No
Matthew 7:21-27
You must put the faith into practice
24 “Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock
You can’t just believe without works
Matthew 25
34 “Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. 35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’
Here also you can see good works not just faith
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
These don't say that your justification is derived from works of that sinning will destroy your justification. However,
Romans 4:5-8 >Now to the one who works, his wage is not counted according to grace, but according to what is due. But to the one who does not work, but believes upon Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteousness, just as David also speaks of the blessing on the man to whom God counts righteousness apart from works: “Blessed are those whose lawless deeds have been forgiven, And whose sins have been covered. Blessed is the man whose sin the Lord will not take into account.”
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
But it still says that works are needed
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
No the exact words are "to the one who does not work, but believes upon Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteousness". What happens if you do NOT work, but believe upon Him who justifies the ungodly?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I was referring to the passages I sites
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Sited*
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Works in this context refers to the works of the Mosaic Law
romans was written to unite the Gentiles and israelites
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Works in this context refers to the works of the Mosaic Law
Where do you see the words "mosaic law"? >romans was written to unite the Gentiles and israelites
And how is he doing that? Why are the judaizers wrong? Why do the gentiles not need to be circumcised to be justified?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
The reason this letter was written was to unite Gentiles and israelites
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
9 Is this blessedness only for the circumcised, or also for the uncircumcised? We have been saying that Abraham’s faith was credited to him as righteousness. 10 Under what circumstances was it credited? Was it after he was circumcised, or before? It was not after, but before! 11 And he received circumcision as a sign, a seal of the righteousness that he had by faith while he was still uncircumcised. So then, he is the father of all who believe but have not been circumcised, in order that righteousness might be credited to them.
In this context it refers to the OT law
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>In this context it refers to the OT law
... Which includes stuff like "Thou shalt have no other gods before me".
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
These 10 commandments were preserved in the new covenant
Circumcision for example(referred to in this passage, was not)
Which Calvinist church do you belong to btw?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Circumcision for example(referred to in this passage, was not)
Why was Abraham justified?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Not because of the OT law
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
James 2:26
Faith without works is dead
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
James 2:25 > 25 In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute considered righteous for what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction?
This is works
Hebrews 11:31 > 31 By faith the prostitute Rahab, because she welcomed the spies, was not killed with those who were disobedient.
What James 2:25 calls works
Is called faith in Hebrews 11:31
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I didn't ask why he wasn't. What does Paul say? Is it because of the good works of obedience he did?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
It’s the righteousness that comes with faith
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
13 It was not through the law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world, but through the righteousness that comes by faith. 14 For if those who depend on the law are heirs, faith means nothing and the promise is worthless, 15 because the law brings wrath. And where there is no law there is no transgression.
More proof that this passage refers to the OT law
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Does that righteousness come with faith if you don't have works?
13 It was not through the law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world, but through the righteousness that comes by faith. 14 For if those who depend on the law are heirs, faith means nothing and the promise is worthless, 15 because the law brings wrath. And where there is no law there is no transgression.
More proof that this passage refers to the OT law
Which still includes stuff like the 10 commandments...
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I told you earlier the 10 commandments are also in the new covenant circumcision is not
Paul referred to works as faith in the case I mentioned
So this faith could be considered works
John 6
27 Do not work for food that spoils, but for food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you. For on him God the Father has placed his seal of approval.”
28 Then they asked him, “What must we do to do the works God requires?”
29 Jesus answered, “The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent.”
Faith is a work
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>I told you earlier the 10 commandments are also in the new covenant circumcision is not
This is not relevant. >in the case I mentioned >John 6
Let's stay in Romans 4. If Abraham had not performed the works of obedience which God had laid out, would he be justified, or to preserve his justification was it necessary that he be circumcised?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Ok I’ll stay in Romans 4 but please answer my questions >This is not relevant
It is because the Judaizers wanted the church to follow the Mosaic Law including circumcision, etc…
But the 10 commandments are still the same
This means the works referred to was the Mosaic Law (Circumcision in this case)
No if Abraham had not performed the works of obedience he would not be saved
Faith is a work
Check the passages I mentioned
What James referred to as works was referred to as faith by Paul
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Ok I’ll stay in Romans 4 but please answer my questions
Ok >This means the works referred to was the Mosaic Law
Abraham was before or after Moses? >No if Abraham had not performed the works of obedience he would not be saved
So then you are agreeing with the judaizers, against Paul, that he was justified after his circumcision? Is it not Paul's point that Abraham did not need to be circumcised to be justified (and therefore gentiles don't need to either)?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I thought you meant faith by the works of obedience mb >was Abraham before or after Moses
Paul was referring to circumcision which is a part of the Mosaic Law
But Paul here is saying that Abraham was saved before circumcision meaning that we don’t need circumcision to be saved >So then you are agreeing with the judaizers
Now that I’ve understood what you meant by works of obedience
Abraham was saved by his righteousness
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Paul in Romans 4 quotes Genesis 16:5 which says
6 Then he believed in Yahweh; and He counted it to him as righteousness.
But check Psalm 106:30-31
30 Then Phinehas stood up and interceded,
And so the plague was checked.
31 And it was counted to him for righteousness,
From generation to generation forever.
The same wording is used with righteouseness
But here as you can see Phinehas *stood up and interceded* which is a work and it was counted for him for righteousness
As I mentioned previously what James 2:25 considered a work, paul considered faith in Hebrews 11:31
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
It says “counted to him as righteousness”
For both cases the same wording was used
You will mention Paul quoting Genesis 15:6 in Romans 4:3
But you will not mention Paul quoting Habakuk 2:4 in Romans 1:17 which says
4 “See, the enemy is puffed up;
his desires are not upright—
but the righteous person will live by his faithfulness
WILL LIVE BY HIS FAITHFULNESS
Isn’t living by your faithfulness considered doing works?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>WILL LIVE BY HIS FAITHFULNESS
The proper translation is faith.
Answer this
[...]
and this
>Answer this
There's nothing to answer. The psalm is written by a different author in a different book. I don't know what the point of the Hebrews citation is supposed to be. The author is saying Rahab's actions were motivated by faith, and his point has nothing to do with this topic.
Romans 4
13 It was not through the law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world, but through the righteousness that comes by faith. 14 For if those who depend on the law are heirs, faith means nothing and the promise is worthless,
Yes Paul was talking about the Mosaic Law telling us that it isn’t the Mosaic Law that saves us
The "law" here refers to the law of God; any works of obedience.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
The psalm indicated that a work was credited as righteousness
The author counts the works as faith
And what law had circumcision?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
And the wording for the psalm was the same wording for Abraham being credited righteousness
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
The ones translating it to faith say lives by his faith
Living by your faith isn’t your faith alone
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
And when will you answer my other questions
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
The point of Hebrew’s citation is that Paul counted work as faith
John 2:25
25 In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute considered righteous for what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction?
Considered righteous for what she did
Hebrews 11
31 By faith the prostitute Rahab, because she welcomed the spies, was not killed with those who were disobedient.
Here Paul refers to it as faith
So what is considered works was considered faith by Paul
So Abraham’s faith saving him could also mean faith
And please answer my questions about other passages regarding faith and works
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I made a typing mistake in my response
>WILL LIVE BY HIS FAITHFULNESS
The proper translation is faith.
[...] >Answer this
There's nothing to answer. The psalm is written by a different author in a different book. I don't know what the point of the Hebrews citation is supposed to be. The author is saying Rahab's actions were motivated by faith, and his point has nothing to do with this topic.
[...]
The "law" here refers to the law of God; any works of obedience.
I made a typing mistake in my response
The point of Hebrew’s citation is that Paul counted work as faith
John 2:25
25 In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute considered righteous for what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction?
Considered righteous for what she did
Hebrews 11
31 By faith the prostitute Rahab, because she welcomed the spies, was not killed with those who were disobedient.
Here Paul refers to it as faith
So what is considered works was considered faith by Paul
So Abraham’s faith saving him could also mean works
And please answer my questions about other passages regarding faith and works
>WILL LIVE BY HIS FAITHFULNESS
The proper translation is faith.
[...] >Answer this
There's nothing to answer. The psalm is written by a different author in a different book. I don't know what the point of the Hebrews citation is supposed to be. The author is saying Rahab's actions were motivated by faith, and his point has nothing to do with this topic.
[...]
The "law" here refers to the law of God; any works of obedience.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Don’t check this one
Check the other
I made a typing mistKe
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Answer this
It says “counted to him as righteousness”
For both cases the same wording was used
You will mention Paul quoting Genesis 15:6 in Romans 4:3
But you will not mention Paul quoting Habakuk 2:4 in Romans 1:17 which says
4 “See, the enemy is puffed up;
his desires are not upright—
but the righteous person will live by his faithfulness
WILL LIVE BY HIS FAITHFULNESS
Isn’t living by your faithfulness considered doing works?
and this
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Paul was referring to circumcision which is a part of the Mosaic Law
Abraham was circumcised, however, Abraham was well before Moses. He is unequivocally not talking about the Mosaic law >But Paul here is saying that Abraham was saved before circumcision
How did it happen? What justified Abraham? >Abraham was saved by his righteousness
No sir that's incorrect, Abraham was saved by Christ's righteousness which is apprehended by faith alone. That is why one is imputed righteousness by faith, and the believer's sin is not imputed to them (it was all put on Jesus).
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
His righteousness which I talked about now
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Romans 4
13 It was not through the law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world, but through the righteousness that comes by faith. 14 For if those who depend on the law are heirs, faith means nothing and the promise is worthless,
Yes Paul was talking about the Mosaic Law telling us that it isn’t the Mosaic Law that saves us
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>telling us that it isn’t the Mosaic Law that saves us
and of course the 'saving us' mene goes totally unnoticed: that we need saving from something in a world created by an omnipotent father figure who loves us. it's almost as if the original shit-up-makers thought in the terms of a powerful but not omnipotent ally trying to help us in a hostile universe not of his making, then later generations simply ended up hiding behind doublethink and plain parroting and not wanting to face the implications.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
If only we had listened to the wisdom of an unbeliever who's never actually read the bible instead
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
But faith in him without works still isn’t enough
If only we had listened to the wisdom of an unbeliever who's never actually read the bible instead
We’re discussing the biblical point of view so I don’t know if his wisdom agree with scripture
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I need to go but don’t close the thread I will answer later
If it gets archived open another one about faith alone
Theology is for litcels that need to gaslight themselves into faith, you think the grandma that devoutly goes to mass every week knows anything about these homosexual IQfy arguments over calvinism or palamism or how st. orthanasius btfo the arians lol
Turns out once you realize there isn't some supernatural force that you need to placate, you no longer need to spend time trying to figure out exactly how to best placate it.
Back in the Middle Ages and the early Modern era, theology was the most important academic subject taught at universities. The brightest minds of all of Europe and the Middle East spent much of their time pondering theological and philosophical questions. Even mathematicians were expected to have a few writings on theology to uphold their reputation, lest they be seen as heretics.
Nowdays, theology is just what black people and scammers study because standards for getting a theology PhD are so low that anybody who knows Philosophy 101 shit can get a theology degree.
Righteousness in the eyes of man
versus
righteousness in the eyes of God
Christ is king, repent and believe the gospel, that is to say that he died for your sins.
No it is not good news if you have the risk of messing it up by failing some sort of sacrament skill check, some sort of sin of the flesh, that stuff will make your life an existential horror (no longer good news)
He is risen, the gift is a true gift, no strings attached, don't let the world present a false gospel that will lead you astray. Amen.
Because unironically how much of a deluded, special snowflake would you have to be to be a Calvinist in >current year?
All it takes is believing the bible Anon
No
salvation is through faith and works
Not sole fide
That's heresy
No
Matthew 7:21-27
You must put the faith into practice
24 “Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock
You can’t just believe without works
Matthew 25
34 “Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. 35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’
Here also you can see good works not just faith
These don't say that your justification is derived from works of that sinning will destroy your justification. However,
Romans 4:5-8
>Now to the one who works, his wage is not counted according to grace, but according to what is due. But to the one who does not work, but believes upon Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteousness, just as David also speaks of the blessing on the man to whom God counts righteousness apart from works: “Blessed are those whose lawless deeds have been forgiven, And whose sins have been covered. Blessed is the man whose sin the Lord will not take into account.”
But it still says that works are needed
No the exact words are "to the one who does not work, but believes upon Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteousness". What happens if you do NOT work, but believe upon Him who justifies the ungodly?
I was referring to the passages I sites
Sited*
Works in this context refers to the works of the Mosaic Law
romans was written to unite the Gentiles and israelites
>Works in this context refers to the works of the Mosaic Law
Where do you see the words "mosaic law"?
>romans was written to unite the Gentiles and israelites
And how is he doing that? Why are the judaizers wrong? Why do the gentiles not need to be circumcised to be justified?
The reason this letter was written was to unite Gentiles and israelites
9 Is this blessedness only for the circumcised, or also for the uncircumcised? We have been saying that Abraham’s faith was credited to him as righteousness. 10 Under what circumstances was it credited? Was it after he was circumcised, or before? It was not after, but before! 11 And he received circumcision as a sign, a seal of the righteousness that he had by faith while he was still uncircumcised. So then, he is the father of all who believe but have not been circumcised, in order that righteousness might be credited to them.
In this context it refers to the OT law
>In this context it refers to the OT law
... Which includes stuff like "Thou shalt have no other gods before me".
These 10 commandments were preserved in the new covenant
Circumcision for example(referred to in this passage, was not)
Which Calvinist church do you belong to btw?
>Circumcision for example(referred to in this passage, was not)
Why was Abraham justified?
Not because of the OT law
James 2:26
Faith without works is dead
James 2:25
> 25 In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute considered righteous for what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction?
This is works
Hebrews 11:31
> 31 By faith the prostitute Rahab, because she welcomed the spies, was not killed with those who were disobedient.
What James 2:25 calls works
Is called faith in Hebrews 11:31
I didn't ask why he wasn't. What does Paul say? Is it because of the good works of obedience he did?
It’s the righteousness that comes with faith
13 It was not through the law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world, but through the righteousness that comes by faith. 14 For if those who depend on the law are heirs, faith means nothing and the promise is worthless, 15 because the law brings wrath. And where there is no law there is no transgression.
More proof that this passage refers to the OT law
Does that righteousness come with faith if you don't have works?
Which still includes stuff like the 10 commandments...
I told you earlier the 10 commandments are also in the new covenant circumcision is not
Paul referred to works as faith in the case I mentioned
So this faith could be considered works
John 6
27 Do not work for food that spoils, but for food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you. For on him God the Father has placed his seal of approval.”
28 Then they asked him, “What must we do to do the works God requires?”
29 Jesus answered, “The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent.”
Faith is a work
>I told you earlier the 10 commandments are also in the new covenant circumcision is not
This is not relevant.
>in the case I mentioned
>John 6
Let's stay in Romans 4. If Abraham had not performed the works of obedience which God had laid out, would he be justified, or to preserve his justification was it necessary that he be circumcised?
Ok I’ll stay in Romans 4 but please answer my questions
>This is not relevant
It is because the Judaizers wanted the church to follow the Mosaic Law including circumcision, etc…
But the 10 commandments are still the same
This means the works referred to was the Mosaic Law (Circumcision in this case)
No if Abraham had not performed the works of obedience he would not be saved
Faith is a work
Check the passages I mentioned
What James referred to as works was referred to as faith by Paul
>Ok I’ll stay in Romans 4 but please answer my questions
Ok
>This means the works referred to was the Mosaic Law
Abraham was before or after Moses?
>No if Abraham had not performed the works of obedience he would not be saved
So then you are agreeing with the judaizers, against Paul, that he was justified after his circumcision? Is it not Paul's point that Abraham did not need to be circumcised to be justified (and therefore gentiles don't need to either)?
I thought you meant faith by the works of obedience mb
>was Abraham before or after Moses
Paul was referring to circumcision which is a part of the Mosaic Law
But Paul here is saying that Abraham was saved before circumcision meaning that we don’t need circumcision to be saved
>So then you are agreeing with the judaizers
Now that I’ve understood what you meant by works of obedience
Abraham was saved by his righteousness
Paul in Romans 4 quotes Genesis 16:5 which says
6 Then he believed in Yahweh; and He counted it to him as righteousness.
But check Psalm 106:30-31
30 Then Phinehas stood up and interceded,
And so the plague was checked.
31 And it was counted to him for righteousness,
From generation to generation forever.
The same wording is used with righteouseness
But here as you can see Phinehas *stood up and interceded* which is a work and it was counted for him for righteousness
As I mentioned previously what James 2:25 considered a work, paul considered faith in Hebrews 11:31
It says “counted to him as righteousness”
For both cases the same wording was used
You will mention Paul quoting Genesis 15:6 in Romans 4:3
But you will not mention Paul quoting Habakuk 2:4 in Romans 1:17 which says
4 “See, the enemy is puffed up;
his desires are not upright—
but the righteous person will live by his faithfulness
WILL LIVE BY HIS FAITHFULNESS
Isn’t living by your faithfulness considered doing works?
>WILL LIVE BY HIS FAITHFULNESS
The proper translation is faith.
>Answer this
There's nothing to answer. The psalm is written by a different author in a different book. I don't know what the point of the Hebrews citation is supposed to be. The author is saying Rahab's actions were motivated by faith, and his point has nothing to do with this topic.
The "law" here refers to the law of God; any works of obedience.
The psalm indicated that a work was credited as righteousness
The author counts the works as faith
And what law had circumcision?
And the wording for the psalm was the same wording for Abraham being credited righteousness
The ones translating it to faith say lives by his faith
Living by your faith isn’t your faith alone
And when will you answer my other questions
The point of Hebrew’s citation is that Paul counted work as faith
John 2:25
25 In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute considered righteous for what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction?
Considered righteous for what she did
Hebrews 11
31 By faith the prostitute Rahab, because she welcomed the spies, was not killed with those who were disobedient.
Here Paul refers to it as faith
So what is considered works was considered faith by Paul
So Abraham’s faith saving him could also mean faith
And please answer my questions about other passages regarding faith and works
I made a typing mistake in my response
I made a typing mistake in my response
The point of Hebrew’s citation is that Paul counted work as faith
John 2:25
25 In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute considered righteous for what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction?
Considered righteous for what she did
Hebrews 11
31 By faith the prostitute Rahab, because she welcomed the spies, was not killed with those who were disobedient.
Here Paul refers to it as faith
So what is considered works was considered faith by Paul
So Abraham’s faith saving him could also mean works
And please answer my questions about other passages regarding faith and works
Don’t check this one
Check the other
I made a typing mistKe
Answer this
and this
>Paul was referring to circumcision which is a part of the Mosaic Law
Abraham was circumcised, however, Abraham was well before Moses. He is unequivocally not talking about the Mosaic law
>But Paul here is saying that Abraham was saved before circumcision
How did it happen? What justified Abraham?
>Abraham was saved by his righteousness
No sir that's incorrect, Abraham was saved by Christ's righteousness which is apprehended by faith alone. That is why one is imputed righteousness by faith, and the believer's sin is not imputed to them (it was all put on Jesus).
His righteousness which I talked about now
Romans 4
13 It was not through the law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world, but through the righteousness that comes by faith. 14 For if those who depend on the law are heirs, faith means nothing and the promise is worthless,
Yes Paul was talking about the Mosaic Law telling us that it isn’t the Mosaic Law that saves us
>telling us that it isn’t the Mosaic Law that saves us
and of course the 'saving us' mene goes totally unnoticed: that we need saving from something in a world created by an omnipotent father figure who loves us. it's almost as if the original shit-up-makers thought in the terms of a powerful but not omnipotent ally trying to help us in a hostile universe not of his making, then later generations simply ended up hiding behind doublethink and plain parroting and not wanting to face the implications.
If only we had listened to the wisdom of an unbeliever who's never actually read the bible instead
But faith in him without works still isn’t enough
We’re discussing the biblical point of view so I don’t know if his wisdom agree with scripture
I need to go but don’t close the thread I will answer later
If it gets archived open another one about faith alone
Theology is for litcels that need to gaslight themselves into faith, you think the grandma that devoutly goes to mass every week knows anything about these homosexual IQfy arguments over calvinism or palamism or how st. orthanasius btfo the arians lol
Old people aren't religious anymore
I stopped coming around because I'm preparing to go to seminary.
t. OPCanon
God bless you Anon, I hope you have a fruitful ministry and a large family
All I need to know about theology.
Turns out once you realize there isn't some supernatural force that you need to placate, you no longer need to spend time trying to figure out exactly how to best placate it.
Dirk finally went to Calvinist heaven
Because nowadays it's just atheists saying
>"You believe in God? LOLOLOLOLOLOL YOUR moronic YOU BELIEVE IN SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T EXIST"
theology then:
>how many wills does jesus have? btw the loser will be excommunicated.
theology today:
>why do atheists [blatant lie]?
Back in the Middle Ages and the early Modern era, theology was the most important academic subject taught at universities. The brightest minds of all of Europe and the Middle East spent much of their time pondering theological and philosophical questions. Even mathematicians were expected to have a few writings on theology to uphold their reputation, lest they be seen as heretics.
Nowdays, theology is just what black people and scammers study because standards for getting a theology PhD are so low that anybody who knows Philosophy 101 shit can get a theology degree.
Because most discussions about it immediately turns to shit because of larpers
Because it is, and always was, a waste of time
Is the human being of dipartite (body, soul) or tripartite (body, soul, spirit) composition?
Man is composed of body and soul
What's there yo say? Calvin solved theology. We're done.
Righteousness in the eyes of man
versus
righteousness in the eyes of God
Christ is king, repent and believe the gospel, that is to say that he died for your sins.
No it is not good news if you have the risk of messing it up by failing some sort of sacrament skill check, some sort of sin of the flesh, that stuff will make your life an existential horror (no longer good news)
He is risen, the gift is a true gift, no strings attached, don't let the world present a false gospel that will lead you astray. Amen.
Amen
Calvinism makes a lot of sense, just why would God choose such a raging autist to preach the closest thing to his word?