this costs $200, is half the size of a phone and it uses a LAM instead of an app ecosystem to run tasks. sheep here are hating on it instead of thinking about the potential of these devices
2 months ago
Anonymous
none of which needs specialized hardware you shill moron, hence it could be run on any old phone as a software package
now have a nice day and spare the internet your filth
2 months ago
Anonymous
You’re so dumb you miss the point. I am already running rabbit OS on my old pixel. It’s just a cute piece of hardware for $200. It’s a cool gadget.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>this is cool >why? >uhmm it just is OK??
have a nice day
2 months ago
Anonymous
>people aren't allowed to like cool gadgets
kys homosexual
2 months ago
Anonymous
>oh my hecking science is that a new shiny gadget that I don't need and could DIY with a common electronic gadget >IM GONNA CONSOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM
DOA botnet datamining device from a money grab and run company, literally. These companies don't make a penny from these, they will harvest all your data and sell it to the best bidder and disappear.
its a scam for westeners. Will sell more than 1k units but not more than 10k as the economy must have fricked the npcs enough for them to become atliest a bit fiscally conservatives. Also a company run by a black man and a white woman that specializes in FOTM services should be a giant red flag... but knowing the target audience, it will sell 1k units because of that.
You’re thinking of Humane and their scam AI pin. The Rabbit can be trained to do complex tasks, costs $500 less and is run by an autistic asiatic and not some creepy interracial couple
>i think its a scam because of x reasons >none of x is true, you're thinking of something else >i dont care its still a scam
thanks for outing yourself as a homosexual who contributes literally nothing of value to any conversation
2 months ago
Anonymous
i still believe that just like 3d printing, crypto and probably many other pre-2012 hype trains, LLM chatbots will have 10% actual use from their hype and devices like the one in op and the other shit are scams at worse, at best they are just prototypes for phone apps.
I know the company that makes it used to make Mac software and they made a Usenet reader but it had a critical bug and they never fixed it because the guy left and it all only came out years later. $20 down the drain.
I know it's not a replacement for a phone, but it has to do something my phone doesn't already do to justify its existence. Same as I don't carry a flashlight, a GPS, an iPod, a PDA and so forth with me.
Sell me on this, consider I have to already carry a phone. What does this gimmicky device offer?
gay and useless, you already have a device that can do everything this does
So would be a phone
jesus i opened this thread expecting some discussion about whether or not this thing had actual value, but it's just a bunch of people who don't know literally anything about what it is, and yet trying to shit on it
thank you for reminding me why i stopped coming here, i hope all of you morons have a nice day
>toys are bad >the consumer electronics industry should just be $1000 cookie cutter phones with large touchscreens for serious people who do serious things
I'm going to spend $200 on a toy and have fun with it while you sneer and stew in misery
also LAMs as a pitch against having 1000 apps for each individual task is a compelling idea for future mobile OS's and if you can't see that you're myopic
2 months ago
Anonymous
>also LAMs as a pitch against having 1000 apps for each individual task is a compelling idea for future
emacs exists
I stopped coming here years ago when I realised every single IQfy poster is a comically insecure teenager. But the four or five boards I moved onto have all turned to shit, so now I sometimes come back. There's a lot less shilling for programming languages than there used to be, so I would say IQfy has actually improved.
maybe if the shills could describe it's use case (I literally asked) it would be helpful. >YOU CAN TEACH IT LIKE, TASKS
such as? >...
oh okay so it is useless.
>I have zero creativity so that means something is useless
You can teach it to remove watermarks in photoshop for example
2 months ago
Anonymous
>you have no creativity >use it to remove watermarks
seriously? I'll stick to not consooming trendy junks.
2 months ago
Anonymous
You asked for an example. I gave one. Like many of the teenagers here you already made up your mind to respond negatively before I said a thing
2 months ago
Anonymous
You gave the most uncreative example. How about explaining wtf this thing does. The WOWOWW spam videos that don't actually explain what it does is pretty telling of how they tried to create a device to solve a problem nobody had in the first place. IF I needed to remove a watermark, I'd just toss it in stable diffusion and img2img with a light prompt - I highly doubt Ill need to do that on the fly with a glorified tamagachi and also doubt it would do a better job than SD on a local PC.
Not to mention the privacy question, at least running local models I dont have to be the product.
>it needs a connection to your smartphone or wifi anyways right?
no it has a sim slot. if it was tethered to a phone all the time I'd agree it's pointless > Imagine your volume is too high and you have to scream VOLUME DOWN VOLUME DOWN over and over instead of just making an adjustment with your hands
you mean like with the scroll wheel or touch screen? If you're going to shit on something at least look at an image of it. I swear half the haters here are thinking of the Humane AI pin - which is dogshit. Rabbit R1 is a MUCH better product at a fraction of the price
Honestly these days have a bt earbud in and using voice is just as easy. I can't see a standalone product doing any better than what your phone already does.
Post a link next time dumb Black person
https://www.rabbit.tech/
it's literally useless, nothing that I can't do with the openai API right now on my phone.
The best case scenario is that this is a moronic gimmick that is a barley improved siri. The worst case scenario is that you're giving Chinese tech bros access to your bank accounts and full control of your life.
Also I don't know why people still think the future of computers is voice. We've had this dumb idea that computers should just use voice for decades and it never catches on because talking to your computer like a crazy person all day and night is moronic. Imagine your volume is too high and you have to scream VOLUME DOWN VOLUME DOWN over and over instead of just making an adjustment with your hands. What do you do if you're in public? I can't believe people are still obsessed with this idea of talking to computers like humans.
>botnet >slow as frick >does nothing new a smartphone already does >minus the infinite more features on a smartphone
If I wanted a music player, I'd get a compact player like an iPod Nano. Anything else, a smartphone.
They'll go under from not having subscriptions to maintain a money flow for server upkeep and you'll have a 200USD brick in a year or two.
>you'll have a 200USD brick in a year or two.
who cares, it's worth $100 a year for sub-free perplexity AI in a cool form factor
a lot of broke haters here
>what does IQfy thinks of X? >dumb idea because ... >wow who cares you haters it's a cute cool gadget
Manchildren are truly embarassing. Imagine living life without being able to handle the slighest criticism.
All this thing is doing is talking to a server where all of the actual work happens. It could be an app on the phone you already have. You're paying $200 to create e-waste for no reason.
They've obviously only done this because a cutesy separate gadget will get peoples attention while AI service app #62042 would not.
It's ChatGPT connected to IFTTT except people are supposed to make the actions themselves by training it to scrape and interact with websites. The whole thing sounds like it will fall apart incredibly easily.
DOA
marketing thread
a separate device for an LLM instead of just putting it on the phone is asinine
it's a cute pocket companion
So would be a phone
this costs $200, is half the size of a phone and it uses a LAM instead of an app ecosystem to run tasks. sheep here are hating on it instead of thinking about the potential of these devices
none of which needs specialized hardware you shill moron, hence it could be run on any old phone as a software package
now have a nice day and spare the internet your filth
You’re so dumb you miss the point. I am already running rabbit OS on my old pixel. It’s just a cute piece of hardware for $200. It’s a cool gadget.
>this is cool
>why?
>uhmm it just is OK??
have a nice day
>people aren't allowed to like cool gadgets
kys homosexual
>oh my hecking science is that a new shiny gadget that I don't need and could DIY with a common electronic gadget
>IM GONNA CONSOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM
It's nothing that couldn't just be an app.
What potential is that?
>a separate device for an LLM instead of just putting it on the phone is asinine
well then you can't have an OS based on a llm
piece of useless dogshit trash made in china
DOA botnet datamining device from a money grab and run company, literally. These companies don't make a penny from these, they will harvest all your data and sell it to the best bidder and disappear.
Don't buy an ad. Just stop posting this junk please.
its a scam for westeners. Will sell more than 1k units but not more than 10k as the economy must have fricked the npcs enough for them to become atliest a bit fiscally conservatives. Also a company run by a black man and a white woman that specializes in FOTM services should be a giant red flag... but knowing the target audience, it will sell 1k units because of that.
You’re thinking of Humane and their scam AI pin. The Rabbit can be trained to do complex tasks, costs $500 less and is run by an autistic asiatic and not some creepy interracial couple
I still have no interest in it even if it is just 1/100 of the scam i think it is.
>i think its a scam because of x reasons
>none of x is true, you're thinking of something else
>i dont care its still a scam
thanks for outing yourself as a homosexual who contributes literally nothing of value to any conversation
i still believe that just like 3d printing, crypto and probably many other pre-2012 hype trains, LLM chatbots will have 10% actual use from their hype and devices like the one in op and the other shit are scams at worse, at best they are just prototypes for phone apps.
Sell me on this, consider I have to already carry a phone. What does this gimmicky device offer?
I know the company that makes it used to make Mac software and they made a Usenet reader but it had a critical bug and they never fixed it because the guy left and it all only came out years later. $20 down the drain.
What does this do that your phone doesn't?
it's not designed to replace your phone
it's just a fun portable gadget that you can teach tasks to
I know it's not a replacement for a phone, but it has to do something my phone doesn't already do to justify its existence. Same as I don't carry a flashlight, a GPS, an iPod, a PDA and so forth with me.
jesus i opened this thread expecting some discussion about whether or not this thing had actual value, but it's just a bunch of people who don't know literally anything about what it is, and yet trying to shit on it
thank you for reminding me why i stopped coming here, i hope all of you morons have a nice day
>it falls in the reader to diligently research your FOTM memeware
its a tamagotchi
a toy
frick off
>toys are bad
>the consumer electronics industry should just be $1000 cookie cutter phones with large touchscreens for serious people who do serious things
I'm going to spend $200 on a toy and have fun with it while you sneer and stew in misery
also LAMs as a pitch against having 1000 apps for each individual task is a compelling idea for future mobile OS's and if you can't see that you're myopic
>also LAMs as a pitch against having 1000 apps for each individual task is a compelling idea for future
emacs exists
clown
I stopped coming here years ago when I realised every single IQfy poster is a comically insecure teenager. But the four or five boards I moved onto have all turned to shit, so now I sometimes come back. There's a lot less shilling for programming languages than there used to be, so I would say IQfy has actually improved.
maybe if the shills could describe it's use case (I literally asked) it would be helpful.
>YOU CAN TEACH IT LIKE, TASKS
such as?
>...
oh okay so it is useless.
>I have zero creativity so that means something is useless
You can teach it to remove watermarks in photoshop for example
>you have no creativity
>use it to remove watermarks
seriously? I'll stick to not consooming trendy junks.
You asked for an example. I gave one. Like many of the teenagers here you already made up your mind to respond negatively before I said a thing
You gave the most uncreative example. How about explaining wtf this thing does. The WOWOWW spam videos that don't actually explain what it does is pretty telling of how they tried to create a device to solve a problem nobody had in the first place. IF I needed to remove a watermark, I'd just toss it in stable diffusion and img2img with a light prompt - I highly doubt Ill need to do that on the fly with a glorified tamagachi and also doubt it would do a better job than SD on a local PC.
Not to mention the privacy question, at least running local models I dont have to be the product.
Is not a phone? I would get a phone with a design like that.
gay and useless, you already have a device that can do everything this does
LAM are based and on the horizon. lm not sure yet if this is good or bad for someone like me, working in test automation.
This thing is snake oil tho. In a few years android will have most of its features built in.
what is it, an mp3 player?
I prefer my electronic gadgets not to speak to me
I think you need to buy an ad.
it's gay, but phones should have a scroll wheel
no idea what rabbit or LAMs are but that bunny on the screen is cute i like them
I mean with things like Google and Samsung and Apple probably incorporating this into their next phones will it really matter?
It seemed dumb on arrival and it needs a connection to your smartphone or wifi anyways right?
>it needs a connection to your smartphone or wifi anyways right?
no it has a sim slot. if it was tethered to a phone all the time I'd agree it's pointless
> Imagine your volume is too high and you have to scream VOLUME DOWN VOLUME DOWN over and over instead of just making an adjustment with your hands
you mean like with the scroll wheel or touch screen? If you're going to shit on something at least look at an image of it. I swear half the haters here are thinking of the Humane AI pin - which is dogshit. Rabbit R1 is a MUCH better product at a fraction of the price
Honestly these days have a bt earbud in and using voice is just as easy. I can't see a standalone product doing any better than what your phone already does.
Post a link next time dumb Black person
https://www.rabbit.tech/
it's literally useless, nothing that I can't do with the openai API right now on my phone.
If I could use it as a client device for a self-hosted model it might be interesting, but as it seems to be right now it's worthless.
The best case scenario is that this is a moronic gimmick that is a barley improved siri. The worst case scenario is that you're giving Chinese tech bros access to your bank accounts and full control of your life.
Also I don't know why people still think the future of computers is voice. We've had this dumb idea that computers should just use voice for decades and it never catches on because talking to your computer like a crazy person all day and night is moronic. Imagine your volume is too high and you have to scream VOLUME DOWN VOLUME DOWN over and over instead of just making an adjustment with your hands. What do you do if you're in public? I can't believe people are still obsessed with this idea of talking to computers like humans.
>botnet
>slow as frick
>does nothing new a smartphone already does
>minus the infinite more features on a smartphone
If I wanted a music player, I'd get a compact player like an iPod Nano. Anything else, a smartphone.
They'll go under from not having subscriptions to maintain a money flow for server upkeep and you'll have a 200USD brick in a year or two.
>you'll have a 200USD brick in a year or two.
who cares, it's worth $100 a year for sub-free perplexity AI in a cool form factor
a lot of broke haters here
>just keep buying the slop so companies will have no incentive to make better built and lasting products
Spotted the American happily content with his atrocious consumer protection laws.
>what does IQfy thinks of X?
>dumb idea because ...
>wow who cares you haters it's a cute cool gadget
Manchildren are truly embarassing. Imagine living life without being able to handle the slighest criticism.
They're pretty nice in Deus Ex, it's fun to toss one into a room filled with bad guys, or to use it as a mine
>LAMs
my vision is augmented
whats a lam
All this thing is doing is talking to a server where all of the actual work happens. It could be an app on the phone you already have. You're paying $200 to create e-waste for no reason.
They've obviously only done this because a cutesy separate gadget will get peoples attention while AI service app #62042 would not.
Qrd me on the concept of a LAM
It's ChatGPT connected to IFTTT except people are supposed to make the actions themselves by training it to scrape and interact with websites. The whole thing sounds like it will fall apart incredibly easily.
Buzzword coined by homosexual manchildren.
moronic and for manchildren. There's no reason it has to look like that and not a normal phone.
Stupidest device since the Wii U.