what do we think?

what do we think?

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wrong board

  2. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >American Prometheus
    They had to pick someone to lead the project, I don't think it would've failed if they'd picked someone slightly less competent or with worse leadership skills, it was just a matter of time until the bomb was made. Why is Oppenheimer glorified so much?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, why do they glorify the person who actually got things done as opposed to the dozens of imaginary people who could have done it but didn't? So confusing.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >the person who actually got things done
        That would be the rest of the team who did the calculations and engineering.

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          You mean a lot of scientists who were way more brilliant and who actually got things done instead of this glorified project manager. Besides, it was a weapon of mass destruction, it brought nothing but misery, many deaths and awful radiation diseases.

          >But what about le rest of le team!
          >He was just the guy in charge of the project, what's so difficult about directing a bunch of scientists and engineers developing weapons of mass destruction???????
          Disingenuous gays.
          Also, name some member of the team who mogs Oppenheimer and deserves more recognition that he does

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            >guy shilling for israeli meme 'I am le become death le destroyer of worlds' guy who tried to poison his professor, tried to rape a girl, who supported and oversaw plutonium injections on 18 unknowing Americans in Manhattan Project
            >calling anyone disingenuous gay
            I'll tell you. Edward Teller, Richard Feynman, John von Neumann, Enrico Fermi. Also you have become reddit, the destroyer of boards.

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            Fermi is based.
            did you know he got the first measurement of the expected yield of the trinity test bomb?
            all of the sensors fried with the blast, and his estimate calculating how far pieces of paper he dropped flew was the only one they had for a bit.

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, I've heard about it, shame they didn't include it in the movie, I didn't like how they sidetracked Fermi considering his achievements, I mean, he was the reason that they were even at Los Alamos in the first place.

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            that would've been an awesome thing in the movie.
            literally some "best scenes" type of stuff if Nolan did it right.

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            So what's so special about that bunch of gays? They had to pick someone to work on the project, I don't think it would've failed if they'd picked someone slightly less competent or with worse skills, it was just a matter of time until the bomb was made. Why do you suck their wieners so much?

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, why do they glorify the group of people who actually got things done as opposed to the one imaginary person who could have done it but didn't? So confusing.

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            I'm glad you finally understand why your post was so fricking stupid

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, why do they glorify the group of people who actually got things done as opposed to the one imaginary person who could have done it but didn't? So confusing.

            I'm glad you finally understand why your post was so fricking stupid

            autistic morons, I wasn't the one who made that reply. No one person in the project should be glorified to celebrity level, it was a national level effort and through the power and resources of AMERICA was the bomb born.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        You mean a lot of scientists who were way more brilliant and who actually got things done instead of this glorified project manager. Besides, it was a weapon of mass destruction, it brought nothing but misery, many deaths and awful radiation diseases.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      What a dumbass question

      Yeah, why do they glorify the person who actually got things done as opposed to the dozens of imaginary people who could have done it but didn't? So confusing.

      BASED

  3. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    kek the merchants really are shilling their shitty mediatic products

  4. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    The movies was way better than the book and much less of an anti-mccarthyist goyslop than the book. The book deserves to be thrown into the trash for glorifying Oppenheimer too.

  5. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Winner of the Pultizer Price

  6. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why do people even consider it as an impressive achievement? The bomb was rendered completely useless since the main enemy against whom it should have been used was allowed to steal it just 4 years later.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      How many weapons of mass destruction have you developed?

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        drop one in the john every day mate.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's not an impressive achievement by any means, but just because the Soviets got the bomb 4 years later because of Klaus Fuchs and their vast agents network, doesn't mean it was over. USA and USSR tried to constantly tried to one up each other, let it be Teller's hydrogen bomb or even neutron bomb down the line. It was basically about making the bomb more perfect in some way, like causing less damage to own troops, but being more damaging to living tissue in general while having less radioactive pollution afterwards or even just causing bigger damage etc.

      It depends from the bomb, but if you ask me, it's all worthless, awful and souless.

  7. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I started reading pic related at the beginning of the month. It does spread the credit around a little better to guys like Fermi, Teller and others.
    Part of the reason I picked it up was because of Nolan but I was also interested because of Cormac’s The Passenger.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      I know that feel atombro, I picked up a book about the development of atomic bombs in USA, USSR and III Reich (which was non-existent there by the way) and it's all because of Nolan. Have you read The Passenger or maybe Stella Maris?

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >which was non-existent there by the way
        not quite.
        their failings were losing the scientists and all the sabotage everyone else did.

        not to forget the idea first popped up in german heads.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        I have read The Passenger but am saving Stella Maris for next year.
        Part of Making of the Atomic Bomb does deal with German, Japanese and British attempts to harness the power of atomic fission. And how much the US was helped by emigres trying to escape from anti-Semitic regimes not only in Nazi Germany but also Hungary and Italy.

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          Admire your patience with Stella Maris. Did you like The Passenger? Tell me more about it, I'm thinking of picking it up.

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            I am not sure what to make of The Passenger. I have read a couple different interpretations of it namely
            1. There is a conspiracy against Bobby by some powerful people in the US intelligence community over the plane he entered and the mysterious passenger
            2. There’s no conspiracy. He legitimately owes the IRS money and that’s why his bank accounts and assets have been seized.
            3. Three all just coma dreams of a brain dead man
            I kind of lean to the last theory but will need to read Stella Maris before making my mind up
            Parts of The Passenger I really enjoyed - the bits about New Orleans and Knoxville. The section on the oil rig, the visit to his crazy alcoholic friend in his cabin.
            I wasn’t as crazy about the bits with his sister and her hallucinations. (Bobby also hallucinates a visit from the Kid and again it leaves me puzzled how to interpret that. ). I’ll have to give it a re-read after I read Stella Maris. But it was an interesting read on its own.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *