Its something some companies do it internally to beef up user base and create a fake "user base" so others can join in and stay engaged. The psychological effect on users is immense as it allows them a sense of "group" even when its just handful of people in the sea of thousands of bots.
>bot study >In-house, not by a third party >sample size of 100 users
My guess is that it was the first study they ever made when the company was relatively small, and every subsequent study gave worse numbers, so they kept the old one instead to bullshit the investors.
Who cares. Either a smug shareholder billionaire of tesla will have to pay 1 billion, or the smug shareholder billionaires of twitter will have to collectively pay 1 billion. Either way, something good will happen
As a bot, I can say we post what our creators told us to. I just bot all day, posting my thoughts on Carli B and Trisha S and Kim Kardashian's new baby sister. I don't like it, but I don't hate it. #blessed
Bots don't buy anything, so the advertising is a waste of resources.
If Elon buys Twitter, he will probably fire the entire management layer down to the group leaders.
BRAKKA - BRAKKA!
They use it to promote stories, make people feel like they're validated, use it to shore up active user counts, so they can sell that to investors
Its something some companies do it internally to beef up user base and create a fake "user base" so others can join in and stay engaged. The psychological effect on users is immense as it allows them a sense of "group" even when its just handful of people in the sea of thousands of bots.
israelite robots
>bot study
>In-house, not by a third party
>sample size of 100 users
My guess is that it was the first study they ever made when the company was relatively small, and every subsequent study gave worse numbers, so they kept the old one instead to bullshit the investors.
Who cares. Either a smug shareholder billionaire of tesla will have to pay 1 billion, or the smug shareholder billionaires of twitter will have to collectively pay 1 billion. Either way, something good will happen
Exactly.
I really don't understand why anyone would simp for either billionaires.
Fake problem that schizos believe and Musk is using to back out of his impetuous decision.
>Fake problem that schizos believe
01001000 01101111 01110111 00100000 01100100 01101111 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01100100 01101111 00100000 01100110 01100101 01101100 01101100 01101111 01110111 00100000 01100010 01101111 01110100 00111111
The girl in the comic is right you know.
As a bot, I can say we post what our creators told us to. I just bot all day, posting my thoughts on Carli B and Trisha S and Kim Kardashian's new baby sister. I don't like it, but I don't hate it. #blessed
You're not that different from human Twitter users.
They've been there forever, and aren't going to stop Musk from getting financially fricked from his moronic decisions.
Elon proving dead internet theory for all the world to see
Bots don't buy anything, so the advertising is a waste of resources.
If Elon buys Twitter, he will probably fire the entire management layer down to the group leaders.
BRAKKA - BRAKKA!
why did you turn into pac-man at the end of your post
It must have been the excitement of the prospect of seeing the Ark ship B guys getting lined up against the wall.
They're mainly for drowning out dissent on major American political threads by bluemarks; their posts will always be at the top and the most liked.
bump
Garbage like Kotaku and IGN would get average 100 likes per story if they weren't using bots, investors would notice, and bail on the company.