Who was their Leonardo DaVinci?
Their Homer?
Their Phidias?
Their Cicero?
Their Galen?
For all that land they conquered, all they did.
They didn't leave anything.
No ruins.
No anything.
Worthless nomads.
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Kek.
Even the famous "secret history of the mongols" was written first in chinese, later translated to mongolian.
>While the Secret History was preserved in part as the basis for a number of chronicles such as the Jami' al-tawarikh, Shengwu qinzheng lu, and Altan Tobchi, the full Mongolian body only survived from a version made around the 1400s at the start of the Ming dynasty, where the pronunciation was transcribed into Chinese characters as a tool to help interpreters[1] under the title The Secret History of the Yuan Dynasty (Chinese: 元朝秘史; pinyin: Yuáncháo Mìshǐ). >About two-thirds of the Secret History also appear in slightly different versions in the 17th-century Mongolian chronicle Altan Tobchi (lit.'Golden Chronicle') by Lubsang-Danzin.
The Chinese will argue that Mongols were harbingers of high culture and civilization to cope with the fact they were enslaved and raped by them.
Maybe Chinks are right, it probably did marginally improve Chinese civilization which was too weak to fend off a few Steppe barbarians.
Don't forget their "capital" was a bunch of tiny steppe huts together and a lonely temple.
And that's the only thing that they really contributed to civilization, everything else is stolen cities from other civs.
Wow, such a mighty empire lol.
I blame mapgays for overrating the mongols, because "but just look at their big territory, bigger than any other empire, even though they did nothing with it".
It's also only impressive when looked frozen in time.
Because the empire instantly collapsed like 2 generations after gengis, lol.
>Who was their Leonardo DaVinci?
>Their Homer?
>Their Phidias?
>Their Cicero?
>Their Galen?
Something tells me you think all these people were "yours", which is funny
If OP is White, then yes, they are.
Then I guess the Mongols can list all famous Chinese people on account of them being Yellow as well.
If that what they want nobody is stopping them to do so.
>nobody is stopping them to do so
I meant it as an answer to the OP.
Sincerely hope this is a troll post.
It collapsed largely because both of the khans who followed Genghis (both of whom were very good rulers, by the way) died unexpectedly young and it nearly ignited a civil war the first time and then fully did so the second.
Straight into my cringe comilation.
That explains why they have like 1million Ghengis Khan statues in modern mongolia.
They don't have anyone else to worship.
Lmao.
>Leonardo DaVinci?
>Their Homer?
>Their Phidias?
>Their Cicero?
>Their Galen?
All overrated.
To be fair they did kill tens of millions of people in some of the most advanced and successful societies in that era, plunging them into a cultural dark age from which they never managed to recover or are only just now recovering from. That counts for... something. They left behind a mountain of corpses and series of broken systems.
>some of the most advanced and successful societies
Or maybe they just weren't as "advanced and successful" as revisionists claim them to be.
Every actual advanced civilization defeated the Mongols.
Until gunpowder era settled civilizations were on the backfoot against horse archer nomads. The more you advance the worse your military power. Until gunpowder.
Dribble.
We don't even have mongol art from the era.
All of it is chinese or persian.
Dosen't surprise me.
At the end of the day they really were just nomads trying to play the civilization game.
Sad thread. No one's asking the real questions
Which are?
>Mongols never even called themselves Mongols, that's a foreign nomenclature
>They reconquered the old Scythian lands, only pushing into Han China as the sole unpreviously conquered land but the Han Chinese used to be enemies of the Saka, hence the building of the great wall.
That is a nice and real question.
yes, they didn't even leave us gold in the mounds, as the Aryan tribes did.
after the death of the last descendants of the Nordic culture of the Andronovo – Sarmatian tribe of the Roxolani, on the Eurasian steppe, only degenerative and dysgenic Mongoloid goblins remained.
sad but true.
why did none of the mongoloid nomads build mounds?
That's all the more reason to shrekt the intellectual nations
Barbarian horse nomads will always have a place in history as the tide which cleanses the frail civilizations of the world with their decadent institutions and oppressive social hierarchies in the fires of destruction. They don’t need to build things. That’s not what they do. That doesn’t mean they don’t have value