Why do retards attracted to complex languages so much?

First it was C++ disaster, then it was Java catastrophe and now it's Rust blasphemy. If you look at rust devs they are mostly ex c++ devs not C. I rarely can find C programmers that would enjoy or at least find rust beneficial for their workflow

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >complex
    it's the opposite though
    C gives you 19 different ways to skin a cat, and only a few of them are safe
    peach circle is safety
    blue is foot guns

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >19 different ways to skin a cat
      lol wut? If it's only 19 ways in C then it must be full 190 in C++

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        yes and in rust it's usually 1 or 2 and they're all safe

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          if rust will ever proclaim permanent backwards compatibility they'll have 190 eventually too.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            they don't declare permanent backwards compatibility

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You have never programmed anything in your life

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >wagecuck code monkey subhuman thinks programing makes him cool.
        >muh you never code.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Ask me how I know you're a python programmer

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Designing things to be done in only one way is a core tenet of Python, though.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >C gives you 19 different ways to skin a cat
      Rust gives you zero and 19 if you use the unsafe block

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Name two examples

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >0
        why are rustlets such copers? there are literally 1 gazillion of different language features coming every few months, faster than c++. in few years language already became more bloated than c++

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Well, it's not really important how cool Esperanto is if nobody using it, can't learn it. C++ has still many advantages others don't quite have (multiple binding and low level performances mainly).

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >I rarely can find C programmer
    actual c programmers are a rare breed, most of them are close to retirement.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I don't see why? I've had 4 different subjects in uni where C is the language we're using. Clearly C is still used in industry.

      If it gives you any idea of a pattern all the subjects were
      >Microprocessors and digital systems (Arduino's and circuits)
      >System programming (Kernel development and bare metal programming)
      >Introduction to electronics
      >Advanced electronics

      I would say C probably gets used mostly by electrical engineers and OS engineers.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >he thinks what's being taught in university has any correlation with what's being used in industry
        Oh no no no. You are in for a rude awakening.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          What language is used in electrical engineering then? What do electrical engineer use for low level programming cause I know for dam sure it's not fricking rust lol.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            This post is funny because the head of electrical engineering at the start up I worked at wanted to re-write all our device firmware in Rust.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Spice at the lowest level

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Can you see a common thread between all these subjects?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, that's what I'm trying to point out

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        University is 10-15 years behind the industry

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It's not entirely that bad though, sometime the industry has hypes that fade quite rapidly.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        C is here to stay, but Rust will be used more and more for its safety

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Good luck getting a C only job.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What are you complaining about, Rust is C++--, that is the whole point.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They're only as complex as much as you want them to be. You don't have to use every feature of the language.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      But what about maijng and adding function in c++
      I dont know c++ but that looked fricked up
      Surely its not that bad

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Wait tgats a regular adding function.
        Why are you gays trying to scare people into using rust?

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    c is simple to learn, complex to master
    java is complex to learn, easy to master
    rust is hard to learn and hard to master

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Why do morons attracted to complex languages so much?
      Complexity in a programming language enables its users to write more useful abstractions.
      >If you look at rust devs they are mostly ex c++ devs not C
      Rust offers a number of the abstractions that C++ offers, but implemented a bit better since there is no requirement to maintain a broken backwards compatibility with C. Most of the Rust evangelists you'll meet are C++ programmers who finally get to use a language that doesn't suck, while maintaining the power and flexibility they had with C++.
      >I rarely can find C programmers that would enjoy or at least find rust beneficial for their workflow
      C programmers are either embedded developers whose programs are so small as to not require any significant abstractions, or masochists.

      Rust is fairly easy to learn if you are already familiar with memory management and ownership as they are used in C++. If you don't, then it's as hard to learn as C++... except with more compiler errors and less runtime errors.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      C isn't really complex to master either. Its just easy to frick up. It forces you to have to pay extra attention to even the most trivial things. Learn to error check your code as you write it, and you're now a master.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        > Learn to error check your code as you write it
        When I say this, I don't mean in your head, I mean, don't assume any functions you call wont fail. Write proper error handling code the first time through.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >c is simple to learn, complex to master

      C isn't complex to master C is easy to master you must simply not to be a brainlet.

      >java is complex to learn, easy to master

      Other way around java is comparatively easier to learn than C because it has more abstraction and normalscum brains really "click" with OOP. However java is BRUTAL (if not impossible) to master because it's so large and inconsistent. Things that should be simple in java are hard and that'll bog you down for hours, weeks for months.

      >rust is hard to learn and hard to master

      I can't comment on this one, I'm not transgender.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        OOP is confusing as frick compared to FP

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          OOP is moronic - it comes from a horrible misinterpretation of what a class is in type theory.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    agree, I believe hare is the future

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >fighting about poo or diarrhea or pee or fart
    no thanks, I'm staying with common lisp.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Based lispchad, staying unemployed to own the Unix weenies.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >noooo you're only allowed to know the languages you use for your joobbb!!!!
        i know other languages tbh, just saying none of them matter because they all suck. common lisp is the best 🙂

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >sepples
    >low level
    Lmfao

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Zig is a good fit tho
    IQfy are haters, that's it

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Java
    >Catastrophe
    >runs the modern banking

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    C++ has always been a shit language that needed a replacement. The same cannot be said for C

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    you just answered your own question

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    HAHAHAHAHHAA FRICK WHAT IS THIS PICTURE EVEN.. AAAAAAAAAAAAHHH

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Is Java really complex?

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Java has gotten C-niles halfway to Lisp
    super based

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The stronger the type system the less time you spend debugging - as it allows you to limit valid state of your program.

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I like Kotlin a lot. It's very non-opinionated and you can write some sleek code is with it.
    I also love the fact I no longer have to work with java

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    C is still complex as frick.Syintax is Garbage purposely confusing.If you want simplicity go with lisp.
    >Muh c is closest to how computer works
    No its not asembly is and its 10 times more logical and intuitive than c.

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >gives unfounded opinion on code
    >gets seen as the poser he is
    >"hurr what jus cus u code u think ur cool or sum, fukin code monkee"

    moron

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *