Why don't we talk about theology anymore?

Why don't we talk about theology anymore, IQfy?

CRIME Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

CRIME Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because unironically how much of a deluded, special snowflake would you have to be to be a Calvinist in >current year?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      All it takes is believing the bible Anon

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No
        salvation is through faith and works
        Not sole fide

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That's heresy

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No
            Matthew 7:21-27
            You must put the faith into practice
            24 “Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock
            You can’t just believe without works

            Matthew 25
            34 “Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. 35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’
            Here also you can see good works not just faith

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            These don't say that your justification is derived from works of that sinning will destroy your justification. However,
            Romans 4:5-8
            >Now to the one who works, his wage is not counted according to grace, but according to what is due. But to the one who does not work, but believes upon Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteousness, just as David also speaks of the blessing on the man to whom God counts righteousness apart from works: “Blessed are those whose lawless deeds have been forgiven, And whose sins have been covered. Blessed is the man whose sin the Lord will not take into account.”

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            But it still says that works are needed

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No the exact words are "to the one who does not work, but believes upon Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteousness". What happens if you do NOT work, but believe upon Him who justifies the ungodly?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I was referring to the passages I sites

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Sited*

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Works in this context refers to the works of the Mosaic Law
            romans was written to unite the Gentiles and israelites

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Works in this context refers to the works of the Mosaic Law
            Where do you see the words "mosaic law"?
            >romans was written to unite the Gentiles and israelites
            And how is he doing that? Why are the judaizers wrong? Why do the gentiles not need to be circumcised to be justified?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The reason this letter was written was to unite Gentiles and israelites

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            9 Is this blessedness only for the circumcised, or also for the uncircumcised? We have been saying that Abraham’s faith was credited to him as righteousness. 10 Under what circumstances was it credited? Was it after he was circumcised, or before? It was not after, but before! 11 And he received circumcision as a sign, a seal of the righteousness that he had by faith while he was still uncircumcised. So then, he is the father of all who believe but have not been circumcised, in order that righteousness might be credited to them.
            In this context it refers to the OT law

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >In this context it refers to the OT law
            ... Which includes stuff like "Thou shalt have no other gods before me".

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            These 10 commandments were preserved in the new covenant
            Circumcision for example(referred to in this passage, was not)
            Which Calvinist church do you belong to btw?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Circumcision for example(referred to in this passage, was not)
            Why was Abraham justified?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Not because of the OT law

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            James 2:26
            Faith without works is dead

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            James 2:25
            > 25 In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute considered righteous for what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction?
            This is works

            Hebrews 11:31
            > 31 By faith the prostitute Rahab, because she welcomed the spies, was not killed with those who were disobedient.
            What James 2:25 calls works
            Is called faith in Hebrews 11:31

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I didn't ask why he wasn't. What does Paul say? Is it because of the good works of obedience he did?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It’s the righteousness that comes with faith

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            13 It was not through the law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world, but through the righteousness that comes by faith. 14 For if those who depend on the law are heirs, faith means nothing and the promise is worthless, 15 because the law brings wrath. And where there is no law there is no transgression.
            More proof that this passage refers to the OT law

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Does that righteousness come with faith if you don't have works?

            13 It was not through the law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world, but through the righteousness that comes by faith. 14 For if those who depend on the law are heirs, faith means nothing and the promise is worthless, 15 because the law brings wrath. And where there is no law there is no transgression.
            More proof that this passage refers to the OT law

            Which still includes stuff like the 10 commandments...

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I told you earlier the 10 commandments are also in the new covenant circumcision is not
            Paul referred to works as faith in the case I mentioned
            So this faith could be considered works

            John 6
            27 Do not work for food that spoils, but for food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you. For on him God the Father has placed his seal of approval.”

            28 Then they asked him, “What must we do to do the works God requires?”

            29 Jesus answered, “The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent.”

            Faith is a work

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >I told you earlier the 10 commandments are also in the new covenant circumcision is not
            This is not relevant.
            >in the case I mentioned
            >John 6
            Let's stay in Romans 4. If Abraham had not performed the works of obedience which God had laid out, would he be justified, or to preserve his justification was it necessary that he be circumcised?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Ok I’ll stay in Romans 4 but please answer my questions
            >This is not relevant
            It is because the Judaizers wanted the church to follow the Mosaic Law including circumcision, etc…
            But the 10 commandments are still the same
            This means the works referred to was the Mosaic Law (Circumcision in this case)

            No if Abraham had not performed the works of obedience he would not be saved
            Faith is a work
            Check the passages I mentioned
            What James referred to as works was referred to as faith by Paul

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Ok I’ll stay in Romans 4 but please answer my questions
            Ok
            >This means the works referred to was the Mosaic Law
            Abraham was before or after Moses?
            >No if Abraham had not performed the works of obedience he would not be saved
            So then you are agreeing with the judaizers, against Paul, that he was justified after his circumcision? Is it not Paul's point that Abraham did not need to be circumcised to be justified (and therefore gentiles don't need to either)?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I thought you meant faith by the works of obedience mb
            >was Abraham before or after Moses
            Paul was referring to circumcision which is a part of the Mosaic Law
            But Paul here is saying that Abraham was saved before circumcision meaning that we don’t need circumcision to be saved
            >So then you are agreeing with the judaizers
            Now that I’ve understood what you meant by works of obedience
            Abraham was saved by his righteousness

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Paul in Romans 4 quotes Genesis 16:5 which says

            6 Then he believed in Yahweh; and He counted it to him as righteousness.

            But check Psalm 106:30-31

            30 Then Phinehas stood up and interceded,
            And so the plague was checked.
            31 And it was counted to him for righteousness,
            From generation to generation forever.

            The same wording is used with righteouseness
            But here as you can see Phinehas *stood up and interceded* which is a work and it was counted for him for righteousness

            As I mentioned previously what James 2:25 considered a work, paul considered faith in Hebrews 11:31

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It says “counted to him as righteousness”
            For both cases the same wording was used
            You will mention Paul quoting Genesis 15:6 in Romans 4:3
            But you will not mention Paul quoting Habakuk 2:4 in Romans 1:17 which says
            4 “See, the enemy is puffed up;
            his desires are not upright—
            but the righteous person will live by his faithfulness

            WILL LIVE BY HIS FAITHFULNESS

            Isn’t living by your faithfulness considered doing works?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >WILL LIVE BY HIS FAITHFULNESS
            The proper translation is faith.

            Answer this
            [...]
            and this

            >Answer this
            There's nothing to answer. The psalm is written by a different author in a different book. I don't know what the point of the Hebrews citation is supposed to be. The author is saying Rahab's actions were motivated by faith, and his point has nothing to do with this topic.

            Romans 4
            13 It was not through the law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world, but through the righteousness that comes by faith. 14 For if those who depend on the law are heirs, faith means nothing and the promise is worthless,

            Yes Paul was talking about the Mosaic Law telling us that it isn’t the Mosaic Law that saves us

            The "law" here refers to the law of God; any works of obedience.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The psalm indicated that a work was credited as righteousness
            The author counts the works as faith
            And what law had circumcision?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            And the wording for the psalm was the same wording for Abraham being credited righteousness

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The ones translating it to faith say lives by his faith
            Living by your faith isn’t your faith alone

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            And when will you answer my other questions

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The point of Hebrew’s citation is that Paul counted work as faith
            John 2:25
            25 In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute considered righteous for what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction?
            Considered righteous for what she did

            Hebrews 11
            31 By faith the prostitute Rahab, because she welcomed the spies, was not killed with those who were disobedient.
            Here Paul refers to it as faith

            So what is considered works was considered faith by Paul
            So Abraham’s faith saving him could also mean faith

            And please answer my questions about other passages regarding faith and works

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I made a typing mistake in my response

            >WILL LIVE BY HIS FAITHFULNESS
            The proper translation is faith.
            [...]
            >Answer this
            There's nothing to answer. The psalm is written by a different author in a different book. I don't know what the point of the Hebrews citation is supposed to be. The author is saying Rahab's actions were motivated by faith, and his point has nothing to do with this topic.
            [...]
            The "law" here refers to the law of God; any works of obedience.

            I made a typing mistake in my response
            The point of Hebrew’s citation is that Paul counted work as faith
            John 2:25
            25 In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute considered righteous for what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction?
            Considered righteous for what she did

            Hebrews 11
            31 By faith the prostitute Rahab, because she welcomed the spies, was not killed with those who were disobedient.
            Here Paul refers to it as faith

            So what is considered works was considered faith by Paul
            So Abraham’s faith saving him could also mean works

            And please answer my questions about other passages regarding faith and works

            >WILL LIVE BY HIS FAITHFULNESS
            The proper translation is faith.
            [...]
            >Answer this
            There's nothing to answer. The psalm is written by a different author in a different book. I don't know what the point of the Hebrews citation is supposed to be. The author is saying Rahab's actions were motivated by faith, and his point has nothing to do with this topic.
            [...]
            The "law" here refers to the law of God; any works of obedience.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Don’t check this one
            Check the other
            I made a typing mistKe

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Answer this

            It says “counted to him as righteousness”
            For both cases the same wording was used
            You will mention Paul quoting Genesis 15:6 in Romans 4:3
            But you will not mention Paul quoting Habakuk 2:4 in Romans 1:17 which says
            4 “See, the enemy is puffed up;
            his desires are not upright—
            but the righteous person will live by his faithfulness

            WILL LIVE BY HIS FAITHFULNESS

            Isn’t living by your faithfulness considered doing works?

            and this

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Paul was referring to circumcision which is a part of the Mosaic Law
            Abraham was circumcised, however, Abraham was well before Moses. He is unequivocally not talking about the Mosaic law
            >But Paul here is saying that Abraham was saved before circumcision
            How did it happen? What justified Abraham?
            >Abraham was saved by his righteousness
            No sir that's incorrect, Abraham was saved by Christ's righteousness which is apprehended by faith alone. That is why one is imputed righteousness by faith, and the believer's sin is not imputed to them (it was all put on Jesus).

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            His righteousness which I talked about now

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Romans 4
            13 It was not through the law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world, but through the righteousness that comes by faith. 14 For if those who depend on the law are heirs, faith means nothing and the promise is worthless,

            Yes Paul was talking about the Mosaic Law telling us that it isn’t the Mosaic Law that saves us

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >telling us that it isn’t the Mosaic Law that saves us
            and of course the 'saving us' mene goes totally unnoticed: that we need saving from something in a world created by an omnipotent father figure who loves us. it's almost as if the original shit-up-makers thought in the terms of a powerful but not omnipotent ally trying to help us in a hostile universe not of his making, then later generations simply ended up hiding behind doublethink and plain parroting and not wanting to face the implications.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            If only we had listened to the wisdom of an unbeliever who's never actually read the bible instead

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            But faith in him without works still isn’t enough

            If only we had listened to the wisdom of an unbeliever who's never actually read the bible instead

            We’re discussing the biblical point of view so I don’t know if his wisdom agree with scripture

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I need to go but don’t close the thread I will answer later
            If it gets archived open another one about faith alone

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Theology is for litcels that need to gaslight themselves into faith, you think the grandma that devoutly goes to mass every week knows anything about these homosexual IQfy arguments over calvinism or palamism or how st. orthanasius btfo the arians lol

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Old people aren't religious anymore

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I stopped coming around because I'm preparing to go to seminary.
    t. OPCanon

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      God bless you Anon, I hope you have a fruitful ministry and a large family

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    All I need to know about theology.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Turns out once you realize there isn't some supernatural force that you need to placate, you no longer need to spend time trying to figure out exactly how to best placate it.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dirk finally went to Calvinist heaven

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because nowadays it's just atheists saying
    >"You believe in God? LOLOLOLOLOLOL YOUR moronic YOU BELIEVE IN SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T EXIST"

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    theology then:
    >how many wills does jesus have? btw the loser will be excommunicated.
    theology today:
    >why do atheists [blatant lie]?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Back in the Middle Ages and the early Modern era, theology was the most important academic subject taught at universities. The brightest minds of all of Europe and the Middle East spent much of their time pondering theological and philosophical questions. Even mathematicians were expected to have a few writings on theology to uphold their reputation, lest they be seen as heretics.
      Nowdays, theology is just what black people and scammers study because standards for getting a theology PhD are so low that anybody who knows Philosophy 101 shit can get a theology degree.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because most discussions about it immediately turns to shit because of larpers

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because it is, and always was, a waste of time

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is the human being of dipartite (body, soul) or tripartite (body, soul, spirit) composition?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Man is composed of body and soul

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What's there yo say? Calvin solved theology. We're done.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Righteousness in the eyes of man
    versus
    righteousness in the eyes of God

    Christ is king, repent and believe the gospel, that is to say that he died for your sins.

    No it is not good news if you have the risk of messing it up by failing some sort of sacrament skill check, some sort of sin of the flesh, that stuff will make your life an existential horror (no longer good news)

    He is risen, the gift is a true gift, no strings attached, don't let the world present a false gospel that will lead you astray. Amen.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Amen

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Calvinism makes a lot of sense, just why would God choose such a raging autist to preach the closest thing to his word?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *