I made a website with a page where I'm trying to put open source solutions, where you can go to the official website or click to copy the installation command for Fedora, Windows and macOs. I'm open for recommendations and critique.
https://carino.systems/software.html
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Eh it's free and more useful than 99% of the shit that gets shilled here. Have a bump anon.
Add more linux distros tho, or I'm retracting my bump.
No need for a link to every AutismoDistro out there, but you know, you should add the commands for Debian-based, Arch-based, Gentoo-based, etc.
I'm going to add Debian in the next couple of months. But for now I want to focus on the functionality, design and info of the website.
What would you change?
How so?
A lot, but I'm not going to do your work for you. It wouldn't even really help you in the long run.
Cool site OP. Weird things happen to the bottom border when you hover on a tile though.
Will fix it, thx
Looks like shit, fix your design
the site looks like some official micro$oft shit it triggered me and i will not be returning
Yup, those bureaucrats were thinking of building a digital Sauron over there. But they went overbudget, are behind schedule by a lot and recently got their cameras and other shit stolen by the organized crime kek
>What are you working on IQfy?
Kegel exercises for getting an stronger orgasm.
you made a typo with "Open Streeet Map"
>Video Editor
>FFmpeg
Oh come on now, Anon, you can't be serious.
You've got ffmpeg in multimedia frameworks, which is enough.
A video "editor" is something like ShotCut.
That is a typo, sorry, it should say kdenlive
Wow, wtf? Ok you're not getting any more bumps from me
I was thinking of adding two video editor, one as Simple Video Editor with Shotcut, and Advanced Video Editor with Kdenlive. How about it?
what about OnlyOffice? It's free and supports even macos
> muh multiplaftform
who the frick cares about that? all that matters is if it has macOS support
Hovering over a button is extremely moronic.
Remove the border property in line 3061 in main.css.
Replace it with:
margin: 10px;
border-bottom: 0px;
This stops it from having a weird overflowing border on the bottom of each element.
Also, don't stick everything into a single main.css file.
What's the point in loading all the styles for every other page on your site, if I'm only going to view one?
Thx a lot. I'm not the greates web dev, it's just a hobby for me, but I will optimize it all in the following weeks, should I make a css for every style then? Let's say three of my pages shared the same style, instead of create page1.css page2.css, I would create style1.css and let n pages load it instead?
added shotcut fren
I'm thinking of adding it instead of Libre Office, wouldn't hurt to do the change for a while.
>should I make a css for every style then? Let's say three of my pages shared the same style, instead of create page1.css page2.css, I would create style1.css and let n pages load it instead?
Only make a new css file for styles that aren't common among all pages.
For example, the header element stays the same for each page, so there's no need to add that into a new css file.
There should be a separate css file in hardware.html, because the table of components isn't shared anywhere else on the site.
Also, you probably shouldn't bother actually changing it. It will be tedious and take a lot of time. In the future, when making other sites, just remain conscious of where you're putting styles, so you aren't wasting resources on nothing.
>vscodium
>not neovim
trash list
>geekbench
>open source
I will remove it, since I can't seem to find a relative solution for benchmarking, specially since it is kinda dumb to expect a single broad solution, it would take me various entries to put very specific benchmarks.
delete this gay ass useless page
why did you think this shit was necessary?
I'm going to make a more pragmatical page where you can straight download LLMs and stuff, it was merely a draft.
>open source
I didn't watch the video past the first few minutes, but something I want to point out is that all the examples of open source software being inferior that he named are art creation software like GIMP, Inkscape and Kdenlive. This is important to note because most open source software is created as a hobby by programmers in their free time. And programmers tend to be rigid thinkers, not creative types. This is why so few open source contributors are interested in art creation software. Meanwhile if you look at software that's not focused on art creation, you will notice that open source software is better that closed source software across the board.
The point of the video is that open source is a good thing, but the design of the collaborative platforms keeps many people out, github and gitlab are not designed to be used by most people. And many users just don't feel like contributing because of that.
I don't get that. If somebody can't even figure out the interface of github, how in the frick are they going to contribute worthwhile code to a project?
Not saying github and gitlab should change either, I'm sure there can be some sort of front-end that connect to a project on github/gitlab or whatever, that allows people from different areas to contribute.
I think the video argues more for groups of people taking over the main decisions of each open source project to give it a clear organized roadmap and add designers and end-users to the team to have a good design vision for the program. Like BDFLs but not stupid.
I know this is gonna sound crazy to you but a program isn't only made of code.
>I know this is gonna sound crazy to you but a program isn't only made of code.
Navigating github is still a basic IQ test. If you can't pass it, you're probably a pajeet with nothing worthwhile to contribute, code or otherwise.
That's gatekeeping though. We're talking about normies here, people who are meant to use the programs, not only programmers coding for advanced users. Input from the actual users is valuable.
I'm trying to beat a particular boss in Stellar Blade. It's a doozy. This shit is Frieda level difficult.
The setup scripts seem interesting (I skimmed through the Windows and Linux ones) but I'd say you should summarize what the scripts actually do on the page and maybe add a link to read them so it's easier for someone a little skeptical to verify that it does what it says.
Also while I was looking through the linux script I chucked at
>"Arch is not supported, and you wouldn't be using scripts anyway"
Who really needs more than archinstall anyway?
Thanks a lot, I made the script so I could save a lot of time, it should work on Debian too. What I need to fix is how it selects the gpu drivers, because I've been installing Mesa and rocm/hip stuff when it finds an Nvidia gpu, also, I haven't really looked into installations with Intel Arc. I wrote the Arch thing because Arch users mostly like to tailor their own installation anyway, if they didn't, they would be an Arch derivative they like. The windows setup I haven't really touched it a lot, just the really basic stuff so I can setup computers whenever I can't copy a Windows installation, the waiting times on Windows are a nightmare.
I will make a new design for the OS page, and it will have links for the script, thanks for pointing it out.
Leave it to programmers and engineers to design a usable interface lmao. I want to spoon my eyeballs out.