Oh hero, yeah, I don't have those things. I hate idolizing people, I don't even do that with my father. I hate it, I'm ok with him, but he was a person made of flesh and bones.
His work is some of the most important so far in the 21st century, I owe him a lot in terms of understanding my trauma and myself better and him offering ways to deal with, his work pertaining to addiction is nothing short of noble.
>Assumes feminism = womanhood >So a woman critizing feminism is self-hating b***h
homie cant tell the difference between gender political movement and gender itself.
She doesn't like or embrace womanhood, she just hates women and wishes she was a man.
Her entire ideology is built around contrarian negation of anything that was (during her younger years) popular among women.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Paglia
Not really though, and anyway the very fact she was never a victimizing and man-hating feminist is one of the reasons why she's so great
t. gay dude
11 months ago
Anonymous
No, instead she was a spiteful contrarian that all but turned women into the real victimizers and who believed that anything 'pro-woman' was actually anti-woman within her erratic and inconsistent concept of what role and value women actually had to society.
Her entire Apollonian vs Dionysian obsession essentially devalues women to nothing but dick cleaners should the reader have any interest in material advancement of society. This while still pretending that yeah, women totally have value and females like her shouldn't be turned into frick toys by the powerful masculine male world.
She is neurotic about the role of women in society and demands that they bend over backwards not to step on any toes, while also accusing them of having an overly sanctimonious mono-culture that fears actually hurting anyone one's feelings.
She prattles the "ticky tacky houses" thing of everyone that isn't her being a massive square who is just like everyone else, and blames modern society and feminism and yadda yadda for this. This despite drawing on a long list of basically identical contrarian sources that say 90% of the same stuff as her. If she hadn't read Nietzsche she'd just be a clone of Phyllis Schlafly.
The only thing separating her from being a proto-RETVRN TO TRADITION type, is her aggressive horniness and obsession with sex being pushed to the forefront of all society and politics.
A sex she doesn't actually ever interface with, being a transsexual lesbo who hasn't gotten fricked by a man or a woman since the 60s.
Of course a gay dude likes Paglia. She tells you everything you wanted to hear about women.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Stop being so butthurt about her and just admit she's great
11 months ago
Anonymous
What greatness is there to admit to?
11 months ago
Anonymous
No, instead she was a spiteful contrarian that all but turned women into the real victimizers and who believed that anything 'pro-woman' was actually anti-woman within her erratic and inconsistent concept of what role and value women actually had to society.
Her entire Apollonian vs Dionysian obsession essentially devalues women to nothing but dick cleaners should the reader have any interest in material advancement of society. This while still pretending that yeah, women totally have value and females like her shouldn't be turned into frick toys by the powerful masculine male world.
She is neurotic about the role of women in society and demands that they bend over backwards not to step on any toes, while also accusing them of having an overly sanctimonious mono-culture that fears actually hurting anyone one's feelings.
She prattles the "ticky tacky houses" thing of everyone that isn't her being a massive square who is just like everyone else, and blames modern society and feminism and yadda yadda for this. This despite drawing on a long list of basically identical contrarian sources that say 90% of the same stuff as her. If she hadn't read Nietzsche she'd just be a clone of Phyllis Schlafly.
The only thing separating her from being a proto-RETVRN TO TRADITION type, is her aggressive horniness and obsession with sex being pushed to the forefront of all society and politics.
A sex she doesn't actually ever interface with, being a transsexual lesbo who hasn't gotten fricked by a man or a woman since the 60s.
Of course a gay dude likes Paglia. She tells you everything you wanted to hear about women.
You're both homosexuals for knowing who she is
11 months ago
Anonymous
Being gay is the most IQfy sexuality.
Heterosexuality cannot be interesting from a literary perspective.
How the frick can you "not understand" Zizek while liking John Vervaeke. John Vervaeke is literally "THE COLLECTIVE CONSCIOUSNESS IS METASTASIZING INTO AN EGREGORE OF DISCOMBOBULABLE RELEVANCE REALIZATIONS"
Vervaeke is like the "it's just word salad" criticism that gets leveled against Peterson but like 20x worse.
His work is some of the most important so far in the 21st century, I owe him a lot in terms of understanding my trauma and myself better and him offering ways to deal with, his work pertaining to addiction is nothing short of noble.
That French guy with glasses with the quotes about how reality is fascist and describing his masturbation in terms suitable for a holy revelation. His works haven't been translated and I haven't read them.
Modern fascists embrace chauvinistic and patriotic (deriving from pater; neurosis relating to father figure or lack thereof) values in order to hide their natural tendency towards transgender behaviors and their inherent femininity.
He wrote a lot of stuff, the things that I somewhat got in touch were his replica to Rorty on the role of philosophy on the contemporary world and his affirmation of universals.
>Modern fascists embrace chauvinistic and patriotic values
They are already over that, currently they are cheering for checheyans raping white Christian women to own the libs
That’s just what fascists are. That’s what distinguishes them from regular authoritarians
>Modern fascists embrace chauvinistic and patriotic values
They are already over that, currently they are cheering for checheyans raping white Christian women to own the libs
Lol, no. How are they confused? Ukraine are the fascists.
Why would a fascist give a shit about white christians?
They’re white supremacists and want their breeding stock to themselves.
Modern fascists embrace chauvinistic and patriotic (deriving from pater; neurosis relating to father figure or lack thereof) values in order to hide their natural tendency towards transgender behaviors and their inherent femininity.
So many frauds named in this thread.
"Intellectuals" became uneducated, corrupt, and cowardly. This has been the case since at least the 1950's or so. There are no longer genuine intellectuals like T.S. Eliot, Nietzsche, Ortega y Gasset, Remy de Gourmont, Wyndham Lewis, Fernando Pessoa, Borges, Schopenhauer, Leopardi, etc. Men who were highly intelligent, perceptive, had something to say and said it clearly, regardless of what form they chose.
All we have now are "intralexuals" writing "theory" B.S., and the few who remain clear and understandable are usually nothing but moralist preachers of the Anglo/Anglicized type like Chomsky and Peterson -- all the first can do is point out one or two things, often wrongly, about this or that paragraph in Kant, while the later can do nothing but ask us to think what would obviously be thought by someone who follows their worldview.
The closest we get to an intellectual are scientists and mathematicians like Roger Penrose and Nassim Taleb, but their scope is limited to technical matters, and whenever they step outside of those matters they become clueless.
If you want me to choose a living intellectual hero, I choose ChatGPT, because it's better than all of the current idiots, and probably more alive too, judging by how old, fat, or sickly people like Zizek, Peterson, Habermas, Weinstein and Chomsky are.
Why did I do it? Because I was sick of all the bullshit i did in my degree and wanted to do something out of left field. Why do I regret it? Because i learned nothing, gained nothing. Lacanian psychoanalysis has not been applicable to anything so far
I can't think of anyone tbh. Tate is a
violent thug also a moron, Musk with all his trillions has turned into a israelite he is also moronic in a different way than Tate, Peterson was ok at first, but after his drug problem he became weak low energy beta cuck. There really isn't anyone.
>living
No idea, I honestly think it is Habermas. Especially considering that he somewhat "pushed" Rorty forward.
Oh hero, yeah, I don't have those things. I hate idolizing people, I don't even do that with my father. I hate it, I'm ok with him, but he was a person made of flesh and bones.
I'm grateful and such things. Does that work?
Peterson, Jordan
thread
Wash your penis!
Is this real?
Might as well be
does anyone have a link to the video where he rants similarly to this? he says "you children of gaia" and so on.
pop culture critics, not intellectuals
he's the literary equivalent of andrew tate
Andrew Tate
Mine died. It is me alone now.
my intellectual heroes live on in the astral plane
Elon Musk
BAP
David Lynch
The self-explication of infinite Absolute Spirit as communicated through the finite writings of George Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (PBUH)
What the hell are you two doing here?
I thought I was all by myself.
Why does he look so sad?
Because he noticed that you're *sniff* full of ideology.
Paglia is the only option for women
Paglia is a moronic self-hating b***h.
Go back to redscarepod
>Assumes feminism = womanhood
>So a woman critizing feminism is self-hating b***h
homie cant tell the difference between gender political movement and gender itself.
She doesn't like or embrace womanhood, she just hates women and wishes she was a man.
Her entire ideology is built around contrarian negation of anything that was (during her younger years) popular among women.
Paglia
Not really though, and anyway the very fact she was never a victimizing and man-hating feminist is one of the reasons why she's so great
t. gay dude
No, instead she was a spiteful contrarian that all but turned women into the real victimizers and who believed that anything 'pro-woman' was actually anti-woman within her erratic and inconsistent concept of what role and value women actually had to society.
Her entire Apollonian vs Dionysian obsession essentially devalues women to nothing but dick cleaners should the reader have any interest in material advancement of society. This while still pretending that yeah, women totally have value and females like her shouldn't be turned into frick toys by the powerful masculine male world.
She is neurotic about the role of women in society and demands that they bend over backwards not to step on any toes, while also accusing them of having an overly sanctimonious mono-culture that fears actually hurting anyone one's feelings.
She prattles the "ticky tacky houses" thing of everyone that isn't her being a massive square who is just like everyone else, and blames modern society and feminism and yadda yadda for this. This despite drawing on a long list of basically identical contrarian sources that say 90% of the same stuff as her. If she hadn't read Nietzsche she'd just be a clone of Phyllis Schlafly.
The only thing separating her from being a proto-RETVRN TO TRADITION type, is her aggressive horniness and obsession with sex being pushed to the forefront of all society and politics.
A sex she doesn't actually ever interface with, being a transsexual lesbo who hasn't gotten fricked by a man or a woman since the 60s.
Of course a gay dude likes Paglia. She tells you everything you wanted to hear about women.
Stop being so butthurt about her and just admit she's great
What greatness is there to admit to?
You're both homosexuals for knowing who she is
Being gay is the most IQfy sexuality.
Heterosexuality cannot be interesting from a literary perspective.
noam chompsky for the next year
Still Peterson. What else is there? Vervaeke is ok too. Never listened to Zizek enough to understand what he is going on about.
Why do you like Peterson
How the frick can you "not understand" Zizek while liking John Vervaeke. John Vervaeke is literally "THE COLLECTIVE CONSCIOUSNESS IS METASTASIZING INTO AN EGREGORE OF DISCOMBOBULABLE RELEVANCE REALIZATIONS"
Vervaeke is like the "it's just word salad" criticism that gets leveled against Peterson but like 20x worse.
The last few years sorted the real ones from the phonies and this guy pretty well showed himself a phony.
Chat GPT
If your intellectual heroes are still alive you are 110% ngmi
Mines probably gonna die soon
This frickin guy.
I bet he's into stuff like fistfricking and anal prolapse.
Well he is Gay.
Only a minority of gays actually like those two things though
I don't know if I should be proud or angry at being called a 'Minority'.
soon-to-be sneed
ChudGOD Carmack
What kind of question is that? Nassim Nicolas Taleb (Zeus be with Him) of course
This guy. The man I learned the most from as far as mere reading is concerned
satoshi nakamoto
His work is some of the most important so far in the 21st century, I owe him a lot in terms of understanding my trauma and myself better and him offering ways to deal with, his work pertaining to addiction is nothing short of noble.
Ummmmm bros. Is anyone gonna tell him.
Under appropriated around here because he hits too hard. Anons are usually too cowardly for him.
College girl "live love laugh" tier self help
>muh trauma
Collin Cleary
Agamben
Myself
Churchland
What, are you pure ideology?
Wendell Berry.
Giorgio Agamben I guess. Don’t really have “heroes.”
That French guy with glasses with the quotes about how reality is fascist and describing his masturbation in terms suitable for a holy revelation. His works haven't been translated and I haven't read them.
intellectuals aren't heroes. fascists are heroes. suck a dick, OP - and don't misinterpret what i said as advocating fascism. fricking brainlets
Modern fascists embrace chauvinistic and patriotic (deriving from pater; neurosis relating to father figure or lack thereof) values in order to hide their natural tendency towards transgender behaviors and their inherent femininity.
