What do we do when silicon transistors can't get any smaller

What do we do when silicon transistors can't get any smaller

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    500 gigahomiewatt monster CPUs

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sexooo

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dude... she's 1.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Excellent.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        it's ok, can still go smaller

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        out of 10

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Out of 1

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Onahole size

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        conceptualize the tightness

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Make them bigger

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    graphene

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It'll take a really enormous amount of money to get any alternative up to the point where silicon is at now. Much more than the cost of building a modern fab.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        so have the government pay for it. what's another 40 trillion in debt?

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >lust provoking image
    >irrelevant time wasting question

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >>lust provoking image
      >>>/b/

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't know but seeing that image right now, something on me can't get any bigger

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    We're at a point where it probably doesn't matter. Software efficiency is going to do loads more than ASIC performance increases.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    pile them up

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    probably go bigger with a multi die setup like we see in current epyc cpus.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    light is the next step, but it's a longer way away than people want to believe. main advantage is you can with some certainty control the data value via indexing frequency values of the light. these wont really be full light transistors though, a lot of the chip will still be a wafer with some light bridge super components.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      that isnt how a fairy would smoke a cigarette

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That's when we start using either Silicon Carbide, Gallium Nitride or Graphine wafers for make semiconductors. Apparently processors made in Graphene have the potential to be at least 10 times faster. George Tech researchers made a functional one early this year. https://spectrum.ieee.org/graphene-semiconductor

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm certain that graphene transister fraud guy actually wasn't a fraud but went to work for Area 51. They probably have computers millions of times faster than a modern PC by now.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Will modern fabs eventually be able to be upgraded for graphene semiconductors?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i don't see why not. the fundamental steps of making the chips would probably be the same. refining, melting, slicing, photochemical etching, and depositing more layers on top. i don't see why the same machines couldn't be repurposed for graphene, but of course there is extremely complex technical information here that none of us have access to like "u cant do heteroepitaxy on a graphene wafer with these machines because (x)"

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Once hardware gains plateau we will finally whip eunich software devs into making efficient code again. Their job will be on the line and I'm all here for it.

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    We use your penis

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *