>Are these kind of proportions neccessary for life and we happen to witness this?
This wasn't the case when life appeared, and wont be the case in a few million years.
That only reinforces the belief in astrology because then they can say when the ratio hits 108 during the orbit, certain astrological phenomenon are stronger, which they are weakest at its most eccentric. Basically, a new form of biorhythm.
When contemplating these kinds of numbers, you often run into 107 also.
107 and 109 are prime, with 108 in the middle.
Another interesting number, 618, also has a prime on either side (617 and 619)
We shall call these sandwich primes
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOO! you can't trust NASA measurements what are you STUPID? they're all a fricking bunch of GLOWBlack folk trying to make you CRAZY with MIND RAYS >YESSSSSSSSSSSSS! 108!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! these are the MYSTICAL TRUTHS from KEK that those NASA GLOWBlack folk are trying to keep from you so the lizard people in government can harvest your orgones to live for thousands of years!
moronic image. The orbits are elliptical, meaning that no orbit has a set distance. It's cherrypicking, you're intentionally choosing the distances which are 108 and ignoring the rest of the orbit which isn't 108. Clearly more information is needed, are we talking about average radii? Max?
That's actually really fricked up.
Are these kind of proportions neccessary for life and we happen to witness this?
What the hell.
>Are these kind of proportions neccessary for life and we happen to witness this?
This wasn't the case when life appeared, and wont be the case in a few million years.
There wasnt a few million years ago and there wont be
numbergays on steroids
Gravity casts shadows
Can I get some sources on this? Don't want to look up the numbers myself and find it was just a hoax.
Its basically true but not 100% accurate because the orbit is a bit eccentric. Sometimes a ratio will get close to 109
Its not the only cool geometric cohencidence. My favorite is the relation between the moon/earth radius matching the golden ratio.
which just shows your shitty reasoning and lack of basic critical thinking.
Not true, it only proves you are a homosexual. Source: Top astrological research
That only reinforces the belief in astrology because then they can say when the ratio hits 108 during the orbit, certain astrological phenomenon are stronger, which they are weakest at its most eccentric. Basically, a new form of biorhythm.
4 + 8 + 15 + 16 + 23 + 42
Based lost bro
An equivalent statement would be "the moon and the sun are the same apparent size in the sky."
Riiiiiight, but still I want to see cited numbers, for the rest of it.
Try Wikipedia.
My main theorem is not having to do any fact checking myself.
no
Not equivalent
It's missing the part about 108 earths fitting in the sun, but it's equivalent to the other part.
384400 km / 3474.8 km = 110
149597870.7 km / 12742 km = 11740
not even going to bother with the rest
i hate numerology morons so much it's unreal
>149597870.7 km / 12742 km = 11740
>distance of earth to the sun
>divided by the diameter of earth
ah yeah. 1AU / dsun = 109, so what's all this shit about "108"?
Look up the diameter of the sun real quick
1.391×10^9 m
are you alright?
have a nice day maggot
verbally abuse is a poor substitute for being able to explain what you're trying to show someone
never expected IQfy to be into indian spiritualism btw
-ly
Die in a fire
When contemplating these kinds of numbers, you often run into 107 also.
107 and 109 are prime, with 108 in the middle.
Another interesting number, 618, also has a prime on either side (617 and 619)
We shall call these sandwich primes
Same with 432. what others
twin primes
The diameter of the Earth is EXACTLY 7 million of my erect penis' length.
Coincidence.... I think not
Lol. Micropenis
Weird how schizos both disdain and love maths & measurement.
>Objective astronomical measurements REEEEEEEEE
> We might live in a Holographic simulation HOLY SHIT KEYED
>>Objective astronomical measurements REEEEEEEEE
YESSS GOYYYYYYYYYY TRUST THE SCIENCE
>TRUST THE SCIENCE
No thanks. Incoherent schizo ramblings for me, please. That way I can call you a hylic and feel smarter than you.
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOO! you can't trust NASA measurements what are you STUPID? they're all a fricking bunch of GLOWBlack folk trying to make you CRAZY with MIND RAYS
>YESSSSSSSSSSSSS! 108!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! these are the MYSTICAL TRUTHS from KEK that those NASA GLOWBlack folk are trying to keep from you so the lizard people in government can harvest your orgones to live for thousands of years!
lol this ngiga thinks there's some cosmic significance to humans settling on a superior highly composite number to represent 1 turn
moronic image. The orbits are elliptical, meaning that no orbit has a set distance. It's cherrypicking, you're intentionally choosing the distances which are 108 and ignoring the rest of the orbit which isn't 108. Clearly more information is needed, are we talking about average radii? Max?
It's not 108. The earth is on an eliptical orbit around the sun so the distance varies through the year
This is just equivelant of solar eclipse.
Why the perspectively they appear the same though?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio
Oh wow objects operating in 3D space will conform to set relative ratios after billions of years of gravitational forces pushing them around.
What a mystery that is.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_large_numbers_hypothesis
Its almost like everything is bound to relativity or something
>>>/x/
>reeeeee, muh zog soience textbook doesn't have the answer in it therefore its mere numerology
keplers laws were just mere numerology for while too
so, god kept 360° as circle and a mile in mind? what a story.
also what are magic 10, 11 and 400 dividers?