>leftists try to not pathologize their opponent challenge: impossible
Same on Agamben and heroes. I try to form my own worldview independently of any figure
What’s Habermas’ deal anyways?
>What’s Habermas’ deal anyways?
A living dinosaur.
He wrote a lot of stuff, the things that I somewhat got in touch were his replica to Rorty on the role of philosophy on the contemporary world and his affirmation of universals.
>Modern fascists embrace chauvinistic and patriotic values
They are already over that, currently they are cheering for checheyans raping white Christian women to own the libs
Why would a fascist give a shit about white christians?
That’s just what fascists are. That’s what distinguishes them from regular authoritarians
Lol, no. How are they confused? Ukraine are the fascists.
They’re white supremacists and want their breeding stock to themselves.
U mad!!
Probably Jeffrey Sachs
The Speed King, the Intelligence Accelerator, the Bataille Impersonator
Guenongay
Chuck
Was Calasso, but now it's Sloterdijk
I hope it's spelled slaughterdick or I 've made a grave error
Jason Reza Jorjani for me but I also enjoyed some of Zizek's interviews
So many frauds named in this thread.
"Intellectuals" became uneducated, corrupt, and cowardly. This has been the case since at least the 1950's or so. There are no longer genuine intellectuals like T.S. Eliot, Nietzsche, Ortega y Gasset, Remy de Gourmont, Wyndham Lewis, Fernando Pessoa, Borges, Schopenhauer, Leopardi, etc. Men who were highly intelligent, perceptive, had something to say and said it clearly, regardless of what form they chose.
All we have now are "intralexuals" writing "theory" B.S., and the few who remain clear and understandable are usually nothing but moralist preachers of the Anglo/Anglicized type like Chomsky and Peterson -- all the first can do is point out one or two things, often wrongly, about this or that paragraph in Kant, while the later can do nothing but ask us to think what would obviously be thought by someone who follows their worldview.
The closest we get to an intellectual are scientists and mathematicians like Roger Penrose and Nassim Taleb, but their scope is limited to technical matters, and whenever they step outside of those matters they become clueless.
If you want me to choose a living intellectual hero, I choose ChatGPT, because it's better than all of the current idiots, and probably more alive too, judging by how old, fat, or sickly people like Zizek, Peterson, Habermas, Weinstein and Chomsky are.
>jew
Really so cringe and “blue pilled” to keep this up
>this moronic anon denies the influence and role of israelites upon contemporary history
Influence is not what is being inferred by the average schizo-anitsemite
>Le says nothing (but wish a lisp!) man
Not really intellectual but its the 3 octogenarians:
Ron Paul
Wendell Berry
Pat Buchanan
I tried listening to Zizek but I cant get past his lisp. Its rapes my delicate ears
I have no respect for any man that doesn't reply "Myself" to that question.
NGMI.
A lot less conservative now than I used to be but I still have so much respect for this man
Would've posted Ray but he is sadly dead
is this carriere? Her technology book is great but she's no Vioulac imo
Unironically think she has interesting things to say but shitposts too much.
Surely this Mega NEET is a hero for many here. As is his pseudo-intellectual mentor.
>the most popular leftist thinker is a cynical defeatist who believes everything leftists do is futile
Bravo
Defeatism is the opposite of accelerationism, moron.
Thomas Ligotti.
>waaah I'm resentful at existence itself but too pussy to an hero.
I wrote my undergrad thesis (political theory) on the sublime object. I regret it profoundly
Why
Why did I do it? Because I was sick of all the bullshit i did in my degree and wanted to do something out of left field. Why do I regret it? Because i learned nothing, gained nothing. Lacanian psychoanalysis has not been applicable to anything so far
I can't think of anyone tbh. Tate is a
violent thug also a moron, Musk with all his trillions has turned into a israelite he is also moronic in a different way than Tate, Peterson was ok at first, but after his drug problem he became weak low energy beta cuck. There really isn't anyone.