Same reason all famous people who create things or take actions of importance are relatively ugly. Tall and beautiful people have nothing to strive for to compensate for their easy life. So they just don't become anything except have sex a lot. It's a sad life, they are reduced to objects. The world objectifies them so they stop trying to be human. They're on par with furniture. Whereas ugly people are the opposite, they're less than even objects, they're non-objects. We like beautiful objects, they're less than even that. And ironically, that pushes them to try to be more than even the objects. And so they become fully human subjects. Whether they become poets, philosophers, scientists, mathematicians, artists, sculptors, musicians, novelists, architects, etc etc, or dictators, etc, it's still the same explanation.
I think you guys don't understand basic probability theory.
Let's suppose that a man have 10% chance of becoming tall, 10% chance of being born handsome, 10% chance of being born smart and 10% chance of becoming ambitious/strong-willed person.
That would mean that he has 1% chance of becoming a great man and 0.01% of becoming tall handsome great man.
As this guy said, having an easy and happy and fulfilling life gives you zero incentive to change things on a massive scale. Men who are not 6ft tall are treated as lesser and that motivates them to alter the world.
they're not. even the cherry picked examples are generally dumb because they ignore the context of the time/place they were living in.
>Hitler
above average for German men of his generation >Stalin
average for his time >Mao
tall even by current Chinese standards >Mussolini
average for his time >Misc pot
above average by current Cambodian standards >Kim jong-il and un
born into power so their height isn't too relevant, il-sung was above average >Saddam Hussein
tall >Mugabe
above average even by current Zimbabwe standards >Marcos above average even by current Philippines standards >Castro
tall >Putin
about average for russian men of his generation >Pinochet
above average for Chilean men of his generation >Franco
finally one example
>about average for russian men of his generation
definitely not true lol
if you wanted a modern example at least use Xi, Putin is a fricking midget by any criteria
>Charles Manson
He was literally just a hobo petty criminal with charisma enough to frick hippie girls. Why is he standing next to Mussolini and Napoleon?
>Napo >he was probably of average height. According to pre–metric system French measures, he was a diminutive 5′2.” But the French inch (pouce) of the time was 2.7 cm, while the Imperial inch was shorter, at 2.54 cm. Three French sources—his valet Constant, General Gourgaud, and his personal physician Francesco Antommarchi—said that Napoleon's height was just over ‘5 pieds 2 pouces’ (5’2”). Applying the French measurements of the time, that equals around 1.69 meters, or just over 5’5”. So at 5’5” he was just an inch or so below the period’s average adult male height.
correlation does not equate causation in this game
tyrannies tend to be third world shitholes, and thirdies tend to be manlets
just look at the picture you posted not a single white in the entire thing
its not like these tyrants are statistically significantly shorter than their average population
Not all are that short for example:
Mike Bannon is 5’9”
General Mike Flynn is 5’11”
Xi Jinping is 5’11”
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is 5’11”
Jair Bolsonaro is 6’1”
Donald Trump is 6’3”
Gregg Abbott is 4’
Because everything is highschool forever so people just make up petty shit about historical figures to use as ammunition elsewhere until we lie ourselves into wars and regime changes. The sub human tendency of "the masses".
short means aggressive, and tall means very calm and friendly, nature
That's not a Great Dane, that's an Irish Wolfhound.
5'6 is 170 cm, I wouldn't say that qualifies as short, not even today
Tom Cruise's hands typed this post.
Normal height in most of the world
manlet syndrome
>Ho Chi Minh, Benito Mussolini, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
All not bad people.
Ho Chi Minh was a seething manlet that helped found the communist party of france
Napoleon was of around average height for a man of his era.
willing to bet the Mussolini was average for an italian in the 1930's
>willing to bet the Mussolini was average for an italian in the 1930's
He was taller than their dwarf of a king, but still a manlet.
Besides, wasn't the King of Italy at the time pretty inbred? Products of incest are more likely to have stunted growth.
Vittorio Emanuele was ethnically french and german. He didn't have any Italian blood
>wtf is this list
>proceed to look up what newsmax is
>oh...
Short people are smarter as neurons take less time to transmit signals across the bony.
>Height of incels who started WW2
Hitler: 5’9
Stalin: 5’5
Mussolini: 5’7
Churchill: 5’6
>Height of chads who wanted to stay neutral
Roosevelt: 6’2
Chamberlain: 6’2
Was manlet syndrome responsible for WW2?
>Churchill
>started WW2
Chamberlain declared war, Churchill inherited it from him
No, many goy elite include Churchill encourage him.
Ok, but Churchill wasn't prime minister in 1939
Hyphenated-british winston-ginger's mother was a hamerican sow named ((jenny jocobsen)). Her father was a wall$treet magnate.
>how we can roast the German refugees on their escape from Breslau
Holy based
>refugees
Good luck on your caring for rapist, Britain
>Stalin: 5’5
Koba-khan was only 5'3"... Mongolenin was reportedly even shorter...
The stock market crash of 1929 caused the Goodgoy War ((as it is known in the west)) / Great Judeocratic War ((as it is known in the east)).
The "Roaring Twenties" led to the crash.
Unbridled capitalism (fueled by WWI booty) led to the economic "boom" of the Roaring Twenties.
do you have moar rare kobas
i thought they always airbrushed his face
Roosevelt was a spiritual manlet due to his wheelchair polio, and he was pro-war as hell
But based Lindbergh was tall
>Refuses all attempts at peace, and thus destroys British empire, in your path
Same reason all famous people who create things or take actions of importance are relatively ugly. Tall and beautiful people have nothing to strive for to compensate for their easy life. So they just don't become anything except have sex a lot. It's a sad life, they are reduced to objects. The world objectifies them so they stop trying to be human. They're on par with furniture. Whereas ugly people are the opposite, they're less than even objects, they're non-objects. We like beautiful objects, they're less than even that. And ironically, that pushes them to try to be more than even the objects. And so they become fully human subjects. Whether they become poets, philosophers, scientists, mathematicians, artists, sculptors, musicians, novelists, architects, etc etc, or dictators, etc, it's still the same explanation.
I think you guys don't understand basic probability theory.
Let's suppose that a man have 10% chance of becoming tall, 10% chance of being born handsome, 10% chance of being born smart and 10% chance of becoming ambitious/strong-willed person.
That would mean that he has 1% chance of becoming a great man and 0.01% of becoming tall handsome great man.
As this guy said, having an easy and happy and fulfilling life gives you zero incentive to change things on a massive scale. Men who are not 6ft tall are treated as lesser and that motivates them to alter the world.
>Manson
>5'6
Did Chuck make this himself?
they're not. even the cherry picked examples are generally dumb because they ignore the context of the time/place they were living in.
>Hitler
above average for German men of his generation
>Stalin
average for his time
>Mao
tall even by current Chinese standards
>Mussolini
average for his time
>Misc pot
above average by current Cambodian standards
>Kim jong-il and un
born into power so their height isn't too relevant, il-sung was above average
>Saddam Hussein
tall
>Mugabe
above average even by current Zimbabwe standards
>Marcos above average even by current Philippines standards
>Castro
tall
>Putin
about average for russian men of his generation
>Pinochet
above average for Chilean men of his generation
>Franco
finally one example
so it's a dumb meme
>about average for russian men of his generation
definitely not true lol
if you wanted a modern example at least use Xi, Putin is a fricking midget by any criteria
>about average for russian men of his generation
He's the same height as Merkel who's 165 cm. How does he get away with it?
>AvErAgE fOr ThE tImE!!!!111
I bet their wives also told them that it was 'exactly big enough for me, I don't even like the larger ones' too.
Also Fidel Castro is an absolute unit. Or was anyway. He once pushed my dad out of the way because he had to take a shit and my dad was in the way.
>average for the time
>average by current standards
lmao
>about average for russian men of his generation
>Charles Manson
He was literally just a hobo petty criminal with charisma enough to frick hippie girls. Why is he standing next to Mussolini and Napoleon?
Mao is 180cm
Xi is 185cm
>Napo
>he was probably of average height. According to pre–metric system French measures, he was a diminutive 5′2.” But the French inch (pouce) of the time was 2.7 cm, while the Imperial inch was shorter, at 2.54 cm. Three French sources—his valet Constant, General Gourgaud, and his personal physician Francesco Antommarchi—said that Napoleon's height was just over ‘5 pieds 2 pouces’ (5’2”). Applying the French measurements of the time, that equals around 1.69 meters, or just over 5’5”. So at 5’5” he was just an inch or so below the period’s average adult male height.
So he was of below average height, a midget
>all of Europe got pounded thrice by a midge
Oh, no no no no, lanklet monarchs on suicide watch
Koba-khan was 5'3".
5ft 6 is so short I wouldn't even date a girl that height in fear of the damage I might cause to any child I have with her.
5'6 is taller than average for a girl.
Bt I can't blame you I date girls 5'8 to 5'10
short men have to prove they are tough. tall men have nothing to prove. you can see this demeaner all around you.
>tall men have nothing to prove
>nothing to prove
It sounded better in your head I guess.
poor nutrition in childhood obviously
why are the real answers always the unspoken ones
correlation does not equate causation in this game
tyrannies tend to be third world shitholes, and thirdies tend to be manlets
just look at the picture you posted not a single white in the entire thing
its not like these tyrants are statistically significantly shorter than their average population
rather based people are more likely to be manlet
Dollfuss
Wallace
Petain
John Komnenos
Augustus
James I
so on so on
Uh, it would appear that height is inversely proportional to ability as head of government but that it overflows after 200
Collectivism is for the weak
Why is Hilary in this pic lmao
Even funnier is that Lori Lightfoot girl. I had to look her up, apparently she's some nig figurehead who's been mayor of Chicago since 2019.
'Ole smeagle the lesbian racist.
Look up her wife next
does she dominate her wife in bed? is that why she's a tyrant?
She's tyrannical.
get off this board Black person the only there who doesn't belong is Napoopan
>Lori Lightfoot
kek who did this?
ask a chicago cop, they'll talk your ear off about her lmao
5'6" isn't short and I will take that to my grave.
t. 5'7"
>mfw 5'7
>Missed out of the mussolini manlet rage/larp
>Still short.
They were born from an ancient gene pool belonging to a time when dark people were 5'5 and normal people were 4'10
Manlet rage
Manlet rage
Not all are that short for example:
Mike Bannon is 5’9”
General Mike Flynn is 5’11”
Xi Jinping is 5’11”
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is 5’11”
Jair Bolsonaro is 6’1”
Donald Trump is 6’3”
Gregg Abbott is 4’
Donald Trump has never been 6'3". 6'1" tops.
>lori lightfoot
I snorted
> Ho Chi Minh
> Dictator
...
any communist ruler is a dictator by definition.
the enslavement of mankind by the giraffes is still in the distant future, that's why.
Because everything is highschool forever so people just make up petty shit about historical figures to use as ammunition elsewhere until we lie ourselves into wars and regime changes. The sub human tendency of "the masses".