Which denomination of Buddhism is closest to the most high-church traditions of Anglicanism?
 |
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
|
Which denomination of Buddhism is closest to the most high-church traditions of Anglicanism?
Which denomination of Buddhism is closest to the most high-church traditions of Anglicanism?
|
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
|
Kek, what a funny question. I always thought Mahayana was fairly close to Catholicism (just swap saints for bodhisattvas), and high-church Anglicanlism is pretty much Catholicism but with some stupid God-save-the-king shit sprinkled over it
Not really, no. Anglicanism is much closer to the fundamebtalist principles of Christendom than Catholicism is.
lol, lmao even
Anglicans were started by an antichrist, and still led by one. The so called "head" of their "church" erected a giant bull and Tower of Babel for the Commonwealth games. If people can't wake up now, there's no hope for them.
Whichever one has abandoned all of its central teachings and utterly beclowned itself within the last 50 years.
Protestard detected.
Anglicans are Protestants. Are you not aware of anything currently going on within Anglicanism? It's a moronic shitshow.
The problems in contemporary England all originate with low-church traditions.
Anglicanism is broader than England
>insult anglicans
>hehe dumb prot durp
I don't get it
High-church Anglicanism and Calvinism are not the same thing.
High-church Anglicanism is closer to the principlesnof fundamentalist Catholicism than most Catholic traditions are particularly in contemporary society.
And Calvinism and Protestantism are not synonymous terms. Calvinism is a branch of Protestantism.
>High-church Anglicanism is closer to the principlesnof fundamentalist Catholicism
Such as what? Women priests, gay marriage, not being in communion with the Pope, not having any meaningful doctrinal standards?
Those are all low-church traditions.
Whoever you want to pin the blame on, it's allowed by the bishops and you're all in communion with each other. You're the same body.
Those bishops are all low-church. Im in favour of only the most high-church traditions of Anglicanism.
Doesn't matter, they're still your bishops and you are still in communion with all the people who support this nonsense. They aren't in a different communion, they are in the same body as you. This apparently does not matter to Anglicans. Sharing communion with people who have abandoned the faith and teach heresy is completely fine.
Also this is why I said Anglicans have no meaningful doctrinal standards. There is no doctrine that is actually enforced. This applies to "high church" Anglicans equally.
Ah yes and the Roman church follows Saint Augustine to the word. Complete nonsense.
I dont accept the contemporary church at all. I think it should be reformed through para-fascist violence.
On second thought OP, you should've started this thread on IQfy. A lot more people would've taken the bait by now
man dis b***h was mad ugly
Everyone kinda knows Anglicanism is just discount discount Catholicism that only exists because of centuries-old and now-irrelevant politics. Even Anglicans know this which is why so many high-profile Anglicans have been converting to Catholicism in recent years.
Nonsense.
The encroachment of potato Black folk in England is more relevant than ever.
pure-land or shin buddhism.
they believe in a kind of faith alone soteriology and they still have rituals.
alot of westoids aren't drawn to it cuz its similiar to what they disregarded in christianity,
Which country is it most popular in?
Japan
Were the Japanese Nationalists in World War 2 in bed with these 'high-church' Buddhists?
yes, but they prefered shintoism because they saw it as more authentically or purely japanese as pureland buddhism originated formally in china, Shin Buddhism is its japanese variant.
Isnt Shinto a total LARP though? Its like the equivalent of the Seidr sorcery and alchemy of the Nordmenn of classical Scandinavia which the Nazis were obsessed with.
yeah kinda. Shintoism was always mixed with various religions and folk beliefs. arguably 'pure' shintoism cannot be defined and is otherwise an artificial construction of imperial japan.
That's cringe.
Strange that the best denomination of Buddhism is practiced in a country which also has such LARPy tradition.
buddhism is not compatible with any form of judaism, mahayana or hinduism on the other hand...
>Buddhism can't be compatible with Abrahamism
Manichaeism was Abrahamic and after Christianity expelled it from Rome it survived an extra 1000 years in China by disguising itself as Buddhism.
Another Anon suggested Pure Land Buddhism which is a good suggestion given the similarities someone might draw between Heaven and the Pure Land. I think a better example would be Obaku because it draws from the Pure Land tradition but also has a strong liturgical tradition.
22416822
fake schizo bait