What do we do when silicon transistors can't get any smaller

What do we do when silicon transistors can't get any smaller

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    500 gigahomiewatt monster CPUs

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Sexooo

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Dude... she's 1.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Excellent.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        it's ok, can still go smaller

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        out of 10

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Out of 1

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Onahole size

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        conceptualize the tightness

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Make them bigger

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    graphene

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It'll take a really enormous amount of money to get any alternative up to the point where silicon is at now. Much more than the cost of building a modern fab.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        so have the government pay for it. what's another 40 trillion in debt?

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >lust provoking image
    >irrelevant time wasting question

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >>lust provoking image
      >>>/b/

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I don't know but seeing that image right now, something on me can't get any bigger

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    We're at a point where it probably doesn't matter. Software efficiency is going to do loads more than ASIC performance increases.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    pile them up

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    probably go bigger with a multi die setup like we see in current epyc cpus.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    light is the next step, but it's a longer way away than people want to believe. main advantage is you can with some certainty control the data value via indexing frequency values of the light. these wont really be full light transistors though, a lot of the chip will still be a wafer with some light bridge super components.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      that isnt how a fairy would smoke a cigarette

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    That's when we start using either Silicon Carbide, Gallium Nitride or Graphine wafers for make semiconductors. Apparently processors made in Graphene have the potential to be at least 10 times faster. George Tech researchers made a functional one early this year. https://spectrum.ieee.org/graphene-semiconductor

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I'm certain that graphene transister fraud guy actually wasn't a fraud but went to work for Area 51. They probably have computers millions of times faster than a modern PC by now.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Will modern fabs eventually be able to be upgraded for graphene semiconductors?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      i don't see why not. the fundamental steps of making the chips would probably be the same. refining, melting, slicing, photochemical etching, and depositing more layers on top. i don't see why the same machines couldn't be repurposed for graphene, but of course there is extremely complex technical information here that none of us have access to like "u cant do heteroepitaxy on a graphene wafer with these machines because (x)"

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Once hardware gains plateau we will finally whip eunich software devs into making efficient code again. Their job will be on the line and I'm all here for it.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    We use your penis

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *