I suppose you'd rather live in England at the time where Edward and his horde of stinking gauls invaded the country after they were funded by israelites to reinstate the practice of usury on the British isles
INGERLAND. Several long periods of no armies tramping about stealing and murdering, save in the far North. Even civil wars got resolved very quickly post-Anarchy. Taxes were infrequent.
To avoid pointlessly re-treading the start and end dates of the middle ages I will go with the year in the image you posted, and choose pre-ducal Milan. >well developed >the lombard wars just came to a close with Milan on top, plenty of plunder and prestige to go around >inland so no med piracy to worry about >detached from papal frickery for the most part >strong noble family favored by the Emperor and at the beginning of a long reign >opportunities for art, industry, agriculture, or mercenary work
It depends on the time
Scotland would be bad in the 1000s since it was totally sacked and had mass genocide committed by the Norse and then English
In the 1400s England regressed to such a state of war that next to no literature from this century exists
Etc
>Holy Roman Empire (several small states)
Why does the meme that the HRE was always a decentralized mess of border gore still exist? The HRE during the medieval period was actually more centralized than it was during the early modern. In fact, medieval HRE was more centralized than medieval France. In other words, France increasingly centralized while the HRE increasingly decentralized.
No my dear nobody, the HRE was not centralizad at all, certainly not beyond the alps, if anything that map makes it seem much more centralizad than it was. The comuni of Italy were de facto independent with their own governors and when Barbarossa came down to Italy many of them gave him the finger
Teutonic Order so I can kill slavshits with my monk bros
Or maybe just England. Simple politics (compared to the rest of feudal Europe), there's the Magna Carta, and very little risk of invasion from foreign powers so my peasant ass doesn't have to worry about getting raped and pillaged.
Golden horde by far, as long as I can be contemporary with ghengis khan, imagine being basically at the same level of an American Indian, so in tune with the land and nature, possessing a more diverse skill set than most city dwellers ever will, then some fat frick comes and says to follow him, seems convincing and he's got a pretty intimidating entourage, so you do, then it turns out your skill set as a nomad translates into military tactics that are near impossible to counter, all the sudden you end up conquering the entire world, grabbing up as much plunder and rape pussy as you want. You die in a succession squabble a few years later but it was fun while it lasted.
Iceland >tend to my goats >tend to my crops >Don't know what a war is and never will >Worse conflict is drunkfight that last minutes >Totally decentralized government >Achieve the comfiest life in all the medieval world despite being a barren frozen island deep in the sea with no resource having only wool to trade for everything else
A better question is not location but what class you are born into
The best place to be in the lower classes would probably be England and Scotland in the late middle ages because there was more freedom and economic development.
As a noble you'd be well of pretty much anywhere but have to deal with wars more
The middle/merchant classes didn't really really develop once again until the late middle ages, they'd probably have it best in England, France, the Baltic region and Italy.
So assuming the question asks me as if I was a regular person, than probably England - you had the best chance of actually owning your own land or moving into the industrial or merchant class, which contributed to Englabd industrializing first.
England and it's not even close anywhere else. Why? Because of the rights. I would love to be an English serf. I can save money, my family is bound to the land and the lord. I can potentially move up in society and become a free landowner. England's move toward a "middle class" of skilled tradies and merchants was big and nowhere else in Europe did lowborns have so much potential.
Whichever had the fewest israelites
HRE
That would be England after the Edict of Expulsion. Zero israelites.
Obsessed poltrad
When is it your turn to do a mass-shooting?
You have to go back /misc/tard
I suppose you'd rather live in England at the time where Edward and his horde of stinking gauls invaded the country after they were funded by israelites to reinstate the practice of usury on the British isles
France, so that I can go galavanting all over the Mediterranean.
uhm USA idk or africa
INGERLAND. Several long periods of no armies tramping about stealing and murdering, save in the far North. Even civil wars got resolved very quickly post-Anarchy. Taxes were infrequent.
To avoid pointlessly re-treading the start and end dates of the middle ages I will go with the year in the image you posted, and choose pre-ducal Milan.
>well developed
>the lombard wars just came to a close with Milan on top, plenty of plunder and prestige to go around
>inland so no med piracy to worry about
>detached from papal frickery for the most part
>strong noble family favored by the Emperor and at the beginning of a long reign
>opportunities for art, industry, agriculture, or mercenary work
Norwegian iceland.
Safe from every european war
>moors attack and enslave you
what to do?
He said middle ages you moron
1627 is still middle ages homosexual
kek
no it isnt you absolute tard
cope, it is
France or England.
