something that reads like it was written by a fifth grader. Is this one passage out of context or it is all this sub-par?
>Conspiracy theory books
Planning on shooting up an elementary school someday, eh OP?
glow more homosexual
I can see you in the dark fedgoy.
i didnt like this because it did not propose a theory. if you cannot tie your conspiracy into an actual THEORY, then it's just an assortment of facts which, although interesting, do not make for a very comepelling book
Dudes a professional journalist, an old school one at that, he probably doesn’t want to state his theory because he doesn’t have enough evidence.
looks interesting
https://www.corbettreport.com/a-new-world-order-reading-list/
https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1429-james-corbett-and-liberty-weekly-recommend-books/
https://www.minds.com/CorbettReport/blog/another-25-books-you-should-read-1184881297836535808
JC has a pretty good list.
The Occult Renaissance, Church of Rome - Michael Hoffman (2017)
There isn't any because conspiracists are fundamentally childish and or mentally ill. It's pretty safe you'll come across two types: right-wingers who think some obscure Bavarian masons from 200 years ago, or perhaps israelites, are secretly orchestrating everything they don't like today or left-wing boomer libtards who can't accept communists or strung out hippies might do something crazy on their own initiative without being manipulated and or framed.
Whenever I encounter one of these tards in the wild I inform them I exclusively eat GMOs, am fully vaxxed and a subscriber to Foreign Affairs and that immediately scares them off or gets me called a shill or sheep.
you watch family guy. your opinion is worth nothing to me.
Sorry if it's above your IQ level
Midwit answer
give me your definition of israeli Power and explain why it doesn't exist
I'm pretty sure he was trolling.
little men in yarmulkes with big bags of money paying off your enemies
Meg post.
You give off incel vibes.
>when i encounter someone suspicious about gay rights i eat a shovelful of cum
you showed them
Okay but Allen Dulles really did do all that shit
He probably did do that shit but there's a kind of left-conspiracism which blames everything on the CIA when there are also various CIA insiders who have blown the whistle on stuff or flat-out gone rogue and defected in some circumstances (like Philip Agee) who seem to depict the organization as basically the mafia for corporate interests, with an added element that they frick-up their operations all the time. "Burn After Reading" is probably the most accurate depiction of who these higher-ups actually are while trying to deal with some clusterfrick disaster partly of their own making since one of their analysts is a maniac.
What happened to the conspiracy guys who blamed the KGB?
they realized it was israelites
Libra by Don Delillio, Yankee and the Cowboy War by Carl Oglesby
"lights in the sky and little green men" by hugh ross
>opened this thread to control+f for this book, didn't have to. fpbp
I got in big trouble last time I tried to post a certain author, so I won't bother. But OP's book is full of shit.
>On July 19, 2019, Variety reported that Amazon Studios purchased the film rights to the book. Before CHAOS was published, an adaptation of O'Neill's story was originally in development by Errol Morris in collaboration with Netflix but O'Neill backed out of the project over creative differences.[16]
If your conspiracy theory about Charles Manson was going to get a Netflix series before it was EVEN FRICKING PUBLISHED, you are reading fake propaganda (remember that the CEO of Netflix is a nephew of Edward Bernays and Sigmund Freud?). To top it off, Amazon bought the film rights less than a month after publishing.
The truth of Charles Manson is that the murders were fake, the trial was a Hollywood hoax, the entire "family" (of actors/elite teenagers) was a blackwashing of the hippie movement. It worked, it killed public support for anti-war sentiment a few years longer and hippies became a joke (also thanks to fellow CIA assets pushing copious drug use), because boomers and silent gen and greatest gen TV viewers implicitly trusted everything the TV told them. No brainwashing necessary, just a series of psyops, not unlike the fake mass shootings, fake terrorists, fake protests/riots you see today.
Sounds like that author was Miles Mathis.
Who's everyone in this pic besides Tomoko
The Toguro brothers from Yu Yu Hakusho.
Can you at least give a first and last initial of the author?
>The truth of Charles Manson is that the murders were fake
Imagine claiming this with a straight face.
NATO's Secret Armies - Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe - Daniele Ganser
The Phoenix Program: America’s Use of Terror in Vietnam - Douglas Valentine
Dark Alliance: Gary Webb and a great companion book Kill the Messenger: Nick Schou
I'm still struggling to find a book that goes deeper into the rabbit hole