Why does Rand get such abuse but Bulgakov does not? If Rand's prose style is too loose then how is Bulgakov's not?
 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
|
Why does Rand get such abuse but Bulgakov does not?
Why does Rand get such abuse but Bulgakov does not? If Rand's prose style is too loose then how is Bulgakov's not?
|
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
|
coz woman
Who?
Somebody who doesn‘t have shills here every other day it seems.
Do you like David Wallace? His prose style is only slightly less loose than Rand's.
Rand never received any fair literary criticism. Criticism is mostly either marxist or conservative and both fields hate her with a passion.
Bulgakov didn't get rich setting up a pseudo-religion.
everything is religion
Whoever came up with this idiotic line of thought should be tarred and feathered.
everyone should be tarred and feathered
U first.
everyone should be first
How does that work? There must be somebody who's the first.
imagine two futas, inverted along the y and z planes, each one's wiener in the other's ass, and they fill each other up with gooey cum at the same time. It'd be like that: simultaneity.
>everything is dogma and tradition
Neither did she. She lived on welfare at the end of her cancer-ridden life.
>She lived on welfare at the end of her cancer-ridden life.
that's incorrect. She left a sizable estate. She took the medicare and social security after her retirement because, despite the philosophical incongruity, it's free money.
Bulgakov is barely known outside of russian speaking realm
Bulgakov is not being pushed by political shills down everyone's throat as some kind of genius
>Why does Rand get such abuse but Bulgakov does not?
Bulgakov is fun. He has talking dogs and cats. Rand is tedious.
Wait. Which Bulgakov is being mentioned itt? Sergei or Mikhail?