Why are men so attracted to war? Serious discussion only (no fake and gayass “psychological” “sociological” bullshit)
Why are men so attracted to war?
Why are men so attracted to war? Serious discussion only (no fake and gayass “psychological” “sociological” bullshit)
Because it's fun. You never played team based games as a child? War is just an extension of that.
War is fun
>Get to fight
Men like fighting
>Only bros and bawds “camp followers” no nagging girlfriends or wives
Pretty chill
>Physically active work
Men prefer physical activity
>VGH
Because they've never march 30km in combat gear and your 2ic forgot to report supply order.
>you may not give real answers
why?
Men are developed to fight.
men have literally dont this throughout all history.
It helps to erase the existential void that all men are born with.
It makes you feel important and useful. And you get paid to do it.
the men who didnt like or sucked at war got conquered and outbred by war enjoyers
this, plus it's a natural extension of the same instincts we used to fight off dangerous wild animals in prehistory. If you kill a sabre-tooth tiger who was threatening your tribe, everyone would celebrate you as a hero and you'd feel no guilt.
Yes. Please go off to war so I can have sex with your wife and female family members.
>incel thinks he'll have sex once the competition is busy
lol
>once the competition is dead
Ftfy
>dikke
lmfao
whats the joke?
Because we believe in things, to an extent women are incapable of comprehending, we value said beliefs not on ourselves or whatever we are, but in how much blood we're willing to pour on those things. That is why women dying in war or being murdered is so sad. For women value is not determined by their merits but by virtue of their mere existence, hence they make stupid decisions thinking others value their lives more than things like religion, dignity, nation, ideology or pride
This man has never been in a real fight in his life (and also never had sex).
What a fricking stupid argument, women don't fight because they're physically weaker than men and would get their shit pushed in 99/100 times
Try stealing a baby from it's mother - you will see levels of commitment you would not believe, you noodle armed virgin.
Because to the average person, from afar, combat is a glorious thing and to an extent it is, but it's not glorious for combats sake, it's glorious because you're potentially giving up your life for your someone else's. Most people have never experienced battle, let alone a street fight and get this mixed up.
Not reading the rest of this shitty bot spam thread, but this anon gets it. War is more than personal glory, masculinity is defined by fighting for things greater than oneself.
>bara on the 'og
>Why does 8 + 2 = 10?
>Serious discussion only (no fake and gayass “mathematical” bullshit)
destroying worthless things is enjoyable
Men want to rape and slaughter, they want to ride a horse and mow through people, they want to club a dragon to death or ram a spear through its heart.
Rape is fun
Is that Sargent Hatred?
Men naturally like rough play and group competition our rulers cooped this desire for cooperative competition and rough play to make us more willing to be artillery sponges for them.
im not gay bros…
Rulers are attracted to war, most soldiers go insane in a war and come back broken and suicidal.
That's not true at all. Medieval history is littered with stories of families who's fortunes changed in a single day when a peasant levy chopped the right head off in front of the right lord in combat and got promoted to nobility. In other cases normal soldiers got set for life just by being able to loot a battlefield and pick up some expensive swords/armour.
The modernisation of war in the nationalist era changed this. I think we can all agree that old cowardly men sending 18 year olds to soak up mortar fire is not natural and has been a disaster for the genetic health of Europe.
males of all species are hardwired for violence due to evolutionary reasons.
I hate war
It's not that men are attracted to war but that certain kinds of men (the type that are able to physically develop more than others and/or lead certain kinds of young men with certain physically attributed) see it as a way to gain power for themselves. They usually grow up being able to physically overpower others, but they're perhaps disenfranchised from society for whatever reason and see a way to better themselves through conquest. It just happens every now and then that they see an opportunity and take it, and of course it's always men since women never develop the bodies for it.
Not wrong but also incredibly narrow. See
Narratives like
are just moronic shit to justify war, or to trick others into fighting a war for them.
>points to an even narrower wargay
Nobody actually likes war once they're in the middle of it. What men like are guns, tanks, planes, and explosions, not war itself where you have to shoot people down and your life is under constant threat. You're either lying or a sociopath if you think otherwise
See
I don't know the biology of it. I'd say men actually like beating the opposition more than war per se. Physical violence is a strange experience like sex.
I guess if you want to go really deep, I think one thing that separates us from bonobos is the prohibition on and disgust toward incest, which sits roughly at the line of first cousin. That possibly makes it necessary to conquer women.
Based purely on physical scrapping and playing STALKER: GAMMA on one life ironman, I would guess that it's captivating.
Glorification of war is important to national defense, always has been. The government will stealth fund anything that promotes it. This is why a nipple causes outrage whereas blood, guys and violence do not.
In a crisis you want kids to be able to understand what a soldier/officer is and that they will probably be safe trusing one, hence good guys with guns who shoot bad guys who die without bleeding or shitting themselves.
