Why doesn't anyone ever recommend Modern Magick when people ask for books about how to do magic? It's by far the best option, much better than that Evola shit
Why doesn't anyone ever recommend Modern Magick when people ask for books about how to do magic?
Because ceremonial magic is cringe outdated shit. True magic is accomplished without spells and rituals.
Wrong. Read Iamblichus reply to Porphyry on the same issue
link it. google is showing too many different things
https://universaltheosophy.com/tt/iamblichus-on-the-mysteries/
Elaborate on this
No
>wrong
>read this theosophy text
>even though they're notorious non-practitioners
shiggy diggy
High Magick is just Theurgy
>Iamblichus
>non-practitioner
I meant the theosophists. Iamblichus obviously did, but considering that homies were still boiling donkey gall and lathering shit on their dick in that era to get results ala PGM, I'm not inclined to "just read Iamblichus bro"
because Schertel exists
Trash that is basically a caricature of how normies think of magic.
false. Schertel was did his PhD on Schellings concept of personality, immediately relevant to magic and the demonic. you are the normie.
Can you explain why Hitler was so fond of this text?
I've been reading 'the occult roots of national-socialism' & he seems to have read a lot about the occult from 'ostara' but I wasn't aware of this text.
>Can you explain why Hitler was so fond of this text?
it was the most annotated text in his library bc it's that good
What was Himmler's most annotated text?
I feel the days of Hitler are over & the next movement within European Nationalism needs to acclimatize itself to Himmler not Hitler.
>What was Himmler's most annotated text?
don't know. don't care. I'm not a nazi I just like mysterious shit.
The Oera Linda/Bhagavad Gita
Is the Oera Linda meant to be an older text than the Mahabharata?
What about Putler ?
Is that a face on that demon's arse
Is this lowkey anti-semitisim ?
Cover looks a bit larpy. Will take a look still. I hope it doesn't simply tell me to meditate and offers something new.
I always wonder what kind of people post in these threads. This belongs on women's forums or /x/ not on IQfy
Unironically /x/ is at times more IQfy than IQfy
Check out the green text postings on some of the
threads.
Yeah, if you avoid the most evident schizo posts there are some good IQfy threads over there.
I'm pretty sure grant morrison was just kidding about this shit. If you actually read this book about Crowley his entire edgelord magik bullshit was just an excuse to get laid.
If you read Israel Regardie(Crowley’s secretary)’s essay about Neville Goddard you’ll see he agreed and says what the first reply in this thread says. Ceremony is unnecessary, Neville’s philosophy is the purest most effective form of magic.
So magic is literally set goals and self motivate
by imagining outcomes ?
And jerking off.
Pretty much, ceremonies and shit like that are just there so it's easier to convince yourself.
what's the difference, they are not real in the end
this thread is for believers only. you have to leave now.
I believe you’re a dumbass, therefore I stay.
Do you believe in particle physics?
What does life actually look like for a "magick practitioner" on the day to day? Are we talking wands and candles after work, nightly meditation in the presence of the shadow things? Tarot reading with breakfast?
pretty much what you said
Sitting in a chair and staring at the wall
Then jacking off while thinking about money
because book 4 exists