> Apple users > Alpha, don't give a shit. What looks good is good > Android users > Coping, seething, constantly trying to prove their bloated piece of shit is somehow better
I have an iPhone 13 from work but I prefer to use my Poco F3 pretty much every time. Not sure why there are so many 120hz haters on IQfy. The jump from 60 to 120 is just as big as from 30 to 60. Smartphones have very small screens that require a lot of scrolling to do basically anything. Guess when a higher refresh rate is the most noticable.
>Not sure why there are so many 120hz haters on IQfy.
It's poorhomosexualry, every single time. They will never ever stop complaining about improvements to technology. I just can't wait for 60Hz to die.
because Apple has realized 12 years ago that what makes a UI look responsive is not really the refresh rate of the screen but the refresh rate of the touch array.
this is why almost since the beginning Apple phones (unlike poodroids) have had 60hz screens with a 120hz touch array.
poodroids, being short sighted as always, were stuck with having the touch array working at the same rate as the screen, so they only got 60+hz touchscreens when they started mounting 60+hz screens.
so basically they only recently got the same responsiveness as iphones while draining double the battery kek
Galaxy s20 has 240 response rate apple Black person btfo cope seethe dilate
But I'll be real Google is glitchy and android idk bout now but for the longest time didn't have good sound production capabilities like I remember this one guitar app on iphone where the strings actually bent on screen while android still couldn't manage a decent virtual drumset and that could also possibly be due to android having bad touch response in the past
>so basically they only recently got the same responsiveness as iphones while draining double the battery kek
Are you trying to claim that 60Hz screen with 120Hz touch array is the same as 120Hz screen with 120Hz touch array? That it's the same thing except drains more battery? Is that really what you're saying?
iPhone was designed with GPU acceleration from the start.
When the original iPhone launched, Nokia actually went and bought high speed cameras to analyze the iPhone's UI speed and smoothness. They could not understand it.
Two years later, they launched their own competitor without a GPU included at all. It was alien technology for them.
Same for Google. When Android was originally a Blackberry clone it had no GPU acceleration. Then, with Eric Schmidt on Apple's board of directors, they got an early glimpse into what was coming. So they hastily rejigged their Blackberry clone into an iPhone clone, and that became Android as we know it today.
But GPU acceleration was never a thing initially, so it was something they frankenstein patched together over the years.
The end result is still not good enough, mainly because Google is worried about memory overhead limitations on low end devices.
It doesn't, but iPhone does appear to be nearly as smooth as the as an android phone with a 120hz screen. Side by side the difference is minimal.
Meanwhile 60hz android is just stutter city.
it doesnt.
t. Galaxy S20 and iPhone 13 mini owner
It does not.
gghxdfgghjkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk;j
tpbp
> Apple users
> Alpha, don't give a shit. What looks good is good
> Android users
> Coping, seething, constantly trying to prove their bloated piece of shit is somehow better
Why must it be like this bros
I have an iPhone 13 from work but I prefer to use my Poco F3 pretty much every time. Not sure why there are so many 120hz haters on IQfy. The jump from 60 to 120 is just as big as from 30 to 60. Smartphones have very small screens that require a lot of scrolling to do basically anything. Guess when a higher refresh rate is the most noticable.
>Not sure why there are so many 120hz haters on IQfy.
It's poorhomosexualry, every single time. They will never ever stop complaining about improvements to technology. I just can't wait for 60Hz to die.
the thread is literally the opposite, its an apple user attempting to denounce Android with a false claim
stop ruining this board
>False claim
Not if it's the truth.
Iphone is pretty bloated... The only difference is that with android you can debloat it while with iphone you can't
because Apple has realized 12 years ago that what makes a UI look responsive is not really the refresh rate of the screen but the refresh rate of the touch array.
this is why almost since the beginning Apple phones (unlike poodroids) have had 60hz screens with a 120hz touch array.
poodroids, being short sighted as always, were stuck with having the touch array working at the same rate as the screen, so they only got 60+hz touchscreens when they started mounting 60+hz screens.
so basically they only recently got the same responsiveness as iphones while draining double the battery kek
Galaxy s20 has 240 response rate apple Black person btfo cope seethe dilate
But I'll be real Google is glitchy and android idk bout now but for the longest time didn't have good sound production capabilities like I remember this one guitar app on iphone where the strings actually bent on screen while android still couldn't manage a decent virtual drumset and that could also possibly be due to android having bad touch response in the past
that's a lotta touchjizz poodroid claims that I TLDR
I also watch techBlack person
>so basically they only recently got the same responsiveness as iphones while draining double the battery kek
Are you trying to claim that 60Hz screen with 120Hz touch array is the same as 120Hz screen with 120Hz touch array? That it's the same thing except drains more battery? Is that really what you're saying?
responsiveness != smoothness
so yes, 60hz iphone has same responsiveness as 120hz poodroid while draining les battery
>moron doesn't know how latency and vrr work
>seething poodroid with his 10.000mAh battery to power the 240Hz screen, 16GB of RAM and 24 cpu cores to run Java applications
phones change refresh rate based on content you absolute drooling moron chimp
and guess which company has the best variable refresh rate screen that goes as as low as 1Hz?
🙂
>moron cornered on moronation
>pivots to new argument
my work here is done, later homo
You're just trying to justify your 1500€ phone purchase with shitty comparisons.
It doesn't?
It does when you're rich enough to get yourself an iphone instead of pajeet chink phone.
slowed down, non-stuttery animations. lots of r&d money was dedicated to animations which have always been designed to cover up loading times.
ESL moron
android = java = garbage collector = very likely for thread blocked over 8ms
ios = objc/swift = reference counted
>DUH TWITTER SCROLL SO SMOOTH
Anyone who buys any phone for high refresh rate is an actual down syndrome patient.
You just explained the whole moronic poorgay android base.
Don't respond to me, phoneposter.
It doesn’t. Posted from my iPhone.
>imagine coping in sixty fricking hertz, for which you had to take a loan
ayylmao
hit the gym nerd
The S22 seems redundant if you already have a N20U
shitty chinese software
android phones almost always have better hardware in almost all aspects but it goes yo waste because the software doesn't take advantage
same shit with windows vs mac given the same price and form factor
It doesn't but iphones have more exaggerated animations that give off an illusion of smoothness
It fricking doesn't
why 60 hz devices can't interlace video output to achieve 120 fps effect?
iPhone was designed with GPU acceleration from the start.
When the original iPhone launched, Nokia actually went and bought high speed cameras to analyze the iPhone's UI speed and smoothness. They could not understand it.
Two years later, they launched their own competitor without a GPU included at all. It was alien technology for them.
Same for Google. When Android was originally a Blackberry clone it had no GPU acceleration. Then, with Eric Schmidt on Apple's board of directors, they got an early glimpse into what was coming. So they hastily rejigged their Blackberry clone into an iPhone clone, and that became Android as we know it today.
But GPU acceleration was never a thing initially, so it was something they frankenstein patched together over the years.
The end result is still not good enough, mainly because Google is worried about memory overhead limitations on low end devices.
>apple
Why does iPhone's 120hz look better than Android's 120hz
It doesn't, but iPhone does appear to be nearly as smooth as the as an android phone with a 120hz screen. Side by side the difference is minimal.
Meanwhile 60hz android is just stutter city.