You don't want kids exposed to hardcore sex before they are able to naturally discover sexuality and lose their innocence on their own terms with their partner.
That's in an ideal society, we no longer live in such a society and for that reason I agree with you that it's probably better to let kids see at least natural sex before they are told bt indoctronated pedos that they should change their gender.
the simplest answer is that war (before gay shit like artillery, drones etc.) was fun
>training and fighting with the boys
>your king says the people you're fighting are all savage godless bastards who probably eat babies
>based they deserve it
>get to rape and pillage to your heart's content
>the simplest answer is that war (before gay shit like artillery, drones etc.) was fun
getting your limbs chopped off and bleeding out in a field was not fun, just like today, back then, war was only fun if you were the winning side. If war was inherently fun we'd be waging it way more often
>war was only fun if you were the winning side.
My ancestors were always on the winning side, that's why I love war. Your amcestors were on the losing side, that's why your genetic memory fixates on the downsides.
My direct ancestors, more than one of them in fact, were knighted for their service to the king. Being scared of war has nothing to do with genetics, its called being sensible. You'd be the first to die in real warfare, you'd head striaght first into a firing line
>fallacious logic
back to school, zoomer
>Zoomer Tradgay unironically believe this shit
Men want to fight for something greater than themselves, war has always sucked but being a soldier has become exponentially worse throughout the last 100 years.
How anyone would want to dig a ditch in the cold and die to a drone strike for some oligarch or globohomosexual democracy is beyond me.
They don't, that's why the state mobilizes people and kidnaps men from the street.
Because men like violence because they think it's cool, it's not hard to understand.
It's the same reason why dudes want to become cops because they think they'll get into to shootouts
>It's another episode of morons who never been in the military or understand who combat works talking about war
>It's another episode of a peace time """veteran""" who drove a convoy truck tryint to act authoritative
Nothing more annoying than you poofters.
I don't think you have to be in the military to have a understanding of how warfare works but it's fairly obvious when overly romantically morons like you start seething about shit.
because it looks fricking cool
because men like being powerful, just like how women like to be beautiful
you ask for no psychological bullshit, but how else should we explain it? war is the ultimate manifestation of manliness pushed to its tolerable limits.
Men are the strong sex, because over their evolutionary history men have sought power, because life is all about pussy, and pussy wants provision and protection, and in order to get pussy, you must have power, in whatever way it manifests. Most often, by nature, it's with physical strength, by way of violence. You will need strength when ressources are scarce, you must compete for them whether it is to keep from others or take from others, this is war. War was not always on the massive scale we know, animals make war too. War is competition between groups of men who are allied with each other either by blood, self-interest or credo. War is just the most extreme expression of competition for ressources. You must have heard of "war" being used even outside of a violent and physical context. And because competition for ressources is the purpose and matter of men, and it is written in their biology, it inevitably attracts them.
Real warfare is horrible though. There is not a single warrior except the deranged who believes that war is cool after seeing guts fall out and limbs fly off. Yet conflict still attracts us because it is a reality that we are intrinsically conditionned for. Look at video games, most of them are about violence. Those types of games attract mostly men because they are about territorial control. There are studies on this.
>Real warfare is horrible though. There is not a single warrior except the deranged who believes that war is cool after seeing guts fall out and limbs fly off.
Not true, many stable and honourable men say otherwise. It's just that a lot of pussies who should have been farmers started being conscripted since warfare was industrialised, but even then there are normal brave men who enjoyed storming trenches in WW1.
If men like war why is conscription a thing?
Checkmate
non sequitarded
men don't like actual war
>world runs on violence and money
>violence is the ultimate power
>hmm, why do men want to be powerful?
So they can live good decent lives by their own rules and not have to take it from boot lickers like you. There is glory in violence as it transcends oppression from the opposers of which there are many.
women are gayer and less real so they like to think violence isn't the rule but rather the biproduct of men.
True. In our life time we will see a return to a warlord era like we've seen in history countless times before when malcontent with disconnected bureaucrats and rulers is combined with distate for funding strong militaries and a hesitance for citizens to enlist to fight for institutions that hate them.
Just another sin men have to struggle to overcome within themselves.
People are obsessed with the things they fear the most, and to most men their monkey brains are telling them that their most likely way of dying since they no longer have to deal with starvation and disease is getting stabbed to death in a brutal conflict. Thus they obsess over it to try and gain some sort of edge, special information, or prior experience in case they actually get thrown into the meat grinder. Of course ever since WW2, it is now impossible for a single soldier to have any sort of impact on the battlefield, and their lives are decided by decisions made long before they try to save themselves, so most cope by romanticizing what they know is a complete bad end best avoided through sheer luck and events they cannot control.
>Why are men so attracted to war?
it's cool
t. veteran
It probably has something to do with why males, no matter the age, when walking in the woods, can find a nice looking stick, pick it up and shamelessly, eagerly hold it like a spear, sword or gun. There is some level of instinctual preparation for conflict.