>constantly switch between socialists kleptocracy and generic military dictatorships for 5 decades >All of these issues are because the norime market liberal nationalist that got elected less than a decade ago!
I was told it is at least better off than Central America? is this true?
If not then are there any differences between central and south americas in culture that explain why they are sometimes split when one could mean both with the 'latin america' angle?
Do they all speak spanish or are there exceptions and if yes what are other differences in culture, where did they come from?
Lack of unity that would enable mutual protection. Look at the bigger world, you have super-states and tiny countries that are like pieces on a chess board.
Ignoring Pinoboos who think leftism is the root of all evil...
It's a mix of the legacy of colonialism and a dash foreign intervention/destabilization in the near present.
Leftists constantly whinge about the U.S. not respecting the sovereignty of other countries, and then also b***h about collaboration with regimes that they don't like. You can't have it both ways, and I won't let you pretend that you can. Somehow, when an unelected regime like Castro's or Maduro's is embargoed, Americans are "imperialists." When America respects Pinochet's Chile or Peron's Argentina as peer nations with sovereignty that can be legitimate partners in U.S. interests, the U.S. is also "imperialist." Maybe if you don't want the U.S. to "involve" itself, don't force it to make hard decisions by being unstable shitholes and then use whatever the American response is to deflect your own responsibility for your nation and the consequences of your actions.
1 year ago
Anonymous
you are arguing with indecisive moralists that will always find away to seethe over who ever has the will and power to actually take any kind of forceful action on the world stage, and will endlessly point to any mistake or blunder that takes place while ignoring any of the benefits from the actions and policies of any power.
They will be angry and frustrated regardless of what is or isn't done
1 year ago
Anonymous
>When America respects Pinochet's Chile or Peron's Argentina as peer nations with sovereignty that can be legitimate partners in U.S. interests, the U.S. is also "imperialist."
No one said this, liar. Peron was democratically elected and did not have support from America. Pinochet seized power in a coup d'état that toppled a democratically elected government in place.
Na I went there this summer to cum on Chilean feet. They're white
They're """white""""
Yeah man its been 200 years since the US involved itself in regime change in middle- and south-America!!
So explain what the "legacy of colonialism" means and why specifically it is making Latin America bad. Because this sounds about on the same level as "they were slaves 200 years ago!"
America has intervened in the politics of countries all over the world in recent history but Latin America is special?
How the frick did people in Guyana get poorer? Didn't their per capita GDP just skyrocket in the last few years because of recent discoveries of massive oil reserves?
>How the frick did people in Guyana get poorer?
You can't derive this from the map, there's no percentage given for Guyana and the colour stays the same. You may confuse it with Suriname.
4% was fake, see https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Institute_of_Statistics_and_Census_of_Argentina >Although nominally independent, under the Nestor and Cristina Kirchner presidencies INDEC was subject to strong political pressure from the government, and its statistics were not considered trustworthy.[3][4][5][6][7] Because INDEC's statistics were reported as being manipulated by the Kirchner government, it was considered "discredited".[8]
>Controversy arose when the government of President Néstor Kirchner replaced Graciela Bevacqua, the Consumer Prices Indicator director (Índice de Precios al Consumidor - IPC). Bevacqua is reported to have arrived at a consumer price increase figure of almost 2.0% for January 2007 from internal data but the rate officially reported to the public was 1.1%.[9]
Brain drain. All the people with the means to get out are leaving. A doctor in Venezuela would rather work construction in the U.S. than practice medicine in a shithole.
Meme. The number of educated professionals is rising in developed countries as the cheap labor addicted 1st world shifts towards service economies run by native workers with wetbacks and other scabs filling lore-skilled labor roles.
Incompetence and corruption.
This , but also changing definitions of poverty.
How has the definition changed you fricking moron the graph literally compares <$5.50 between two periods. You stupid motherfricker
>le incompetence xD
it's called being a dependent economy, moron
>be coombrained normie moron sexhaver
>have 10 kids you can't feed
Fertility rates aren't that high nowadays
Yeah, NOWADAYS. But nowadays all those kids are grown up
It is the exact opposite you fricking moron.
what socialism does to a mf
the pink tide was already in force in 2012 though, the continent moved right if anything in the last 10 years.
>the continent moved right if anything in the last 10 years.
Are you moronic?
You subhuman Black folk had your chance with your free market worship and you failled miserably in Chile Argentina and Brazil
>argentina
>free market
least braindead tankie
>you failled miserably in Chile and Brazil
poverty barely increased in chile and brazil
That's complete bullshit, estupido de mierda.
>constantly switch between socialists kleptocracy and generic military dictatorships for 5 decades
>All of these issues are because the norime market liberal nationalist that got elected less than a decade ago!
It's another day that ends in y, people are once again referring to a 70% privatized market economy as socialism
Monroe Doctrine.
Fell for the socialism meme.
There were riots here in Argentina because they wanted to lower welfare.
We have the welfare of a first world country and the economy of a shithole.
I was told it is at least better off than Central America? is this true?
If not then are there any differences between central and south americas in culture that explain why they are sometimes split when one could mean both with the 'latin america' angle?
Do they all speak spanish or are there exceptions and if yes what are other differences in culture, where did they come from?
Yes
No
Yes, Portuguese
>Yes, Portuguese
and German
Lack of unity that would enable mutual protection. Look at the bigger world, you have super-states and tiny countries that are like pieces on a chess board.
Massive inflation means the currency they ear gets lower in US dollar.
Ignoring Pinoboos who think leftism is the root of all evil...
It's a mix of the legacy of colonialism and a dash foreign intervention/destabilization in the near present.
>It's a mix of the legacy of colonialism and a dash foreign intervention/destabilization in the near present.
Dindu nuffin!
t. Latinix
>legacy of colonialism
they've had two centuries of independence
will they ever stop using that excuse?
Aren't mapuches still fighting in Chile.
Let's hope the mapuche win to end the "excuses".
Yeah man its been 200 years since the US involved itself in regime change in middle- and south-America!!
Leftists constantly whinge about the U.S. not respecting the sovereignty of other countries, and then also b***h about collaboration with regimes that they don't like. You can't have it both ways, and I won't let you pretend that you can. Somehow, when an unelected regime like Castro's or Maduro's is embargoed, Americans are "imperialists." When America respects Pinochet's Chile or Peron's Argentina as peer nations with sovereignty that can be legitimate partners in U.S. interests, the U.S. is also "imperialist." Maybe if you don't want the U.S. to "involve" itself, don't force it to make hard decisions by being unstable shitholes and then use whatever the American response is to deflect your own responsibility for your nation and the consequences of your actions.
you are arguing with indecisive moralists that will always find away to seethe over who ever has the will and power to actually take any kind of forceful action on the world stage, and will endlessly point to any mistake or blunder that takes place while ignoring any of the benefits from the actions and policies of any power.
They will be angry and frustrated regardless of what is or isn't done
>When America respects Pinochet's Chile or Peron's Argentina as peer nations with sovereignty that can be legitimate partners in U.S. interests, the U.S. is also "imperialist."
No one said this, liar. Peron was democratically elected and did not have support from America. Pinochet seized power in a coup d'état that toppled a democratically elected government in place.
It's the current Chinese-American battlespace for world domination. The war is very silent though.
We don't give af about Peru, they can enjoy that hellhole.
Chilano dominance continues I see
qrd on Paraguay
Because of rampant reality television and government incompetence.
I would ban reality television in secret. In the dead of night where no one will know.
Those Chile homies gettin dat paper.
Shut up
They're """white""""
So explain what the "legacy of colonialism" means and why specifically it is making Latin America bad. Because this sounds about on the same level as "they were slaves 200 years ago!"
America has intervened in the politics of countries all over the world in recent history but Latin America is special?
>whitest area is the most successful and competent
Chileans aren't white though
Na I went there this summer to cum on Chilean feet. They're white
How the frick did people in Guyana get poorer? Didn't their per capita GDP just skyrocket in the last few years because of recent discoveries of massive oil reserves?
It’s not fully into production yet. Another 3-5 years and Guyana will the be richest per capita in Latin America.
>How the frick did people in Guyana get poorer?
You can't derive this from the map, there's no percentage given for Guyana and the colour stays the same. You may confuse it with Suriname.
Sounds like you got Guyana mixed up with Suriname. Suriname is the one whose color stays the same. Guyana goes from a 26% to a 38% poverty rate
What the frick happened to Argentina? That's a massive increase in poverty compared to basically all the other countries there.
4% was fake, see https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Institute_of_Statistics_and_Census_of_Argentina
>Although nominally independent, under the Nestor and Cristina Kirchner presidencies INDEC was subject to strong political pressure from the government, and its statistics were not considered trustworthy.[3][4][5][6][7] Because INDEC's statistics were reported as being manipulated by the Kirchner government, it was considered "discredited".[8]
>Controversy arose when the government of President Néstor Kirchner replaced Graciela Bevacqua, the Consumer Prices Indicator director (Índice de Precios al Consumidor - IPC). Bevacqua is reported to have arrived at a consumer price increase figure of almost 2.0% for January 2007 from internal data but the rate officially reported to the public was 1.1%.[9]
I wonder why Paraguay went down a percent
>argentina
>4%
>2012
>believing government lies
why is chile so successful?
Leftists put in power by morons that believe in their populists promises.
Mesitzos + Democracy
Brain drain. All the people with the means to get out are leaving. A doctor in Venezuela would rather work construction in the U.S. than practice medicine in a shithole.
Meme. The number of educated professionals is rising in developed countries as the cheap labor addicted 1st world shifts towards service economies run by native workers with wetbacks and other scabs filling lore-skilled labor roles.
The commodity boom tricked them into thinking socialism works.
This. Once China started slowing down, they were done for. The last decade was generally a lost decade for most of Latin America as a result.
Operation Condor, democracies overthrown and debts acquired.
Other powerful states on the continent was a risk USA decided to avoid.
Low IQ.