VR but with no games and marketed for productivity. There's nothing on the Vision Pro that you can't do on a laptop.
That being said it has some cool tech in it, the pass through is supposedly very good. But then again, so does the Quest 3 which is like 1/7th of the price.
3D video porn on VR is mind-tripping, you will get personal space vibes from it, and when a girl comes in for a kiss you feel the reaction to kiss back.
It was not marketed or sold as a dev kit. More importantly, dev kits are produced to support development for a product that will launch soon after. What product is the Vision Pro a dev kit for? It's not even clear if Apple is planning to release a cheaper headset.
Most people don't have $3,500 to buy into what is essentially an experimental headset with a wire connected to a battery pouch that provides less than two hours of use per charge.
blacks are dumb enough to pay for it. The higher IQ races will research VR for weeks/months and then buy anything, but Apple's VR headset. It makes sense from a business/marketing perspective. Sell your company's soul for $$$
It was marketed to white urbanites who want to have another way to virtue signal themselves as being down with whatever blacks are doing. Not many blacks will actually buy the Vision Pro but by making it appear to be a black product, Caleb, the scrawny white boy with a messenger bag who is an API specialist for a start up in the city can pretend to be a cool black guy.
The rumors were that the Vision Pro was never intended to be a product in the first place
It was internally considered the dev kit and they were working on the proper consumer model, but Tim Apple needed a product launch ASAP to distract investors from not having AI slop to present
So he threw the Vision team under the bus to buy Apple time, forcing them to launch an overpriced product with no apps the team knew would fail
>With the product
They were more interested in making a marketing prop than they were in making headset. The headstrap is fundamentally flawed and pretty much everyone already knows how to do it better. It's also the most walled off walled garden >With the marketing prop
Trying to create a new consoomer class of black people obsessed with their hair and buying shoes/meme tech is a stupid idea.
i own a rift cv1 and none of the gimmicks any vr headset have provided aside from being wireless have been worth anything past the novelty factor that wears off like 1 week in.
I can’t bash them too hard. This was meant to show that Tim Apple can innovate without Johnny Ive.
They messed up by not advertising this as a dev kit. Normies should not expect much from this.
The best uses found for VR so far are gaming and porn. The Apple Vision Pro is a VR headset built exclusively for everything but gaming and porn.
I get what Apple was trying, they don't wanna compete with Meta or PSVR but instead find their own VR niche that they're the only player in. But unfortunately neither Apple or anyone else has any fricking idea what that niche could possibly be.
Nothing. It reached its goal of raising hype and being a dev kit for the cheaper version Apple is aiming to release in 2025.
I can't fricking wait for a 4K per eye linux headset to come to the market.
there's something unreal about the Black woman they chose for the AVP ads, like it doesn't seem like a real person, it feels like a composite made by some diversity committee and they took and mashed in different features of entirely different people to make 'her'. Her shirt for example is noticeably fake, the button and collar is just too big.
did you see how bad the avatar for it is when you facetime someone while wearing it? And the fricking eye display is a blurry mess, not to mention there are like no apps and because it's apple it's not compatible with the already existing VR universe
>make shit headset >sell it for absurd price tag because Apple >its worse then any other significantly cheaper headset and has even less use cases then those do
Apple thought because it was Apple it could produce a garbage product and it would just sell like hot cakes like normal.
tripckd
>one 0 too much
>Black folk in marketing
VR but with no games and marketed for productivity. There's nothing on the Vision Pro that you can't do on a laptop.
That being said it has some cool tech in it, the pass through is supposedly very good. But then again, so does the Quest 3 which is like 1/7th of the price.
my Quest 2 has millions of games and it is collecting dust already
>my Quest 2 has millions of games and it is collecting dust already
How's the porn?
I wannna know where the porn lives but all I've ever heard about is Virt-a-Mate and to a lesser extent Koikatsu.
Not the same guy but I also have a Quest2 and I use VR stripchat and torrented videos (Javs and Western)
3D video porn on VR is mind-tripping, you will get personal space vibes from it, and when a girl comes in for a kiss you feel the reaction to kiss back.
First few times it is great. Then brain adjusts.And then I tried passthrough (on valve index) and it is great again.
>$3500
>limited use cases
checked trips
what went wrong?
Black folk
Price:
$3,500
Use cases:
- FaceTime but moronic
-
The best use case I heard was you could use the virtual monitor on a plane to do "work" privately.
Tell me the company, that hands 3500$ VR headsets to employees to work in fricking economy class productively without a physical keyboard.
No company. Personal use.
Those suck.
>those suck
Its better than blowing 3.5k on a useless headset.
You can also buy a 5 dollar laptop screen privacy guard. But yes, spend 3500 dollars minimum on a headset with 2 hour battery life. Sure.
Small battery probably there just in case the cord falls out.
>bulky $3500 voicemail machine
no porn games
Apple fricked up HARD by using M2 abandonware. In otherwords this thing was DOA.
nothing would change if Apple went with M3
It's a developer kit.
It was not marketed or sold as a dev kit. More importantly, dev kits are produced to support development for a product that will launch soon after. What product is the Vision Pro a dev kit for? It's not even clear if Apple is planning to release a cheaper headset.
Most people don't have $3,500 to buy into what is essentially an experimental headset with a wire connected to a battery pouch that provides less than two hours of use per charge.
>what went wrong?
do you want to spend 3000$(?) to look like this Black person woman? I don't
of all the fricking models they could have picked
That's the best black one they could find. Just be glad they didn't pick the black Hermione instead.
>black Hermione
more?
>more?
I have even more questions
old bat rowling is already fighting the troony and israelite front. she'd get instacancelled if she didn't give on the race thing.
over-priced
health issues reported
globohomosexual woke advertising like your image
etc.
Black folk, that's what. noone wants to look at Black folk. frick Black folk. Black folk.
Stop. Be better
N
I
G
reddit bros... we almost had it. let's give it another try?
N
this, this is clearly a neggress
respect the pronounce chuds
ew
>2000 dollar meme accessory
>market it to blacks
blacks are dumb enough to pay for it. The higher IQ races will research VR for weeks/months and then buy anything, but Apple's VR headset. It makes sense from a business/marketing perspective. Sell your company's soul for $$$
>The higher IQ races will research VR for weeks/months
Na. Everyone is about as dumb.
It was marketed to white urbanites who want to have another way to virtue signal themselves as being down with whatever blacks are doing. Not many blacks will actually buy the Vision Pro but by making it appear to be a black product, Caleb, the scrawny white boy with a messenger bag who is an API specialist for a start up in the city can pretend to be a cool black guy.
G
E
R
The rumors were that the Vision Pro was never intended to be a product in the first place
It was internally considered the dev kit and they were working on the proper consumer model, but Tim Apple needed a product launch ASAP to distract investors from not having AI slop to present
So he threw the Vision team under the bus to buy Apple time, forcing them to launch an overpriced product with no apps the team knew would fail
no porn
not anime
>With the product
They were more interested in making a marketing prop than they were in making headset. The headstrap is fundamentally flawed and pretty much everyone already knows how to do it better. It's also the most walled off walled garden
>With the marketing prop
Trying to create a new consoomer class of black people obsessed with their hair and buying shoes/meme tech is a stupid idea.
screen display size in them is too small and better to use a monitor/TV
Useless garbage for tech bros and s_o_imilk drinkers.
a ton.
at the bedrock it is hiring only stout apple fans.
instead of people capable of critical thought.
We let lizard people convince us that cheap labor was worth the irreparable destruction of our society.
The technology to make a VR headset that doesn't suck simply doesn't exist yet.
all promos included Black folk
iTODDLERS BTFO
i own a rift cv1 and none of the gimmicks any vr headset have provided aside from being wireless have been worth anything past the novelty factor that wears off like 1 week in.
They failed to learn from Google Glass. You can't sell something without a use case and no one wants to wear the stupid thing on their face.
Apple will fix it in today's event bros... right??
>$3000
>Yeah, Rajeev? I just received my Apples Goggles but the box does not contain the advertised item. Is she shipped separately, Rajeev?
I can’t bash them too hard. This was meant to show that Tim Apple can innovate without Johnny Ive.
They messed up by not advertising this as a dev kit. Normies should not expect much from this.
The best uses found for VR so far are gaming and porn. The Apple Vision Pro is a VR headset built exclusively for everything but gaming and porn.
I get what Apple was trying, they don't wanna compete with Meta or PSVR but instead find their own VR niche that they're the only player in. But unfortunately neither Apple or anyone else has any fricking idea what that niche could possibly be.
no youtube app
>$3500
>still uncomfortable
>no controllers
>its "gimmick" isn't even good
>at best it's a portable TV or monitor
Too expensive and doesn't even have AV1 hardware decoding like Apple M3/M4 does
Turns out, Apllel user base is not as rich as they like to pretend; In fact most of them are indeed poor.
>they went back and edited this image for the promotional material to try and scrub out the vacant Black person stare
lmao
Nothing. It reached its goal of raising hype and being a dev kit for the cheaper version Apple is aiming to release in 2025.
I can't fricking wait for a 4K per eye linux headset to come to the market.
immigration
>2400 Grams
White people exploiting people in Africa.
there's something unreal about the Black woman they chose for the AVP ads, like it doesn't seem like a real person, it feels like a composite made by some diversity committee and they took and mashed in different features of entirely different people to make 'her'. Her shirt for example is noticeably fake, the button and collar is just too big.
did you see how bad the avatar for it is when you facetime someone while wearing it? And the fricking eye display is a blurry mess, not to mention there are like no apps and because it's apple it's not compatible with the already existing VR universe
>make shit headset
>sell it for absurd price tag because Apple
>its worse then any other significantly cheaper headset and has even less use cases then those do
Apple thought because it was Apple it could produce a garbage product and it would just sell like hot cakes like normal.
VR without games & porn (it can't even play 360 videos)
Every time I see this image, her teeth look worse than I remember. It's like that Ben Franklin troony with the ungodly fivehead