why do religious people portray atheists as being weak people with no strong convictions when everytime atheists have taken power in countries they've built strong nations that heavily persecute religious people? (the Soviets, Ataturk, Mao etc.)
why do religious people portray atheists as being weak people with no strong convictions when everytime atheists have taken power in countries they�...
all those nations failed though
bet you wouldn't have said that during their reign
Are you sure?
yes, muslims and israelites literally had to invent laws like being able to lie about your faith so they could stop getting killed and christians did the same
ok
The children of God who know who they are hold the act of speaking and writing in special high regard because it is believed of them that the Word of God is manifested by them through their Holy Spirit and so meant for sacred purpose.
This is why you find vows of silence among some children of God who are terrified that to speak may lead them to blaspheme the gift of God.
Personally I am guided by the Holy Spirit and know that when I fail I am raised up the the Christ who is the sign that God loves me personally in spite of when I fail at perfection even though I try for it every time.
no
>but eventually X collapsed
moron bait argument not even worth entertaining.
>Calling Mao's China a strong nation is especially moronic of you. It only got strong once it started distancing itself from that low IQ moron.
Look up exponential curve.
Rightoid moronation is hilarious. This is must be why they pawn off their thinking toward the village God communicator and thousand years folk tale books, folk tales not even related to their own ancestors lmao
The Christian religion is an ethnocentric identity religion based around the shared belief that children of God are the spiritual rulers of earth who God specially selected using the sword of God to cleave them from the rest of humanity into the Kingdom of Heaven upon the earth.
the part that gets lost in the shuffle and fog of history was that originally the sword was whiteness because in every single religion like that which has ever had god kings it was and has always been based around whiteness being of God.
So naturally the thing is suppressed because of its inherent power to destabilize anything not in alignment with that vision of the garden of eden upon the earth.
>soviets
dead and gone
>ataturk
turkey is a heavily muslim country today
>mao
this homosexual caused a famine that killed millions of his own people and caused the cultural revolution which caused the chinese to worship the state
>turkey is a heavily muslim country today
you have never spoken with a turk, they dislike islam because they see it as arab, turks are ethnonationalists
Most of them fellate the mutted Ottoman Empire and would love to restore it
Name an atheist. (I'll wait.)
Calling Mao's China a strong nation is especially moronic of you. It only got strong once it started distancing itself from that low IQ moron.
Ataturk didn't "heavily persecute" religious people.
they guy described islam as a rotting corpse and the religion of an immoral bedouin lol lol
And he was right but that's beside the point
Atheists logically can't have strong convictions. Subjective morality implies that there's literally no clear right or right to have string convictions for.
What if you believe in Marxism as objective reality?
Marxism is a religion, congratulations on realizing it
Then you're low IQ to begin with.
Everyone has their own prejudices. Why do think "le tolerant left" is a meme? People's brains don't haywire with existential crisis everytime their ethics are contradicted, they double down on their biases.
It’s seething hatred that others can see through their inane bullshit
>why do club people portray non-members of their club as being weak people?
dunno, anon
why do IQfy hates reddit and vice versa?
>OP imples west atheism is not a religion
lmao
>strong nations