why do retards say ips the best when its actually the worst display technology by far?

why do morons say ips the best when its actually the worst display technology by far?

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >what is tn

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      the best one? do you have actual brain damage?
      >best response time
      >no ips glow
      >no backlight bleed
      >-.....

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I have both IPS (Dell) and TN (BenQ). Neither one is the best, wach one has it's own pros and cons.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >best response time
        Any modern IPS beats few year old TNs easily. Most recent ones may still have a slight advantage at very high frequencies, but they're still LCDs, they look like garbage in motion either way thanks to sample&hold motion blur.
        >no ips glow
        Yea, instead your whole fricking picture is fricking glowing, because your viewing angles are absolutely intolerable.
        IPS glow is a viewing angle issue, which is limited only to blacks. On the other hand, ALL colors on a TN glow and shift.
        >no backlight bleed
        Pictures or gtfo. Dark room, and expose it properly.
        Even 500€ BenQ's have absolutely atrocious uniformity.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Any modern IPS beats few year old TNs
          KEK have a nice day you delusional moron
          TN has true 1ms rt
          >IPS glow is a viewing angle issue
          amazing cope
          just don't look at it straight on LMAO
          >Pictures or gtfo
          you mean the pictures of literally everoyne who has ever reviewed an ips before you moronic reddit shitskin?

          im sorry you got memed into keeping your shit display but don't cope so loud

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >TN has true 1ms rt
            No LCD has anywhere near close to 1ms, when measured with gamma-corrected methods. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbZUgKpzTA0
            Here's a 2020 TN reviewed with such methods https://tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/budget_gaming_monitors_2020#lg_24gl650
            6.4ms, there are IPS monitors that easily beat this.
            No one really reviews TNs anymore, the tech's so outdated ..
            >amazing cope
            It's a fact.
            >just don't look at it straight on LMAO
            What did you mean to say with this?
            TN angles are so terrible that even if you do view it straight on, you still see major distortion. On IPS monitors those distortions are only limited to blacks.
            >you mean the pictures of literally everoyne who has ever reviewed an ips before you moronic reddit shitskin?
            So you're making up bullshit that you cannot back up?
            >im sorry you got memed into keeping your shit display but don't cope so loud
            You seem to think I'm some sort of IPS evangelist, wrong, I hate all LCDs, but IPS is the least worst option.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >gamma-corrected methods
            KEK
            >its a fact
            KEK
            yes im gonna turn my monitor 30 degrees so i don't get an orange tint on 30% of my screen you delusional moron
            >TN angles are so terrible
            i stare straight at my screen not my problem you're a fat moron who can't keep his head straight
            >So you're making up bullshit
            making up what? im telling you got look at any review you blind sub 90 iq neanderthal
            >but IPS is the least worst option.
            thank you for confirming yet again you have brain damage and you're from a 3rd world shithole

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >KEK
            no arguments?
            >i stare straight at my screen not my problem you're a fat moron who can't keep his head straight
            Take a picture
            >making up what? im telling you got look at any review you blind sub 90 iq neanderthal
            They all look like shit, except for the professional units that are deisgned to have good uniformity

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            my argument is that you're a moron who doesn't know what he's talking about and refuses to look anything up even though he knows im right
            dilate back with your shitps panel

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            So no arguments what-so-ever, got it

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >n-no you
            i accept your concession little troon

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >i-its very hard to post from a new ip
            who do you think you're fooling you mentally ill homosexual?

            meds

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Great arguments you convinced me

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            great samegayging
            try not to dilate to death

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            He posted from a new IP newbie lmao
            Frick off

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >i-its very hard to post from a new ip
            who do you think you're fooling you mentally ill homosexual?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >the best one? do you have actual brain damage?
        You do if you think TN is any good. Worse than fricking VA.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >n-no you
          the average iq of an ips shill
          low just like the quality control of their shit displays
          KEK

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    True colors, for designers.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      sure but its mediocre or just plain shit for everything else

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's pretty great in what it is needed and not so adequate to other things, like everything else in life my dude.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      OLED definitely has the highest potential right now but its not that viable yet
      i would still get it over a ShitPS though

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >but its not that viable yet
        What the frick?
        It's only been in development for 20+ years.
        My 10 year old phone has SuperAmoled, but somehow it's not a mature technology per you.

        Everything is RETROGRADE now.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >My 10 year old phone has SuperAmoled
          SGSII had a terrible burnout, I was aware of such thing and did not leave it with turned on display, nor it was my main device, and yet I had an "unlock ring" of CM10 burned out after six months.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Wow, it's also literally 11 year old phone and screen. Don't you think that tech has evolved since 2011?

            Serious question: Why did plasma die? It was superior to LCD and OLED in literally every possible way.

            You've obviously never used a plasma IRL. You'd know how they noticeably heated up the room when turned on.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    good for muh anime

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Serious question: Why did plasma die? It was superior to LCD and OLED in literally every possible way.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It probably affected the electric company's billing, so they had to get rid of it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They died because plasmas can’t be made in small form factors.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They were heavy as frick and not energy efficient.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They were heavy as frick and not energy efficient.

      >100 nits for 500 watts
      People forget how energy efficiency does effect picture quality, in that it limits your maximum brightness.
      Plasmas have no real advantage over OLEDs.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >there were no downsides to plasma
    You moron, I mentioned it in my post. Energy efficiency means brightness, and your shitty plasma might not have even been in the double digit nits.
    OLEDs are better in every way.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Triple digit nits*
      And you didn't get a perfect black level either since plasma pixels need a precharge. It was very deep, but not OLED tier. Resulted in a contrast ratio of around 50,000:1.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Triple digit nits*
      And you didn't get a perfect black level either since plasma pixels need a precharge. It was very deep, but not OLED tier. Resulted in a contrast ratio of around 50,000:1.

      [...]
      >have to run the AC just to watch TV
      >No downsides
      Is this how it's like to be moronic?

      So you literally samegayged your own shitty thread just to reiterate that you have absolutely no point, absolutely no idea what you're talking about, and just mindlessly asserting things are patently untrue because you're a stupid piece of shit, and all of this AFTER you tattled to Jay and got the post deleted even though it was not off topic and didn't violate a single rule? Is this how it's like to be an assblasted know-nothing homosexual?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Take your meds

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >have to run the AC just to watch TV
    >No downsides
    Is this how it's like to be moronic?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *