Web 1.0:
>Decentralized, wildwest
>Used to exchange information and share knowledge
>Every person on the Internet had their own website
Web 2.0:
>Curated, centralized, government approved Internet
>Used to maximize ad revenue, consumer spending and improve government surveillance
>Internet dominated by a few big players
>People no longer have a website on the Internet, they are just another profile in a larger website
What will web 3.0 trend towards? Will we become even more centralized?
 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
|
Web 3.0 is the programmable serverless web.
Web 1.0 was static pages
Web 2.0 was interactive server-backed services
Web 3.0 is (re)programmable distributed and serverless
Examples include IPFS, smart contracts, etc.
rofl
Bump
> IF I KEEP SAYING IT THEN IT WILL BECOME REAL!
web3 doesn't exist, and only exists in the minds of grifting crypto israelites, failures of life and computer illiterates. have a nice day as soon as possible, you disgusting israelite.
>Depends on how much you value free speech.
decentralized != free speech, you stupid and moronic fricking Black person.
>semantic web
Stormgay, you're annoying. Go leave.
Fricking segregate the web, separate but equal bandwidth.
Even more centralized and government regulated. There will basically be 10 services you can use.
the only web3 project that I like is urbit, but I don't like how it used the etherum blockchain. Web3 will be basically techno-feudalism, which is pretty bad
>web 3.0 is techno feudalism
Isn't that 2.0?
No, the new web with blockchain will be.
Whens the techno anarchy gonna come?
When someone physically nukes Google's servers
Can't wait for a virus/worm using AI for finding 0 days and blockchain protocol to paralyze the internet.
All forums are arguably web 2.0.
The next time you will be serf of gayMAN.
https://urbit.org/understanding-urbit/urbit-id
Is this a legitimate use of blockchain?
uses blockchain = gay
>What will web 3.0 trend towards?
An interesting concept that's popping up recently is "federated" websites. That is, websites that are separately owned and hosted but built to share a common login, to improve user convenience. This allows different site owners to have full control over their sites and not be censored by a big authority, but while still allowing users to use all their websites as if they were owned by one big company.
I hope this is the case. Everything else posted would suck.
Federated websites + jpeg xl, av1, opus + ipfs
lmao no way gays, not under capitalism/technofeudalism. we will progress deeper into the hellworld and the fediverse will stay irrelevant
>it's another moron doesn't realize web 2.0 started in the 90s thread
>Used to exchange information and share knowledge
Web 2.0 is unarguably better for this purpose, because it's what brought about web based forums and all other discussion, file hosting, etc. to the scene that didn't involve emailing the webmaster so they could add your post or whatever to their site.
"Web 3.0" is a meme marketing term that will be used time and time again to push random bullshit as the next big thing. There will never be a "web 4.0", because that would require settling on whatever meme technology to call "web 3.0" rather than continuing to drag out the term for marketing use. The original web 3.0 was just formatting and tagging to make information on the web better processable by a computer for searches and whatnot.
>The original web 3.0 was just formatting and tagging to make information on the web better processable by a computer for searches and whatnot
semantic web
excuse me boomer please frick off this is a thread for zoomers to larp and is not for people who lived through web 1.0
Nothing will ever be deleted, everything will last for ever on the blockchain. Every DNS request, HTTP request, IP address, for ever.
I think that locked hardware is worse than locked software
no business reason to exist.
Depends on how much you value free speech.
>free speech
no one cares for that
>free speech
>no one cares for that
yet
>decentralized != free speech, you stupid and moronic fricking Black person.
no, but decentralized and anonymous in the same protocol layer : yes.
free speech, decentralization = buzzwords
you are a moron
What if someone create a decentralized Internet Relay Chat using smart contracts?
IRC is pathetic legacy garbage
smart contracts are pathetic unsecure useless shit
>IRC is pathetic legacy garbage
What is Twitter?
propaganda plataform used by bots and accounts paid by millionaires
What is Mastodon?
the true web3 is tor
no
I like how it takes us back to anyone with an Internet connection being able to offer Internet services while solving the privacy issues of doing so.
Tackle the web fricking SportsBet NRL footy it's time to bed tackle me on the field and finger my fricking ass
The average fricking Australian is a fat ass alcoholic who is obsessed with gambling his money away on fricking footy fricking sportsbet frick right off
wat
Tor is centralized, services can be hacked / DDOS, spam...
Onion sites are for pedophiles and drug dealers.
Also, illegal arms dealers. What a normal person who doesn't uses drugs and CP, can find there interesting?
its literally just websites without rules, you can host a blog if you want tardo
Is there still no name for that imageboard?
Still thinking about it. I'm bad at coming up with names.
>no numpad
How do you get real work done with this?
You don't, home computer. For business, use pic related.
Web 3.0:
>Elon Musk steps out onto the stage
>The audience is silent, humbled by Elon's presence
>Without saying a word, Elon reaches into his coat
>He pulls out a gun and shoots a black teenager sitting in the front row right in his fricking head
>The room is swept into chaos
>Frantic screaming and panic echoes throughout the auditorium
>Elon announces amidst the madness
>"Black Friday has begun, get your free TVs."
>Millions of Americans rush to their local Wal-Mart to pillage high definition televisions
>Redditors cry for gun control
>White liberals elevate themselves through the social hierarchy, spearheading racial movements where no member of the ethnic groups they claim to represent elected to represent them
>Elon Musk places the gun back underneath his coat and makes his way back stage
>He arrives unopposed without incident
>Web 3.0 is a-go
Elon Musk is the world's leading turbo homosexual. He must get his super powers from guzzling down buckets of Black person semen sucked fresh daily from hornt blacks.
Not really, most people don't like him and he might even be using your data right now but I can't say he is because I don't anything to prove it but I can say that if he is using your data then he may be using it for his shit robots.
Are you going to pass on a genius? A level TWO super genius at that? Come on. Most people told me to stay in school you know, but as a super genius? I'd at least get an interview. One round interview. Okay no problem. If someone came up to me and said "Hey, I'm a level one super genius" I'd say sure no problem, have one interview. At least one round interview. No way man. You know. I'm not going to repeat myself, you know, something I've already said and all that like. Level two super genius? Really? First round interview.
Web 3.0:
Every website is hosted geocities style under one umbrella server provider like google.
GOOG:\Yourwebsitehere.goog
Imagine running a server 24/7 for your website that gets 3 hits per month from a bot
The model is referred to as NOBO which stands for "Not Owned But Operated". Pilot for this is Google AMP. Webmasters host their web bundles on Google servers (pic related).
You can securely verify that Google has not changed the contents of the page: A technology similar to SSL is used for this, called Signed eXchanGe (SXG). In this case, NYT can sign the page, you can verify they published it even though it is delivered through Google.
kek thx
>HJKL to move the cursor
based vim keyboard
WEB 3.0:
> decentralized service running on every smartphone
> highly scalable, instant and anonymous transactions
> The WEF and liberals seethe.
> Governments try to ban it, but they can't
> The USD and EURO are worth shit.
>decentralized service running on every smartphone
"decentralized" is the new buzzword
>highly scalable, instant and anonymous transactions
>highly scalable
>instant
>anonymous
lol
>Governments try to ban it, but they can't
They just need to regulate ISPs and energy providers
Less privacy, less anonimity, the lie of decentralization.
everyone using a cheap dummy computer or tablet connected to a server
The devices need the following capabilities:
- user input (touch screen, flimsy keyboard)
- output (video decoder, screen)
- connectivity (WiFi)
- (optional) DRM support
Get lost tourist
You're already using it, it's websites refusing to load without JS.
Web versioning is a social construct
just "apps" and muh security for everything, internet is doomed
>web3
no such thing, it's all marketing and bullcrap
CNN streams directly into your brain and you can't adblock.
CNN streams fat wads of cum directly up my butthole.
DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS DICKS
more centralization
more ads
more tracking
less freedom
Web was a mistake, we should use internet only for transfering (pirated) files.
We need search 2.0
what