women have this mindset that "I ALREADY KNEW THAT" when they clearly didn't and that they only really agree with it on an entirely surface level.
not sure, but what I do know is she exposed herself as a moron.
What did she mean?
understood what extremely? Her argument is very comprehensive...
Is this some more womanist (feminist) crap about women being smarter?
You know, I wonder if he really ever had the opportunity to prevent that from coming to pass. Was he a hardworking father so occupied by keeping a roof over his family's head that he never had the time to properly influence his son? If so, that's a tragedy. Was he just too weak of a man? I guess so, since he was forced to celebrate the humiliation of his bloodline. But still, what brings a man to this level? Was he threatened with divorce? Is he that broken? Is he truly happy about this? There is a pain in those eyes, but it's the pain of a slave. No one is coming to save him. No one cares to save him.
have you considered that she is just ugly? Altho the idea of a woman being falsely accused of being trans because of how ugly she is a cruelly funny mental image.
No, women aren't usually good philosophers. It's why there are basically no women philosophers and the ones that are around basically say, "Man bad, woman good." It's also always a mistake to talk philosophy with women.
There is definitely some good women philosophers but their topics always revolve over sex and the differences between genders not necessary how women are better, but i don't think women are intellectual atleast not in the way men are, but they could be more intuitive or observe the world better thus coming to the same conclusions earlier, philosophy is articulating that into thoughts and words in a meaningful manner.
>There is definitely some good women philosophers
Ayn Rand, Margaret Thatcher, who else
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Modesta pozzo
Ana campgnolo
My friend
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Ayn Rand
Ehh. She articulated her ideas pretty well, and it probably is right by her, considering the childhood trauma of the family pharmacy being taken for the crab bucket called the USSR, but I don't think she fully explored the ramifications of the ideas.
I'm going to ruin the mental image of her two biggest books for you - If you take away the philosophical aspect, they're basically paperback romance novels. Strong, handsome, independent guy fighting the good fight is met by strong, independent woman who wants to be by his side. The guy suffers a few setbacks but ultimately succeeds over the antagonist and fricks the strong, independent woman somewhere along the way. Bonus points if he's already married *cough* Hank *cough*.
Of course, I could just be tapping into my German and taking things to logical extremes with a heavy dose of cynicism.
Intelligence distributions don't really result in many super intelligent women to begin with, so it's going to be quite rare for one of them to end up writing philosophy. I've never read a female philosopher's writing, and then thought I read something significant or important. It's usually something that's about standard for a male grad student, at best. Even someone like Beauvoir, is just a second-rate-Hegel follower.
I hope philosophy ends up with one, before I die, so I can read what a super intelligent female thinks like.
This is why they complain about "mansplaining" all the time. They mention "X", a man adds "X+Y=Z" and they convince themselves they said "X+Y=Z". The female mind is profoundly narcissistic.
What did she mean?
understood what extremely? Her argument is very comprehensive...
Is this some more womanist (feminist) crap about women being smarter?
Nah, not even a christgay at all. Asked her because she is a woman and she is my friend and I wanted to hear her take. She has a decent personality for a woman and she isn't even fat or ugly. You will never experience anything like that and I feel genuinely sorry for you.
That's not what I said at all. I feel sorry for incels. Learn to context my guy.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>incel
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
At this point I don't even know what the frick you want from me, dude. I'm not even trying to argue with you like wtf is your damage?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>you will never experience sex with a woman >i feel... LE BAD
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Dude this isn't about that at all and you know it. I didn't mention sex in my at all. This butthole dragged religion into it for no reason what so ever. I was just saying that I had a female opinion on it and nothing more. Your hostility is so unwarranted here.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>You will never experience anything like that and I feel genuinely sorry for you. >I feel sorry for incels
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I do. I hate modern society in the west for creating the conditions that people have to be incels. It's not like it's their own fault. I'm sorry if you disagree with me but I feel that my opinion is correct. It's an entirely unnatural and historically unprecedented situation that they ought not even to be suffering.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Being an incel is totally their choice. They want to be bitter and see themselves as victims.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Is it? Go on /adv/ right now and look at all the threads about them lamenting on why they can't get a girlfriend. The incel thing was never a problem in the past. It only is now. This shit is engineered somehow like come on dude, use common sense.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Is it? Go on /adv/ right now and look at all the threads about them lamenting on why they can't get a girlfriend. The incel thing was never a problem in the past. It only is now. This shit is engineered somehow like come on dude, use common sense.
You are both right. Incels are right to reject our degenerate progressive society, but they lack the self-discipline to find alternatives or challenge it. It is easier to goon and play vidya.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
It's a dark age and it will pass as many have before tbph.
Very few people are thoughtful or conscious of their life and thr world around them. Women are subject to this and mych more. As women by nature don't have to be as aware.
The potential danger oncoming? Their dad or whatever male pursuer will handle that for them, and if all else fails they really can just ask some random dude for assistance, and he will almost invariable cave to the allure of thr axe wound.
> As women by nature don't have to be as aware. >The potential danger oncoming?
Women are more sensitive to, aware of and on the lookout for danger. That's my only point
It's not what we really see on the day.
in fact, it's the opposite.
Women are too slow to deal with danger and especially in their reaction time.
I worked at a police academy for 6 years and where was this "more female consciousness" my feminist friend?
From a historical point of view, why would this exactly be the case? Is it more useful for a group that HUNTS or a group that COLLECTS to have greater awareness and sensitivity to danger? so it is.
what is more,
The response (of the women) time that I have seen in my entire life is not with this study.
funny history;
We were practicing with glocks and a co-worker just realized that if she didn't get out of the way, her could take a shot.
but of course, what matters is checking if the bullet was stuck in front of the stand with several people shooting and with their fingers on the trigger...
but who am I? I'm not a study guy! The study says they are more sensitive and attentive than men. Maybe in 32 years of life, I've been with the wrong women.
Nobody cares what you think.
The studies are clear about this, and this is actually not the only one.
this has been known since 2015
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
https://i.imgur.com/vCPQma3.png
[...] > As women by nature don't have to be as aware. >The potential danger oncoming?
Women are more sensitive to, aware of and on the lookout for danger. That's my only point
It's a SHIT biased "study" published on a SHIT biased journal. That's not even a true "vision" heatmap, participants were asked to imagine walking through the place in the image at night and then click on the areas they would pay more attention to.
>Nearly 600 individuals took part in the study, published recently in the journal "Violence and Gender", with 56% of participants being female and 44% being male. Each participant looked at 16 images and were told to imagine themselves walking through those areas. They used a Qualtrics heat map tool to click on the areas of the image that stood out the most to them.
It's not what we really see on the day.
in fact, it's the opposite.
Women are too slow to deal with danger and especially in their reaction time.
I worked at a police academy for 6 years and where was this "more female consciousness" my feminist friend?
From a historical point of view, why would this exactly be the case? Is it more useful for a group that HUNTS or a group that COLLECTS to have greater awareness and sensitivity to danger? so it is.
what is more,
The response (of the women) time that I have seen in my entire life is not with this study.
funny history;
We were practicing with glocks and a co-worker just realized that if she didn't get out of the way, her could take a shot.
but of course, what matters is checking if the bullet was stuck in front of the stand with several people shooting and with their fingers on the trigger...
but who am I? I'm not a study guy! The study says they are more sensitive and attentive than men. Maybe in 32 years of life, I've been with the wrong women.
Kind of ironic that these don't really counter each other and actually follow predator/prey physiology. Men, like predators eyes, focus intensely on what's in front of them, mostly ignoring peripheral happenings. Women, like prey eyes, lack immediate attention for what's in front of them and are more likely to have their attention diverted to surroundings. Might help explain why men can be okay with a single recliner and a tv in a bare apartment while women tend to plaster their environment with colors and fill it with objects.
it means she wanted to be raped
>she
You know, I wonder if he really ever had the opportunity to prevent that from coming to pass. Was he a hardworking father so occupied by keeping a roof over his family's head that he never had the time to properly influence his son? If so, that's a tragedy. Was he just too weak of a man? I guess so, since he was forced to celebrate the humiliation of his bloodline. But still, what brings a man to this level? Was he threatened with divorce? Is he that broken? Is he truly happy about this? There is a pain in those eyes, but it's the pain of a slave. No one is coming to save him. No one cares to save him.
have you considered that she is just ugly? Altho the idea of a woman being falsely accused of being trans because of how ugly she is a cruelly funny mental image.
First post best post.
The only way to deal with feminism is corrective rape.
women have this mindset that "I ALREADY KNEW THAT" when they clearly didn't and that they only really agree with it on an entirely surface level.
How do you know that? Maybe you're just pretending that you know that
No, women aren't usually good philosophers. It's why there are basically no women philosophers and the ones that are around basically say, "Man bad, woman good." It's also always a mistake to talk philosophy with women.
Debora
Modesta pozzo
Hipátia etc
There is definitely some good women philosophers but their topics always revolve over sex and the differences between genders not necessary how women are better, but i don't think women are intellectual atleast not in the way men are, but they could be more intuitive or observe the world better thus coming to the same conclusions earlier, philosophy is articulating that into thoughts and words in a meaningful manner.
You're feminist dude
>There is definitely some good women philosophers
Ayn Rand, Margaret Thatcher, who else
Modesta pozzo
Ana campgnolo
My friend
>Ayn Rand
Ehh. She articulated her ideas pretty well, and it probably is right by her, considering the childhood trauma of the family pharmacy being taken for the crab bucket called the USSR, but I don't think she fully explored the ramifications of the ideas.
I'm going to ruin the mental image of her two biggest books for you - If you take away the philosophical aspect, they're basically paperback romance novels. Strong, handsome, independent guy fighting the good fight is met by strong, independent woman who wants to be by his side. The guy suffers a few setbacks but ultimately succeeds over the antagonist and fricks the strong, independent woman somewhere along the way. Bonus points if he's already married *cough* Hank *cough*.
Of course, I could just be tapping into my German and taking things to logical extremes with a heavy dose of cynicism.
>She articulated her ideas pretty well
Thank you
You've never read philosophy.
And you are just inventing names.
Intelligence distributions don't really result in many super intelligent women to begin with, so it's going to be quite rare for one of them to end up writing philosophy. I've never read a female philosopher's writing, and then thought I read something significant or important. It's usually something that's about standard for a male grad student, at best. Even someone like Beauvoir, is just a second-rate-Hegel follower.
I hope philosophy ends up with one, before I die, so I can read what a super intelligent female thinks like.
This is why they complain about "mansplaining" all the time. They mention "X", a man adds "X+Y=Z" and they convince themselves they said "X+Y=Z". The female mind is profoundly narcissistic.
not sure, but what I do know is she exposed herself as a moron.
What did she mean?
understood what extremely? Her argument is very comprehensive...
Is this some more womanist (feminist) crap about women being smarter?
That's incredibly vague and unquantifiable so she can just be ignored the way women should be. Asked my fiance and she agrees.
Do You need ask to your matriarchy? Good boy.
Maybe you're Catholic
Nah, not even a christgay at all. Asked her because she is a woman and she is my friend and I wanted to hear her take. She has a decent personality for a woman and she isn't even fat or ugly. You will never experience anything like that and I feel genuinely sorry for you.
>have sex incel
That's not what I said at all. I feel sorry for incels. Learn to context my guy.
>incel
At this point I don't even know what the frick you want from me, dude. I'm not even trying to argue with you like wtf is your damage?
>you will never experience sex with a woman
>i feel... LE BAD
Dude this isn't about that at all and you know it. I didn't mention sex in my at all. This butthole dragged religion into it for no reason what so ever. I was just saying that I had a female opinion on it and nothing more. Your hostility is so unwarranted here.
>You will never experience anything like that and I feel genuinely sorry for you.
>I feel sorry for incels
I do. I hate modern society in the west for creating the conditions that people have to be incels. It's not like it's their own fault. I'm sorry if you disagree with me but I feel that my opinion is correct. It's an entirely unnatural and historically unprecedented situation that they ought not even to be suffering.
Being an incel is totally their choice. They want to be bitter and see themselves as victims.
Is it? Go on /adv/ right now and look at all the threads about them lamenting on why they can't get a girlfriend. The incel thing was never a problem in the past. It only is now. This shit is engineered somehow like come on dude, use common sense.
You are both right. Incels are right to reject our degenerate progressive society, but they lack the self-discipline to find alternatives or challenge it. It is easier to goon and play vidya.
It's a dark age and it will pass as many have before tbph.
>ackshually I knew that the whole time
Women mindset “i want to get dicked, i want to buy new stuff”
Which is straightforward and practical
Men are too proud to go the same mental path and instead have to convince themselves their lives have a bigger meaning
Very few people are thoughtful or conscious of their life and thr world around them. Women are subject to this and mych more. As women by nature don't have to be as aware.
The potential danger oncoming? Their dad or whatever male pursuer will handle that for them, and if all else fails they really can just ask some random dude for assistance, and he will almost invariable cave to the allure of thr axe wound.
TLDR:
Typical female delusion, nothing more.
Actually women are more sensitive to danger than men
women are more easily scared
not the same thing
> As women by nature don't have to be as aware.
>The potential danger oncoming?
Women are more sensitive to, aware of and on the lookout for danger. That's my only point
It's not what we really see on the day.
in fact, it's the opposite.
Women are too slow to deal with danger and especially in their reaction time.
I worked at a police academy for 6 years and where was this "more female consciousness" my feminist friend?
From a historical point of view, why would this exactly be the case? Is it more useful for a group that HUNTS or a group that COLLECTS to have greater awareness and sensitivity to danger? so it is.
what is more,
The response (of the women) time that I have seen in my entire life is not with this study.
funny history;
We were practicing with glocks and a co-worker just realized that if she didn't get out of the way, her could take a shot.
but of course, what matters is checking if the bullet was stuck in front of the stand with several people shooting and with their fingers on the trigger...
but who am I? I'm not a study guy! The study says they are more sensitive and attentive than men. Maybe in 32 years of life, I've been with the wrong women.
sorry, she could get shot*
Nobody cares what you think.
The studies are clear about this, and this is actually not the only one.
this has been known since 2015
It's a SHIT biased "study" published on a SHIT biased journal. That's not even a true "vision" heatmap, participants were asked to imagine walking through the place in the image at night and then click on the areas they would pay more attention to.
>Nearly 600 individuals took part in the study, published recently in the journal "Violence and Gender", with 56% of participants being female and 44% being male. Each participant looked at 16 images and were told to imagine themselves walking through those areas. They used a Qualtrics heat map tool to click on the areas of the image that stood out the most to them.
Kind of ironic that these don't really counter each other and actually follow predator/prey physiology. Men, like predators eyes, focus intensely on what's in front of them, mostly ignoring peripheral happenings. Women, like prey eyes, lack immediate attention for what's in front of them and are more likely to have their attention diverted to surroundings. Might help explain why men can be okay with a single recliner and a tv in a bare apartment while women tend to plaster their environment with colors and fill it with objects.