It depends on the time
Scotland would be bad in the 1000s since it was totally sacked and had mass genocide committed by the Norse and then English
In the 1400s England regressed to such a state of war that next to no literature from this century exists
Etc
>Holy Roman Empire (several small states)
Why does the meme that the HRE was always a decentralized mess of border gore still exist? The HRE during the medieval period was actually more centralized than it was during the early modern. In fact, medieval HRE was more centralized than medieval France. In other words, France increasingly centralized while the HRE increasingly decentralized.
No my dear nobody, the HRE was not centralizad at all, certainly not beyond the alps, if anything that map makes it seem much more centralizad than it was. The comuni of Italy were de facto independent with their own governors and when Barbarossa came down to Italy many of them gave him the finger
>when Barbarossa came down to Italy many of them gave him the finger
the cucks in padua didn't but venice would take over that city anyway
>before Timur the gigalame
Oh wow
Wallachia was smaller tho.
Somewhere in Italy.
japan
Tunis' name is most similar to benis so Tunis
you never heard of Benin aren't you
Ukraine is rightful Golden Horde, Genoese and Gothia clay.
Surprised you didn't say khazaria shlomo
Outremer
Sweden so I wouldn't have to be a slave like in the south and I would be free from shitty lords and their dick measuring contests.
Roman empire because it's next to the ocean and there are no freight ship docks
some steppe country so i could commit large amounts of sexual assault
Peasants’ Republic of Dithmarschen
Teutonic Order so I can kill slavshits with my monk bros
Or maybe just England. Simple politics (compared to the rest of feudal Europe), there's the Magna Carta, and very little risk of invasion from foreign powers so my peasant ass doesn't have to worry about getting raped and pillaged.
Egypt, I want to smoke hash with multiple wives.
England, specifically London. If not, the Low Counties
>medieval London
Imagine the smell.
DAS HAILIGES ROMISCHES RIECH
>christcuck kingdoms
I'll pass
Bohemia
HRE
or
Genoa
Golden horde by far, as long as I can be contemporary with ghengis khan, imagine being basically at the same level of an American Indian, so in tune with the land and nature, possessing a more diverse skill set than most city dwellers ever will, then some fat frick comes and says to follow him, seems convincing and he's got a pretty intimidating entourage, so you do, then it turns out your skill set as a nomad translates into military tactics that are near impossible to counter, all the sudden you end up conquering the entire world, grabbing up as much plunder and rape pussy as you want. You die in a succession squabble a few years later but it was fun while it lasted.
Iceland
>tend to my goats
>tend to my crops
>Don't know what a war is and never will
>Worse conflict is drunkfight that last minutes
>Totally decentralized government
>Achieve the comfiest life in all the medieval world despite being a barren frozen island deep in the sea with no resource having only wool to trade for everything else
Khanate of the Golden Horde
Stolen
HRE sounds kino and soulful
which fiefdom?
I would choose Bavaria or Tyrol
Siena, to BTFO faithless Fl*rentine dogs
Serenissima Res Publica Venetiarum
any other opinion is trash
A better question is not location but what class you are born into
The best place to be in the lower classes would probably be England and Scotland in the late middle ages because there was more freedom and economic development.
As a noble you'd be well of pretty much anywhere but have to deal with wars more
The middle/merchant classes didn't really really develop once again until the late middle ages, they'd probably have it best in England, France, the Baltic region and Italy.
So assuming the question asks me as if I was a regular person, than probably England - you had the best chance of actually owning your own land or moving into the industrial or merchant class, which contributed to Englabd industrializing first.
Castile. Good weather, good food, more rights if I born peasant, cute architecture and uprising continental and oceanic power.
Byzantium on the eastern front so I die quick
>cute architecture
why do you talk like a woman
Castile, Galicia. Its safe
Norwegian Iceland
Why is no one saying mamluk?
I'd just convert to islam and become a rich as frick merchant
Because most of the merchants there were Egyptian
*Were Italian
I said Egypt, patrician choice.
Bedouin tribes
Assuming it's in 1328 like this map, somewhere in Italy. Nice weather, and I'd get to experience the Trecento.
Border lands between Russia and the Golden Horde, drop me in with a horse too while you're at it.
England and it's not even close anywhere else. Why? Because of the rights. I would love to be an English serf. I can save money, my family is bound to the land and the lord. I can potentially move up in society and become a free landowner. England's move toward a "middle class" of skilled tradies and merchants was big and nowhere else in Europe did lowborns have so much potential.
Poland because I'm a proud Ashkenazi israelite