Why are they so incapable of good UI design?

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >he said unironically
    >as literally every os he's ever used apes the windows ui

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yet it is surpassed by all of them

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      After they stopped being capable of good UI design it became more lucrative to indulge in bad UI design and get a bunch of Stockholm syndrome baby ducks invested in it. Anyone trying to copy them would be producing bad UI that wouldn't get anyone to use their software and an inability to be exactly like Wangblows would ultimately prevent them from luring any of the baby ducks out of their lockstep waddle. It's a brilliant trap, especially since the defaults and suggestions will often attempt to cater to the Windows crowd, thus ensuring that everyone is scared off within minutes of installation.

      >everything copies Windows UI
      >everything good mysteriously stops copying everything after XP

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >everything good
        name one (1) "good" DE that doesn't directly rip off apple or microsoft. if you say KDE, you already lost.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This. KrashDE is a Windows 7 ripoff. GuhNome is a Mac OS Classic ripoff.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This. KrashDE is a Windows 7 ripoff. GuhNome is a Mac OS Classic ripoff.

          This is implying that there are unambiguously good DEs, the core concept of a DE is to abstract away as much as possible from the user. Use a WM instead.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >This is implying that there are unambiguously good DEs
            Absolute state of braindead IQfy zoomers. You're too young to have used classic Mac OS, and anybody who has used Windows 2000 wouldn't think anything past it is a "good DE".

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      And Windows copied RISC OS.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Absolutely pure sovl

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >claims windows 1.0 (released 1985)
        >ripped off arthur/riscos (released 1987)
        Is this the absolute state of IQfy I keep hearing about?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Windows before 95 didn't have a taskbar.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because they know what's good for you, why do you think they're a trillion dollar company? They are peak compute.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    function > aesthetics.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You're trying to compare apples to lemons, Black folk to hwite mayn

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    just install xfce

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >windows incapable of good UI design
    have you tried macOS, anon?

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i just had to log into hotmail (or outlook now) for the first time in years and jesus the interface is comically shit

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why waste time on good UI design if you can just slap flatshit on everything and everyone will praise you

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because they have no taste.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >creates the most tasteless zombie conformist mind virus on planet earth
      >microsoft offshoring UI design to pajeets hired by israelis is worse than my product
      THERES NO WAY OUT NO WHERE TO GO AHHH!!!!!!!

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >thinks that humanity is a species that evolves through culture
    >embraces a culture of coastal american decadence, gets AIDS, and dies
    "we have foucault at home"

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *