What is it about Barbarossa that feels so kino?

What is it about Barbarossa that feels so kino?

It's like everything in history happened as a build-up towards it and nothing before or since even matters anymore.

It's like 2 autisms clashed and the result is absolutely spectacular.

It's the closest we ever got to a real apocalypse and it probably seemed that way to witnesses.

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    >It's the closest we ever got to a real apocalypse and it probably seemed that way to witnesses.

    This is why, it’s just all out brutality on a massive scale. Two gigantic armies facing off in a no holds barred battle to the death with no one spared. Not just that the SS/Wehrmacht and Red Army were pure soul.

  2. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    J

  3. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    I think it’s just the way history is taught and viewed. WW2 is the most important event in recent history and the invasion of the Soviet Union is one of the most important part of the war. I’ve even seen some people refer to it as WW2s main front. So history pre ww2, is viewed as just buildup to it, and it’s defining event. That’s my theory at least

    • 3 years ago
      Anonymous

      >I’ve even seen some people refer to it as WW2s main front.
      This is objectively true

    • 3 years ago
      Anonymous

      >I’ve even seen some people refer to it as WW2s main front.
      Uh, obviously? The largest battles in human history were battles of that front.
      >Kursk-Prokhorovka
      >Stalingrad
      >Rzhev
      >Dnieper '43
      >Leningrad

      • 3 years ago
        Anonymous

        Mutts are brainwashed to think the small skirmishes in the West somehow mattered.

        • 3 years ago
          Anonymous

          It goes both ways, in Russian education the Second World War starts in 1941

  4. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    For once because something like that is rare.

    Huge industrial nations rarely fight each other to the death (because it is moronic). Except Barbarossa the only other case is France and Germany in WW1.

    For that shit two literally BOTH have to be ruled by a ruthless, totalitarian dictatorship with absolute control and support, which of course is very rare.

  5. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    >What is it about Barbarossa that feels so kino?

    The sheer scale, the depths of human depravity, and the mutual genuine desire of both sides to completely annihilate the other is unlike any war that has come before or since. It was a true clash of the titans where the winner would take all and the loser would have all taken. The Eastern Front represented the culmination of a milennia of souring East-West relations dating back the Great Schism of 1054, even more so than the Cold War which had the potential to be even bigger, but was staved off in part because of sobering lessons learned on the vast Russian steppe from 1941 to 1945.

  6. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    Because it was a clash of the races, history books just don't call it that way for obvious reasons.

    Slavs are extremely different from Westoids, but of course mutts and non-whites can't tell the difference.

    • 3 years ago
      Anonymous

      Except neither side thought they were a distinct race. Hitler in MK even says they weren't a race.

    • 3 years ago
      Anonymous

      The Soviet Union was multi-racial moron

      • 3 years ago
        Anonymous

        >That israelite
        Based artist

    • 3 years ago
      Anonymous

      Slavoids ruin the European genepool and needed to go.

    • 3 years ago
      Anonymous

      Hitler attacked the Soviet Union because he wanted a stronger base to face the British and American empires and because he needed resources that he had no other way of getting (together with internal pressures and the fact that the rapid USSR military improvement would make waiting another year extremely dangerous). Painting it as a racial deathmatch is just the propaganda needed to get the masses to accept it, the same applies to Stalin and the capitalist menace.

      • 3 years ago
        Anonymous

        It was the explosive end of the old-style European colonialism with Germany, having been wienerblocked by Britain and fearing the rise of the United States, turned the imperial land- and resource-grabbing to Eastern Europe. In this sense, the USSR was like a "third world" country and I think the impact of the 1917 revolution was greater in colonized and semi-colonized countries.

        The USSR was very centralized of course but I think the initial idea at least was to create a socialist version of the European Union or something with various republics including Central Asian republics.

        I don't know much about anti-Slavism in Europe, but here in the U.S., the media likes to present Russia as a Mordor-like place. I like to listen to music from around the world, and I showed my mother this video one time and she was kinda surprised by it:

        She didn't say why, and I didn't ask her, but she gets her news about the world from CNN and MSNBC and she's a "good" middle-class liberal who votes for Democrats, but a lot of these "good" liberals in the U.S. have views about other countries that are not very different from right-wing ultranationalists. She's not a bad person, and she's my mother, but people are heavily propagandized to, so I try to challenge that in little ways. But of course, that video of those Russian musicians is a very "nice" image compared to the middle-class liberals like my mother. I like this guy, too:

        I don't speak Russian but he makes comedy music videos, and some of his other videos will also talk about Western stereotypes of Russians and so forth. I like ordinary people like that.

        • 3 years ago
          Anonymous
      • 3 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Painting it as a racial deathmatch is just the propaganda needed to get the masses to accept it
        I'd be more willing to believe this if Hitler didn't spend the last 2 years of the war autisticly killing every israelite he could get his hands on

  7. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    Because it was Western civilization's final attempt to quell the steppe barbarians once and for all.

    It failed. Civilized people will forever have to live in fear of the hordes from the East

    • 3 years ago
      Anonymous

      The West literally fought Hitler, you're not making any sense.

      • 3 years ago
        Anonymous

        The Anglo*

  8. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

  9. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    I like it, i've got Operation Barbarossa and Germany's Defeat in the East by david stahel and glantz's Barbarossa Derailed on my reading list

  10. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    Iran-Iraq war was close to Barbarossa but much smaller scale.

  11. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    Wars that are just as brutal as Barbarossa are usually against natives and the natives only manage to win some battles at best.

  12. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    because it was recent, so its well documented
    the most underrated historical war kino is 30 years war

  13. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    the biggest spergout in history

    • 3 years ago
      Anonymous

      What is that moronic map

  14. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    >What is it about Barbarossa that feels so kino?
    You are a manchild that enjoys playing war in your imagination

  15. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    It represents how far the bourgeoisie will go to crush communism. But their efforts are in vain. World Bolshevism will defeat the world bourgeoisie.

    • 3 years ago
      Anonymous

      Stalin himself was doing a pretty good job of crushing communist expansion outside of the USSR

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *