What philosophers have the best writings on female nature?

What philosophers have the best writings on female nature?

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

  1. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    My homie Shoppy

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Otto Weingner did it better

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        this woman didn't do reveals or anything

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          She killed herself in 2014

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            Who is she?

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            chinese girl who jumped off a balcony after her bf broke up with her

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            le blinding man

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      sorry, what freedom of speech haha

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      ahahaha, was my first thought

  2. 8 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Giacomo Casanova.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ninon de Lenclos

        Any particular works they did?

  3. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    In "Elsa" I saw, from the commencement, my desired antithesis to Lohengrin,—yet naturally, not so absolute an antithesis as should lie far removed from his own nature, but rather the other half of his being,—the antithesis which is included in his general nature and forms the necessarily longed-for complement of his specific man-hood. Elsa is the Unconscious, the Undeliberate (Unwillkürliche), into which Lohengrin's conscious, deliberate (willkürliche) being yearns to be redeemed; but this yearning, again, is itself the unconscious, undeliberate Necessity in Lohengrin, whereby he feels himself akin to Elsa's being. Through the capability of this "unconscious consciousness," such as I myself now felt alike with Lohengrin, the nature of Woman also—and that precisely as I felt impelled to the faithfullest portrayal of its essence—came to ever clearer understanding in my inner mind. Through this power I succeeded in so completely transferring myself to this female principle, that I came to an entire agreement with its utterance by my loving Elsa. I grew to find her so justified in the final outburst of her jealousy, that from this very outburst I learnt first to thoroughly understand the purely-human element of love; and I suffered deep and actual grief—often welling into bitter tears—as I saw the tragical necessity of the parting, the unavoidable undoing of this pair of lovers. This woman, who with clear foreknowledge rushes on her doom, for sake of Love's imperative behest,—who, amid the ecstasy of adoration, wills yet to lose her all, if so be she cannot all-embrace her loved one; this woman, who in her contact with this Lohengrin, of all men, must founder, and in doing so, must shipwreck her beloved too; this woman, who can love but thus and not otherwise, who, by the very outburst of her jealousy, wakes first from out the thrill of worship into the full reality of Love, and by her wreck reveals its essence to him who had not fathomed it as yet; this glorious woman, before whom Lohengrin must vanish, for reason that his own specific nature could not understand her,—I had found her now: and the random shaft that I had shot towards the treasure dreamt but hitherto unknown, was my own Lohengrin, whom now I must give up as lost; to track more certainly the footsteps of that true Woman-hood, which should one day bring to me and all the world redemption, after Man-hood's egoism, even in its noblest form, had shivered into self-crushed dust before her.—Elsa, the Woman,—Woman hitherto un-understood by me, and understood at last,—that most positive expression of the purest instinct of the senses,—made me a Revolutionary at one blow. She was the Spirit of the Folk, for whose redeeming hand I too, as artist-man, was longing.—

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      I don’t get it what’s he trying to say

      Give me tldr

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        This question of Polygamy versus Monogamy thus brings us to the contact of the purely-human with the ever-natural. Superior minds have called Polygamy the more natural state, and the monogamic union a perpetual defiance of Nature. Undoubtedly, polygamous tribes stand nearer to the state of Nature, and, provided no disturbing mixtures intervene, thereby preserve their purity of type with the same success as Nature keeps her breeds of beasts unchanged. Only, a remarkable individuality the polygamous can not beget save under influence of the ideal canon of Monogamy; a force which sometimes exerts its power, through passionate affection and love's loyalty, in the very harems of the Orientals. It is here that the Woman herself is raised above the natural law of sex (das natürliche Gattungsgesetz), to which, in the belief of even the wisest lawgivers, she remained so bound that the Buddha himself thought needful to exclude her from the possibility of saint-hood. It is a beautiful feature in the legend, that shews the Perfect Overcomer prompted to admit the Woman.

        However, the process of emancipation of the Woman takes place amid ecstatic throes. Love—Tragedy.

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          I don’t get it what’s he trying to say here?

  4. 8 months ago
    ASSposter69

    Not philosopher but Henry de Montherlant

  5. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Judith Butler

  6. 8 months ago
    Anonymous
  7. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    De Sade.

  8. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    None of them. If it involves the slightest amount of logic you have already excluded female contributions. Judith Butler was a lesbian who tried to look man-ish, so she is slightly above a standard female but nowhere near Foucault, some of the best philosophical content generated in history has come from dudes who frick other dudes just to get the frick away from females. Let that sink in.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah but this post was about men writing about women not female philosophers

  9. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    le future man wins every time. no contest.

  10. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    They are the window dressing of existence. They aren't anything significant or worthwhile in the least to examine. They're there to tend to men, to their offspring and engage in effeminate activities such as upkeep and cooking. Anyone who holds any opinion over such beings that is not indifference or slight contempt at best is quite the moron.

  11. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Daoism

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      How so anon?

  12. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    imagine a philosopher, but she's a black woman

  13. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    either of these

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      I don’t get it what’s this in reference to and how does it relate to female nature?

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        if you don't get it just give up already anon

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          I also don’t get it enlighten us anon

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          Dude stop being cryptic

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        That they only care about money.

  14. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    She beautiful

  15. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Michel Houellebecq

  16. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ninon de Lenclos

  17. 8 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Lol source? What book is that?

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        A New Dictionary of Quotations on Historical Principles from Ancient and Modern Sources

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          Nice

  18. 8 months ago
    Anonymous
  19. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Esther Vilar

  20. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >ctrl+F “Unwin”
    >not found
    Come on people, seriously?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *